?Impact

Trudeau doesn't think kids should be put in jail with hardened criminals because they took a puff from a joint, that doesn't mean he wants them to smoke weed.

I have yet to see a dialogue. You point to extremely biased articles and pretend they are informed and have yet to actually debate a single topic. If you want to put up the credentials of the authors, then they will be addressed. Pointing out that people like Tom Quiggin is a know far right Islamaphobe with made up credentials is fair game when you pretend he has some credibility. His security agency he quotes was never heard of before he gave it a lofty title and began waving it around as if it meant something.

Wrong. The advisory board has 3 federal members and 2 provincial members. Like I said, I would prefer a much better system, but this one is a billion times better than what we have suffered through for the past few decades.

Really? Really? Really, you really said that? Really?

Yes, Liberals are bad; they associate with people before they are known criminals. Much better to be a Conservative who associate with known criminals.

Yes, everything is a grand leftist conspiracy. You might want to skip brushing you teeth in the morning, you never know what they put in that toothpaste.

You mean the Tom Quiggin from the Fraser Institute and the self defined Terrorism and Security Analysts of Canada Network. Yes, people are stupid to accept bogus credentials.

What was your policy on Catholics from Ireland during the IRA years? Do you really need to sink to the level of calling Iqra an idiot, we already have one person trying to lower the level of discourse.

There is a world of difference, as I have already pointed out. First off it is removed from the party machine, if only by arms length, and second it has involvement of the respective province that could easily be from another party. It is not as far as I want to see it go, but it is a long, long ways from recent years.

Provided by whom? I understand the motion, I don't subscribe to propaganda.

This is indeed a serious situation, I was just speaking with some Australian friends and they said that this disturbing phenomenon reached their shores this past week.

Did you read my last sentence? I believe the current process is far superior to the old one, but it doesn't go all the way. b.t.w., there is non-liberal involvement in the current process through the provinces.

No, but I have read M-103. Shall we discuss the motion itself?

Amber, blond, cream, golden, pale, light - What I wash my glassware in Red - Will do in a pinch Dark - Now that's beer Does one need to become a brew master to learn the difference between an ale, lager, stout and porter?

I agree, the role of the PM needs to be severely curtailed. He (and in one very brief instance - she) did not start this way, but over the years that role has acquired more and more of the power. We no longer have a House of Commons, we have a House of Prime Minister and a few dissenters. The "crown" however is not a good substitute, as it is represented by a single individual without the required background. I believe the process put in place by current Liberal government to appoint Senators is more along the lines of what is needed for the SCOC, although there might need to be more professional involvement at least as part of the vetting process for candidates. I had been suggesting something similar to the current advisory board for many years, although the appointment process for it I was looking for more involvement from the opposition parties (both federal and provincial).

Laws are crafted by politicians, are you suggesting they be removed from that as well? b.t.w. I agree that we need to improve the process, but I don't think it is as simple as pointing the finger at politicians.

Let us return to the adult conversion that this thread was started on: -Justin Trudeau must be pursued for his treason I have already notified all 333 sitting members, but rest assured, these people are simply not very intelligent; and these are the people we rely on to "protect" Canada. Oh well, I guess that is a miss as well. Perhaps a bit of helpful advice from a recent post: I suggest you shut up and stop making yourself look stupid.

The original poster clearly stated: Please stay on topic as all trolling will be reported - this discussion is about M-103, and nothing else. The only problem is the original post was about anything but M-103.

Sounds more sketchy than Stephen Harper and the Northern Foundation.

No, that is speculation at the grandest of scale - zero evidence. To make an assumption that a "designer" is required is not evidence, it is day dreaming. Of course the Bible thumpers ignore the greatest of all conundrums, who designed the designer. You are relying on the FM theory - if I don't understand something it must be F*ken Magic. What you were arguing before was negative, you were denigrating the Roman Catholic Church, and by extension all Catholics. It may be against your particular beliefs, but it is not for hundreds of millions of others. Salvation is great news - if and only if it is true. Otherwise it is false hope. As you correctly pointed out, religions like the Catholic Church have exploited that hope to fill their pocketbooks and to justify crimes against others including murder.

Ok fair enough. One question however, why do you participate in discussion forums? Do you see them as not really discussion, but a stage upon which to proselytize?

Since your faith itself is not based on logic, and you are unwilling to look at a detailed analysis done 130 years ago, I also doubt you are unwilling to look at a modern analysis of the King James Version and the Textus Recpetus upon which it is based. Sorry, I don't have some YouTube video that goes into great conspiracy theories about how one Church is corrupt and my Church is the only true one; you see I agree with the premise that the Catholic Church is like the mafia and the Jesuits are their thugs, the only difference is I don't use that to promote my faith because I don't have one. If you go to the home page of the above website, and click on list of articles you will get a lot of detailed analysis from various authors.

In the old days, we used to pick up our parcels at the post office and pay the duty and all was fine. Ever since the capitalist FedEx, UPS, etc. got into the picture there have been fees upon fees upon fees. Time to send all the capitalists back to where they belong.

Concerning the Queen's Christmas Message 2017, it just appeared on the YouTube trending at 1.7 million views.