Goddess

The majority of people were in no danger of dying from covid.

You post her letter but none of the press conferences and updates she held regarding the letter. Groot is correct. There are a lot of questions on the Oct. 19 Alberta referendum regarding immigration levels and TFWs. It's not so much Smith "telling people what they want to hear" as she is quite active in finding out what Albertans want and then acting on it. I don't agree with ALL of her positions, but I agree with most of them. Albertans are active and vocal followers of politics in Canada, I would say more so than any other province. In spite of it being a very conservative province, Smith gets her fair share of questioning from the press. This is quite different than what YOU get. YOU support ALL of Carney's views no matter what. You poop your pants any time someone here pushes against his narratives or questions anything he does. CBC is your main source of information. You mock other media sources, which is interesting, because do you know on what platform Carney released his Trump-like state of the union address last week? It wasn't the CBC. It was YouTube. Trust in the CBC has been tanking for years. Hardly anyone s watching it anymore. A lot of that is because they do not hold the government to account, which is their job. When they do stuff like that time they cobbled together 2 clips of Poilievre speaking and aired it as something it wasn't and they got caught and were forced to fire the 2 people who did it or when they've gotten caught putting an Orange filter on Poilievre while other outlets show him being normal colored......some of us take note of those things. You're oblivious to it. Or just don't care that you're nothing to this government and media other than a fungus, kept in the dark and fed bullsh*t. The health of a democracy isn’t measured by elections alone—it’s measured by how rigorously power is questioned. When the media environment tilts heavily toward narrative over scrutiny, and when voters are increasingly detached from policy and evidence, the system becomes vulnerable. Not because of one party or one leader, but because the basic mechanisms of accountability stop functioning as they should. I think it says a lot about YOU that you do not want Liberal power questioned at all and have a tantrum every time it is.

Can you take your seatbelt off? You can never un-vaccinate.

Ok, but when someone tries to explain something to you 47 different ways and you still don't get it so they quit trying....that's not them using turtle strategy. Just sayin'

Solution to the Strait of Hormuz problem:

I don't think you understand what turtle strategy is. You keep using the term incorrectly.

Of course. That's why I keep all these receipts 🤣

I did (still do) have a lot of respect for this Liberal lady:

🤣 LOL I guess you weren't in Canada at the time, it was a truly heinous act that was all over the news media, who used it to paint the protesters as white supremacist Nazis.

I know. They funded CAHN, which was doing the same damn things SPLC was doing.

This was all over the news when Carney was appointed as Trudeau's economic advisor. Are you surprised that they want to sweep it under the rug now and pretend it never happened? 🤣 The best they got is "Well, but, well, but, well, but......Trudeau never actually took his advice!" Like how the f*ck would they know if he did or didn't? Would Carney have stayed on as economic advisor for 5 years if Trudeau was refusing to take his advice? C'mon, you donkeys.

Just a reminder that if you decide to peacefully protest against the government, you will be treated more harshly than men who break 1/4 of their newborn baby's bones. Baby found with 50 fractures; parents facing justice

Maddie de Garay was in the vaccine trials for children and was catastrophically injured. She was 12, now in a wheelchair and on a feeding tube. I've followed her mother Stephanie, since the beginning, too. Pfizer covered it up by telling the FDA that Maddie had "stomach issues" and dropped out of the trials. There were 2,268 children in that trial. What happened to Maddie should have told them that these shots had AT LEAST a 1 in 2,200 risk of serious harm to children. Look: Safety, side effects, allergies and doses. The COVID-19 Pfizer vaccine for 5-11 year olds explained What does the trial data say about safety and efficacy? The Pfizer vaccine trial included 2,268 children aged 5-11. Of these children, 1,517 were given two doses of 10 microgram vaccine three weeks apart, and 751 who were given a placebo. The results found the vaccine was safe and had good efficacy. Children given the vaccine had similar antibody levels after the second dose to older adolescents and young adults (aged 16-25). This indicates their immune system was able to recognise the lower amount of vaccine mRNA – the vital ingredient in the Pfizer vaccine – and still produce a good amount of antibody to protect against the virus. There were no serious reactions in this trial, however the sample size wasn’t large enough to detect rare adverse events. Parents were lied to.

He was punished for going against the covid narrative. Like all doctors were, who spoke up at the time. Other doctors said the cause of death could not be determined. That's why Dan paid for an independent autopsy. Dr. Cole does the proper staining on body organs to find whether the spike protein is there or not. Obviously Big Pharma and governments who mandated these shots don't like that. The other doctor who worked on this was Dr. McCullough, a cardiologist who found the spike in the boy's enlarged heart. Dr. McCullough was the most published and respected cardiologist in the US - until he spoke out about the myocarditis he was seeing in his practice. Then he was smeared, blacklisted, cancelled. Now there's a black box warning for myocarditis on the vaccine packaging. It took years for them to admit it was true. In a world first, a woman in Greece just won a judgement against the Greek government over the covid jabs because they ruled there that the government DID have a duty of care. You obviously don't agree with that concept. I do. Mr. Hartman posted the ruling and Pfizer's reply is in there. I've also posted here the actual contracts between Pfizer and the Canadian government (and some of the contracts with other countries, they all say the same thing) and it states right in the contract that the governments accept that the injections may not be safe or effective and that Pfizer takes no responsibility for anything that happens. At the Covid Commission in the EU, Pfizer also confirmed that the injections were never tested fully for safety or efficacy. I posted that here, too. At the time Sean Hartman got his shot, the package inserts for the vaccines were blank. Because they didn't know what the shots would do to people - pregnant women, children, teenagers, anybody. The method of delivery for the shots - the LNPs were also largely unknown. The pre-human testing of them had not gone well, but they decided to sue them anyways. Normally vaccines go through about a decade of testing, these were less than a year. We still don't know long-term how they will affect people. And we wont' know for quite a while. Things like fertility (they know the spike settles in the testes and ovaries.) The shots were never tested for whether they increased cancer or not - we're still learning, still looking at data, still studying. It was a big experiment, dude. And children like Sean - never needed it in the first place. They were never at risk. Just so you know - there's a lot of dead kids out there from the shots. And a lot of the parents are like Dan. They want acknowledgement of their wrongful deaths. I appreciate you saying that. When I first posted here about what happened to Sean, quite a few people called his father a liar, said he probably didn't even have a son, he was a grifter, just wanted money, etc. I expected that again. When they couldn't deny what happened to Sean anymore, then they switched to "Well, some children have to die to save others." I saw yesterday that Dan is going to fight this all the way to the Supreme Court. I've never seen a dad fight so hard for his kid and his grief is.......awful. It's one thing if your kid dies in an accident or something but when this is like your kid being murdered.

They get people riled up by faking things. Plus the government will use their fake information to crack down, like Trudeau did with the Convoy. CAHN does. It's also believed they were the ones who showed up at the Freedom Convoy with a Nazi flag. The person has not been identified.

I posted several times on here about the CAHN and how they instigated or created supposed hate crimes. Like the one above where they faked a hate crime using a flyer that came from Miami and claimed it was from the Freedom Convoy.

They likely fell into to the usual bureaucratic trap - supposed to eliminate hate but then hate crimes go down so now their government funding gravy train is over (or reduced), so they have to create more hate crimes to keep the gravy train rolling.

Newsflash! You're on a public discussion forum. 🤡 If you want to insult him directly without anyone else seeing it or commenting on it, use the messaging feature. That's the little envelope in the top right corner.

Of course you do. Nobody was talking about literacy rates here. You said it - to an American - because you hate Americans.

21% in 2023 was the figure I saw from Our World in Data. Interestingly, Canada in 2023 was not much better at 19%. You might want to come up with a new factoid to hate Americans with. I avoid AI. You know it just tells you what you want to hear based on your own algorithms, right?

You don't get to just barf out 💩 and pass it off as fact. Show your work. Where's the cite for that?

Asked AI: Can Canada’s inflation realistically be blamed on Donald Trump, or are domestic policies the bigger factor? Answer: Domestic policies are the bigger factor. Canada's inflation hit multi-decade highs pre-2025 due to heavy federal spending, housing shortages, immigration-driven demand, and energy costs—issues tracked by the Bank of Canada for years. Trump tariffs (imposed 2025) add modest import cost pressure and are factored into BoC projections, but CPI eased to 1.8% y/y in Feb 2026 (near 2% target) despite them. Domestic fiscal and supply-side factors remain dominant. If domestic policies are the main driver, which specific policies had the biggest impact on inflation in Canada? Answer: The biggest domestic policy drivers of Canada's pre-2025 inflation spike were: **Record immigration surge ** Federal targets ramped net migration to over 1M annually (IRCC data), spiking housing demand without matching supply—shelter costs (rent/mortgage interest) became the largest CPI component, per Bank of Canada analysis. **Large federal deficits/spending ** Post-COVID stimulus (CERB, extended benefits, infrastructure/childcare) overheated demand, as tracked in BoC Monetary Policy Reports. **Housing supply restrictions ** Zoning, approvals, and NIMBY policies at federal/provincial/municipal levels slowed builds. **Energy/carbon policies **Carbon tax and regulations raised fuel/transport costs. BoC repeatedly flagged these supply/demand imbalances years before tariffs.

US literacy rate is 79% in 2025. If you have to lie to make your point, maybe your point is 💩.

Hope so. Sounds better than the 209th province of China.