Shady

This is nonsense. A person can be both an intellectual AND opposed to "gay marraige". The term "gay marraige" is an oxymoron. I'm also opposed to "gay marraige" but in favour of civil unions. Some may think it's semantics, but words mean things.

Um, because people like Fred Phelps are really annoying, but don't pose much of a risk to our country. On the other hand, people who want to mass murder thousands, if possible millions of people are definitely a risk. It's quite logical.

Again, can someone please link to where it states the man's religious beliefs? I haven't been able to find that part yet. Some of you seem to have access to additional information. If so, please share. I'd also like to state that one can be against the practice of abortion for reasons other then religion. Mine are scientific.

By not that kind of terrorism, you must be referring to the kind that puts thousands, potentially millions of innocent people at risk. If so, I wholeheartedly agree. Also, I didn't read the part referring to "radical religous beliefs". Can you please link to that? Thanks.

That's ok. Humor/satire obviously isn't your thing either.

No offense Liam, but humor and/or satire isn't your thing. Don't quit your day-job.

I don't understand how this can be described as a "revenge" killing. Zarqawi was a terrorist, conducting terrorist activities in Iraq. He wasn't going to stop unless killed or captured. He was killed. It wasn't out of revenge, it was out of necessity.

LOL!!! Damn that's good!!! Refusing to accept Zarqawi's large terrorist presence in Iraq is column A of the kook-left response. Refusing to accept his very existence or that he's actually dead is column B. Remember these, because they'll be the same responses used on the day Osama Bin Laden is killed.

No one here is necessarily comparing the wars. It's satire. Just taking some jabs at the ridiculous talking points. That's all.

I like this one too. 10. It’s been two and a half years since Pearl Harbor and they still haven’t brought Admiral Nagumo to justice

Great post. Those are hilarious. This one is the best. But don't forget about asking if any of their relatives are fighting in the war. Especially any sons. And if not, then why not?

Now that's a new one. I hadn't heard that one before. I'm familiar with the more popular kook-left talking points regarding Al-Zarqawi. He wasn't really that important anyways, or that, he's not really dead. But he's not a real person? Too funny. If you types are good for anything, it's definitely humor. Keep up the good work!

Well, unfortunately you suspect wrong. I know that to you people, everything in the world leads back to George W Bush, but my opinions about the insane leader of Iran and ignorant statements related to him, are based on three facts. His belief in the 12th Imam, his desire to destroy Israel, and his denial of the Holocaust. Apparently you tree-hugging people have no problem looking past all this and praising him as some respectable, sane, logical world leader. That's ridiculous, and so are you.Please, get your heads out of your collective asses. Put aside your hatred of President Bush, and see the facts for what they are. I beg you, for the good of the world.

This is an actual quote from GostHacked referring to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. I know what you're thinking. No, I didn't make it up.Link

Absolutely not. This is the only real instance in which a Nazi reference is completely legitimate. What we need to stop doing is stating that Hitler-like leaders are and I quote "This guy sounds more sane than 3/4s of the current world leaders". Imagine how ignorant one would have to be to think that way. I can't imagine.

This maybe the all-time most ignorant statement ever. Is this how you feel about all holocaust deniers?You people are hilarious. I can't believe you'd fall for such a calculated ploy. Iran's President is psycho. He believes in the 12th Imam. Do a little research, educate yourself. He wishes Israel to be wiped off the face of the earth. He's also a holocaust denier, and all I hear from you idiots is praise. How do you know this letter was even written by him? And well written? So the F what? So was Mein Kampf. You people are ridiculous, completely ignorant, unbelievably irresponsible, and immensely scary all rolled into one. You're all a bunch of Neville Chamberlain's. Sorry to be so harsh, but you guys really need to get your heads out of your asses.

Thanks for the link. However, I'm still a little confused. How is it a Bushism? It's an actual word/term.

Wow, that's original. Never heard that one before. I was away for a while, can someone refresh me as to why the "decider" statement was note worthy? How do you know it was without notice? Did Karl Rove invite you into the Oval Office again to participate in another meeting? Damn you, I'd kill for one of those invites. Oh, and apparently, he was asked to resign, it wasn't voluntary.

Wow, I'd love to live in the world you're living in, unfortunately I'm sober. And unfortunately, I live in a world where "President" Ahmadinejad has stated that Israel should be "wiped off the map", and Iran is a country with massive ties to terrorism, with a culture that sees suicide as a religious path to heaven.

Global-warming alarmists intimidate dissenting scientists into silence OPThere IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998 Telegraph

THE ELEPHANT IN THE BEDROOM Yeah, yeah, yeah, you’d think Democrats would be better in the sack, because they’re usually, well…better human beings in general. Plus, they’re so em-oh-tional and sen-sitive and they genuinely care about your day. And how you feel. And how you felt yesterday. “Is there anything you need?” they whimper. Oh, shutthefuckup! This is sex we’re talking about! After numerous years of intensive research on both sides of the aisle—and sometimes in the aisle—I am here to report that Republican men (except the closet cases) are infinitely better to have sex with. Here’s why. 1. NO CONSCIENCE! A Republican man will never whine in the middle of the night—let alone in the middle of screwing you—about the girlfriend/wife/whatever he is “devastating” by sleeping with you. He just does it. It’s all about him—he needs to be the best you ever had, and that can be a good thing if your getting off is contingent on his. He doesn’t even stay for breakfast. (Though if you do make him breakfast, he is eternally grateful and will go down on you for another several hours.) One word: pancakes! 2. NO TEARS! A Republican man will never, ever cry. Not on election night (no matter what happens). Not when you’re breaking up with him (what, you think he cared?). Not even when he’s having “a problem I’ve never had before, really, I’m not kidding, I swear.” 3. A SENSE OF PERSPECTIVE I’ve dated Democrats whose nights have been ruined (forever!) due to some stupid-ass comment by Bill Frist on Hardball. I’ve watched them go all mopey, argue with the TV…and then their little weenies disappear. Not so with GOPers. Republicans, particularly when naked, do not want to sit around and talk about Social Security privatization. Or Iraq, for chrissake. Or why (oh, boo hoo, get over it!) Kerry lost. They don’t even want to sit around naked and talk about George W. Bush. They just want you to sit on them. 4. A SENSE OF HUMOR Republicans are happy to watch Jon Stewart with you. They think he’s a riot. They don’t parse every word he says in an effort to figure out if “The Huffington Post” will approve. They just laugh, pour another cocktail, and decide upon which couch they will fuck your brains out after the show. 5. FOREPLAY Democrats often need something incredibly erotic—like Meet the Press—to get revved up, particularly on a Sunday morning (there are only so many sections of The New York Times). Republicans, on the other hand, don’t even need Fox News to get it up. They understand that foreplay is about sex. And lots of it. Democrats are too busy checking if the condoms you keep in the jar by the bed are good for the environment. And by the time they figure that out, we’ve all lost our erections. 6. SIZE It is absolutely, positively, 100 percent true that Republicans have bigger dicks. Just ask Lynne Cheney. (Dick is the Liam Neeson of Washington!) 7. EFFICIENCY Republicans are much more likely to whip their dicks out during the cab ride back from dinner. (This is not an urban myth.) They are also more inclined to get started in the elevator, pin you against a wall, do you on the kitchen sink, wherever. Democrats bring jammies, spend at least twenty minutes prior to “sex time” doing God knows fucking what in the bathroom, and then emerge with a big grin that says: “After all I did for you supporting equal pay and abortion rights, the least you could do is make love to me.” Democrats always think you owe them. Republicans, because they’ve never done a goddamn thing for you, have no such delusions. 8. LARGESSE Republicans have great taste in restaurants and will never make the wussiest of pre-date proposals: “You pick.” They understand that a woman wants a guy who knows how to pick a restaurant by himself. And who doesn’t feel the need to tell you what Zagat said about it before you get there. A Republican also knows how to order wine without getting all prissy about it, never dissects the bill (they don’t even look at it!), and will never, ever—ever—say, “Well, yes, I think that’s fair; your half comes to $39.25, but you had one more drink than I did,” if you offer to pay. They won’t let you think about offering to pay. This is so sexy! The best part: There’s never any guilt involved; we all know they got their tax break. 9. WOOING TECHNIQUES Republicans will never send you group e-mails that consist of the entire text of Al Gore’s last speech (that was “woefully underreported” but “I knew you’d want to read it in its entirety”). Or the sign-up sheet for Democracy in Action, or whatever the hell those weirdos from the Howard Dean campaign are up to now. Or forms to send your congressperson because something terrible is happening to some woman you don’t know in Niger. (And you’d better send it to a hundred more friends or her labia will be removed tonight!!!) Nah. Republicans send e-mails that say: “I can’t wait to eat your pussy.” 10. NIGHTSTAND READING You will never hear a Republican say, “Let’s just cuddle and read The New Yorker tonight.” They understand you do not want reading materials in bed. You want a man. 10.5. THE BIG CAVEAT Yes, Republicans are the better lay—but only the Republicans you’ve never heard of. The more prominent they are, the less fuckable they are. The opposite is true of Democrats. Think about it. Is there any woman on the face of the earth who wouldn’t fuck Bill Clinton? (Didn’t think so.) But with a gun to your head, could you even think of doing Santorum? DeLay? Lott? Yuck, yuck, yuck! Okay, with a gun to our head, we might do W. And Cheney. Definitely Cheney. As long as we’re blindfolded. (But that’s okay. Republicans are into that, too.) *The author wishes to remain anonymous for fear of cutting off her supply. GQ Pretty much what we all knew anyways, right?

What's really illustrated is the utter ignorance and stupidity of the kook-left. It's the same type of people who "grace" this board with their presence and their dumb f*ck thinking. I'm simply amazed as to why their ilk don't win over more public support and especially win more elections. Not. Good God that was some funny video. Once again, another great post from Monty! Keep up the good work.

Yeah, ABC News is a real right-wing blogger, eh?

Great post Monty! Unbelievable! I'm not exactly sure how anyone can attempt to undermine so many facts. Their heads must be spinning by now. I'd just like to humbly add a few points. To those who may be ignorant of the fact. Allah Akbar translated means "God Is Great". This was added to the Iraqi flag a short period of time after the first gulf war. As Monty has stated. Iraqi leader's Koran 'written in blood' BBC Do you people understand that? He had the Koran written entirely in his own blood. His own blood! Yet some of you ignorant Saddam Hussein apologists continue to spout the "he couldn't have connections to Al Qaeda, he's secular" bullshit. Wake up and smell the freaking coffee, please. Connect the GD dots.Also. Abdul Rahman Yasin (the Al Qaeda terrorist - wanted by the Clinton administration for his complicity in the 1993 World Trade Center terrorist attack. Absolutely true. I'm not sure how anyone can overlook this so easily as the "progressives" do. Abu Nidal, the most wanted man in the world, who was sheltered in Baghdad. Absolutely true, and again, I'm not sure how open-minded "progressives" can so easily overlook this fact. Zarqawi fled to Iraq after Afghanistan fell and was treated for an injury at Baghdad's Olympic hospital, a hospital run by Uday Hussein. Absolutely true. Again, how can the "progressives" simply brush these facts aside. The absolute denial of these types of FACTS is what I mean by Flat Earth Society thinking. Stop being partisan, stop the Bush hating for just one second, and examine the possibilities, especially in the face of so much information and evidence.

Hmm, what about the funding of suicide bombers in Israel? Is that desperate propaganda as well? Nope. Anyone that hasn't realized by now that Saddam Hussein was neck deep in terrorism, may as well belong to the Flat Earth Society. (CNN) -- Russian President Vladimir Putin said his country warned the United States several times that Saddam Hussein's regime was planning terror attacks on the United States and its overseas interests. CNN A Hamas suicide bomber's family got $25,000 while the others - relatives of militants killed in fighting or civilians killed during Israeli military operations - all received $10,000 each BBC But the tapes do show the degree to which the hard-line Baghdad regime went in the mid-1990s to trick U.N. weapons inspectors. They also show Saddam and his henchmen had the full intention of rebuilding an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction once U.S. sanctions were lifted WT The evidence of an Iraq/al-Qaida connection hasn't gone away Slate That OBL and the Taliban are in contact with Iraq and that a group of Taliban and bin Laden group members visited Iraq That the U.S. has proof the Iraqi government and "bin Laden's group" agreed to cooperate to attack targets inside America That in case the Taliban and bin Laden's group turn out to be involved in "these destructive operations," the U.S. may strike Iraq and Afghanistan That the Afghani consul heard about the issue of Iraq's relationship with "bin Laden's group" while he was in Iran. ABC News To suggest this material has been "debunked" is disingenious at the very least. I still can't figure out how so many "progressives" can so easily brush all this information aside. It's terribly irresponsible.