Infidel Dog

And that kind of sounds like you're agreeing with me. Minorities have the legal rights everybody else does. So what's your problem then?

Not sure what you're talking about. Currently minorities have the same rights everybody else does.

Starting to sound desperate again, Beave.

And I'm sure when you tell the followers in your head that they cheer from the mountains in your head to the shores in your head. Unfortunately for you though, outside here in reality - crickets.

I like that old chestnut. It's almost as good as the one about how raw democracy is just 2 wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for dinner.

C'mon Beave, be honest. You don't have a sense of humor to crack up. But hey, you and yours sure seem to be getting worked up and laying on the blather about people noticing you're not using the term democracy correctly for your "Democracy is under threat" meme. Really seems to be getting you guys worked up. Ever hear the one about how when you're getting a lot of flack you know you're over the target?

Then there was this: With this coming on the 8th: Return of the ‘blood moon’: A total lunar eclipse will be visible around the world on Tuesday A total lunar eclipse will occur Nov. 8, with the moon turning blood red as it slips into Earth’s shadow. It will be the last total lunar eclipse until 2025. November 8 is the night of the midterm elections. Almost like God's trying to speak to the faithful in America, eh? "Cease your worries. You are not forgotten."

For one thing it relies on a warped definition of "Democracy." Tucker explained.

Do you need to be reminded that America is not a Democracy. It's a Republic with democratically influenced checks and balances at different levels of government. Your thought leaders want you believing now that if when Democrats lose at the state level this Tuesday all Democratic input crumbles. It's just another silly scare tactic and it won't work.

Well, with talk like that you'll never know. But the easy answer from my perspective would be he doesn't ignore the obvious. It's OK though because I wasn't actually talking to you. There are those who are open to Tucker's insights and information. They already know there's a difference between what the prog machine means with this current "end of democracy" theme it's pushing. They recognize it as BS. Tucker will help with clarification as to why. You sound angry though. That's interesting. I'm thinking maybe you watched a little bit and he hit a nerve.

Lots of talk about "Democracy" up there, but the far left, Salon doesn't mean the same thing by "Democracy" that most of us do. When they say, "Voters overwhelmingly believe American democracy is under threat" they're not talking about the same thing you or I are when we use the term. They'd like you to believe they are so they can claim the statistic but they aren't. "Voters" would include Republican and Independent voters. It would even include Democrats who believe Democracy means when you vote your vote matters. It doesn't matter who that vote is for. It still matters. Tucker explains what the far left like Salon means by "Democracy":

R&R: "Come back here and take what's coming to you. I'll bite your legs off." Me: Come along Patsy."

Hey...funny you should mention that. You kind of remind me of the Black Knight. I doubt you watched that scene when you looked up Monty Python and the Holy Grail to see what it was so here ya go... See if you can figure out why you remind me of the Black Knight.

Seriously? You've never seen Monty Python and the Holy Grail? Catch up for God's sake. You're embarrassing yourself.

What facts aren't correct. Read what your critiquing for God's sake. Show what specifically I said there that isn't true. What Ray Epps did on Jan. 6 was much worse than anything Grandma did on Jan. 6. "Hemphill pleaded guilty in January to one count of demonstrating, picketing, or parading in a Capitol building, a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail, a fine up to $5,000, and up to five years of probation." But OK, I said she got 6 months. My video says it was 60 days. The point remains. Epps got nothing. A pat on the back from the DOJ and the Jan 6 committee maybe. "Nothing to see here."

You're entitled to your opinions - crazy nuts as they are. Meanwhile though, meme-makers are having great fun with the Elon Musk takeover of Twitter this morning: More Here

Is Tucker your own personal boogeyman or something? Whatever...here ya go. No Tucker though:

Again stop asking us to ignore the obvious. Epps incited a riot for 2 days and finished in a restricted area. Three more pages of babbledy gook won't change that.

Yes. Now tell me how that conflicts with this:

And were all these people who weren't "punished" standing on a thirty foot platform in a restricted area inciting the crowd to enter the capitol building? Because if they weren't I'm not sure I get why you're so desperate to make a false equivalency of Epps to them. As to your link, I waded through it. There's a lot inconsequential gobbledygook about what a bad boy Shroyer is for being an infowars reporter and how a year earlier he interrupted a committee meeting by shouting from the gallery. Blah, blah, blah. The only thing that matters as far as comparing what Shroyer did Jan 6 to what Eps did is this at the very end (and I'd like the time of my life back that I wasted up to that point.) There's more on another page but it won't allow copying. Doesn't matter. It all says the same thing. There's nothing Shroyer did that Epps didn't do. Look will you stop with the black is white crap and 'pay no attention to your lying eyes.' Ignore the obvious.' Epps incited a riot. From a restricted area even. Anybody who did anything close to that is doing time as a political prisoner or waiting to do time. The fact Epps isn't throws shade on the whole process - as in it makes it look shady.

Of course, I do. Do you? Offences punishable by law that were committed by Epps were not acted on. The 65 year old Gramma doing hard time right now for something they cooked up called "parading" is making tea and cookies for 'Orange is the new Black' now though. Explain the discrepancy.

Bullshit. Show me the premeditation. A few anti-government or BLM/Antifa instigators maybe, but cut the hyperbole. There was some vandalism and jostling with the police that didn't even reach the level of a George Floyd riot. And there's a good argument the police started that. BTW, did you know Epps was an Oath keeper. More likely an FBI infiltrator in the organization but still...

If you'd like to see Epps inciting a riot from a restricted area, Nancy Pelosi made a boo boo. She was busy trying to show us what a heroic figure she was during the riot and her videographer wasn't paying attention to what was in the background. It was Ray Epps shouting instructions from a raised platform about 30 feet in the air just outside the entrance to the Capitol building. Go ahead. Tell me he's allowed up there. I could use a laugh. WHOOPS: CNN Shows Ray Epps Footage Shot By Nancy Pelosi’s Daughter in Jan 6 Propaganda Segment

Are you saying they couldn't prosecute the guy who incited people for 2 days to go into the capitol building because he was savvy enough not to take his own advice and actually go into the capitol building? You seem to have missed the clip I posted on the New York times article describing what Epps did: Now if that's not enough to allow a prosecution explain this: https://deadstate.org/prosecutors-charge-infowars-host-owen-shroyer-for-rioting-at-the-capitol-on-jan-6/

They screamed "Noooo!" when Epps yelled at them to go into the capitol building the following day. It's on the video clip you seem to be suggesting you watched. I'd try to translate that "No!" into Prog for you so you can understand what "No" means when a Republican says it, but in Progressive it seems impossible to point out the obvious.