Goddess

Saskatchewan is prepared to cut BC off, too, now. http://business.financialpost.com/commodities/energy/saskatchewan-issues-threat-of-its-own-to-b-c-as-trans-mountain-pipeline-battle-escalates

I like this guy: Clarence Louie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_Louie We need to clone him 600 times and send him out to all the "nations". Google some of the articles written about him - he's an interesting character.

I think it's very sad that you completely miss the point of what Jesus was saying here. He was not addressing the issue of homosexuality, nor identifying or classifying the sexes. No matter how you try to twist the above words - homosexuality was not what was being discussed here, nor was that the main point of Jesus' comments. Your giant red lettering is not emphasizing the main point Jesus was making and also does not prove your point that Jesus hates gays. In fact, Jesus said nothing about homosexuality and neither should those who profess to follow him. No mental gymnastics, no fun with words, no inferring necessary.

I'll wash them for you. Have a lovely day

I think it's YOUR beliefs that more closely match the beliefs of those groups.

You're absolutely right, Betsy - the Bible is clearly stating that gay people do not deserve the love, affection, companionship, etc of a relationship. How dare they....... Lovely book you're following, BTW. Where can I sign up?

Right on, Betsy! There's companionship, partnership, affection, mutual goals and purposes, sex for enjoyment, adoption of children, health benfits, psychological benefits and legal/tax benefits.........and NONE of those things are exclusive to hetero relationships.

Because we live in a predominantly "white" area of the planet, so our TV and advertising is geared towards "white" people.

Here's my idea to simplify the tax code: 1. How much money did you make this year? 2. How much did you spend? 3. How much do you have left? 4. Send it in.

Toodles! Have fun judging and condemning!

LOL I'm not starting threads to judge people - whether they be homosexuals or adulterers. Maybe you're the one who should keep your emotions in check......

You did just say this, did you not?

.....with your own interpretation. AND started a thread to let all the homos know they are going straight to hell. Wakey, wakey - you're speaking for Him.

Probably you shouldn't speak for Him, then.

"Shake Hands With the Devil" - ya, Rwanda showed Mr. Dallaire how little Western countries can do when it comes to religious fanaticism.

When are we going to learn to stay out of these brutal squabbbles? We completely underestimate the level of religious fanaticism in those parts of the world.

The Kadhr's don't believe in it and you welcome them.

So a gay couple couldn't send in a straight freind to buy the cake. Which means they are still discriminating against gays.

But only to certain people.

Not really. What if the lesbian couple wants 200 cupcakes for their wedding? Or 6 dozen cookies for their LGBQT meeting? Do they ask everybody what their purchases are going to be used for?

Put up a sign saying "We don't serve homosexuals". Simple.

Maybe Christian owners of businesses should put up signs to indicate who they will refuse service to? "NOTICE: We do not serve homosexuals, adulterers, revilers, liars, anyone who eats shellfish or animals with cloven hooves, anyone who works on the Sabbath, doesn't honor their parents, anyone who mixes cottons and polyblends, or menstruating women. Jesus might love you, but we sure don't. Have a nice day!" Seriously, though. They should put up signs indicating who they refuse service to.

The occasion is a wedding. Obviously they are not refusing because it will be used in a wedding. They are refusing because they have determined that the couple are sinners and don't deserve to be served.

But, F*$@K everyone else's consciences? I don't believe religious rights should trump human rights.

I think the Muslim "chick" already has a thread on why homosexuals need to die. Maybe you could just add to that one.