blackbird

Still I don't think anyone is claiming something comes from nothing. They are claiming or you claim something about quantum fields. Such a thing is something. If a field exists, it is not nothing. These are all just theories pulled out of hat. There is no proof that a big bang ever occurred and no proof just how such a purported big bang happened or what made it happen. The bottom line is the universe is very complex and governed by the laws of physics. So the question remains. who created it? Who designed and put in force the laws of physics, the atoms, molecules, protons, neutrons, electrons, gravity, the energy spectrum, etc. etc.? Something like that just does not happen by itself out of the blue. Every scientists will tell you every effect had a cause. I believe most scientists agree there had to be a beginning at some point in time. So what caused it and what designed it?

You said "quantum fluctuation" which means nothing. You will have to do a better job explaining yourself if you want anybody to take it seriously. It shouldn't be that hard to explain unless you just pulled the words out of a book somewhere. Any honest scientist would tell you something does not come from nothing. So where did the big bang come from? Most scientists will tell you there had to be a beginning at some point. What caused that beginning and what was it, in layman's terms? Of course they have something to hide. They don't want to admit they simply don't know the answer. So they come up with a bizarre theory with no explanation of where it came from or how it started.

LOL. Good obfuscation.

What does that mean? You love to throw out sound bites that have no meaning. You still have not explained where the big bang came from.

Psychiatry in general appears to support gender transitioning and does not oppose it. What does that tell you? They have no common sense or moral compass. Position Statement on Treatment of Transgender (Trans) and Gender Diverse Youth (psychiatry.org)

What caused the big bang and where did the material come from?

I've got news for you. The truth is psychiatry and psychology in general is way off base and untrustworthy. Did you know the American Psychological Association denies sex is binary and supports a range of gender identities? " “Psychologists understand that gender is a nonbinary construct that allows for a range of gender identities and that a person’s gender identity may not align with sex assigned at birth.” (APA, 2015, p. 834)." Their national association passed a resolution supporting this. APA Resolution on Gender Identity Change Efforts Yet you support these people making critical (subjective) claims in court concerning murderers.

Except that God is a reality in the here and now. Where do you think everything came from? "7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction." Proverbs 1:7 Afraid you have lost all credibility some time ago just with your comments concerning Israel and the middle east conflict alone.

Hard drugs, marijuana, liquor and illicit sex and porn are also providing relief to millions, in their way of thinking.

"Utter BS": Sajjan responds to allegations he instructed Canadian special forces to rescue Afghan Sikhs | Watch (msn.com)

We're talking about the problem of the NCR. If you think accusing me is a good argument go for it. I don't believe murderers should get off because someone says they have mental problems. Pretty simple but you don't get it.

Hate to have to tell you, but the article I gave you says otherwise. Psychiatry is a very doubtful and questionable practice.

We are talking about the NCR as a defence in court for crimes like murder. Check this article out: "What psychiatrists still don't know about mental illness" " Anne Harrington puts it plainly: "We don't understand any major mental disorder biologically." The Harvard historian of science takes no pleasure in relating this surprising fact. She knows that people with depression, schizophrenia and bipolar conditions want better treatments for their symptoms. She also acknowledges that psychiatrists and researchers ARE "working hard to change that situation." But her book, Mind Fixers: Psychiatry's Troubled Search for the Biology of Mental Illness, surveys a flawed medical field that has been unable to come to any clear consensus around the causes of — or cures for — mental illness. " What psychiatrists still don't know about mental illness | CBC Radio If psychiatrists don't know about mental illness, how can they be used in court to determine the guilt or innocence of an alleged murderer?

Using mental illness or temporary mental illness as an excuse to escape conviction for crime is not acceptable in my view. Psychiatry is often highly questionable. Diagnosing someone as having been mentally ill is very questionable and subjective opinion. Their opinion on someone being temporarily insane when they committed a crime should be highly suspicious. You should know I don't believe in exorcists, priests and bonfires. You are talking about something in the Roman church in the middle or dark ages, which was not Biblical. " Anti-psychiatry, sometimes spelled antipsychiatry,[1] is a movement based on the view that psychiatric treatment is often more damaging than helpful to patients, highlighting controversies about psychiatry. Objections include the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis, the questionable effectiveness and harm associated with psychiatric medications, the failure of psychiatry to demonstrate any disease treatment mechanism for psychiatric medication effects, and legal concerns about equal human rights and civil freedom being nullified by the presence of diagnosis. Historical critiques of psychiatry came to light after focus on the extreme harms associated with electroconvulsive therapy or insulin shock therapy.[2] The term "anti-psychiatry" is in dispute and often used to dismiss all critics of psychiatry, many of whom[who?] agree that a specialized role of helper for people in emotional distress may at times be appropriate, and allow for individual choice around treatment decisions. Beyond concerns about effectiveness, anti-psychiatry might question the philosophical and ethical underpinnings of psychotherapy and psychoactive medication, seeing them as shaped by social and political concerns rather than the autonomy and integrity of the individual mind. They may believe that "judgements on matters of sanity should be the prerogative of the philosophical mind", and that the mind should not be a medical concern. Some activists reject the psychiatric notion of mental illness.[3] Anti-psychiatry considers psychiatry a coercive instrument of oppression due to an unequal power relationship between doctor, therapist, and patient or client, and a highly subjective diagnostic process. Involuntary commitment, which can be enforced legally through sections, is an important issue in the movement. When sectioned, involuntary treatment may also be legally enforced by the medical profession against the patient's will." Anti-psychiatry - Wikipedia

I don't deny mental impairment exists. In fact, it is the way much of society is. However, that does not excuse evil and is not an excuse to get away with murder or anything else. Once society starts doing that, they are on a slippery slope and nobody can expect to be safe and justice will disappear as it often has now. You think would be criminals don't know this? Simple as that.

" 3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: 4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: "" Romans 13:3, 4 KJV The powers that be are to exercise their authority and punish evil doers. Doesn't say anything at all about letting criminals off if someone says they have mental problems, or any of various other problems such as homelessness, being a visible minority, etc. etc. Again "for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil." Get it?

Is that your excuse?

I don't think there is any other reason. Criminals know they will get off lightly or get away with crime entirely on the Montreal transit system. This is the same with the constant catch and release of offenders across Canada. Toronto is experiencing it with about 40% of people arrested for car theft are people out on bail. " The Montreal metro's special constables are warning of a major hike in crime on the city's underground public transport system. With summer festivals and tourism spiking, they feel it's only likely to get worse. The union representing the special constables said there are around 200 calls for help every day and that there were around 30,000 calls in the first six months of 2024. In 2023, there were 47,000 total. Most of the calls, they said, are for assaults, fights and theft. In April, two random attacks on the same night at the same station led to an increase in security, including more patrols and the closure of an Atwater station entrance. STM union vice president Kevin Grenier is worried about what the festival season will bring. "We have these big festivals where a lot of people are using the metro," he said. "It creates an opportunity for different crimes, especially theft." As a response, the STM points to the 14 security ambassadors it has already hired, with another dozen coming in July. The agency also added 16 more special constables at the end of 2023. "Since the pandemic we've seen a rise in the number of vulnerable people and cases of incivility caused primarily by intoxication, mental health and the housing crisis," the STM said. "Despite a difficult financial context, security is one of the only areas we've increased spending every year." Grenier said, however, that despite the STM saying it knows the cause, there aren't many solutions. "We really need concrete actions from the government because everyone agrees there is a problem, but no one has done anything," he said. With 700,000 trips taken every day, he said constables are already struggling to keep up. " With that kind of crime on the Montreal transit system, who would feel safe in using it? People still have to go to work, appointments, doctors, etc. What a sad state of affairs. Again the justice system is failing to protect society. Major crime hike on Montreal metro concerns special constables | CTV News The justice system as it is lets people off very lightly if they were intoxicated, on drugs, mental health issues, housing issues, or they are FN or a racial minority. There are many excuses used. Criminals know this too.

Every person who commits murder or some other crime did it because their mind was evil or faulty. There is no excuse for murder or crime. The idea that people are somehow mentally not responsible is an idea from the pit of hell, i.e. the work of Satan. People like yourself believe anything that liberals and progressives put forward. Mental health psychiatrists are no more qualified than anyone else to judge who should be declared not criminally responsible because the whole idea is wrong. Of course psychiatrists are going to be used by defence lawyers and go to court because that is what they get paid for. It is a good-paying business. People who commit murder etc. are responsible for their crimes and always have been all through history. Families of victims should not have to put up with this garbage any longer. The whole thing is a clear sign of a decadent and fallen society. It is a crime against society and families of victims to be put through the wringer endlessly in courts and hearings to decide parole or conditional releases of murders, etc.

"An earlier trial found he was experiencing psychosis at the time of the killings and believed he was saving his children from sexual and physical abuse. Schoenborn was found not criminally responsible and in 2017, a B.C. Supreme Court justice ruled that he doesn't meet the criteria to be designated as a high-risk offender." Wow! A guy who murdered his three kids is not a "high-risk offender"??? How does a judge come to that conclusion? Is he able to read people's minds into the future? Seriously, this strikes me as bizarre. This kind of thing is one the major problems with having such a designation of "not criminally responsible". Once some judge in his infinite wisdom (tongue in cheek) makes a so-called NCR ruling, society is now at risk. The relatives of the offender must continually suffer knowing the offender, who could quite possibly be dangerous, may be released on day passes and other release arrangements. According to the law judges have been given the power of some kind of god. This problem comes from the federal government and laws that enabled the NCR designation. This hug-a-thug mentality is the same reason we have been seeing catch and release and the ongoing problems of dangerous and repeat offenders continually victimizing innocent citizens in Canada. It was recently reported that 40% of cars are being stolen or 40% of the arrested offenders are people who were released on bail or parole. It is just a revolving door and the criminal justice system is broken. NCR originated from the same kind of mentality. Hug-a-thug. " A hearing to decide whether a B.C. killer could continue to go out in public unescorted ended abruptly and without a decision on Wednesday, after the man shouted at members of the B.C. Review Board and his lawyer quit the case. Allan Schoenborn yelled an expletive as the board chair asked his treating psychiatrist about what risks he may pose to children in public. "If a child gets on the train, [do] you want me to get off the train? No booze, no women, no alcohol, no drugs and no children: Is that what it's going to be?" Schoenborn asked. Schoenborn's outburst and concurrent legal issues derailed Wednesday's hearing at the Forensic Psychiatric Hospital (FPH) in Coquitlam, B.C., where Schoenborn has been institutionalized since 2010. Allan Schoenborn granted overnight leave from psychiatric hospital, 14 years after killing his 3 children In 2008, Schoenborn stabbed and smothered his children Kaitlynne, 10, Max, 8, and Cordon, 5, inside the family trailer in Merritt, B.C. An earlier trial found he was experiencing psychosis at the time of the killings and believed he was saving his children from sexual and physical abuse. Schoenborn was found not criminally responsible and in 2017, a B.C. Supreme Court justice ruled that he doesn't meet the criteria to be designated as a high-risk offender." Hearing for B.C. man who killed his 3 children adjourned over outburst, legal issues | CBC News This whole problem could have been avoided if there were no such thing as a not criminally responsible ruling or legislation in Canada. As it stands, the justice system is broken and caught in a bind between a rock and a hard place. This law puts society at risk.

This is a surprising revelation, but I guess we shouldn't be too surprised with what the Liberal government under Trudeau has been doing. New shocking revelations seem to come out regularly. After all Trudeau's gang has been sending billions of dollars all over the world for various causes. Money is of no concern. Putting people with a foreign religion in charge of a major government department with this kind of result should come as no surprise. What is next? " OTTAWA — The Canadian Armed Forces was following "legal orders" when it tried to rescue a group of Afghan Sikhs during the fall of Kabul three years ago, Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Wayne Eyre said. Eyre's comment came as former defence minister Harjit Sajjan explained his decision to intervene on behalf of a group of around 200 Afghan Sikhs who were trapped along with thousands of others in August 2021. Sajjan said in a statement that he passed along information through "appropriate" channels that he had been given about the group's whereabouts and that doing so was in line with government policy to help vulnerable groups on the ground in Afghanistan. Sajjan said he did not instruct the forces to prioritize this group above Canadians or Afghan interpreters, who aided Canadian soldiers during previous operations. In an interview with The Canadian Press, Eyre said the military was following "legal orders" when it made an effort to specifically help the group of Afghan Sikhs." Military was following 'legal orders' to try to rescue Afghan Sikhs, Gen. Eyre says (msn.com)

You are changing your story now. You wanted everyone who talked to a politician to be on camera. Now are talking about conversations between public officials. Cabinet meetings have always been private. Government officials have a right to discuss business privately. You already have public viewing available for Parliament and Parliamentary committee meetings.

If China is allowed to take over the EV business, that would put Canadian EV manufacturers out of business. Secondly, they could easily use EVs to spy on Canadians. Thirdly, the quality of the EVs might be very poor. Fourthly, the EVs could be controlled remotely and be shut down.

You simply don't understand what we're talking about. You don't solve the problem of foreign interference by taking away everyone's freedom in Canada to speak to their MPs. You would be playing right into Communist China's hands. They are an authoritarian country and want us to be too. We are not China. We have to do things differently from Communist China.

Communist China is a threat in every way possible. They are not just another trading partner. Most politicians never understood this. Pierre Trudeau was sucked by the Communists back in 1970. Canada never learned much since then.