Goddess

Back to topic: The German federal police have requested data from the Gab platform to identify a German user who called the far-left politician Ricarda Lang, "fat". Seriously, how far do you think the far-left are going to take censorship? I think, all the way. Yes. Because this topic is about censorship.

Already have. Many times.

Your team is the one advocating an experimental medical procedure that don't prevent transmission or infection for an illness with a +99% survival rate. It's on you guys to prove they're safe.

Again, I've read everything about the case - you have not. Dishonest? Like telling the public IVM is "horsepaste"? You don't have a problem with that dishonesty, though, do ya?

Look up the case and read about it. Part of the case was because of them labeling it "horsepaste." I've read the transcripts and the lawyers' breakdowns.

France extends detention of Telegram chief Pavel Durov – POLITICO Over the weekend, Telegram founder Pavel Durov was nabbed by French police. Yet to be charged, media articles all suggest Pavel’s detention is related to Telegram’s failure to cooperate in stopping ‘criminal activity’ on the social media platform. Telegram advertises itself as a protected free speech platform with over 900 million users. It was created and is owned by Pavel Durov. Pavel was born in Russia, but fled to Dubai in 2014 after Russian efforts to control his first social media platform, described as a Russian ‘Facebook.’ Anyway, most people view Pavel’s detention (not arrest) as a kind of hostage scenario. If Telegram plays ball, Pavel’s problems will magically disappear! All the platform need do is build a few government backdoors into the Telegram system, for safety, not for monitoring and censoring citizens, no, never. It’s unusual for a corporation’s CEO to be arrested for crimes committed by others. Media calls it “unprecedented.” We can compare Pavel’s predicament with Mark Zuckerberg’s. Zuckerberg learned how to play ball in 2020, generously donated to Democrats, and, despite originally warning employees not to take the jabs, hired a battalion of security-state drones and built the government its own misinformation portal page during the pandemic. Zuckerberg has never been detained, not even for the child pornography rings running rampant on Facebook. Nor detained for anything else, since he’s a good little deep-state doggie. Other corporate bigwigs evade prosecution even for crimes they commit themselves. Take the pharmaceutical industry, for example, whose executives escaped detention even AFTER pleading guilty to literally killing people through fraud, like opioid maker Purdue Pharma. Maybe Telegram should hire pharma lawyers.

There is.

Lot of "coincidences" out there that Pharma is not interested in investigating. In my city, there were 2 people in one week who dropped dead immediately after getting getting the booster, one in Shopper's Drug Mart (lady in her early 60's) and one in WalMart (man in his mid 30's). I'm sure they were just "coincidences".

I think the saddest thing I saw because of the censorship was the groups of vax injured people on Facebook getting deleted. Some of these groups were 300,000 people. This was when anyone who got Guillian-Barre, Bell's Palsy, myocarditis, pericarditis, neuro disorders, tremors, vertigo, tinnitus, miscarriages, menstrual issues, etc, after the jabs - it was all being denied. They were called "anti-vaxxers" and they had TAKEN the jabs!! These people were just trying to get help, being ignored and slandered by the gov't, the media, the health care providers, told they were crazy or just "stressed". Many were close to suicide. Now, we know, of course, that these are all documented adverse events from the jabs and that governments and Big Pharma collaborated with the media to hush up adverse events so that other people would continue taking the jabs. This can never happen again.

Provisional Deaths in Canada Dashboard (statcan.gc.ca) There are more weekly deaths in Alberta now (blue line) than at the height of the pre-vaccine COVID epidemic (orange). In fact, there are 15-25% more deaths in Alberta than in 2018, even though our population only increased by 9% in that period and only aged slightly. The body bags are piling up, and the morgues are overflowing, but no one is panicking. They started rolling out the "vaccines" in December 2020 and that orange line goes up like a rocket. The cure was more deadly then the disease. Post-pandemic excess deaths make that clear. A casual look at http://ourworldindata.org reveals the nearly every country that engaged in extreme genetic vaccine coercion is still recording high excess death 2.5-yrs later. There were 'experts' pushing each other out of the way to analyze everything about covid. They came up with every impossible scenario and shoved it down our throats for years. Where are the experts NOW on this massive increase in deaths? If one looks at the purple line of 2020 it’s shows the normal and anticipated Gompertz Curve rise and fall in March/April then a return to normal. If we had done nothing further, no lockdowns, no masks, no ventilators that would have been the end of it. All other increases in deaths is directly due to all the political and pharmaceutical malpractices and malfeasance mandates, and vax deaths. Look at the Under 44s, and compare "the height of the pandemic raging w/o measures in place, early 2020" & then AFTER the young people are "PROTECTED" by the "safe and effective", so generously mandated for participation in society. Canada-wide, it's about 1000/week. Oddly, the media is silent, and there's no apparent effort to examine it, at any level of govt. Too many people are curiously incurious.

Their throne of lies is crumbling. The COVID lies they told us continue to warp our lives | National Post Got that? FAKE experts.

This group sued the FDA over their MISINFORMATION about ivermectin and......won. Rather than take a money settlement, the group asked only that the FDA remove the misinformation from their website and the tweets. Biden’s FDA Concedes Defeat In Ivermectin Lawsuit, Will Remove Snarky Social Media Posts (msn.com) Try to keep up. I know it's hard to adjust your brain after you've believed lies, but you gotta do it. If you have the capacity and critical thinking to do so, maybe ask yourself WHY the FDA would lie to the public about Ivermectin and how many people died because of the lies.....

That's cool. 😎 Mine is Waipio Valley in Hawaii (on the big island.) You can only travel it if you have a 4X4. Waipio Valley - This Hawaii Life

From Dr. Vinay Prassad's substack RE: the booster shots for this Fall: Years ago, a famous scientist told me “I am going to have a problem when they recommend 23 boosters over 22 boosters without a randomized study” I laughed. No one would ever do that, I thought. Yet, that day steadily approaches. This week, the FDA authorized a new fall COVID booster. This was done without any studies measuring the impact on severe disease or hospitalization or death. Worse, the viral target was chosen by Peter Marks, against advice, and is already out of date. First, let me highlight the most honest, decent scientist on the topic. My UCSF colleague: Next. Here is data on the target’s frequency: It's simply bad medicine to recommend a medical product to people, many of whom have just had COVID, without evidence that benefits exceed harms and worse without ongoing studies to answer open questions. It's especially bad if the target is out of date. I consider such recommendations to verge on malpractice, even if sanctioned by captured ‘authorities’. Now consider some of the most shameful tweets promoting this product. First, the CDC director: Cohen has the temerity to recommend that little children get this shot— which is inconsistent with most European nations. Moreover, even though she has the clout to demand or even run a randomized study, she does not. Mandy Cohen has joined Rochelle Walensky as two of the worst CDC directors since the agencies inception. Vaccine mistrust is in part due to people like her. Here is a link to the full tweet that falsely claims the booster reduces severe disease. The FDA has no data for that claim. I encourage all readers of this post to community note this claim and cite this post. The FDA should not be allowed to engage in false statements. Now look at how doctors extrapolate. This is Ashish Jha former Biden COVID Czar: Jha has the audacity to invent the best time to get a booster. A data free recommendation on timing for a data free vaccine. Dr Akkad, an ID doctor agrees this is damaging to public trust. I think it is inconsistent with being a scientist, who would want better studies. But it gets even worse. This is Dr. Vin Gupta, the MS/NBC correspondent: He recommends this out of date booster for a woman who just had an actual infection. This claim is problematic, both because her future risk is low… And worse, adverse events appear higher when doses are given after infection. I am concerned Vin Gupta is spreading dangerous medical advice with the false legitimacy of being a TV pundit. Per his biography he works at the University of Washington. I tried to find him on open payments and found he takes payments from Pfizer. How is it possible for a doctor to make recommendations for an unproven vax, appear on NBC and not disclose payments from Pfizer? Across the board, I believe the physicians recommending this shot are dishonorable. None of them are advocating for randomized studies. Many of them are promoting Pfizer's interests. Some may even be paid by the company. A few weeks ago, I discussed a new paper showing trust in medicine is on the decline. It isn't low enough. These doctors mean you don't distrust doctors enough. We live in concerning times where drug companies push unproven products, the FDA rubber stamps them, and sell outs promote them. It's sad times for evidence based medicine when the sellouts get promoted.

You sound like you have good defensive driving skills. I feel like this is lacking in Canada, maybe due to our "wide, open spaces". I noticed during my travelling years, in countries that had few lights, skinny, winding mountain roads with no guardrails, no speed limits, etc, that they seemed to be much more aware of what other drivers around them are doing.

Vaccines, like all drugs, have side effects. This should not be controversial. No vaccine is “safe and effective” for everyone. This should not be controversial. Drawing attention to the serious side effects listed on every vaccine insert should not be controversial. Advocating for individuals who have been injured by vaccines should not be controversial. Making vaccines safer should not be controversial. Holding vaccine companies accountable for their products should not be controversial. Preventing pharmaceutical companies from influencing regulatory bodies that approve drugs should not be controversial. Ensuring that the regulatory system is not weaponized against the public while safeguarding pharmaceutical companies should not be controversial. Instead, for the last number of years, individuals, scientists and doctors with valid concerns have been disparaged, censored, and labeled as “anti-vaxxers” or “conspiracy theorists.” This behavior is detrimental to the public interest and contributes to a lack of trust in public institutions and officials. Time to ensure that the actions of public agencies truly serve the public interest. This should not be controversial.

LOL The more I think about it, the more absurd you are! The gov't and pharma industry ADMITTED lying to the public about vax injuries and you're still here saying they WEREN'T lying!!!! You're a special kind of stupid.

Yes, I know you've said before - they are all liars. How would you know? The Canadian and US gov'ts and all the alphabet entities said they deliberately censored vax injuries and deaths from the public. Are you saying all the people (evidence on the ground) are lying and the studies are lying the datasets are lying because YOU haven't seen anyone injured (that you know of)? You're so vocal about your denial that I doubt if anyone close to you had an injury, you would be the last one they'd tell. You'd just call them a liar. I sure wouldn't confide in you. Really? That's your stance? A total rejection of science? You support gov'ts deliberately lying to you about it? I'm not really surprised. Just surprised you admit it.

Home - React19 That's just one of many websites. I've given it to you before, but you refused to look at it. I'm sure you will refuse again. So, you don't get to say there are no injuries or deaths when you simply refuse to look at the evidence, the scientific studies or the datasets. That website/group, BTW, was started by one of the women who was badly injured in the vaccine trials.

It's because you refuse to listen to those who have been injured or had loved ones die from it. I'm not saying it. Peer-reviewed medical studies from all over the world are saying it. Datasets from all over the world are saying it. Excess deaths are up almost 20% in every highly-vaxxed country. Disabilities have sky-rocketed in both Canada and the US. And it's not the elderly, obese or terminally ill dying now. It's young people and working age people dying suddenly in their sleep or from heart attacks/strokes, or "unknown cause".

Glad you're doing well. Lots are not. I just post what the scientific studies are showing.

Ironically, it may be unvaccinated people who have this specific gene that are the key to solving covid. Some people never get COVID-19: researchers say a specific gene could be why | Watch (msn.com)