-
Posts
5,868 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Infidel Dog
-
Here's something I just heard about this morning from Dr Michael McDowell. Ever heard of "viral immune escape?" Basically, according to Dr Michael McDowell (quick Argus and Bubberman to the google-mobile to find a slate hit piece on him)... Vaccinations are a threat to us all. https://blazingcatfur.ca/2021/08/21/viral-immune-escape-explained-by-dr-michael-mcdowell/
-
I must have missed something. I saw Argus's no numbers, unlinked little pictographs. They said fewer vaccinated were being hospitalized and dying in Ontario than unvaccinated. "Preventing new infections" though I missed that. You have something that shows the 80% who are vaccinated are spreading less covid variant than unvaccinated, do you? Not that I don't believe you but gotta link? EDIT: Wait...I'm not progressive enough. I can't lie. The truth is I don't believe you. I don't believe you have anything that shows the 80% who have been vaccinated spreading less covid variant than the 20% who are unvaccinated.
- 1,228 replies
-
- covid19
- coronavirus
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
America Under pResident Biden
Infidel Dog replied to Shady's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Osama bin Laden BANNED al Qaeda from trying to assassinate Joe Biden because he believed he would be an incompetent president and 'lead the US into a crisis' " Bin Laden made the remark in a 2010 letter that was found in a trove of documents at the Pakistan compound where he was killed by US special forces in 2011. The document was first made public in 2012 but has been brought back to light and given new significance amid the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan that has gifted the country back to the Taliban. He was an evil shit of a man but nobody ever said Bin Laden was stupid. Osama bin Laden BANNED al Qaeda from trying to assassinate Joe Biden because he believed he would be an incompetent president and 'lead the US into a crisis' -
I know I'm not supposed to know or believe the data below from the CDC and VAERS, but I do and it affects my vaccination hesitancy. Tags of "anti-vaxxer" or "conspiracy theorist" bother me less than what the stats imply. https://truthbasedmedia.com/2021/08/20/13000-deaths-nearly-600000-adverse-events-reported-after-covid-vaccines-as-debate-swells-about-need-for-a-third-dose/ I don't imagine Citizen will be slapping me on the back and parading around with his chest puffed out over my little pictograph of statistics like he was with Argus for his Ontario stats. He might tell us how comorbidities might affect those stats although I doubt he'll tell you how that critique would also apply to general covid stats.
-
Nobody makes that point better than Lara Logan. You can watch her do it at about the 17:30 mark of Tucker Carlson's show at the link below. Can't find it on YouTube. https://vladtepesblog.com/2021/08/19/tucker-carlson-from-last-night-august-18-2021/ Tucker tries to make the point solo on a different show but he's not quite as good.
-
Ben Shapiro seems to think contingencies could have helped secure a safe transition for the Afghan people but that's a fantasy, I think. He goes into the horrors Afghanis are facing right now. He shows videos. Pretty horrible stuff and the Taliban are going after translators and others who helped Americans. That sucks. Nevertheless Americans in Afghanistan could have been protected. Armaments could have been evacuated with them rather than be left there for Taliban usage. And I hear Al Qaida will be returning so they'll be pleased to get access to RPGs, Drones and armored vehicles if not the odd Tank. They'll have a big thank you for Joe, I'm sure.
-
Vaccinations might offer some protection. They also offer the possibility of side effects including death and nobody knows what the long term effects might be. And it looks like if you're a jab person you'll be jabbing for the rest of your life. I heard a possible future recommendation of twice a year. I forget where, so grain of salt that one but let's see what they're saying in a year.
-
I don't believe they're talking about booster shots now to protect vaccinated from the unvaccinated. If the vaccination jabs were really as protective as Citizen and Argus want us to believe then the sainted Vaccinated would be safe from the evil unvaccinated horde. They wouldn't need more jabs forever. There would be no talk of going all Nazi with lockdowns and mandating useless cloth masks again.
-
I don't think anybody is saying Trump planned to stay in Afghanistan. He had a contingency plan for getting Americans out safely. It overlapped with another program called Op Med. That one was in place from aiding transportation of Americans at the start of the covid crisis. The Biden State Department had it cancelled even though talk of contingency plans for such things began after the mess in Benghazi. They go into all this in detail here: https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/bidens-state-dept-halted-trump-era-crisis-response-plan/ and here:
-
Massachusetts health officials on Tuesday reported more than 2,500 new breakthrough cases over the past week and 18 more deaths. In the last week, 2,672 new breakthrough cases -- infections in people who have been vaccinated -- were reported, with 496 more people hospitalized and the 18 new deaths, officials said Tuesday. That brings the total to 12,641 cases and 124 deaths in people with breakthrough infections. Mass. Has 2,672 New Breakthrough Cases, 18 More COVID Deaths Among Vaccinated
-
Well here's me smiling and scratching my head then. You seem to be saying you have me pegged as a Trump hater. I think I'm starting get something like a point from you though. It clicked when you said "right to choose." See I generally think of Libertarianism as a thing that gets stuck with the right, but now that you mention it I think there is a kind of libertarian that connects with the left somehow.. In fact, I think it's called left or leftist libertarianism. I think I tried to understand it once but found it contradictory and irrational so I wrote it of as fringe and forgot about it. As to right to choose I could see that contradicting with what I hear most libertarians call their "non-aggression principle." It's the 'is it a baby or is it a clump of cells' thing. If it's an independent being by it's potential I could see the kind of libertarian I'm more familiar with refusing to aggress against it. "Non-aggression principle."
-
Try this one then: https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/chinas-2020-coal-output-rises-to-highest-since-2015-undermining-climate-pledges-2021-01-17 I'm on board with you that China and India might want to move on to LNG (if only to clear the skies of black smoke in their industrial areas) but please lay off that "agrarian societies" BS. I don't need a chuckle that bad.
-
Here's something you might find interesting if you can past the fact it's published at WattsUP, Boges: " Michael Tamvakis, City, University of London It is only a few days since the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) signalled the dire consequences of human-induced climate change. At the heart of this stark warning by UN Secretary General António Guterres and the scientists behind the report was the urgent need to heavily reduce coal in the energy mix. Yet in the run-up to publication, and absent from mainstream news headlines, was the steady ascent of coal prices, past US$100 (£72) per metric tonne in June and then past US$130 in mid-July to over US$170 today. This is almost four times the price last September. The rise in prices can be attributed squarely to a resurgence of demand after the depths of the pandemic – especially in emerging Asian markets such as China and India, but also in Japan, South Korea, Europe and the US. Electricity demand, which remains closely linked to coal, is expected to have increased by 5% across 2021 and a further 4% in 2022. On the supply side, there are also some issues such as China being unable to acquire coal from Australia due to an import ban, and smaller disruptions in the export output of major producers Indonesia, South Africa and Russia. But there are no long-term supply issues, as the main producing countries have not curtailed their production or export capacity. Prices should not therefore stay high for very long. The revival of world demand for energy hopefully means the world economy is recovering from the pandemic, but the surge in coal prices is a reminder of how energy still relies on fossil fuels. Global energy consumption totalled 556 exajoules in 2020, and oil, coal and natural gas accounting for 31%, 27% and 25% of the total respectively. That adds up to more than four-fifths of the total..." https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/08/17/the-coal-price-has-skyrocketed-in-2021-what-does-it-mean-for-net-zero/ Feel free to prove anything he said there incorrect though. Sounds about right to me.
-
The post you're replying to was talking about India and China. Are you pretending to still be talking about India and China or did you move on without telling us? India and China are every bit as capable as we are of moving on from coal if they want to. The just don't want to. It's easier for them not to while making insignificant gestures pretending they are moving on from coal...except they're not and there's coal dust in the Arctic every year attesting to that.
-
As far as I know there are no Vaccine mandates, pressures or passports in Sweden. There were no covid deaths in Sweden today either. Nor were there deaths yesterday or the day before. So what exactly is no deaths in Ontario supposed to prove anyway? I believe I heard the general behavior of the variant is to rise rapidly, spike, then plummet.
-
I've gotta admit you're not as bad as Argus. What he does is spew proclamations of claims as facts then after you pester him for a link he finally gives you one that turns out not to support what he claimed. I notice what you like to do is post some link to some some small selected data point somewhere then in following posts suggest this created some broad over-reaching fact that applies to the whole world. And when challenged you say, "Liar. I never said that." Nice that you'll at least admit now that the infallibility of your "precious" may not apply to children.
-
Oh do cut the crap. One of my main bitches with you and for that matter Argus is you're all the time spewing numbers and claims of facts with no links. But you do like to check others and then we might get a link. Now as to the Japanese study the BBC wants to emphasize and call a fact check. Yes, that particular study was not good science. 3 doctors below who you'll tell me suck and no doubt you can find proggy "fact checkers" who have anecdotes for us on how they suck discuss the issue of reproductive toxicity: Basically we don't know if there's a problem right now but there is new data and things that suggest concern. And going by the problems thalidomide caused in cellular generations following the tests that authorized that drug we should be cautious. The other link I gave you of Laura Ingraham talking with the guy who worked on the vaccine also expressed concerns. He was saying that unlike other vaccines the mRNA thing spreads out from point of contact to gather in other locals in the body. The womb was a common gathering point. And the worry is the the mechanism that spikes into cell walls may cause antibodies to attack healthy cells, if not in this cellular generation perhaps in following generations.