Jump to content

Goddess

Senior Member
  • Posts

    10,058
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    93

Everything posted by Goddess

  1. Care to answer my question above? I am interested in the answer. How did authorities determine that your friend's mother got covid from that one family member and not from a grocery store, pharmacy, restaurant, or other vaxxed person? I am sorry that the vax did nothing to protect your friend's mom.
  2. How did they determine definitively that the mom caught it from a family member who was not vaxxed? Did she never leave the house? Never went to the grocery store or pharmacy? Never ate out at a restaurant? And only ever had contact with that one member of her family? How did they determine this? I ask because few places are doing contact tracing anymore. And it's increasing obvious that both vaxxed and unvaxxed spread covid. There was a nightclub in BC (Blue Grotto? I think) posted on facebook that in spite of checking everyone's vax passes before the show, almost 60 people caught covid that evening - all vaxxed. There wasn't one unvaxxed person there that they could blame it on.
  3. "Not fully vaccinated" includes: People who just had one dose (some had adverse reactions to the first dose and refuse the second dose) People who had their 2nd shot less than 2 weeks prior It's a shady way of counting who is in the hospital, but I also understand why they do it - because your system is actually immuno-compromised for 2 weeks after each shot. You are actually at GREATER risk of contracting covid and a multitude of other infections and diseases for 2 weeks after each shot. There are multiple studies coming out now that show the double-vaxxed immunity is waning very quickly and frighteningly, going into the negative. Which is exactly what many scientists and immunologists warned would happen and why they say in the next few years, cancers, neurological disorders, auto-immune diseases will skyrocket. (Haha, I used Boges' word) Saved from a 0.5% chance of dying of covid to opening yourself up to dying from a multitude of things in just a few years. Quite the trade-off.
  4. Imagine EVERY school in the US having several children die and more with life-altering neurological disorders, heart attacks and strokes. How can anybody think this is worth it? This means more healthy children will die from the vaccine than from covid.
  5. I'm not sure why the CDC would recommend an experimental vaccine, with no long-term studies and no studies at all for pregnant women. (Well, I do know why they're pushing it, come hell or high water.) CDC also said thalidomide was safe for pregnant women. That didn't turn out so good. I guess each individual would have to weight the evidence (or lack of it, according to Pfizer's own information I cited above) from all these different sources. Which is why it should be up to the individual.
  6. https://theexpose.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfizer-covid-vaccine-in-clinical-trial/ Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) (fda.gov) If you download the appendix to the Pfizer trial research.. there is another table. Where it shows there were 2 severe or life threatening adverse reactions after the 1st dose of Pfizer..in 1131 children (and children with drawn from the trial given that only really healthy kids would get ‘volunteered for a trial.. real world this could be higher. 2 severe or life threatening adverse reaction, out of 1131.. is the equivalent, of about 2 per secondary school… there are thousands of secondary schools. On those figures hundreds could be at risk of dying… It goes on to say this: It doesn't bother you that there are no studies completed with regard to pregnant women, yet pregnant women are being forced to take it? When whistleblowers are coming forward to report 10X the usual number of stillbirths in vaccinated women, this doesn't alarm you. At all? Very small, very short studies on children and no studies on pregnant women - WHY are we forcing this vaccine on everyone? I would use other sites like VAERS and VigiAccess but you've already made it known that you do not put any credence to them.
  7. Actually it was. And more young people are being disabled and dying from the vaccine. Let's see those stats every day.
  8. Funny how before the vaccine, the age of those dying was to be ignored, but now we are to consider that as a factor in the vaccine's uselessness.
  9. I think making them wear them, and instilling fear of everything is more than just pointless. It's damaging to young children. Your hysteria feeds into these nonsense rules. Please. Knock it off. The interview with the pediatrician/scientist had absolutely nothing to do with vaccine efficacy or anything else. It was a straight forward study on what isolation is doing to young children. Yes, old people matter. No one has said otherwise. They are, however, more susceptible to flus and pneumonias. Demanding young people risk the adverse side effects of a vax that in no way benefits them, is selfish in the extreme. Never before has the elderly population demanded that young people risk heart attacks and death to "save" them from flu season. If the vax worked, then they would have nothing to fear. Covid is real. It's a bit worse than the seasonal flu. There are lots of ways to stay healthy and avoid the flu/covid. There are enough studies to show that mass vaccinations, especially forced ones during a pandemic is a really bad idea. Vaccines are not really reducing much - as shown by the large numbers of vaxxed people getting covid, spreading covid and dying from covid. If your vaccine worked, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Wakey Wakey - it doesn't do what it's supposed to do - no surprise to all the scientist, immunologists and biologists who said this from the beginning. Again, the people who just want to be left alone are not the extremists. The people who just want to be left alone are not the hysterical ones.
  10. And none of this would be an issue if we actually had a vaccine that worked. The only reason all these ones are in hysterics is because they know - it doesn't work.
  11. There's a rumour that Trudeau is a major shareholder in the Canadian company that invented the lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine. Which would be a huge conflict of interest. He would be making money off every vax administered in the world. I'm trying to find out if this is true. Would it make any difference to some of you, if it was true? Would you care?
  12. Toronto students told not to talk at lunch to reduce the spread of COVID-19 | CTV News Kids asked not to yell ‘trick-or-treat’ as part of Quebec’s pandemic Halloween rules | Globalnews.ca This is the hysteria you promote.
  13. It's not weeks or months - it's years now. Simple common sense should tell you those are the formative years for children. I'm not the one hysterical about lockdowns, restrictions and vaccines - you are. Pretty sure the people who just want to be left alone are not the extremists here - it's you.
  14. You're a pediatrician? Wow, I had no idea. You should be somewhere in authority, you know soooooo much more than any of these professionals.
  15. Viral immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle speaks at medical freedom rally – Things That Matter
  16. Jon Nisbett - Must Watch: Suzanne Coles- Speaks at the Waterloo... | Facebook
  17. I know this makes you rejoice, but to me, it's sad. Like in the 60's before abortion was legal and women were dying from backroom procedures. Desperate people do desperate things.
  18. All of them except this vax. It didn't go through the "complete" trials. You are the trials. And so far it's killed more people than all the vaccines from the last 30 years.
  19. It's odd to me that authorities and people are willing wo be guinea pigs for an experimental vaccine but not ivermectin. It makes sense that if doctors are having success with it, it should be studied. But nope, we're going to put all our eggs into a vaccine basket. That's not even working.
  20. Really? After every doctor or scientist who has used it successfully or studied it has had their license revoked and been shamed by the bought-and-paid-for media? It's like that article on MSM that said, "Hey, if you had a severe reaction to Pfizer, don't worry, you can get all the shots and all the boosters! Ask your doctor first." Really? Ask my doctor? who gets his license taken away and publicly shamed when he gives an exemption? How many doctors are going to write exemptions now? None. I've never seen this level of censorship, bullying, manipulation lying and coercion since I left the JW's.
  21. Why are you sooooooo against anything that fights covid19 except a vaccination that doesn't actually prevent transmission or death? This is what I don't understand. You all are dead-set against anything not the vaccine. Wont' even look at it. Wont' consider it. Discount any scientists/doctors that are showing other treatments also work. Refuse to acknowledge natural immunity. Refuse to acknowledge that people who have looked after their bodies for years are at very little risk. FFS, if this virus is sooooo deadly that "we're all going to die!!!!!" you would think you would welcome anything that works. It's just bizarre to me. But I guess when all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.
  22. Yup. You want unvaxxed people to lose their jobs, be stripped of freedoms, be denied healthcare, be sent to camps and to die. Don't give a rat's patootie about you. And you dare call anyone else a "scourge on society".
  23. And doctors here are having their licenses revoked for prescribing it:
  24. I was watching an interview with a pediatrician/scientist who has started testing IQs in toddlers born just before all this and shortly after. He has found that they have lost an average of 20 IQ points - from lack of socialization, lack of seeing faces, lack of interaction. Likely will affect their learning abilities when (and if) they start school.
×
×
  • Create New...