?Impact

I was wonder when you would weigh in on this, if you would take the responsible road and disapprove of Trump or if you would double down and come out fighting. Obviously you are dead set to support Trump, so how does it feel to support a proven child molester, because according to you above if it isn't disproved then it is fact. Well the lady who said Trump had sexual relations with her when she was 13 has not been disproved, so according to you Trump is 100% guilty of child molestation. You must be proud of him.

30 is the perfect age to date. I dated a 21 year old, and asked her what she was doing and she said something like studying algebra, obviously too young. 35 is check out time.

Yes, but how does the community know that when there are many malicious users out there. Wikipedia has millions of articles, but a relative small number are consider vital. Those are divided into four hierarchical groups, and Muhammed is in third priority group. The community just wants to get to know that you are not a temporary malicious user. Spend some time editing other articles before heading for the big ones. Work on ones related to your community, hobbies, etc. Things that are not so high profile at first. Once you establish some credibility in the community you will be allowed to work on the higher profile stuff. This is not personal, it is an unfortunate consequence of the many malicious users out there.

I hate Clinton so bad that I will elect a child molester and rapist before I vote for her. Why do I dislike her so? Because the child molester and rapist told me I should because she is married to someone who has consensual sex outside of marriage.

I still haven't voted, but I am leaning towards the positive side. The activity tab is a great improvement. I was missing some of the ability to catch up the old forum had but this tab seems to beat it by a long shot. You can quickly see what recent activity was, what is happening to content you started, what is unread, etc.

There have been several controversial topics that have been locked in the past. I can certainly see many people wanting to make changes to the Prophet Muhammad that are very controversial. I believe there are different levels of protection for various pages. Have you been a wikipedia editor for a long time, and have you made extensive edits elsewhere? Generally for controversial topics you need to have a history of several days and a dozen or more edits before you are allowed.

I just reproduced what you saw using safari on my iPad. At the same time I did a reload from my MacBook and it hung for about 30 seconds but then responded properly. Yes, something is amiss. b.t.w., a reload on my iPad did work, so it seems like the server gets locked up for short bursts.

Clinton has won the Presidency, that is an iron clad fact. The best hope now is for the Republicans to salvage what they can and take control of the Senate so that she cannot have a free hand in the Supreme Court. Many Republicans have already made very prominent statements denouncing Trump, even Arnold Schwarzenegger made it clear that he will not be voting Trump. Mike Pence, Trump's own running mate came as close as he can without crossing the line. I suspect a few think they can wait another 30 hours to see just how poorly Trump does tomorrow night, if he even shows (which I predict he will chicken out), but come Monday morning we will see the entire GOP turn on him.

As long as the interview makes it clear that more is involved. The ad is "look but don't touch".

I use cash about 99% of the time for ad-hoc transactions. Recurring transactions are almost always through some sort of electronic means, a few of them through my credit card. I can't remember the last cheque I wrote many years ago.

I generally use Safari from a MacBook, so far I haven't noticed the problems you are speaking of although I haven't used the new site that much. There were a couple of things I thought quirky when I first started using the site last night but they might have been just getting used to the new format.

Yet immigrants have a better track record of paying those bills than old stock Canadians.

We all know that the words out of Trumps mouth are meaningless, so that he denied stepping down doesn't hold water. My prediction is that the little chicken shit will not face Hilary tomorrow night.

Yes, if you are rich then you can get away with anything. You can grope their pussy and they can't do anything about it because they plebs will think they are just after your money. You need to go back to the email dump and find something that is actually problematic. A bunch of backroom campaign folks discussing the issues and how they may sound is not actually revealing, and has nothing to do with the far right kooky theories.

You should talk to Jill Harth, a former employee that says his locker room talk mirrors the real world.

Old shoes are always more comfortable.

Solar panels degrade less than 1% per year. After 25 years they still have about 80-85% of their capacity. I will take them in 75 years when they are done as long as you take the spent nuclear fuel.

Leitch is 100% wrong, and a poll filled with false dichotomies does nothing to help her. Leitch is not interested in Canadians, she is interested in propagating fear in order to enrich herself. She is the pretender - shades of Trump. You ignorer the part of the poll that says the vast majority of Canadians are satisfied with how immigrants are fitting in, why is that? Leitch is the propagator of anti-Canadian values, low life fear mongering.

Again you totally ignore the point I was making, while pretending you don't. Yes, the entire footprint (overall risk assessment in your words) is very important. Naming scary chemicals, and now adding the even scarier carcinogenic label does absolutely nothing towards that goal. I could give the same label to other forms of energy, and rhyme of another list of scary chemicals, and I would accomplish the same nothing. You need to give a comparative analysis, otherwise you are just pissing in the wind.

Not sure where you get that from. His father abdicated the throne to him when the British & Soviets both invaded in a joint operation. His position was accepted, but there was also an elected government which the British and Americans overthrew later.

Objective facts would be a comparison of total footprint of different technologies. Listing off names of chemicals is completely meaningless, there are no quantities per unit of power produced.

What percentage of Muslims, particularly western ones, believe in beheading and the other nonsense you keep repeating?