H10

Innocent until proven guilty, you have no proof he even committed a terror act.

RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson conceded before a group of First Nations leaders on Wednesday that there are racists inside his police force, a surprising admission welcomed by indigenous people, who say it is key to addressing the crisis of missing and murdered indigenous women. "I understand that there are racists in my police force. I don't want them to be in my police force," When even the head of police admit the force is filled to the brink with racist and he can't even get them out, you only embarass yourself by denying it.

Lol, yeah you know there is no evidence to support your position when you have to dive down into to Numbeo dot com. Nigeria has much stricter laws than Canada, and while Canada has many laws, the enforcement is very lax and criminals get off all the time, ask any victim of a crime or their family, how many murder cases where the judges just plain old through out the case because of too much time to bring it to court again in Canada? Many of the people in Canada are violent criminals, most of them up north and in rural areas locked away in prison. Nigeria's murder rate is much lower than Canada's and you make yourself look foolish by citing sources that only you can edit like numbeo and wikipedia and are not considered generally valid sources. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/uk/06/prisons/html/nn2page1.stm In fact, 64% of the 40,000 people in Nigerian jails haven't even been convicted but are just awaiting trial, so Nigeria actually has fewer convicted criminals than Canada in prison system "In 2015/2016, there were on average 120,568 adult offenders on a given day, in either custody or in a community program" https://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2017001/article/14700-eng.htm In Nigeria, there is no community program, you go to prison or jail, the laws are far more strict too. Canada has a far higher homicide rate than Nigeria. Just look at the homicide rate in lagos, The National Population Commission of Nigeria, which put the population at over 21 million in 2016, and there are 220 homicides in Lagos. 21 million divided by 220 is about 95,000. The is roughly 1 murder per 100,000 people in Nigeria's largest city that reports the most homicides. Compared to Canada's which is 1.5 and Toronto is 1.4. Canada actually has almost 50% more murders. If Toronto was Lagos' size, it have almost double the murders. Wasn't it two Canadian girls who were caught in nigeria committing crime in a large scale international scandal? I agree that a people do not stop committing crime when they have adapted a criminal lifestyle like bombing people's countries, robbing them off their land, enslaving them and stealing their labor, and genociding perhaps this is why whites in Canada have such a high murder rate compared to Nigerians who have half the homicide rate and far less people in the prison system despite a much larger population. It is easy to be generous with other people's money, mainly the money that white people obtained through enslaving and robbing indians and africans in Canada.

This post seems very much like trolling, I will report it, it is designed to inflame tensions. there is no proof he is radicalized, and innnocent until proven guilty.

They aren't going to rebuild a blownout country with nothing, they come here, work a few years, wait until war is over, and then go rebuild.

More people are identfying as natives to get benefits because more is being given out. Healthcare is a provincial responsibility and legal system is slow due to lack of qualified judges. Canada has good judges in general and that is because we are picking reallyexperienced lawyers from top firms. The problem is if you start appointing small time lawyers to judgeships, the judges become corrupt and take money under the table.

Doubt Singh will beat out a francophone from Quebec in Trudeau. Trudeau might even win bigger next time around because Singhs turban and not being from Quebec will work against him and Trudeau being a charismatic Liberal, which is the natural governing centrist party of Canada. The best case scenario for the cons would be a minority government or substantial gains, but with an extremist at the helm, I doubt they have a chance. I suspect Trudeau will be in power for a while, he is young, probably won't lost until he is in his 60s and since he is so young he can come back.

Actually affirmative action presumes that the white decision makers will behave in a biased manner against the non-white person regardless of qualification and that the history of racism against non-white people is so deeply entrenched into white society, as the research is overwhelming that this is the case, but for affirmative action, there would be no real possibility of an integrated society. I suggest you listen to LBJ speech at Howard University in the 1960s if you are confused. However, if anyone would or ought be questioned on the merit of their skills, the historical evidence would suggest if any, it ought be white people, specifically wealthy white males who have benefitted from an old boys club and centuries of affirmative action, which gave them free education, free land, free labor all at the expense of non-white people, specifically african americans and native american groups. 'You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and then say, 'You are free to compete with all the others,' and still justly believe that you have been completely fair. Thus it is not enough just to open the gates of opportunity. All our citizens must have the ability to walk through those gates.'' L.B.J. went on to set out the history of discrimination and the ''special nature of Negro poverty'' to make the case that to right these wrongs, ''equal opportunity is essential, but not enough.'' And people of other ethnicities are different. When were white people in Canada enslaved, robbed of their culture, mass genocided by the federal government, kidnapped out their country, have their land stolen and discriminated against for hundreds of years, denied voting rights and given inferior education, schools, and housing based off of their skin color? I don't think that happened to white people as any identifiable group in large numbers, so it would be silly to deny that there is a difference. You even claimed affirmative action furthers the idea of "black inferiority". You see, you said, further, so that idea is and was already out there, or else there is nothing to further, suggesting there are a group of people (white) who prior to affirmative action already believe african-canadians to be "inferior". Thus by your own statements you actually prove the problem is not affirmative action, as white people already believed africans to be inferior before affirmative action (hence segregation +racism + slavery + genocide). The problem is the miseducation of white people on raced based issues. So the answer is not to get rid of affirmative action, but to get rid of racist ideas in white people's heads. And that only occurs by exposing them to non-white people who can dismiss those beliefs, and since whites believed that africans are inferior before africans even had rights in the country, and whites had entrenched themselves into the economic decision making positions, the only way to change these beliefs are with robust affirmative action policies.

I would add even in Toronto, the restuarants in downtown are mainly staffed by young high school dropouts in the front and university students and immigrants and tfws, especially in the back, the pay for just a regular old line cook making salads is like $15-$16 an hour or more with tips now. Not even the immigrants want to work these jobs, they are too hard, too much lifting, too much fast paced work.

Well there could be an obvious answer that you have just chosen to overlook. Police racism, which is something that non-white people from coast to coast complain about and studies from universities have proven to be an empirical fact.. White people are close to 80% of the prison population, committ the vast majority of the crimes and go to prison for the vast majority of the crimes, including violent ones like rape where they are grossly over-represented for their general population. Yet the RCMP is choosing not to list their faces. It could be white police racism, it could be white police think all non-whites look alike so they want someone from that community to figure out who they are because they cannot. Also I just looked, of the 18 I saw in the ottawa citizen, about 13 appear to me to be white, which is roughly the white population of Ottawa. Another reality is that most whites are born in Canada, they have a general better understanding of Canadian law enforcement procedures like dna, investigations, things like that, so when they commit crimes they take more steps to cover it up or make it look accidental or to hide evidence in a way police cannot find. For instance, we are just now finding out about the large number of older white men like priest, coaches etc who were pedophiles all along.

Nigeria has far lower crime rates than Canada, for a country of almost 200 million people they only have twice as many people incarcerated as all of Canada which has close to 40 million people. Nigeria's crime rate is actually just a fraction of Canada's. The general correlation seems to be crime rates have fallen since the 1960s, now whether that is due to an increase in non-white immigrants as white immigrants like the irish, italians, eastern europeans and jews, were traditionally associated with higher crime rates and organized crime and mafia involvement that current immigrants do not have.. I suspect immigration in the 1920s and 1950s probably increased crime given that the immigrants were primarily coming from crime ridden regions where organized crime reigned supreme in Europe and due to the fact that there were poor controls. Now a days, with all the finger printing and technology and tracking and information, it is very hard for an immigrant to have a criminal lifestyle until they atleast become a citizen, without getting deported.

"Harper has more than doubled that score — posting annual average job-growth of 1.1 per cent. Alas, in the list of 10 prime ministers since and including Bennett, that is the second worst rate. Bennett's economy shrank by an average of a little more than 2 per cent compared to 1.5 per cent annualized growth in Harper's time. Much, much better, but — again — every prime minister between Bennett and Harper had a higher score on this." Harper "has the worst record on jobs creation since World War II," http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-election-2015-stephen-harper-jobs-analysis-1.3254371 Worse ECONOMY EVER. Took the largest surplus in Canadian history and ran them into the largest deficits to enrich his private sector donors and cronies. While the Paul Martin liberals were grossly corrupt, no one, not even myself would image that Steven Harper would find a way to out do his corrupt ion and destroy the strongest economy on earth at the time. Harper grew the welfare rolls because it is rural hopeless, jobless welfare queens up north who vote conservatives. The people with jobs in the cities that run the country like Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal, you know, where all the economic activity occurs, knows which government makes it good for business and there is a reason they consistently vote against conservatives. Well since my view is economic based, and Harper has destroyed the economy, why would I like him? What has Trump done? He hasn't been in office very long, lets wait 2 years and see where the country is in his 3rd year or 2nd year, he hasnt even passed a budget yet. Sorry I did not vote for Trudeau. And I am glad Hilary lost. Hilary was a terrible candidate, they dnc rigged the election so she could win because she was otherwise unelectable. dems should have foreseen if she couldn't win a primary and was imploding to Sanders when she had 20 point leads she'd be unelectable. But for the russian rigging the election for Trump, she might have won. Its not the east job to "help" the West, pull yourselves up by your own bootstraps! Bombardies is kept alive off of the backs of Ontarians, which is why we want Quebec to seperate because we were supporting them and are sick of it, and we were doing it for a very long time. Quebec tax payers probably spent alot of money to make the west get developed anyways, because for a long time Montreal was the economic driver of the nation and the west was just dirt and farms and used eastern money to build the infrastructure for oil. Well they could have voted for Liberals. Ontario has the strongest economy in the nation right now, it is the biggest, unemployment is at an all time low, wages are rising, profits are rising, there was a time 5 years ago when it was bad, but it is quiet strong right now. Alberta wouldn't even be able to pump oil without immigrants and if you seperate you won't get any white immigrants because the only whites going to alberta now are east coast mariners. You think people are coming from sweden with paid 6 weeks minimum vacation to work low wage canadian jobs you need to drink the fresh coffee.

Conservatives but the nation in the dump, Paul Martin handed Harper the best economy in the world bar none. Martin was grossly corrupt so he was punished, and he was very ugly too. The Harper government was a big failure, 1 government and voters kicked him to the curb.

No, employers will make more money if everyone is earning a living wage. I know so many poor people who don't go out because they don't have money but have jobs paying nothing. Screw it, I am not subsidizing your business, you can't afford to hire someone don't!

Ontario's economy is the strongest in the nation and the strongest it has been in a very long time, unemployment is quiet low here now.

Harper imploded his party by playing the race card and neglecting everything East of Alberta. While it is true Liberals often neglect Alberta and oil policies that would help them, this only works because no one lives in Alberta compared to Quebec and Ontario. Harper got 1 majority government and was given the boot, he imploded his party and was lucky the liberals under dion and ignatieff was so weak that the NDP refused to form a coalition with them because they simply assumed that once Harper imploded the nation everyone would vote NDP due to weak liberal leadership. And this was almost true as NDP was projected to win the election but Trudeau stole it away from them in a surprise win. The difference is that Trudeau has shifted the national liberal party to the left, taking the NDP votes. Most of the provincial liberals haven't done this (Except recently kathlen wynne). Trudeau was the change candidate, the conservatives (nationally speaking) are the status quo party. Now in BC the NDP were the change party since the liberals had been governing for a while and to be fair they just barely lost a majority government. I agree, 2019, liberals will have a reduced majority. I think Trudeau is facing this issue of radical middle with marijuana legalization. It is a grossly impractical policy but he must do it to maintain the stoner vote. Luckily, Trudeau is not driven by corporate money so he can be a little more radical than lets say, previous liberal candidates, who just tried to be middle ground candidates.

We will agree to disagree, there are far more min wage workers than 30% in Ontario. It is. I agree, and $15 is that amount. No government subsidies for businesses who cannot afford to employ workers. We cannot have a race to the bottom, most countries like China and India have lower cost and low labor and lower electric and heat. It is better to have unemployment, than a large class of working poor people who are working but cannot even afford a basic living.

It really should. then we don't have to pay taxes to support the large welfare class in the jobless north and east and west and central regions. Those people pay no taxes, they are all welfare queens, why should they get anything but crumbs?

For the last 9 years, Harper was ruling until just what 1-2 years ago when Trudeau got elected. If the economy is in the dump, Harper put it there.

So your solution is to run a Harper clone, when the real Harper LOST in a land slide to Trudeau? Whose side are you on? Are you a closet Trudeau supporter? Americans in applachia with the inbreeding have very low IQ's, they voted for Trump thinking he'd get the non-whites screwed over, but now they are losing are their welfare and government handouts. The West was very poor until oil showed up. Lets not kid ourselves. The West is living off of Quebec and Ontario, with all the mass layoffs, your people even elected NDP. If the largest economy in Canada is broke, then what is Alberta's tiny economy?

Given that most jobs in Ontario are minimum wage low paying jobs, and the province's business class greediness has caused them to push wages down to nothing for most people, there is a large class of under 40 workers working min wage retail jobs. $15 min wage will basically guarantee Wynns re-election while knocking the sails out of the NDP far left and putting the conservative in a bind where they will have to argue why poor people don't deserve $2 an hour wage increase while they voted for tens of thousands of dollars in wages for themselves and favoring large payouts for large CEO and business directors. Like it or not, she is clever politician and this basically ensure Wynn will win the masses of voters who are working in $11 an hour retail, restaurant, hotel, etc jobs. The conservative party is in real trouble provincially.

1. Harper was from Toronto and moved out West, BIG DIFFERENCE. Harper had a minority government because the liberals ran a series of poor candidates, one who didn't live in the country, the other who spoke no English. Once Harper got a majority (which he only got because people got tired of having an election every 2 years, he was voted out the first chance Canadians had. Harper had several years to try to get some French MPs. Sheerer doesn't have that advantage. If he gets a minority government in 8 years because he won't win the next election, whose to say liberal and ndp won't form that coalition like they tried to, to block him? 2. Not really, Harper was deeply unpopular in Ontario. He really got elected once after a series of elections while luckily holding onto a minority government because alot of voters got tired of constant elections, which is why once they had the chance to boot him, they ran from him in a landslide. Sheerer opposing gay marriage makes him politically dead, it made it impossible for Harper to win a majority government for a long long time. Ontario, specifically Toronto is like the gay capital of the world. Sheerer won't win Quebec, won't win in toronto, he is at best competing for 2nd or 3rd place. 3. Sure myself included. However, that doesn't give Sheerer a chance in hell. 4. Where in the rest of Canada will these magical seats come from? Not the GTA, not BC, not quebec and maritimes. Face it, the conservatives are a regional party except when Liberals run terrible candidates. Even the NDP would have a better chance of forming a government at this point. The country has swung to the left. 3.

Look I get you are a pro-Trump guy. the problem is that type of politics just won't fly in Canada because the average IQ is probably higher among the white population up here than down here. There is a whole thing about inbred white folks from Appalachia who ain't that bright and will vote against their own interest. Sheer is already towards Trump, Harper tried to use coded racial language and he went from a majority party to a 3rd rate political party that got annihilated nationally and even provincially in his home province. Westerners are not even a homogenous political block. The conservative party lost to the NDP in Alberta, the NDP has historically been strong in Saskatchewan, the NDP are just forming a government with the Greens unseating the liberals in BC. So where is the magical Western separatist party going to form or come from? The East spent close to 100 years supporting the West before it was oil rich and the East is supporting you know, you'd literally be dead without central Ontario bailing out your province right now.

So if a gay player calls another gay a kike or vermin or untermenschken, is that cool too?

I believe that the conservatives knew they'd lose the 2019 election. Trudeau is too popular right now and enjoys too much support to lose the next election, Harper imploded his own party. That is why their best canidates like Kenny and Mackay chose not to run. The best candidate the conservatives had was probably bernier or chong. Sheer's election has guaranteed that Trudeau will win again. 1. Sheer is a Western Canadian with poor french running against a francophone liberal. 2. Central Canada particularly Ontario has become increasingly more liberal and it will be almost impossible for a social conservative to win without cracking this region and it is almost impossible for a social conservative to win this region. 3. Trudeau has pivoted to the left of the ndp making it hard for anyone to beat him. 4. There are 4 maritime provinces who are dependent on government handouts mostly federal. No real conservative will crack these areas.