?Impact

Free speech does not mean free platform. Nobody is obligated to help them in their free speech, but that is what the snowflakes are always confusing with free speech.

Then the neo-NAZIs can build their own universities to spread their hate speech in.

So unless neo-NAZIs are allowed to spread hate speech, we are all Marxist? What a bunch of hogwash.

How soon they forget that NAFTA was Reagan's baby, many years earlier. It was a Republican led and negotiated agreement, Clinton was dragged along.

Conspiracy theories are generally properly labelled, because they have zero sound substance behind them. They are almost always not trying to further something, but to dismiss the hard work of others. How many of the conspiracy theorists actually invest in doing something positive? You have things backwards.

Yes, it is a big gamble but the potential payout is tremendous. Of course Donald will want the money to build a wall instead.

peer-review is like democracy. It is the worst form of scientific publication, except for all the others. Tour has already been refuted many times, but you won't listen.

So you are saying that employers must respect the vacation wishes of their employees, without exception?

It is not only an efficiency standpoint for the employer, it is about the employees as well. Yes, you can take the attitude that employees are simply commodities to be exploited, but that is not what society is all about. Having a common family holiday like Christmas allows families to get together regardless of religion.

Of course, you as a entitled white male in a rich country deserve a larger share of the worlds resources and to leave behind more wasteful byproducts than some third world person because? Could you tell me because why?

Perhaps a tangent worthy of its own thread. I see some value in common holidays, just like having a work week with weekends off. One could argue that New Years day has a specific cultural meaning, even with some ancient religious significance. Certainly there are many jobs where total flexible hours are feasible, but most require some level of coordination with others.

Exactly, you somehow associated publishing an article in Inference as carrying weight, which it does not. Science does not progress by throwing the gauntlet at the whole science community, that is called grandstanding (childish behavior). Tour's argument is against the infinite monkey theorem , but that is really what evolution theory is about because there is a reward feedback loop that is missing from that theorem.

You shouldn't edit something you quote, that is immoral. Thank however for proving my point.

I usually don't eat canned soup, so nothing much to boycott for me. I do have a few cans of St. Hubert soup in the pantry just in case, they are manufactured just north of Montreal (Blainville).

Did they change their ways after becoming politicians is the true sign of virtue signalling.

All bigotry needs to be stopped, this is not the place to compare who is the bigger victims, especially when it was almost exactly a year ago that 6 Muslims were killed and 19 others injured in a hate crime in Canada for simply attending religious services at a Mosque.

Yes, Conservatives/Republicans have zero morals, they are always willing to look the other way if it servers their partisan agenda.

Inference is not a peer reviewed journal.

Sexual preference has nothing to do with this. It is about taking advantage of someone in high school when you are 10 years older, or someone who you have a position of authority over.

We know, you have CBC envy

Is there a way to limit new members to creating a single new topic in their first day/week to stop spammers like luanacooks?

Agreed, but what would be a good one? I don't want no friggen bombs bursting in air either, no glorification of mass murder. Yawn That has God in it as well, it also celebrates war, and above all is simply a WASP nationalist tune.

Good, a long time overdue.

Absolutely, that is why one needs to not take all content on face value. A high intellect individual is capable of watching propaganda and deciding on it applicability/validity.

Purging membership is a completely different issue. I don't know any of the details here, but the membership should be open to any Canadian citizen residing in Ontario who agree with the party membership qualifications. Now this is pure speculation, but Brown did bring many new members into the party. There have been many instances in the past that party membership (all parties, not just the OPC) has been fraudulent. Could there be some suspicion that those new members were in fact not valid?