SkyHigh

Sharia law for everyone

Robert Morris

Come on, I won't tell anyone. You're really some genius master troll, right?

As far as the accusations themselves, they are from the Daily Mail and even Fox News says they can't confirm them(he also denied hitting that girl and an affair between consenting adults, I don't think either of us care), but for the sake of argument I'll grant it My post was addressing the double standard in using the bad people on the other side (whichever side that may be) without admitting that their side has just as many bad people. The same people that would call Trump a fascist or Harris a Marxist So, yes if proved credible, it just most certainly should be front page news. True journalism should be as unbiased as humanly possible. As well, Trump is partially responsible The man is all style no substance, all form no function. If he focused more on actual policies he wouldn't be such a target for the irrelevant stuff. I do think his die hard supporters secretly like that, so they don't have to look at the glaring professional deficiencies he has, that break the idea of Trump he has crafted. The man is a brilliant self promoter, shameless but brilliant

Really?

I will accept that, as I believe it was expressed in good faith.

Yes I know we pay for health care (it does cost us less per capita than Americans and we rank higher on many comparisons) but that's irrelevant, my(and the heritage foundations) point was that in terms of financial freedom (maybe the one I care most about) the ability to change jobs and/or start something yourself and possibly hire new employees, is exponentially easier when you don't need to worry about (you or your possible dependents or potential employees and their possible dependants) getting sick. Much more than the ability to say something offensive or hateful. So unless you can provide an example where someone faced any true government prosecution for simple speech, I fall to see how we have less freedom of speech than our neighbors to the south, regardless of if it's enshrined in their constitution. Oh and I did say "Arguably" more freedom, an important distinction.

Yet you continue to accuse me of the opposite. The problem is you don't have a point, all you have is silly partisan talking points that you yourself betray in order to "own the libs" even if the other interlocutor isn't a "lib" You're just sad

I would assume, though there may be more than one. Hahahaha I just googled it Robert Morris is his name

You know what? You're right Agreeing with you on anything, much less trying to find common ground with a pervert was not very intelligent. I guess stooping to your level makes it unavoidable to lower ones IQ , if only to be able to communicate on the primary school level of logic you operate under. You're not even fun to laugh at anymore because you just keep repeating things you know to be false. At least come up with some new nonsense so you're incoherent rants stay fresh.

I would say I agree with that, but still don't understand how it pertains to what I said. Could you please use specific examples taken directly from posts I made to better illustrate your point. I would suggest that part of the problem is you're reading my posts with preconceived ideas of what I'm trying to say, and some of your objections to the style (as you have not yet commented on substance) of what I say come from the fact that neither of us was truly trying to communicate in good faith but simply to one up each other.

Ones choice of account doesn't reflect on their moral values the same way your spiritual advisor does, I'm sure you'd agree

Citation please, not saying this is false I'm just unaware.

Ok I've specified this many times, the US doesn't have health care and again not my opinion it's that of the heritage foundation and the Frasier institute. If you're not even going to acknowledge my points I see no reason to continue

Yup, you're CUCKoo for MAGA coco puffs aka young girls

Again I agree you nimrod Problem is the Democrats are none of those things and by going off half cocked (because you're impotent) about nonsense, you're not addressing the actual problems with their actual policies and platform Now of course this is mainly because you're not at all a logically thinking, reasonable minded person. You are someone that wouldn't be able to put together a sound argument for anything even if It slapped you in the face then I wrote it down for you. You're just sad

Agreed , the idea was to illustrate the difference in proximity of the pedos to Trump (MAGA) as compared to Harris (D)

When I got here I would go as far as to say there was a clear conservative bias in the moderation(but at least there was moderation), lately though even that has seemed to disappear and is now basically a free for all

Sad

Dude, Trump's spiritual advisor, take that in for a second Trump's Spiritual Advisor recently admitted to inappropriate behavior with a minor. Not some random person with no actual ties to any party, but Trump's Spiritual Advisor. Do you not see how empty your silly accusations are?

Again you just prove your lack of understanding of the words you throw around so freely. Even if I grant your premise (which of course any reasonable person wouldn't) Black lives matter is not a labor movement, therefore nothing to do with Marxism (a political philosophy I still don't agree with). Seriously read some Marx you may come off like you're not a raving lunatic completely detached from reality (well at least on this issue) I guess that was before I came here

As much of a Marxist as Kamala, so not at all You really are a sad little impotent man

Of course I agree that "anarchistic freedom" is unattainable but I also assume that you agree that some restrictions on freedom are also necessary for a functioning society. As the saying goes "my freedom to swing my arms ends millimeters from your nose". I've mentioned the financial freedoms that our system promotes that the US system categorically doesn't offer. I used this topic as a jumping off point specifically as this came directly from a study produces by the Fraser institute and the heritage foundation two clearly conservative outlets one Canadian one American, so your side (again I have no side, other than maybe that of supporting my nation) agrees with me at least on this point. So other than property rights (an issue you'd agree is more complex than simply saying Canadians have none) and guns which is something that is really a non-issue for a strong majority of Canadians and also comes with many, many downsides (see mass shootings, accidental shootings (leading cause of death in children) and suicide) personally I've never needed or wanted a gun and I grew up in arguably some of the toughest parts of this country. So specifically what freedoms that do exist in the US do you feel don't in Canada?

Honestly, I still fail to see how my personal experiences and opinions as they relate to my short comings (writing ability) and my thoughts on why many people that lack exposure to other cultures (French québécois was my example) are more likely to be xenophobic, could be construed as partisan but as we have already agreed this is probably not the most substantial issue we could be discussing, let's move on So, in the interest of continuing this newfound civility between us, I invite you to select any topic you feel best represents your political philosophy and we shall discuss. EDIT: I will endeavor to do my best to refrain from using personal experience if you can commit to using the principal of charity whilst reading my attempts to express myself in a medium in which I admittedly am weak . Deal?

You don't find that definition ambiguous and open to interpretation ?