Infidel Dog

Now explain to us why Zelensky insisted and still insists it was a Russian rocket, Beave. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11433783/World-leaders-plot-response-missile-hits-Poland-killing-two.html https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-g-20-summit-nato-biden-government-and-politics-c76bead57a11bc8397a30ee7bb06264e because it sure looks like he's pushing for a WW III based on a false premise.

I saw the video of a guy claiming to be Ilhan Omar's cousin driving around with stacks of ballots explaining how he got them and what he was going to do with them. At the time it was a civic election but the suggestion was it was a general practice. Don't condescend to me with a back-handed compliment and an unsupported posture of superior understanding. I saw it. You apparently did not. I imagine the video is still on the Project Veritas website somewhere. Feel free to educate yourself.

The world was going to get warmer following the Little Ice Age with or without the Industrial Revolution. Actual, for real, climate changes with or without man's influence. That doesn't mean man can't influence it. It just means climate will change with or without them. How much influence does man have on climate? Who knows? Not the Politically charged "experts" who feed chicken littles like Greta - and those gullible enough to think she has a clue - with politically endorsed bits of panic porn they call "the science." I say "The Science" as opposed to actual science which questions according to the scientific method.

Did you ever see that Project Veritas one where they showed a guy claiming to be one of Omar's cousins driving around collecting stacks of ballots for ballot box stuffing? If you ever wondered how she can keep getting elected, I mean.

Actually I clicked the link at the bottom of your post which gave me this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy#:~:text=In American politics%2C the Southern,to racism against African Americans. but I get your point. Your actual quote was from something called the Journal of Negro Education which would be Humanities profs spewing cultural marxism, crt and the religion of woke. Should have stuck with Wikipedia. It's bad too but not that bad.

BTW your guy at Wikipedia reaches pretty deep up his butt for support. School segregation is one thing. School Choice is another. He specifies School Choice. If School Choice is such a bigoted option why are so many black mothers even far left advocates so passionately for it. And political appointments to the judiciary is something both parties do. Pointing his finger at the party he wants to damn for a misdirected point doesn't make your Wikipedia editor's opinion fact. It just makes him look strange and bigoted:

There are two things you need to know about that. # 1 Wikipedia editors can be blatantly, noticeably, glaringly, obviously high end progressive propagandizers. Even the co-creator of Wikipedia has complained about it. It's gotten so bad with so many complaints that they were even forced to ban head editors like Progressive climate propagandizer William Connelley. #2 You'll know when you've hit one of those propagandizers pet projects when you see something like this from the Wikipedia page you quoted from: "This top-down narrative of the Southern Strategy is generally believed..." Now what a guy like that means by his opinion "is generally believed", is generally believed by his fellow 'Progagandizers.' Basically you found an echo for the BS you want to believe. Good for you.

Really? Shaking Nixon's hand imbued upon you the gift of being the repository of all American historical and Political truth? Wow! That's some handshake. Can you believe they wanted to impeach that guy? On the other hand concerning this "Southern Strategy" you believe in with such devotion to the myth...

The only fact there is that you keep calling falsehoods facts.

The Republicans never were racist as a party but they remained conservative, lovers and God and Country. The South largely empathized. Democrats decided not to be the face of Racism anymore and moved towards something they pushed as "progressive," except it wasn't. And now they're what we call "woke" where "racist" is becoming a word without a meaning. It's just a thing they call you if they disagree with your politics. Good on you Southerners. You made a good call. You chose well. As to the idea of a "Southern Strategy" with a migration of Dixiecrats to the Republican party for more racism... That's a myth.

Already dealt with: "The South, as a whole, became Republican during the 1980s and 1990s. This had nothing to do with Nixon; it was because of Ronald Reagan and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America.” The conservative appeal to patriotism, anti-communism, free markets, pro-life and Christianity had far more to do with the South’s movement into the GOP camp than anything related to race.

Show me that last part. Nice try at sneaking it in though. Actual Dixiecrats though. They were a specific thing.

Still not sure I get your point. You'd like me to learn there were Democrats that remained democrats and opposed civil rights? I thought I already knew that. Were you expecting a thank you for your superior wisdom on what I knew? Expect a long wait.

There were Dixecrats. What's a hoax is the BS tall tale that they all crossed over from Democrat to Republican.

And if you weren't so busy trying to obfuscate from the issue you wouldn't bother trying to introduce him into the Dixiecrat myth.

Ever hear the one about LBJ where he was on a Plane talking to senators and he informed them the Democrats were going to go with the civil rights push saying, "We'll have these n##gers voting Democrat for a hundred years."

Didn't click expand and read, eh? Not to worry. Here I'll help you out: " The South, as a whole, became Republican during the 1980s and 1990s. This had nothing to do with Nixon; it was because of Ronald Reagan and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America.” The conservative appeal to patriotism, anti-communism, free markets, pro-life and Christianity had far more to do with the South’s movement into the GOP camp than anything related to race. Yet the myth of Nixon’s Southern Strategy endures — not because it’s true, but because it conveniently serves to exculpate the crimes of the Democratic Party. Somehow the party that promoted slavery, segregation, Jim Crow and racial terrorism gets to wipe its slate clean by pretending that, with Nixon’s connivance, the Republicans stole all their racists. It’s time we recognize this excuse for what it is: one more Democratic big lie." What LBJ is supposed to have to do with Dixiecrats, I don't know. You mean, because of the civil rights thing? That's why you think the south in general (the actual Dixiecrats in the majority stayed Democrat) went Republican? Civil Rights isn't something LBJ invented. The push was around before LBJ. Even after:

Believe what you want to believe. This sounds more supportable to me: https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/402754-the-myth-of-nixons-southern-strategy/

Too bad the only American history you know is what they indoctrinate you with on Progressive websites. The Dixiecrat hoax was perpetrated on weak willed easy believers of what they'd like to believe by a Progressive journalist masquerading as a republican who infiltrated Nixon's band of toadies and tried to represent that as 'in the know' knowledge.

I agree with this guy: https://rootforamerica.com/democrats-just-stole-another-election/

Thanks, Beave and Moonbox.

I'm not even going to look this up. If I'm wrong I want to be corrected. But wasn't Borodino the one where Napoleon lured the enemy onto the ice then fired canons through it? If so, I'm not sure I get the connection.

I get crunched for trying to use 'M0rOn every once in awhile. The first time I was like, "Hey, have I been hacked." But then figured it out and said to myself, 'What a M0r0n.'

A denial of what? Whatever it is if it's from Beaveworld in your mixed up mind I deny it.

Beave, you're not qualified to speak for me or Tucker. You've never listened to either of us. You should though.