SkyHigh

I think you're an idiöt , with no grip on reality, that would greatly benefit from reading a few textbooks. They're written by unbiased, truth seeking people, not the partisan hacks that you get your "information" from. To be clear partisan hacks exist on both sides of the political spectrum.

I didn't support the convoy, but don't support Canadians having their bank accounts frozen (well at least not until they've had the opportunity to defend themselves in court). But the idea that it was a free speech issue isn't true. When you park your truck and remove the wheels, you're no longer just expressing your free speech. They should have been removed by force much earlier.

Dude you're literally arguing against yourself. Small l liberal I'll accept, as that is defined as protecting the minority from decisions made by the majority and I'm all for that. As far as Marxist, Communist, Socialist (all words you clearly don't understand) or leftist (a word that doesn't mean anything) neither I nor the Democrats are any of those things. Again I don't support the Democrats and if I was American (again I'm Canadian, so I don't vote in the US) I would have numerous problems with their policies, but all of my problems are rooted in reality, therefore will never comport with the mad incoherent ravings coming out of your mouth. You're just sad

What does any of that have to do with free speech?

Well, I have friends that live downtown Ottawa and from their perspective, what they did was a heck of a lot more than just speech. So not relevant. I'm not saying I agree with what happened, just that it's not a case of violating free speech.

If I was expecting a thoughtful conversation in which I could grow in my understanding of life and the cosmos, I would completely agree. But, since I'm just bored because I'm stuck in some podunk town and other than helping my mom and doing some work around her house, have nothing to occupy my brain. I think my time is well spent laughing at simpletons, beats making fun of the kids at the primary school a few blocks away. Hahahaha

This always seemed a non-issue to me. If a private company chooses not to provide their services for any reason (legitimate or not) should have the right to do that. Personally I wouldn't turn down a client whatever (save those promoting violence or hate) they may stand for. I once did a union event for some big wigs and I think unions are for the most part useless and are a large contributor to the bureaucratic waste stalling every attempt to improve the lives of the masses, but I digress. Public services of course must accept all

Or maybe it's because the opportunities for women to seek higher education have greatly improved over the last few generations, not to mention women that have migrated from countries where women are actively discouraged from attending school and when given the opportunity jump on it. As well, if I were just leaving High School today, I would most certainly study a trade. I recently read something that said that 15 years from now a plumbers income will be comparable to that of an MD and trades are still highly dominated by men.

Honestly, his opinions are as empty as Capones vault.

Sharia law for everyone

Robert Morris

Come on, I won't tell anyone. You're really some genius master troll, right?

As far as the accusations themselves, they are from the Daily Mail and even Fox News says they can't confirm them(he also denied hitting that girl and an affair between consenting adults, I don't think either of us care), but for the sake of argument I'll grant it My post was addressing the double standard in using the bad people on the other side (whichever side that may be) without admitting that their side has just as many bad people. The same people that would call Trump a fascist or Harris a Marxist So, yes if proved credible, it just most certainly should be front page news. True journalism should be as unbiased as humanly possible. As well, Trump is partially responsible The man is all style no substance, all form no function. If he focused more on actual policies he wouldn't be such a target for the irrelevant stuff. I do think his die hard supporters secretly like that, so they don't have to look at the glaring professional deficiencies he has, that break the idea of Trump he has crafted. The man is a brilliant self promoter, shameless but brilliant

Really?

I will accept that, as I believe it was expressed in good faith.

Yes I know we pay for health care (it does cost us less per capita than Americans and we rank higher on many comparisons) but that's irrelevant, my(and the heritage foundations) point was that in terms of financial freedom (maybe the one I care most about) the ability to change jobs and/or start something yourself and possibly hire new employees, is exponentially easier when you don't need to worry about (you or your possible dependents or potential employees and their possible dependants) getting sick. Much more than the ability to say something offensive or hateful. So unless you can provide an example where someone faced any true government prosecution for simple speech, I fall to see how we have less freedom of speech than our neighbors to the south, regardless of if it's enshrined in their constitution. Oh and I did say "Arguably" more freedom, an important distinction.

Yet you continue to accuse me of the opposite. The problem is you don't have a point, all you have is silly partisan talking points that you yourself betray in order to "own the libs" even if the other interlocutor isn't a "lib" You're just sad

I would assume, though there may be more than one. Hahahaha I just googled it Robert Morris is his name

You know what? You're right Agreeing with you on anything, much less trying to find common ground with a pervert was not very intelligent. I guess stooping to your level makes it unavoidable to lower ones IQ , if only to be able to communicate on the primary school level of logic you operate under. You're not even fun to laugh at anymore because you just keep repeating things you know to be false. At least come up with some new nonsense so you're incoherent rants stay fresh.

I would say I agree with that, but still don't understand how it pertains to what I said. Could you please use specific examples taken directly from posts I made to better illustrate your point. I would suggest that part of the problem is you're reading my posts with preconceived ideas of what I'm trying to say, and some of your objections to the style (as you have not yet commented on substance) of what I say come from the fact that neither of us was truly trying to communicate in good faith but simply to one up each other.

Ones choice of account doesn't reflect on their moral values the same way your spiritual advisor does, I'm sure you'd agree

Citation please, not saying this is false I'm just unaware.

Ok I've specified this many times, the US doesn't have health care and again not my opinion it's that of the heritage foundation and the Frasier institute. If you're not even going to acknowledge my points I see no reason to continue

Yup, you're CUCKoo for MAGA coco puffs aka young girls

Again I agree you nimrod Problem is the Democrats are none of those things and by going off half cocked (because you're impotent) about nonsense, you're not addressing the actual problems with their actual policies and platform Now of course this is mainly because you're not at all a logically thinking, reasonable minded person. You are someone that wouldn't be able to put together a sound argument for anything even if It slapped you in the face then I wrote it down for you. You're just sad