?Impact

So you have no truth, only foolish fantasies.

The only thing I support is truth. Do you have any?

Absolutely, you can prove with with bill ?, motion ?, speech from MP ? What, you have nothing to back that up? Hardly surprising.

So what is a race? Provide examples.

Since I addressed facts, what is your problem with those I addressed? Magically thinking that major legislation could be changed in a day is extremely naive.

That is an extremely naive statement.

Barnum and Baily were amateurs.

I believe there is only one around that has comprehension difficulties. If you want to locate that person, then look above you bathroom sink.

You mean like building roadways, canals, and airports?

I thought you needed an excuse to get new ones. No, it is the people with curly hair; or any other characteristic you want to use.

English is a butchered language, always has been, always will be. If you prefer a more exacting language then learn Esparanto or perhaps German for something that more than a handful of people speak.

The take the same exact thing and apply it to Muslims, ok?

Did you ask what is antisemitism was when Harper and Kenny issued their statements from the Parliamentary Coalition to end antisemitism, or the Ottawa Protocol? They are not any more clear defined in those far more encompassing frameworks than a simple motion to study an issue.

Motion 103 is not a friggen law, how many times does one have to beat people over the head to understand that.

We should separate out the whole pro-choice, anti-abortion debate into another thread, or else we will have another rat hole. I agree, but I wouldn't label it fiscal conservative. How about fiscal competence, something neither Conservative or Liberal governments demonstrate (even Paul Martin had some weakness in that area but he was light years above anything I have seen in my lifetime).

People are people, and I will say it loud and clear - That was an extremely racist remark to make.

I don't see him advocating the enforcement of possession laws. The issue is we need to have in place the proper method for distribution and sale of pot, and Emery was caught drug trafficking.

Yes, even bad laws need to be obeyed or else we will have anarchy. The solution is to fix the laws, not break them.

That is not a relevant response to my request for you to substantiate Sharia anti-blasphemy laws you claim I cited. You are great at copy/paste of completely irrelevant content, and full of crap.

Really, I cited Sharia anti-blasphemy laws? Could you point that out for me as I must be getting forgetful in my old age. Maybe we should have a book club topic, and then you could post your recommendations there.

This was spotted just off County Rd 19 in Wendover.

Again you provide the same boring made up credentials, and no real topic to discuss. Why not admit you are an Islamaphobe without anything to support you but other Islamaphobes. Open dialog starts with a real topic, and you have yet to introduce one.

What is really sickening is the entitled attitude of drivers who think they should have their roadway plowed first. I don't see cyclists posting photos of a roadway that is plowed before a bike lane and crying like a little schoolgirl who didn't get the biggest piece of cake. Only the selfish, self entitled, single occupancy vehicle, environment disasters are the ones that act like that.

Pretending he has credibility is your only argument. You put up some made up bullcrap by Quiggin and then pretend he is someone we should listen to. Attacking his credentials is perfectly valid as you are the one pretending he has any to begin with. If you want to actually argue something, then put it up and we will debate the issue you draw without any pretense on either side.