blackbird

Why don't you be honest for a change? Trudeau jets around the world for some conference or meeting or another practically every week or so. He can wine and dine at taxpayer's expense and enjoy all the benefits without calling it a vacation. That's why he loves Canada being globalist. It gives him endless vacations.

How would you buy food, gas, etc.?

"Since 2016, the federal government has spent $4.7 billion on its Middle East strategy, Hussen said. " 'Deepening unemployment crisis' among Iraqi youth prompts $9.9M federal investment | CBC News That is incredible. We have a health care crisis, a housing crisis, and many other needs in Canada; yet the government saw fit to spend 4.7 billion dollars in the Middle East. They have absolutely no concept of money. That is hard-earned Canadian taxpayer's money. They spend it on other countries like water. Fix Canadian problems. This is shocking. I said in another post that Canada is a post-national state. Liberals could care less about Canadians and Canada. It is all about globalism and trying to build a name for Trudeau and liberals on the world stage. Maybe retire with a job in the U.N.

That was referring to individuals, not nations. Big difference. Can't you see it refers to one person talking to another? If it meant nations or immigrants, it would have said so. I use the real Bible, the King James Version 1611. Not pseudo at all. Only in your mind.

Who let this cougar guy into Canada anyway? He is a known sh_t disturber.

You are misunderstanding the Bible completely. Those verses are referring individual charity. What comes out of your pocket and who you want to bring into your own home. But that would be dangerous today because of all the criminals. It is referring to a personal situation. A country has to be careful about letting immigrants in as too many or the wrong kind can cause major problems as we see now with the housing crisis. A nation has a perfect right to have borders and limit and control who comes in. All countries do this and always have. You can invite strangers into your home if you wish, but you cannot use other people's money to bring thousands of immigrants into the country. That is stealing other people's money. Contrary to what you said, there are many criminals in other countries that should not be allowed in. There are also extremists. There are billions of Muslims in the world and they are totally against western values and Christianity.

Wow! Those verses have absolutely nothing to do with the subject of immigration. Do you just pick verses out of the blue and think you can fool people?

You have proven your own ignorance on almost every topic. Every country has borders and exercises the power to decide who can come in. There is nothing against that in the Bible. Try again.

It is an attack on Canadian citizens as many of the passengers held citizenship. It is a result of bringing in people who want to carry on their terrorist activities from Canada. Canada brought in an unknown number of Nazis after WW2. One of them ended up being cheered and clapped for in Parliament a few months ago. You never mentioned the 700 people associated with the terrorist organization IRGC in Iran either. Canada is a haven for these kind of people. We also have seen thousands of people demonstrating in Canada for Palestine. We don't need that.

The big problem with Canada is liberals and left don't believe in a sovereign country of Canada. They now believe Canada is the property of the U.N. and the whole world should be able to come in if they wish and live here. That is why we had open borders allowing illegal migrants to pour in. It is also why the government plans to take in half a million immigrants a year from the third world. It's the reason why Canada allows the U.N. to run Canada and Canada meekly bowed and adopted the U.N. Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People without having a clue what it meant. If you examine the document you will find it basically gives Canada back to the aboriginal people (5% of the population) and forces Canada to pay them an unlimited amount of money for everything under the sun.

Are you dense? I referred to Caucasians because they are the European founding people's descendants who are threatened. Why is ok to talk about FN, aboriginals, or blacks but Caucasians are not allowed to use the word? Get a grip.

So its all just hyped up talk. No terrorist attacks. How many have been convicted of a terrorism? NONE How many were even involved in this so-called Atomwaffen in Canada? 2 men?

That is nonsense. Where were the terrorist attacks by neo-Nazis in Canada? Already told you. It's not the colour as I said. It's the conflict with our historic Judeo-Christian culture that is the problem. These people do not assimilate and want nothing to do with us except the social services and benefits.

Nothing stupid about it at all. The fact is the third world immigrants don't share the same culture or assimilate. I already told you that. Are you deaf?

We have had some terrorist attacks. In 1985 they blew up an Air India passenger plane full of people holding Canadian citizenship. Around 300 people were killed. Some people from Canada went over to the middle east to join ISIS. There was an attempted terrorist attack on trains in Ontario some years ago. There have been the odd terrorist attack which the government has avoided calling a terrorism attack. I think there was one in Edmonton a few years ago committed by a terrorist who got in as an illegal migrant. The news reported recently that there are about 700 people in Canada that are linked to the terrorist IRGC in Iran. Canada is a refuge for terrorists even though there are not presently terrorist attack.

The problem is not the colour of the skin. The problem is many third world immigrants do not assimilate in with the traditional European founding people. They remain separate in their own little enclaves. Their beliefs conflict with traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs and culture. It is like trying to mix water and oil.

"While there are no accurate figures representing the number or composition of undocumented migrant population in Canada, estimates range between 20,000 and 500,000 persons." CIMM – Undocumented Populations – March 3, 2022 - Canada.ca Can you believe it? The Canadian government has no clue how many people are in Canada illegally. They admit it could be anywhere from 20 thousand to 500 thousand or half a million. This must be a huge contributing factor to the housing crisis and homelessness. What a mess! One problem is Caucasian Canadians, such as the European founding people's descendants are a threatened people. They are having fewer children than the third world immigrants and FN people. The number of children per Caucasian family is lower than the minimum number of 2.1 required for survival. They are actually a diminishing people in Canada.

That is not how the history of the Apocrypha went. This article says Jesus and New Testament authors never directly quoted the Apocrypha. Some early church "fathers" did quote from it. But the Roman church has a history of error and false teaching so that would be no surprise. Protestant church leaders were not perfect. Nobody is perfect except God. Men have made mistakes throughout history. Before the Reformation in the 1500s, the main church in the western world was the Roman church controlled from the Papacy in Rome. They had a lot of error including the Apocrypha. Not everyone agreed with it either. But the ordinary people did not even have a copy of Bible. Very few people even had a copy of any Holy Scripture before the printing press was invented around the 1500s. Roman Catholic priests may have had some copies of their Latin Vulgate through the middle ages, but few other people had access to it. Here is an article that gives some detail about the history of the Apocrypha. Those books were not considered as Holy Scripture by many down through the ages. They were not included as Holy Scripture by major Protestant denominations. God has preserved the Holy Scriptures in the form of the 66 books of the Bible without the Apocrypha since the time of the Reformation. quote Thirty-nine Articles (1571), article 6: “And the other Books (as Jerome saith) the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine.” Belgic Confession (1561) 6: “The church may certainly read these books and learn from them as far as they agree with the canonical books. But they do not have such power and virtue that one could confirm from their testimony any point of faith or of the Christian religion. Much less can they detract from the authority of the other holy books.” Westminster Confession of Faith (1647) 1.3: “The books commonly called Apocrypha, not being of divine inspiration, are no part of the canon of the Scripture, and therefore are of no authority in the church of God, nor to be any otherwise approved, or made use of, than other human writings.” unquote A Brief History of the Apocrypha - Westminster Theological SeminaryWestminster Theological Seminary (wts.edu)

You must be referring to the Apocrypha. That is a group of books that the Catholic church has in their Old Testament Catholic Bibles. It was rejected by Protestants because it did not appear to be divinely inspired. God promised he would preserve his words. " 6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. 7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever." Psalm 12:6, 7 KJV

I don't think the translators working on the new translation from 1604 to 1611 were editing and removing part of the Bible. What gave you that idea? They were translating from the Masoretic Hebrew (Old Testament) and from the Greek Textus Receptus (Received Text) into English.

No, the prophecy is future and yet to be fulfilled. The Devil is still loose.

quote Such a man (the King) was sure to have enemies. One such man, Anthony Weldon, had to be excluded from the court. Weldon swore vengeance. It was not until 1650, twenty-five years after the death of James that Weldon saw his chance. He wrote a paper calling James a homosexual. Obviously, James, being dead, was in no condition to defend himself. The report was largely ignored since there were still enough people alive who knew it wasn't true. In fact, it lay dormant for years, until recently when it was picked up by Christians who hoped that vilifying King James, would tarnish the Bible that bears his name so that Christians would turn away from God's book to a more "modern" translation. It seems though, that Weldon's false account is being once again largely ignored by the majority of Christianity with the exception of those with an ulterior motive, such as its author had. It might also be mentioned here that the Roman Catholic Church was so desperate to keep the true Bible out of the hands of the English people that it attempted to kill King James and all of Parliament in 1605. unquote Chick.com: Was King James a homosexual?

I don't quite follow that second sentence. Are you saying the Church of England believed the KJV was divine revelation? Or are you saying something else? If you are serious about finding out the truth of the matter, you would need to take a little time and do some reading. There is a large website that has hundreds of articles, audio messages, etc. that explain a lot. The King James Bible Defended! (jesus-is-savior.com) If you could take the time, just this one article explains a lot and answers some of your arguments: Is the King James Bible Inspired Or Preserved? (jesus-is-savior.com) If the KJB is inspired and preserved, then indeed it is God's divine revelation to man. There are many reasons why this is a fact. But if you have not read them and understood it, that would explain why you don't believe it. God and his revelation are supernatural matters. You can't approach it with a natural mind or thinking. It must be approached from a spiritual view. There is a natural world and there is a spiritual world. We have a soul and a spirit which are related to the spiritual world.

I won't quote long passages because you probably won't read them. Just a short verse. " 10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. " Revelation 20:10 KJV God has His plan and time for doing things. The book of Revelation is partly about the future events which will happen. He certainly is the Almighty God. Many will find this out in due course. You might wonder why you should believe this. The answer is there are many prophecies which were written centuries ago and did in fact come to pass.

quote KING JAMES The VI Of Scotland & I Of England Unjustly Accused? "Royalty, Rumors and Racists" (jesus-is-savior.com) Anyone should know the Devil would use something like that to try to discredit God's written revelation to man. Some people are so easily deceived. Very few people believe that nonsense. You are a rare person indeed. So the phony claims are not having much affect. Perhaps the rumour was started by Jesuits who really have tried to destroy the KJV. They tried to blow up the British Parliament too but were caught and failed. The KJV (or KJB) has been used by hundreds of millions of people in the world down through the centuries. There is not an inkling in it to show King James had any influence on it. In fact, it condemns homosexuality and other unnatural behavior. It exalts the traditional family of a man and wife. Why would King James allow it to be produced if he was that kind of person? Makes no sense to begin with.