Yzermandius19

Illegal immigration is a thing, and being against it doesn't mean you are against immigrants in general.

You really don't know the difference between anti-illegal immigrant and anti-immigrant, do you?

Indeed, but there is no reason to pouring our public into the infant green energy industry either. Market Forces FTW.

Well then let it happen anyway, stop trying to use government coercion to achieve the goal.

If you don't want to buy Chinese products, don't buy Chinese products. Stop trying to control the purchasing decisions of others with government coercion, worry about yourself and stop demanding everyone does as you do, or else. Y'all vastly overestimate Canada's bargaining position if you think Canada can force China's hand with such silly ultimatums. Either that, or you don't care how ineffective your virtue signalling is, you just want to punish China even if you have to shoot yourself in the foot to do it.

You not looking for any positives he's doing and tunnel visioning on the negatives is not proof he's doing a bad job, it is proof you are biased against him though. Trump supporters bring up the positives all the time, it's not like they are hard to find, you just don't want to look.

Better Ratings.

Because you continue to focus on shit that doesn't matter in order to attack Trump, due to having no good material. Trump said the media blaming him is a Democrat Hoax, not the virus itself.

No matter how fast the Trump administration acted you would claim it wasn't fast enough and that any damage the virus does is on him. Typical Trump Derangement, everything is Trump's fault, if there is any problem in the world, then Trump must be the cause.

When you figure that out, and focus on criticizing that, then your criticisms of Trump will be much better than they are with your tunnel vision on what he says.

Tunnel vision on what he's saying, total blindness as to what he's actually doing.

There you are focusing on the way Trump talks instead of what Trump is actually doing. Is that really all you have? If that's the best line of criticism you have against Trump, you don't have a good case against him.

Yeah, that was dumb. Republicans attacks against Obama were pretty lame, but Democrats attacks against Trump are full retard.

Remember those times that Trump gave great SOTU addresses? I know I do.

Well Joe Biden is about as coherent as a five year old, so advantage Trump.

Don't have to be Usain Bolt to outrun Creepy Uncle Joe. Joe Biden is not a high bar to clear in the wit and intelligence department.

Put some shit in his ear, tell him some things. I think we can go dumber. Joe Rogan Knows.

Even if that were true, it isn't relevant, come up with a better line of attack, if that's the best you have, that's straight pitiful. Attacking his "remarks" is weak sauce, attack something that is actually relevant. Attack an executive order he signed, or legislation he signed into law, or attack his foreign policy decisions, etc. Enough of the attacking him based solely on his personality rubbing you the wrong way, that shit is weak, and if it's all you got, then you have no valid criticisms of Trump whatsoever.

The stock market would have "collapsed" no matter what he said, his speech did not cause it. You simply give his words too much weight and think they are far more important than they actually are. If you are going to attack Trump on Coronavirus, you could at least attack the way his administration is handling the situation, instead of criticizing the tone and phrasing of a f*cking speech. If the best anti-Trump coronavirus material you have is the tone and phrasing of speeches and tweets during the pandemic, you don't have a good case against him, you are just grasping at straws because the way he talks triggers you and the stuff he does that triggers you has little if anything to do with actual job performance.

Words and tone are trivial, what is actually being done is what matters. Elevating words and tone above what is actually being done is what rubes do to reach for straws to attack politicians they don't like. The media and Trump haters would attack his words and tone regardless of what he says or how he says it, they move the goalposts and cherry pick petty trivial things to judge him on because judging him on actual meaningful criteria reveals that he's doing a better job than they think he is and the last thing they want to do is admit that to themselves or others. The underlying action is vastly more important than the words, phrasing or tone describing that action, pro tip. If you are going to attack Trump in ways that aren't grasping at straws, you need to focus on criticizing what he does, not what he says, or the way he says it. If instead you focus on words and tone, then you simply don't have good ammo to actually attack him with, otherwise there would be no need to resort to such weak sauce attacks in the first place, because you'd have much better criticisms at your disposal and wouldn't need to use an avalanche of bad critiques to attempt to cover up the weakness of your case. You would just lead with the good material and have an infinitely stronger case than you would by watering it down with cherry picked petty trivial sh*t.

No, it would just kill the economy. The juice is nowhere near worth the squeeze, any good it does is far outweighed by the negative.

If the Dems pull the plug on Biden, they don't have anyone on the bench who can save them anyway, so no need to worry.

Why do you suspect that? Because Biden is so inspiring? Because they didn't hate Trump enough in 2016, but do in 2020? lulz

Mine too.

Yes, he did. At least he corrected himself right away.