H10

You are only embarrassing yourself. How can you determine nothing will be found before any investigation has ever even been completed! He already is in violation of the emoluments clause. When it comes to trump and russia, it has been proven that his own secretary was in contact numerous times with Russian foreign intelligence and arms of the Russian government, so much so he was given a warning by the security sources that Flynn could be compromised and he lost his secret clearance. And if nothing has been proven, that is exactly when you investigate! Trump is the swamp. He already has done enough to get impeached, what about child rape and fraud? You are speaking like a conspiracy theorist.

Then what is the foundation for claiming Soros is a globalist and Trump is not? EU is voluntary union to facilitate trade. And what do you think Trump American style nationalism super power is? A single authoritarian government (USA aka him) replacing sovereign foreign nations rules and laws that he doesn't like, such as Mexico's emigration policy, Japan, China and Vietnam's trade policy, N.Korea and Iran's nuclear policies. Donald Drumpf is the ULTIMATE globalist! He wants to turn, foreign countries into arms of the USA.

Trump says one thing, but when he has all those loans owed to globalist, all those hotels in globalist countries and globalist goldman sachs bankers like steven banon and minuchin running his entire cabinet, he is indeed a globalist, globalist controlled. How the heck in your mind is a guy with a bunch of businesses all over the world not a globalist? You need to put away the conspiracy theories. trump is the definition of a globalist. America doesn't come first under Trump, TRUMP comes first under Trump. Trump is about to get a special prosecutor appointed by his fellow Republicans to invesitgate him for criminal acts. The only one who should be looking at criminal charges is the guy who was on trial for child rape, mass fraud, bankruptcy fraud, running an unlicensed university, and violating the foreign emoluments clause. What happen to Trump air, trump water, trumpland, and trump casino? I don't hate Trump at all. Trump does a good job embarassing himself. Hilary is done with politics, this has nothing to do with it. JT is better than Drumpf.

They accept him now because he has POWER. He couldn't even show his face in CPAC when he was running for office, they claimed he wasn't conservative enough and only Ted Cruz was. Are you forgetting that Trump is a globalist? Since when is Soros the only Globalist? Trump is a guy who turns a blind eye to Saudi terrorism because they let him build a few hotels and shoddy golf courses. Trump accepts money from foreign heads of states, this guy is globalist #1. The last thing we need is an unqualified fake billionaire 8 time bankrupt who doesn't know what he is doing running our country. Trump doesn't believe in America first, he believes in Donald first. If Trump believed in America first, he wouldn't declare bankruptcy against all those loans who owed to American banks, he'd try to pay his debt to society, he wouldn't have ducked the war in vietnam and the draft. He could have taken a desk job or a non-combat role like truck driver. Trump has only ever been trump first. You think Trump isn't giving away billions to foreigners? All you got to do is donate money to Trump to get anything. Trump is a fake and a phony, he ran as a life long liberal from nyc, and teflon don even said he'd run as a republican because republican voters are the stupidest and lowest iq and so easy to trick, sad part is he is right and the joke is on America. I am glad Canadians are not dumb enough to be fooled by a charlatan like that.

So to you a ghetto is a slum area occupied by minority groups?

So can you define what a ghetto means to you? Because I searched on google, and posted what I saw as the first thing, and you said you disagree with it, so why don't you just give me your definition rather than having this back and forth.

CPAC did not accept Trump as conservative. Real conservatives rejected Trump en masse during the primaries. Trump is the most thin skinned pc president we had in a while. Canada had lots of multiculturalism before we were even a nation or country. We had French, Native indians, africans, americans, english, irish, germans etc. The first prime minister's wife was born in Jamaica. While America may had been very right wing at one point in the past, Canada was never that, the things were set up by the government. Harper was much closer to a globalist because he pushed through things that reduced our liberty, put american armed thugs on canadian soil and gave away Canadian sovereignty.

" put in or restrict to an isolated or segregated area or group. " Do you agree with that as the definition you use? No gotcha moments are planned. We can't have a discussion on ghettos if we cannot even agree on a meaning of the term.

I want to know how you define a ghetto.

What is a ghetto?

Maybe it will, maybe it will not. Its dishonest to pretend multiculturalism hasn't worked in the uk, you got the angeles, saxons, jutes, irish, scottish, welsh, all living under one flag despite a history of intense violence with each other. even if all the indians, africans and yellow people left, it'd still have different cultures. And the biggest cultural issue is with POLES, not ethnic brits.

What is ghettoisation? Europe has had Jewish ghettos since the time of shakespeare. Canada has white minority cities and cities with slim white majorities that are rated as some of the best place to live. Maybe Europe's issue is not multiculturalism. And most people in warm climates can't take cold. I've lived in Sweden and Finland, Norway and Iceland. My tolerance for cold is falling, thank goodness we had a mild winter in central canada.

I don't see any big problems in Toronto,Gta or vancouver, and many of these areas are white minority now. I don't know where you live, but things working really well in richmond hill which is rated as a top 10 area to live in the nation.

Liberals are foolish to let Wynne run again, she is so terrible, so corrupt, she doesn't even have the decency to step down.

In Sweden, at most music concerts, women who don't go in big groups find themselves being groped, its a big problem globally, in sweden unwanted touching was redefined as rape, cnn talked about it just 2-3 days ago on don lemon. What might not even count as anything in canada, like touching on the arm or back is counted in swedish law as rape

At the current rate, Sweden might redefine it to that.

Rape was redifned in Europe in the last decade to mean any unwanted touching.

Multiculturalism is working well in Canada, must be a british problem.

I don't think he will be too old, he is only 4 years older than Trump, and I am pretty sure when he ran against Clinton, he wasn't running with the intention of being a one term president. Really it is not a question of age per se, but rather health. 74 is old, but JFK was the youngest president elected ever, just 43 years old, and he was extremely ill, had he not been assassinated, he wouldn't have probably made it to 50. As long as he can campaign, he is good. Unless you are trying to say that 74-75 is too old to be president, in which case Trump should resign because he is going to be that age before his term is over.

I thought both represented their respective positions relatively well. I'd give the win to Sanders. Cruz got stumbled by what to do with the poor broke people question and how do they get care. He also stumbled heavily when Sanders pointed out his claim about everyone will have access was pointless, we all have theoretical access to ferrairis and maseratis but most of us don't have the money to buy it. Access is just the chance to buy it, if you can afford it. Ultimately, this was the big stumbling block that Cruz had, and republicans had back in 2008 when Obama ran promising universal healthcare. Cruz's best point wasn't his point at all, but rather when the woman in the audience said she had 49 employees or something like that and wasn't paying health insurance for any of them. She asked sanders what should happen and he says he thinks she should pay for them. That was a sober reality, but Sanders worse answer. I thought he could have spun it better. Ie he could have said something like this Sanders "Do your employees do a good job" Woman:Yes Sanders: "Do you value your employees Woman: Of course Sanders: "Do you value your business" Woman: Yes Sanders: Do you have a home Woman: Yes Sanders: Does your business have insurance? Woman: Yes Sanders: Does your home have insurance Woman: Yes Sanders: Why? Woman: So that if something bad happens, I don't lose everything. Sanders: That is the reason my plan will ask that you pay money, to protect the health of your employees who create the value in your business and so that if something bad happens to those people who help make your business what it is, you and they do not lose everything.

How is that?

Yup, at least it might help someone, God knows that the government will find a scandal to disappear that money into, at least in Haiti it might help someone and build us some goodwill.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/toronto-housing-bubble-1.3985497 The number of CEO's and rich people in banking, and finance and other such jobs has exploded in the last 2 decades, especially in Toronto. I know two cops married in their 40s, both earn over 120k per year as just run of the mill officers. With just a 250k down they have no problem qualifying for a house well over 2 million dollars. And that is not even counting they can earn more money from overtime. I know so many people just civil servants clearing 100k per year, there are so many new jobs now that didn't exist before where people are earning lots of money like programming and software jobs. We see so many more entrepreneurs owning new businesses, I don't thinkt here is a price bubble, I think there are just alot more people with money, almost all the professors in the business schools and law schools are earning well into the six figures, we have hydro one employees doing just run of the mill work clearing 100k, if they are married that pushes them into the 200k range.

Well you are basically asking for the economic history of two countries. Canada was founded as a settler colony, designed primarily to benefit new European settlers coming in. They benefited historically from substantial investment from Britain followed by the USA, basically the two most powerful nations for the last 200-300 years or so. Haiti was on the other side of that. Britain and the USA declared war on it both along with Spain and France all trying to undermine its government and people and population. You don't have to go decades back to find a leader of Haiti who was literally forced onto a plane into South Africa by the American government for raising minimum wages by like a nickle per hour. Canada has never faced that. Its not even an issue of the Haitians, its an issue of foreign sabotage largely. Actually the globe and mail wrote a nice article on this, the western countries are not forking out their dollars to anyone, they are actually taking from these countries and giving them crumbs from what they are taking to keep an installed leadership who will keep the people where they are. Your vote is not counted and if you rebel like in Syria, you are called a rebel or terrorist group. Most developing countries have no welfare system. You don't work, you die in the street or live off handouts. Our debt has to do without addiction to a lavish lifestyle of oriental imports we cannot afford.

Drug addiction is a moral issue.