H10

No, you got research to do, you don't know what you are talking about.

Harper nuked the economy already, can't nuke it again.

This makes no sense, a person's age wll not determine if they are a terrorist, and without any information, you cannot even determine if they are lying because you have no way to verify any of it.

Israeli apartheid is wrong, when will you condemn the shame that is Israeli apartheid., why won't you condemn israeli apartheid? 99% of egyptians today classify themselves as Arabs. Non verbal language is ineffective because different people and cultures communicate different things by the same behaviours. So lack of eye contact in one culture can be perceived as dishonesty, but in some cultures people are told to avoid eye contact with authority, and others are taught to look you in the eye and lie and then different people have different abilities and tendencies. You claimed jews are mixed with arab blood, but arabs nor jews are not a race, arabs are an ethnicity and a culture, jew is a religion. And if the in person interview is valuable because 90% of the communication is what they don't say, then you don't need the in person interview because its what they don't communicate that matters, not what they do.

Hawaii has senators, it has had a president, and it has a bunch of congressmen. If it is not a state, someone made a big boo boo.

Harper had turned the largest surplus into the largest deficit and expanded the debt, Trudeau inherited a broke economy so now must spend money to try to get out of the broken economy of Harper. Harper had one majority government, and that was all it took, 1 term to boot him from office, worse leader ever.

No, because we have intelligence and the ability to interview the other side, how are you going to interview a source in a city being bombed in syria? We won't do it because we have to, we do it because of fear mongers who want to give up all freedom and liberty and want us to be a northern version of the police state to the south.

Without intelligence, face to face interviews are not effective. Canada does not have the intelligence to identify suspect terrorist anyways. Israel has a network of spies over 10,000 people and another 100,000 working in intelligence just gathering information on arabs. We don't have that in India or Syria or Pakistan. It is you who demanded jew people be segregated from arabs and from whites and other races, why don't the israelis integrate with the arabs? Israel is an apartheid state.

Well your entire premise is based on milk shake like soil. You erroneously believe Haiti is getting money, when the opposite is true, they are often paying out money to clean up the mess that the UN makes there.

No, the media reported he was syrian and refugee, the media doesn't report when the criminal is white their national origin.

Texas Rangers was ran into the ground? Bush had some failures, but he had some pretty good successes too. He was not a serial fraud on trial for child rape, fraud, and used fraudulent loans and russian pee hookers. Bush wasn't the brightest bulb, he was slow, ok but he wasn't like a literal criminal who had a wife that broke immigration laws. Well both Hilary and Obama were senators leading up to the 2008 election. Obama had went to a slightly better law school, was a constitutional law professor for over a decade, served in the state senate and actually overcame tremendous odds to win. Hilary was the favourite, she had a popular former president in her corner. Hilarly would have lost again to Sanders if she didn't rig the election. She is a generally unlikeable person, and the only people who really voted for her substantially were African American women, even white women voted against her. She performed worse than any democratic candidate since the 1980s, her turnout was way down. Original privilege would be if you start seeing African American people with records like Bush and Trump or Clinton (you know, ones with rape allegations, drunk driving records, or child rape trials) becoming president. Nah, Trump didn't have failed businesses, he was using it as a strategy to defraud banks.

No, the interrogations and interviews are useless without intelligence because that is how you catch terrorist lying. Without the intelligence, then 35 of 35 terrorist can slip through the interrogations and interviews with ease because you never have the evidence to justify stopping or holding them. Its like police stopping a criminal and hoping he'd confess vs having a bunch of evidence and witnesses. Without intelligence, interrogations are useless because you don't have the intelligence to know if you are being lied to, and you have no way to prove denying or holding anyone. What is different about the spousal visa? INTELLIGENCE! They have a requirement you submit a bunch of documents, you are being interviewed on a PERSON, who you should know a large amount of information about. They get to interview that person and gather INTELLIGENCE. Remove that Canadian spouse and the ability to give them endless interviews and you remove the intelligence and the questions become useless.

The media always makes race the issue when the criminal is not white. That is the entire point. Is the media trying to say because he is Syrian he raped? If that is the case then reporting he is Syrian would be relevant, but why is it that when someone is German or white and rapes which over 90% of rapes in this nation are, it is never said, hey rapist is WHITE! Why is there never an inference that the people who do 90% of the raping have a cultural issue with rape and that never plays into the story.

They have a human right because you have a right to communicate to government, it has nothing to do with the size of the minority.

Trump is not a billionaire, he does have access to a large number of highly leveraged assets. He doesn't manage the large companies, he hires people to do that for him, and most of his companies have failed, despite inheriting close to $1 billion, he has managed to largely squander that money in failed investments like trump air and his disaster of a public company. No, there is white privilege, it is when you get goodies for being white. Yes, because the senators are the ones who get to determine along with the house how the budget is drafted and spent. Obama has 2 degrees 1 in politics, 1 in law, the president is essentially a job that combines the two, it doesn't have as much as a business element as one might think given the spending is determined not by the white house but the house and senate. Running a billion dollar company, well firstly, there is no proof nor evidence Trump has ever done that to begin with because he refuses to release his tax returns which would be the only way to verify it. Being a lawyer, senator, constitutional law professor, state senator, is pretty good preparation for president, the saying on capitol hill is every senator look in the mirror and sees mr president. " Obama was white he would be indistinguishable from Clinton and would never have gotten the nomination." Which is exactly my point. White privilege means Obama could be indistinguishable from Clinton and still not get the nomination because of his skin color. That is what I mean when I speak about white privilege. If Obama was the governor of a small southern state, no one had ever heard of, went to yale and those experiences he would not get the nomination because it was Clinton's white privilege that put him over the edge in a highly competitive field of candidates. Yup, the greatest American president in American history who killed Osama, passed a universal coverage healthcare bill which progressives since 1900 have been rying for but could not pass, not fdr, not roosevelt, not clinton, not kennedy, not nixon, not coolridge, None! Signed in more Great Society measures than any other president, dodd frank, reform and consumer protection act, repealed discrimination against gays, defended tranny rights, rescued the American economy from failed trickle down economics policies that had crushed the American economy, passed tarp and the job creation act, ended the Great Recession, cut taxes and passed the budget relief act, extended unemployment insurance and saved tens of millions of Americans homes and ended the iraq war, normalized relations with cuba and iran, made deals on climate change, commutted 1200 unjust sentences and more than any other president, saved the us auto industry, save the us banking sector and saved the us insurance and housing sector, made the US a net exporter of oil and energy independent, the first president in the modern era to achieve that, signed daca, cut homeless veterans rate by 50%, ended bush era torture policies, improved school nutrition, passed the lilly ledbetter act to create equal pay for women, put the first hispanic women on the supreme court and first lesbian, and expanded stem cell research. If a pink skin president did all that, you'd call him god incarnata.

failing 35 times out of 35 is huge failure rate that it don't matter. All those techniques failed on 35 terrorist! Israel still has terror attacks, the Israelis have essentially setup a police state. They monitor communications of all palestinians, so its much easier to catch terrorist because they essential are policing them, hey know who they are, where they live, they have an army of double agents, it is often just the process of matching a name to a face so those in person interviews work. We don't have 10,000 double agents in syria do we?

Good luck with coming up with the tens of thousands of dollars in a 3rd world country to immigrate to Canada to go on welfare. That doesn't even make any sense, you are going to save half your income working for 15 years to move to Canada and live worse than you did in your own country? With the exception of refugees, immigrants have to have money to come here. Europeans have much more rules and environmental regulations than Canada. Europeans aren't going to move to a higher tax, lower service, lower quality living country, what don't you get about that. Its like asking why don't more British people move to pakistan and bangladesh. Europe was poor over 100 years ago, they had people dying in the streets, huge wars, mass poverty etc. Even Norway was very poor and short on land back then. What is wrong with pink people being a numerical minority in Canada, pink people are already a minority or on the verge of it in many cities like Toronto, Vancouver, Bramptom, Richmond Hill, etc and those are nice places, even for the pink people. Canada has no culture. How do you know your grandchildren will even live in Canada? How do you even know your grandkids will be white, there is a good chance your kids run off with a non-white person to spite you. I see it all the times, white people with racist parents running off with a yellow man or african man. Some non-white nations like Bermuda, Singapore, etc. enjoy higher standards of living then Canada.

You want to give, go to the Haitian embassy and give, at least it will actually get there.

Constitutional Law professor for 12 years at one of the top law schools in the world and most prestigious US law school, national senator, state senator, ran for congress, author of 2 top selling books, 2 decades in public service, Harvard Law grad with an expertise in Constitutional law, president of the harvard law review (probably the most prestigious role a Harvard student can get), ivy league undergrad degree in politics, worked in several highly regarded law firms, community organizer and yes great public speaker. Trump is the exemplar of white privilege. His only qualifications was his skin color. If he was red, yellow, brown, any other skin color, he couldn't be elected.

You are confusing handing money over with PLEDGING MONEY. Countries pledged billions but less than $50 million came in, and most of that got used up trying to fix the Cholera problem the UN made there but denied. Hilary Clinton raised $100 million for Haiti, and spent less than $4000 there. Haiti is kind of used like a convenient way for many Westerners to get rich off of raising money but it never helps anyone on the ground. Haitians, nor does the Haitian government, NEVER TOUCHES, SEES OR HAS ACCESS TO THAT MONEY. Haitian people never got aid money, they actually ended up paying out more money trying to fix the UN cholera disaster after the earthquake than they received! Israel receives 10000 times more aid than Haiti, Haiti just gets pledges, but no money comes in. Haiti didn't receive any money, they ended up actually paying out more for anti-cholera medicine than they got in aid and trying to clean up all the cholera UN left. Haiti is one of the countries that need aid. Also fortunes change all the time, at one time Haiti was well off and some of that money from enslaving haitians and was used to develop alot of what was french owned Canada. This seems to be a case of canada doing a good thing, because no one else does.

Everyone has a right to government services in their languages. It doesn't matter if you spent 5 years studying English, no amount of reading the dog crossed the street will allow you to understand legalistic language.

Israel has many measures, many of which aren't public. I'm not interested in being a police state or apartheid state like israel. This right here is the problem with having a little knowledge, it is much more dangerous than no knowledge. No serious muslim jihadi would ever have a tattoo because tattoo are forbidden or haram in Islam. You are just making comments on the spot with no actual evidence. The interview skills of the CIC officers have declined so far that they have no real ability to conduct interviews. And determining french or English proficiency on the spot is not easy. A person who is nervous can underperform, they can get lucky in the line of questionings, a corrupt agent could forward the questions to potential applicants who simply memorize the answers. We all know they aren't stopping russian mafia members, these complaints about immigrats are aimed at non-white immigrants. Plus, what is to stop any tear drop russian mafia member from applying makeup to cover his tattoo before the interview? Why didn't questions stop those 35 9/11 hijackers from entering USA? No in person interview is necessary to vet someone.

The issue I have is the inconsistency with Canadian media, why is it when the criminal or suspect is non-white, his race is made the issue and his race s reported, but when he is caucasian it is almost never ever reported unless his being white is part of the reason for the crime ie hate crime?

Explain to me how interviewing someone face to face would allegedly stop any purported fraud?

Obama was in the south alot, he campaigned heavily throughout the south, he won florida, turned republican south carolina blue, flipped another southern state in virginia blue, obama has been to every state and he has toured the gulf coast states several times as president. Not only did Obama go down by car into Alabama, he got out of the car and walked side by side with people in huge crowds down in Selma, Alabama. Well it is true conservatives play dirty tricks to try to disenfranchise perceived liberal or democratic,specifically non-white voters every election. This does have a history. You don't have liberals trying to purge conservatives from the voter rolls in any state and not in federal elections. Democrats were not thinking about Republicans stealing elections back in 2008 when they won with historic majorities. They were thinking about healthcare laws, dealing with the wave of hate crimes directed at non-whites, equal pay act for women, fixing the broken economy of Bush and failed Republican policies. Several historically red states had turned blue, so many republicans were plotting on how to rig the elections to prevent that from occuring again, so you got some extreme gerrymandering in 2010 congressional district lines. The democrats were naive to some extent, many democrats did not want to focus on a 50 state strategy as Howard Dean had pushed for after 2008, the new leadership wanted to ignore states were winning was less likely and ceded alot of cities and rural areas in republican territory. If the democrats really were not naive to vote rigging, they would have strengthed up the voting rights act prior to the republicans dismantled it through court challenges.