WestCanMan

That's not kosher. It's bad for everyone, not just their own kids.

1992, 27 years ago. Who knows what Epstein was into three decades ago, way back before people had cel phones? There were no underage girls in the video. This isn't incriminating. Bill Clinton making two trips the island on the Lolita Express while he was POTUS is incriminating. There's no denying what Epstein was into at that stage of his life. Going to that island once might have been a mistake, going twice was not a mistake it was a decision. For all the video that they're finding about Trump and Epstein there's far more of Clinton and Epstein because Clinton's trips happened in the smart phone era. Your sources are just hiding that while they are trying to smear Trump.

I hate to be a conspiracy theorist but if a Coroner was dumb enough to rule that Epstein died of strangulation that would be akin to committing suicide by jumping down an elevator shaft onto some bullets.

Those links are from unknown sources, and that doesn't look like an underage girl at all to me. He's 6'3, and wearing dress shoes which would have 3/4 of an inch or more for a heel so he's about 6'4 there. She looks to be about 3" shorter in that pic, so with 3" heels she's a full 5'9 (+3" =6'0) at least, maybe 5'10 or 5'11 max. Any 20 yr old guy on the planet would be going for that girl if they were single. That pic is not the slightest bit incriminating unless it's from an exclusive party at Mar-A-Lago from the 2000s.

It's completely personal and if they don't want their children in the Sex Ed classes they shouldn't have to be in them. The notion that the school board has absolute control over your child's mind is scary.

screed /skrēd/noun 1. a long speech or piece of writing, typically one regarded as tedious. I just talked about plain, hard, verifiable facts, you're talking about your emotional reaction to facts, and making accusations based on your misguided emotions. Your feelings don't matter here. 130,000+ REAL jobs (family-supporting, private-sector jobs, not part-time burista jobs or public-sector drain-on-the-federal-budget jobs ) were lost. The lost revenue is $200,000,000.00 per DAY. That actually matters. It's ok to you that Trudeau created a law (tucked into the far back of a 600-page omnibus bill) to protect a crooked corporation (known to bribe liberal politicians with large sums of money) from justice, then broke another sacred democratic trust to force the AG to use his shiny new law to protect that crooked corporation, and that he paid CBC and select media outlets $1,395,000,000.00 to cover his back. I get that, and when I want to hear the hot new platitude I'll pop in and see what's up.

That's just proof that the Republican party is functioning like a healthy democratic institution. They're not just goose-stepping drones sucking a huge salary off the public tit, like the Dems, who recklessly throw themselves behind every ridiculous conspiracy theory that Hillary and CNN belch out.

Make the jump to ludicrous speed! Use the Schwartz!

That's a fine political speech, but just a farce of an actual, concise commentary of what happened. Oil is still being extracted at 100% production all over the world, everywhere but in Alberta and Sask. All over the world oil still sells for "the price of oil". Alberta oil sells at roughly 50% of what it's worth, sometimes less. Trudeau did do this to Alberta and you're the only one denying it. WTH are you even talking about? Only one of us is guilty of supporting violent groups like BLM and Antifa. So out to lunch.

Scheer was fighting against the far right, the Greens, and the media. If Trudeau's scandals got reasonable coverage then his popularity would have gone down more than just 6% (39 to 33). It wasn't just Scheer trying to steal votes from the Libs, it was also the Greens, NDP, Bloc, and PPC. All 5 of those parties tried to steal votes from the libs and they barely made a dent. That's entirely because of the power of the MSM.

A better strategy would have been to get rid of terrorist-lovin' Trudeau. Bernier's plan was stupid, right from the get-go. Bernier's plan was an epic failure. If Bernier's level of planning is this horrible then he's exactly what we don't want n a leader. omg taxme, that's just a crazy, almost rabid alt-right conspiracy.

Cite? Explanation? He has a 95% approval rating among Republicans and zero Rep Congressmen voted in favour of impeachment.

What do American on "both sides of the fence" think about Trump? He's wildly popular on one side, in case you hadn't noticed.

There was huge negative reaction when he talked about SNC. CTV and CBC have brainwashed the majority of Canadians to think that the topic is off-limits. Same with brownface. The CPC would have won at least 5 more seats if the PPC votes in those areas would have gone to the CPC. So, in effect, all that the slimy rat known as Max Bernier managed to do was HELP THE LIBERALS win extra seats. Just like I said all along. Scheer wasn't the biggest problem, Mad Max was the biggest problem.

Not Scheer’s fault that CTV and CBC want to talk about SNC as badly as CNN wants to list off Trump’s accomplishments

Still, if they ditched their terrorist-supporting leader and her socialist ideals they could have a future. Right now they don’t. Anyone who honestly wants to support the Greens, and follows them closely for a while, comes to the realization that she’s the same frumpy little dimwit on the inside that she appears to be on the outside. She may look like Yoda, but she’s Kermit the Frog, minus the charisma and the cute froggy wisdom.

Singh lost nearly 50% of his seats. Scheer's party grew by 22%. If you're being honest, the seats that the Libs lost were left-of-center seats, which had at least as good a chance of going NDP as Conservative. The biggest loser was May imo. Millions of Canadians considered the environment to be the biggest issue going into the campaign and she only gained two seats.

He actually is. Do you think that he's smart enough to do all of this by himself? Do you think that he's a pure genius in every facet of running an entire country? You have too much faith in him.

Trudeau has publicly stated that the Oil Sands will be phased out. $135 Billion in investments pulled out of Alberta in the first year of Trudeau's first term. He literally doesn't care at all about Alberta jobs, he wouldn't give Alberta the steam off of his crap. Remember that when Alberta needed money, after giving $13 Billion into confederation this year, Trudeau gave them a loan lol. That's like if your parents give you their house and then you let them rent a room in the basement and make them do all the chores when they experience hard times. I literally hate every single person who voted for Trudeau.

Media farce for Oct 31: WIdespread stupidity prevails today as the leftist MSM is going into hyperbole hyperdrive to hammer home the notion that "al-Baghdadi (the austere religious scholar according to WashPo) was killed in spite of Trump's involvement". I know that I don't have to spell this out for the majority of people, but the operation was an absolute success from top to bottom. Hardly any civilians were killed (3 small children were killed by Baghdadi himself), and no Americans were killed. The US also killed islamic state's spokesperson in a separate attack. The Whitehouse gave proper credit to everyone involved from the dog who chased him down, to the American Special Forces involved in the raid, and the Kurdish SDF who provided valuable intel for the raid. Powerless to use this info for the purpose of Trump-bashing, the media's only option to put spin on the story was to say that the incident happened in spite of Trump's leadership. Truth is, the President had to give the OK to a mission to kill Baghdadi, he would have had multiple scenarios to choose from over the past two years, and he chose the grand-slam homerun option. A truly great leader isn't a micro-manager, they surround themselves with great people and heed the counsel of those people to make the best possible decisions. Trump is by far the best US President since Kennedy.

Sheila Copps, from Twitter: OK, so it's just "regional alienation". That's, liiike, tots ok, right? Copps, again: Two entire provinces is a lot, isn't it? Yeah, how about if the rest make it work and two provinces leave. OK by me. Me be gone with them.

Once again, I'll dignify your answer with a response for no apparent reason. CNN and CBC are the leaders of the liberal flock, even to a greater extent than the Dem and Lib politicians. That's because the MSM picks up on what points they like and then stimulate your amygdala by reinforcing those points vigorously with emotional side stories and videos, or they cover the points minimally with no emotion so that the flock forgets them quickly, or they omit those points altogether and their flock never gets the opportunity to decide whether or not they care about it. As the leaders of the flock, their opinions are by definition the liberal opinions/talking points unless there's a huge uproar among their base. If you don't understand that then boo-hoo, stay in the sandbox making kiddie-level contributions to the discussions.

Huh is your response to things that you just don't understand.

Wrong. You just don't understand the similarity between railroading your child towards a whimsical profession and railroading them towards a sex change. Are there such things as "girl" or "boy" activities? Answer carefully. Adult-level decisions made by 3 yr olds and 8 yr olds. What could go wrong? Are you for real? I've known people who were entirely adamant that they didn't want kids when they were in their early 20's who did a total 180 at 30. Changing gender in grade 3 is making that exact choice 12 years earlier. If they still want to change at 18 they can still do it. A boy-> girl switch might end up looking like Serena Williams instead of Halle Berry but whatever. Serena is happy to be Serena.

It doesn't matter what language they're speaking. Vindman can't "advise" the Ukraine. If you were in a room with your lawyer would you want him giving advice to your opponent?