H10

Funny, I thought he was a jew with his hook nose and high pitched voice and all. So what if he is a nazi, that is a good thing, no more hiding in the shadows, I like my nazis out front and public, he has admitted he is a nazi, so lets have all the cards on the table.

Try reading the entire comment " " As one of his Fourteen Points, President Woodrow Wilson demanded that the nationalities of Austria-Hungary have the "freest opportunity to autonomous development". In response, Emperor Karl I agreed to reconvene the Imperial Parliament in 1917 and allow the creation of a confederation with each national group exercising self-governance. However the leaders of these national groups rejected the idea; they deeply distrusted Vienna and were now determined to get independence. " " 1. The Americans demanded as a condition of their victory that Austria-Hungary be broken up. They saw it as a threat for there to basically be a 2nd large inland German satellite state 2. People in Quebec want to separate. Now imagine if Quebec was physically adjoined to France. Alberta and Quebec shared a border, the government was more centralized with no withstanding clause for the provinces. The urge to separate would be even stronger. Especially if Alberta was all one ethnic group attached to a homeland. Basically, the different multi-cultural groups didn't want to be minorities in a large multi-ethnic state, they prefered to be majorities in a majority ethnic state. Ie. Poles in austria-hungary wanted to rejoin poland. Romanians and Ukranians in the empire wanted out too to rejoin their own ethnic group. Lots of the Austrians wanted to be united with other Germans. Imagine if Quebec and every other major region of Canada which could form an ethnic plurality was given "Self governance" it basically is a step to independence for a bunch of different regions. 3. Nope, jews and gypsies were widely disliked in this region of the world, and they still are. Multi-cultural for many white cultures, but many of the whites didn't like how they were being treated. the German groups had basically dominated over the slavs in the empire. The empire failed because they lost WW1, there were multiple independence movements within the empire and the Americans demanded they get self governance which was the end of centralized government.

1. WW1. Once they lost this, the Americans and Brits wanted to ensure they'd never have to fight such a formidable opponent again. 2. Austrians speak German, Hungarians speak a different language. Austrians wanted to join Germany and Hitler in the aim of a greater German Republic. Remember Hitler was actually Austrian not German. In otherwords, not even Austrians wanted in, they wanted to be part of Germany. 3. I don't know if you call murdering all non-whites like jews and gypsies a place where minorities was respected, but if you were white you were respected. This is the former Austrian Empire today. Part of it split off and became Yugoslavia which had its own huge civil war. Additionally, Europe was swept by a wave of nationalism after WW2. Crotia, Slovenia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Albania, etc all wanted out of Yugoslavia. Even if it survived the German ww2, it would never have survived the invasion by russia and subsequent factionalism that swept through the region. Ultimately, the romanian areas would want to go back to romanian, the polish speaking areas to poland, the italians areas to italy and german areas to germany and so on. " As one of his Fourteen Points, President Woodrow Wilson demanded that the nationalities of Austria-Hungary have the "freest opportunity to autonomous development". In response, Emperor Karl I agreed to reconvene the Imperial Parliament in 1917 and allow the creation of a confederation with each national group exercising self-governance. However the leaders of these national groups rejected the idea; they deeply distrusted Vienna and were now determined to get independence. " This is the best summation of it. Europeans dislike central government from people of different ethnic groups ruling over them, its kind oflike colonialism. Do you want an Austrian emperor when you are polish?

Explain to me how else you get an unruly passenger off the plane. If the guy didn;t act like a baby, he'd not have gotten hurt.

His past is relevant because he committed a felony trespass! There was no brutality, he was removed from a plane where he volunteered to leave, reneged, then was bumped, as is constitent with the TOS of the ticket, buying a ticket doesn't mean you own the plane. So patients don't pay to see their doctor now? No, he doesn't have every right to be there, because the contract says they can bump at will, for any reason the airline sees fit! He was told to leave multiple times and refused, and even ran back on the plane after being thrown off. The CEO is bowing to left wing liberal agenda, he needs to grow a pear, he spoke the truth the first time around.

It matters because it speaks to his behaviour and the felony he committed by refusing to leave a plane, which is a felony. He did cause a disruption, not leaving is a disruption. Running back on a plane after you were thrown off, that is a disruption.

That would make sense if United knew before, they didn't, crew call in sick last minute, people need to get reshuffled around from cities to prevent tens of thousands of delays

Based on what? The terms and contracts and the ticket all say the airlines reserve the right to bump passengers. If he had read his agreement and contract, he would see his only right was to compensation.

Is morgentaler not white?

Facts: -Doctor was charged with over 69 felonies for running a pill mill in Kentucky -Had his medical license suspended for over a decade -Was offered over 5 times in compensation for what he paid for his ticket plus free hotel room for the night, he initially accepted the offer along with his wife. He then reneged on the offer after he found out that there was no same day flights and would have to wait to the next day. -He was then bumped from the flight and informed by the crew that he was bumped, would be given compensation and hotel room but that he had to leave. He refused to leave and after he was removed the first time, he ran back on the plane! -It is a felony trespass to remain on or re-enter an airplane when you have been told to leave. Not only did he delay that UA flight, but he delayed all other flights on that same commuter plane and all connecting flights and flights associated with the crew who had to bump passengers because there are federal laws that prevent pilots and crew from working more than a certain number of hours. After all, do you want the crew who is sleepy eyed and hadn't slept for 20 hours flying you through heavy air traffic and possible mechanical problems? He literally delayed tens of thousands of people, not to mention all the planes that couldn't taxi or unload cargo and passengers because they were stuck in the gate/tarmack creating a big traffic jam. -Officer didn't even tazer him, he is very lucky. I would have tazered him. And 3 other passengers took the compensation without incident. -Left Wing Cry Baby Media wants to portray the airline and policemen as big bad boogey men for just doing their j-o-b. Removing unruly passengers from a plane to ensure passenger safety. Can you imagine being a flight attendant dealing with a stubborn headed guy like that in an emergency 30,000 feet up in the air? Imagine being a flight attendant or captain where airline rules are you cannot leave a plane until all customers are evacuated in an emergency and you got a guy who won't leave the plane without an emergency? You think this guy yelling and screaming and acting crazy and incoherent (yes he was acting out before the cops came) on the ground is going to behave better because an emergency? Someone like that jeopardizes the entire plane and crew members because he didn't co-operate. -Just because you buy a ticket to travel on a plane doesn't mean you own the plane ok. You don't get to hold up the entire plane when you been offered 5 times what you paid for your tickets + free hotel. Look at how many people get kicked out of Uber for far less egregious behaviour or Taxis or buses or other forms of transit. -He's got a rap sheet that makes most bad boys and bikers look like choir boys, he had it coming to him. Felony trespass, resisting arresting, he was asked to get off the plane dozens of times politely and he refused. By the way being bumped from flights is not some obscurity, it is ROUTINE since the 1950s. And this isn't because the airlines are just big bad mean people, running an airline is tough business, they have thin margins, and are heavily regulated by the Federal government including employee work hours. If a pilot or crew calls in sick, you can't just make another pilot work more overtime like a normal job, you got to have another pilot flown in to replace him. -PS, it is on the back of every ticket and terms of conditions they can bump you and use force to remove you. -What do you think would happen to a patient in a doctor's office who was told to leave, refused to get out and was preventing the doctor from seeing other patients? He'd call the cops, the cops would arrest such person for trespass if they refused to leave. This punk got exactly what he deserved. United Airlines should be commended as the officers. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/united-airlines-ceo-apologizes-dragging-kentucky-doctor-flight-n745161 #Blue Lives Matter.

No, I am serious, lock those thugs up, life in prison for druggies.

You seem to be forgetting Canadian (white) women want their women's rights and fought to have abortions to kill off their own babies.

That is also part of the free market, the free market dictates those who save their money will be able to buy up houses during the crash and get rich, this is why there new millionaires in the 1930s during the great depression than at any other time in american history. When you have a big crash, it allows the common man with savings to buy up big real estate. Those people saving $350,000 to make a down payment in toronto, might be able to buy 5-6 houses or an entire condo when the market crashes. Trump tower was bought up during a recession in prime manhattan real estate for just $1 million. It is now worth over $100 million.

" O’Leary also promised to accelerate immigration for those in key sectors by working with employers and HR executives " thestar.com speech at empire club. What do you people who are on the far right think about that? More TFWs? More immigrants coming in driving up housing prices?

We need to lock them up and throw away the key so they can get clean. The problem is laziness and poor morals and a culture which has not taught these kids right from wrong so they engage in rampant drug use, lock them up, re-educate them.

No, I believe in the free market, I believe that I have the right to get the biggest amount of money from any buyer anywhere, not my problem if poor people cannot afford to live in the city, move out the city, rent, or go live in Scarborough. People just want to l ive in the expensive downtown core and complain.

You said jews were discriminated against in every country including Canada,but since you now admit jews are not discriminated against and never have been in any meaningful way in Canada, I am sure you agree Israel shouldn't exist because since Jews can have a safe homeland in Canada with little relative discrimination, there is no reason for them to be on stolen Palestinian lands right? I already provided quotes from peer reviewed research and hareets showing jews view themselves as a race. If jews are not a race, then Hitler and the Nazis are not racist for targetting jews, because they aren't a race. Which simply goes to show there is no need for Israel to exist as some kind of safeland for the jewish race, since you admit jews are not a race right? If they are not a race, then it is not "Racist" to be prejudiced towards jews. In fact, if the hatred of jews is based on their BELIEFS and not on them being race, it is actually impossible for anyone to be racist against jews. And what is wrong with hating people for their beliefs? Which I am not sure which beliefs it is the jews of Israel share since about half of them are athiest coming from former communist russia. Then you agree there is no justification for jews to have a state because they fear some form of bigotry.

Any time the arab countries elect a secular government we fight with them. After nile valley civilizations, most of the first civilizations that were ration based start in the middle east. Middle East had alot of civilizations before most other parts of the world. However, we are always bumping heads with the secular government in the arab world because they undermine our goals of greater control of the middle east. Right now the western nations are or have recently been bumping heads with egypt (under secular mubarak), turkey, iran, iraq (under saddam), syria, Libya (under gaddafi). These were not the radical islamic nations, they were more secular leaning with turkey and egypt being the most moderate. We then buddied up with the saudis, emiratis, omanis, afghanis, pakistanis and other countries where they still behead people. The West has determine it is easier and better to work with radical muslims over secular muslims, and in the case of Saddam and gaddafi, replaced secular government with religious ones. Don't blame the muslims for it, we invaded them and overthrow their secular governments and replace them with radicals. We should be asking why did Harper and Bush and Obama do this?

This is obviously true. The only anti-semitism I am seeing is against the Palestinians and Canaanites and african jews who are all treated as 3rd class citizens in Israel.

it does

Yes but she is still marginally better than Harris. And this is why liberals keep getting re-elected. The conservative party of ontario is all of the bad from liberals but on steroids, more corrupt, more theft, more incompetent, more corporate hotel buyoutism. The conservative party of ontario's policies are literally written by the lobbyist who donate to the party, I recall being in meetings fighting with these lobbyist, and it was those of us who believed in conservatism, fighting the lobbyist, and the lobbyist won.

yes it is for US, but Canada has followed a similar path.

Most charts show real earnings for north american middle class peaked in the 70s despite productivity increasing substantially.

This is why large deficits are good, they finance our living standards through investment.

Yes. They spent 1000 years killing all dissenters, in fact, protest in Japan are really rare until about 10-15 years ago when they seeother nations doing it, Japanese people were taught by the elites to shut up and sit down. The only time democracy came to Japan is after anyone who might dissent was killed. Alot of the "stable" democracies were really established this way. USA comes to mind, and the wild west, much of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Britain. It wasn't until dissenters were killed or stomped out did they really become democracies that permitted any dissenting opinions. For instance, USA did not let native indians, african americans participate in American voting until it was guaranteed that it would work for the white political elites. This meant using campaigns of racial terrorism to push out indians and african american populations from states where they formed majorities to ensure they couldn't exercise any state rights. So whites were a numerical minority in states like Florida, Mississippi, Georgia, South Carolina, Louisana and so on. Therefore they said African Americans won't have votes. When they kicked out enough african americans into northern states, they said ok, now your vote doesn't matter because white is the majority, you can vote. You even hear it again when you hear people in USA talking about revoking birth right citizenship because the fear is all these brown messicans with their kids are going to have votes one day and undermine white agenda.