Goddess

The point is - it could be used to treat anything any doctor felt it could be used to treat. Doctors were free to prescribe and use it as necessary - like Tylenol. Until it was successful - then it had to be eliminated so that the EUA for an experimental drug could happen.

There was no need for a "proper trial". It's a drug that's already been proven safe. We already know the proper dosage, we already know it's an efficient anti-viral, it makes sense that it would be a treatment for covid. And yes, if you read the trials for the covid vax, they were insufficient. Why do you think they are only authorized for EU? It's because they had to shortcut and release it to the public with few safety studies and zero long-term studies.

NEJM_LTE.pdf (skirsch.com) The authors of this paper show clearly that based on the data currently available, there is >82% spontaneous abortion rate at 82% rate. The key point is: we don’t know what the number is because nobody has the data and it shows that the CDC is pushing the vaccine on pregnant women even before the safety data is available! This has never happened before. In the past, we’ve always had to prove an intervention is safe BEFORE we recommend it to pregnant women. **As of June 11, there are 522 cases of spontaneous abortion after COVID-19 shots reported to VAERS. You do know that many women are reporting horrific menstrual cycles after the jab, right? Women and teenagers are reporting heavy bleeding of 50-80 days straight.

And then you cite a CDC page that shows no studies have been done on pregnancy and covid vaccines. Because there are no studies on pregnant women and covid vaccines. They're safe because the CDC and FDA says so? You know that all those commercials telling you that if you've been injured by a drug product you may be entitled to compensation - those drugs were all okayed by the CDC and the FDA. But at least they went through some type of testing before being released AND none of them were ever forced on the public.

Don't you find that nobody, literally nobody, wants to hear good news about Omicron or covid in general? It's like they love reveling in the dismalness of it all. I look at all the articles regarding studies about natural immunity and think YAY! All those "cases" are people with natural immunity, we can stop all this nonsense. But nope. Others look at that and say "Nope, that's terrible news, don't want that! I prefer force vaccinating everyone no matter what, in fact, starve them until they comply - fire them from jobs, ban them from grocery stores. Do whatever you need to do to force injections of experimental crap. That's what I want to see, not no natural immunity."

Yes, I'm very aware that Canada and the US do not want it being used for treating covid. They even went so far as having stockpiles of it destroyed so it couldn't be used. Ivermectin, up til now, was one of those all-purpose types of drugs that doctors could prescribe for anything they felt it would be a benefit for. Because it has no side effects, dosed properly. When it started to be used successfully in treating covid by frontline doctors who were actually working with covid patients (it is an anti-viral, donchaknow), Big Pharma knew they wouldn't be able to get EUA for their vaccines coming down the pipe if there was a successful treatment for covid. So they tanked Ivermectin and destroyed millions of doses, removed it from over the counter sales and rescinded licenses of frontline doctors who continued to prescribe it and went on a media rampage touting it as "horse de-wormer" knowing full well it's much more than that since millions of Africans take it weekly their whole lives to prevent malaria and other viruses. They also delisted it as a drug doctors could prescribe. It's estimated that 500,000 Americans died because of this. This quote is misleading for the reasons I gave you above. It was openly available for use as an antiviral or absolutely anything else doctors wanted to prescribe it for. Frontline doctors tried it out in order to save lives before the vax came out and they found it worked. No drug submissions or approvals were needed, it was already FDA approved for 65 years. There was no applications for clinical trials submitted because time was of the essence in saving lives. And once it was found to successfully treat covid, Big Pharma moved very quickly to have it submarined so no clinical trials could happen. All of this is actually exactly the playbook Fauci used to submarine pharmaceuticals that frontline doctors found worked for AIDS in the 80's and 90's, so that he could market AZT, which was one of the most toxic substances known to man. But thanks to Fauci, all that was kept a secret until journalists and the AIDS community started outing him. Check out Celia Farber's book "Serious Adverse Events - An Uncensored History of AIDS". You'll be blown away by how Fauci is using exactly the same playbook with covid as he did with AIDS. He's been a real-life Dr. Mengele for many years. They call him Teflon Tony.

I think the question he is referring to is this one: In other words: Do you believe everyone shares the same risk of dying from covid? I do know that you are not trying to be cruel. I am just trying to get help for my sister, who has now been suffering almost 6 months since the jabs, which she only got in order to travel and now cannot even do that. And there are many others, too - debilitating migraines, extreme fatigue, tics & twitches that don't allow them to work anymore, convulsions and seizures, deaths, neurological disorders, autoimmune disorders, heart attacks, strokes and heart weakening where previously there was no issues with these things until post-jab - hours, days or weeks after. I'm not sure why these ae being denied as happening, when they are the very adverse reactions to the jabs that are listed. There is no help or acknowledgement from the government and the victims are silenced by the media and Big Pharma of course had all governments sign off on any injuries or deaths, so we can't go after them, either. Putting your fingers in your ears, closing your eyes and screeching "Na Na Na Na, I can't hear you." isn't the way to go here. I'm truly thankful that not everyone experiences these adverse events. Glad you're one of the ones who are okay.

LOL Because it's already FDA approved. Like 65 years ago.

Erm, when death is an adverse reaction, it kinda is. Tests do not conclude until 2025. It has not been thoroughly tested until then. I'm happy for you. My sister is still suffering and so are thousands of other people. But great that you're okay! You must not have looked very hard. We already know that is not true, because of the shady way they count "deaths from covid". I don't know where you're getting your information from ( I do, really, MSM), but you are woefully uninformed.

Like all the other restrictions, banning from grocery stores has nothing, repeat - NOTHING - to do with health or safety. It's about forcing the vaccine on everyone. You comply, or you don't eat. Expect it to get much, much worse. Coronavirus not found in 957 grocery store samples | CTV News Surprisingly, this was in the Toronto Sun. I guess there's at least ONE journalist who's awake and still able to reason. FUREY: Canada, it's long overdue that we drop the COVID alarmism cycle | Toronto Sun

I'm wondering where the people who insist that the vaccine has no effect on fertility are getting their information from. @Boges @ Dialamah Care to share where it says it's perfectly safe for pregnant women? Because according to the package insert and the manufacturers, the vaccines were never tested on pregnant women: Package Insert - COMIRNATY (fda.gov) Page 13 Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Fact Sheet for Health Care Providers (fda.gov) Page 24 Is it ethical to force everyone to take this experimental vaccine - whose trials in humans are going to be for 2 years, humans are the guinea pigs - which has DEATH listed as an adverse event, and possible congenital/birth defects and has not been studied as to future fertility issues? If a pregnant woman reads this and decides she does not want to risk death or birth defects or be part of this experiment, should she lose her job? There are several places in Canada that are reporting large increases in still births - one said they usually see 1-2/month, and they saw over 85 from January to June this year. And Scotland has launched an investigation, also due to large increases in still births.

It takes about 10 years to get a new drug to market. mRNA vaccines, in spite of being studied for that long, have never been brought to market before because the animal trials all failed. While it seemed to have a good effect initially, the animals all became immuno-compromised, got a bunch of weird cancers and then died when exposed to the virus again. Pretty much exactly what we're seeing in the global human trials.

Something weird happened here, oopsy doodle

Just this statement alone tells me you do no independent research. Covid has not proven itself. In the information above, I told you how scientists have found now that the spike protein they are injecting into everyone is TOXIC and how what that means, is this: What else don't we know about it? Cus this was a pretty major blunder and has not been corrected.

The point, of course, which seems to have gone WHOOSH over your head, is that the vaccine has not. So why are we force vaccinating vast numbers of people?

It wasn't polite, you inferred I don't' do my own research. I know how to read a medical study, I understand a lot of the terminology and I know what to look for and I see the things they "don't" say or omit. I also look for biases by the authors - for instance, if they are a Pharma shill I take whatever they say with a grain of salt.

Really? Then why force vaccinate the entire population if we're still not sure if or how much death it causes?

Nope. You don't get to use that excuse. You pooh-poohed that explanation when it was being used to show that the majority of deaths from covid were in the extremely elderly and morbidly obese, amongst other comorbidities. In fact you shamed people who pointed out this by saying they didn't care about the people who were dying because they were old and ready to die anyways. So in reverse, you don't' care about the people dying from the vaccine because they were already going to die anyways? Is that what you're saying?

Evaluation of individual VAERS records show the cause of death is consistent with the mechanism of action of the vaccine and have no other explanation, e.g., a healthy 20 year old who dies in his sleep less than 24 hours after vaccination. What is your explanation for why reporting to VAERS exploded after this vaccine rollout, whereas for the last 3 decades, there was little in there? All fakes? All liars? Hmmmmm?

Where do you get the basis for saying there is no natural immunity, there are no deaths and there are no adverse reactions? From actual scientists and doctors or just MSM? Do you look up and read the scientific papers?

Directly from VAERS, confirmed by others. I know that VAERS doesn't matter to you guys. All lies in there, right?

Over half of the deaths reported to VAERS were within 72 hours of vaccination. The majority of adverse reactions have been in less than 1-2 of vaccination. You don't know this because you refuse to acknowledge vaccine deaths and adverse reactions.

It is backwards. We are injecting first, doing safety studies later. The cost-benefit analysis for children is non-existent; it is 1 to 2 lives per 1,000,000 assuming the vaccine is safe. But the vaccine isn’t safe. It has already killed at least one child who died after getting myocarditis already and that story was censored by social media. More importantly, the chance of permanent disability is quite high. Consider the case of 12-year old Maddie de Garay who is now permanently paralyzed, cannot walk and must eat via a feeding tube. She was part of the Pfizer clinical trial for 12-15 year olds which reported her result as “abdominal pain.” This trial had only 2,200 participants. This suggests that the rate of disability even for kids could be as high as 1 in 2,000. We don’t know since another trial wasn’t done. So that means the vaccine has the potential to disable 500 previously healthy kids for every life saved. Is it worth it, especially when safer alternatives are available? Shouldn’t we do a larger trial to find out the true number before we do a mass rollout to kids? Of course we should. But we aren’t. We are doing everything backwards, experimenting first, and looking at the data after the experiment. This is the biggest unregulated unaccountable medical experiment in the history of mankind. Censorship keeps these events from public view. Facebook has removed groups of over 200,000 people discussing vaccine side effects. If the vaccine was safe, that group would have nothing to talk about and there would be no reason to remove it. Vaccines that kill less than 25 people are pulled from the market. These have not been, after killing far more people than 25. Why not? For children - 4 deaths is the threshold for banning a vaccine. It is now well established in the peer reviewed literature that the spike protein is toxic. The vaccines cause the spike protein to be manufactured for up to 48 hours in all parts of the body including the brain thanks to the efficient delivery mechanism of the lipid nanoparticles and PEG. The spike proteins produced in these cells do not remain anchored as designed; they also break off the cell and become “free spike” which is even more dangerous since it can circulate in the blood. The net result is inflammation and micro-clotting inside all organs (including the brain) throughout the body as well as temporary opening of the blood brain barrier (which explains the severe migraine headaches). This explains the wide range of neurological symptoms after injection. The mechanism of action is confirmed by the adverse event reports. The VAERS database shows that over 6,000 people have possible vaccine-related deaths as well as over 300,000 SARs that are consistent with the mechanism of action. If we remove 500 “background deaths” in the VAERS system each year, we are left with over 5,500 “excess deaths” that are coincident with the vaccine rollout. The safety signals have been flashing “red” since January in VAERS, but nobody was paying attention (except for a few users on Twitter who were being ignored). This is a HUGE number of excess deaths and SARs. So the question for the CDC is “OK, if the vaccine did not kill these people, then what did?” The FDA knew that the biodistribution data on these vaccines would deliver the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs which contain the mRNA) to all parts of the body. But since they thought the spike protein was harmless, this wasn’t a cause for concern. Now that assumption was proven wrong, it should have sent alarm bells ringing. The drug companies should have been required to immediately do toxicology studies in NHPs and the amount of bound spike and free spike should have been measured. Of course, nothing of the sort ever happened because the FDA and CDC are all focused on reducing vaccine hesitancy, not safety. This is the scientist who invented the mRNA vax: C19 VAX REACTIONS - Home This UK paper shows that vaxxed people are 2.2X MORE likely to die of one of the variants. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation (publishing.service.gov.uk) That’s right… getting vaccinated actually increases your chances of dying from COVID if you get it. The perfect way to combat vaccine hesitancy is to allow a debate between the 2 camps of scientists - the ones paid off by Big Pharma and the ones who are unbiased and still doing the safety studies. But the bought off docs and scientists refuse, in spite of many invitations to openly discuss these things.

I think it comes down to who you gonna believe? You choose the docs and scientists who are being paid by Big Pharma. I choose the ones without bias, those with no horse in the race. Like the scientist who invented mRNA vaccines. And the scientist who invented the PCR tests. And the front-line doctors, who are all losing their licenses for early treating of covid, instead of just waiting around for people to die.

I'm on 2 different discussion boards for people who have been injured or had a loved one die from the vaccine. I think it's truly evil that you believe they are all liars. When all this is finally dealt with, I would hope you would feel bad about your comments. But I doubt you will. Not everyone wants jabs every 4 months for the rest of their lives.