WestCanMan

1) Kudos for at least knowing what the word means, even if you just learned it from reading the definition there. 2) There were 500 speeches given by various Dems, their stooges and CNN taking heads during the last 4 years which were seditious too, far more if you include crap from the collusion fiasco. They had their supporters out harassing, attacking and shooting at members of the gov't in case you've forgotten. Their little turds even did things like put pictures of themselves on social media holding an effigy of the POTUS's severed head, they talked about assassinating the POTUS, talked about blowing up the whitehouse.... Those are all textbook examples of sedition which, if unpunished, have the net effect of legalizing it. And TBH, all Trump did was organize a protest against the people who want to sweep widespread election corruption under the rug. There really were too many examples of 'voting irregularities which all favoured one side' even if it can't be proven to the satisfaction of a court that it was all done for the purpose of actively committing fraud. If you can cite where he told people to attack anyone or seize control of government buildings, that's sedition, but organizing a protest is not sedition.

Nothing says "diminished sense of security" like: -the three full years of racial violence, rioting, looting, killing and arson that happened under Obama, -the litany of terrorist attacks against the USA and the rest of the world while Obi-wrong was POTUS, -the growth of a nation-sized genocidal theocracy in the middle east, -Russia's sudden rise to world-class douchebaggery, and -the rise to prominence of rocket-man. Also, wages went up by several times as much in just 4 years under Trump as they went up in 8 years under Obama. A good example of democracy faltering is when a criminal with dementia has the power to turn the Supreme Court into kangaroo court. Nice try though Reefer. A... sawwwinganamisssss.

They used the word sedition wrong on CNN yesterday (I saw a clip of Joke Yapper), no surprises there because they're dolts at the very best, and you just copied them. For your edification: se·di·tion /səˈdiSH(ə)n/ noun conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.

If it wasn't live it doesn't count right Beave? You cracked the code big guy. Give yourself a big, fat star. At-that uz-way arcasm-say. On't-day ell-tay eave-Bay.

Yes "Dem-led riots". Did you ever have any doubts about the fact that the Dems supported the rioting? They supported everything from anthem kneeling, playing a black national anthem, painting BLM on city streets while the BLMers were burning down cities and murdering people, they supported de-funding the police until they saw how much that hurt their popularity, they hid bodycam footage from the public in G Floyd's death while the riots were causing billions in damages plus 20 lives..... I know that you like to play stupid here but even you can't deny that the Dems supported the rioting 100%. FFS Hillary even went on TV and bemoaned her white privilege. And if you're keeping score, Trump told rioters twice in the span of a few hours to chill the f out but that's not enough for you? (You can count to two, right? Or do I need to point them both out in your own post that's quoted above?) Obama and the Dems told the rioters to tone it down zeeeroooo times from 2014 thru 2016. Them and their buds at CNN even said that protests didn't even need to be peaceful. They justified the riots every time they went on TV by talking about how bad the police were instead of talking about how bad burning homes and killing people was. Then they really threw gas during the 4 months of rioting in 2020, and you think they're just grand Beavie? Do I have to explain the difference between how Trump talked about rioting and how Obama talked about rioting to you? I bet that I do, I'm just not going to bother because everyone else gets it. Your comments are morally repugnant and utterly disgusting. Last thing - the day the bodycam footage came out the G Floyd riots dropped off the face of the earth. They didn't even fizzle out, they just ended abruptly. Try telling me that Ellison didn't know what was on that footage lol.

Unfortunately for you, you're not gonna be able to find any conservative websites or news outlets who say that the loss of 5 lives was an acceptable outcome. They're just not dishonest enough to categorize 5 deaths as 'mostly peaceful'. We both know that I can find multiple quotes from every alt-left media outlet in the US that called the riots 'mostly peaceful'. It's a buzzword that they're prompted to use. Also: Of the 5 deaths that you named it appears that one of them died from a heart attack. I'm surprised that they didn't count this one as covid. And a stroke victim. So it's down to 1 person killed by police, and two geezers who possibly just keeled over. Still unacceptable though.

Hilarious disinformation (FYI that means lies). The Dems, CNN and Obama knew that there was going to be bloodshed and violence on almost every single night that it ever happened (eg, on nights after a decision came out in the court, or when lies and disinformation about a new event were actively being spread by the media). There was never any stern reproach. The rioters were never called out for the criminals that they were. The Demmies never did their best to stop it, they eggged it on and provided false justification for it. They never even told the public when new information had come out that proved the old theories to be wong. For example: 1) When the body-cam footage of G Floyd's arrest was made public CNN never even showed it. They showed a heavily-edited version of it which didn't show key parts of the incident, and they posted known disinformation on it while they did it (a statement from Floyd's family's lawyers which said that 'police approached the van with guns drawn because there was a black man in the van'. The video footage clearly showed that the guns weren't out until after the officers told Floyd MULTIPLE TIMES to put his hands where they could see them - Floyd was rummaging under the passenger seat while officers were telling him that over and over again. You'd have to be a complete idiot to rummage under the seat of your car while an American cop has you pulled over.) Did you notice that after the body-cam footage was released the rioting across America instantly stopped? Sure, CNN refused to show it, but the people who were rioting actually cared enough to look at the video footage on the internet and when they did it took all of the wind out of their sails. FYI it was a high-profile Dem, AG Keith Ellison, who chose to stifle that partially- exculpatory (mitigating anyways) body-cam footage despite the fact that incendiary footage of other parts of the arrest were very public. It sure seems like Ellison wanted the rioting to occur, because he knew as well as anyone what that footage showed. 2) The Dems, CNN and Obama let the Brionna disinformation run unchecked for months after she was shot. They didn't say squat to set the record straight. 1) She wasn't in her bed, 2) the police did knock despite the fact that they had a warrant which said they didn't have to, and 3) the shooting happened after her boyfriend opened fire on the cops, who at the time were executing a legal search warrant. How big of a deal is it for people to know that a cop was shot before Brionna was shot? How heinous was the shooting compared to the version of events that was making the rounds? FYI allowing disinformation to be spread and not doing anything about it, when you have the power to easily set the record straight like CNN, Obama and the Dems did, is just as bad as spreading the disinformation yourself. People were getting killed and businesses were being destroyed while the truth was considered verboten. There was one day with rioting by Trump supporters and they didn't kill anyone. The Dem-led riots went on for months and almost two dozen people were murdered. It's like the difference between moonlight and sunlight.

Obama made the Trayvon Martin case out to be something that it wasn't, which stoked racial division. He also played up the Michael Brown incident like something that it wasn't, which again stoked racial division. He also stood in front of 5 murdered cops, and instead of just lambasting the killers as inhuman filth, he insinuated that centuries of slavery and discrimination were partly to blame for their murders. Then, during the worst rioting in 3 years (summer 2020) Michelle Obama gave a speech to new grads praising anger and demonstrations, without a hint of disgust at the racial violence, murders or arson that occurred during those riots. Add in that CNN and the Dem puppet-masters were calling the riots 'mostly peaceful' and even saying things to the effect that the riots were important enough that the violence (which was known to include several murders at the time) and destruction was just part and parcel of the bigger picture. I get that you don't want to acknowledge that the Obamas are vocal supporters of rioting and looting, but that has nothing to do with facts and everything to do with where your head is lodged.

Right. This all looks very interesting, but it's also worth noting that his family were devout muslims and one of his best friends since childhood was busted with over 50 kilos of carfentanyl. 2 milligrams of that stuff is enough to be lethal to most people. IE, he had enough murder-drug to kill about 25M people. Why did Faisal have murder fantasies from a young age? I dunno. You offer up your best guess Beave. The whole point is that every time a muslim goes on a killing spree there's an instantaneous rush to distance their actions from their religion, even when they praise their god while they're busy massacring random, innocent people. Omar Mateen was a perfect example of a guy who praised allah while he was gunning down people in a gay bar. The MSM blamed gun laws and Republican hate speech, although AK-47s were illegal before Mateen was born and there's no Republican war cry that anyone can cite which praises allah. Therefor, I contend that I have ample room to suggest that the people who were involved in yesterday's rioting can't be called 'Trump supporters' merely because they wore MAGA hats and chanted about the election being stolen. It's far more likely (by CNN's standards) that they're a bunch of pro-abortion radicals. Here's a photo of a gay parade in NYC that happened a week after Omar was killed (a week where CNN tried desperately to connect Omar's actions with 'Republican hate speech', although they had no cites showing where Republicans had ever advocated for any gay bashing let alone murders. CNN just offered their baseless accusations to their muppet horde, just like they did when some Jews were killed in Pennsylvania and CNN rushed to blame Trump (FYI Trump's son-in-law is a Jew, his grandkids are being raised in the Jewish faith, and he's the most pro-Israeli POTUS ever. By contrast, there's the fact that America's most virulent anti-Semites are hard-core Democrats)). Anyways - the photo:

What a coincidence. Did you know that I was wrong for the first time in my life the other day? I said: "Not all leftists are idiots. Some are just liars." Turns out that even the liars are idiots.

I'm sure that you're accustomed to being wrong by now. I'm one of those who said that 'there is proven, widespread election fraud in the swing states, but it will be almost impossible to prove it'.

Huh? Only leftists support rioting, tearing down statues, looting, arson, racial violence and murders in the name of [insert fake cause here]. Leftist news: "The protests were mostly peaceful. They happened right there, in that smoking 7-square block wasteland with the dead bodies in it. All hail the cause."

Obama was a first class dog whistler who fear mongered police and stoked racial division at every turn. He said nary a word to discourage rioting, and as soon as it sprung up again in 2020 him and his stanky wife started pushing racial division and fear mongering police again. Again, you're the liar. This is getting old Beave.

I never said that Trump would be President in 2021. I said that Biden won't be President anymore by 2023, on account of his declining mental health.

I'll bet you that a lot of your heroes in Antifa are incels. Have you seen their mugshots? They're so ugly they can't even masturbate. Faisal Hussein.

Biden will be carrying around a suitcase full of Tonka trucks, Depends, prune juice and pablum. But don't worry, he will still manage to get plenty of people killed.

Obama incited riots for 3 years straight. Duh.

Nope. They aren't Trump supporters. They're incels. That's a little trick I learned from the CBC.

Contradiction. I recall a 3 year long witch hunt involving actual crimes by the FBI, people being locked up and being coerced to give false testimony in exchange for leniency, a pre-dawn raid on an old man with assault weapons pointed at him who was subsequently frog-marched into custody in front of CNN cameras, thousands of lies and endless propaganda daily on mainstream news channels. Those kinds of things. That's pretty bad, considering that it was based on zero evidence and concluded with zero evidence. Sgt Schultz, is that you? Verboten topics are all around you beavie. Open your eyes. One of the Biden's closest business partners described their influence-peddling in detail. Were your eyes open Beavie? No? Joe was caught on camera multiple times denying knowledge of Hunter's business dealings and then he had to admit that he lied about that, every single time. Hunter admitted himself, on camera, that he got all of his lucrative board positions because of who his father was. He hasn't even been asked politely about any of it. Your MSM just calls all of that "Russian disinformation" and you completely lack the mental fortitude to even question them. News flash! There is no Russian disinformation. They spent some money on FB, dissing BOTH sides, to sow dissent. You wanna know who got foreign money to win some elections? Democrat Eric Swallwell. His campaign bundler was a Chinese spy. Do you see the Dems calling for his resignation? No, you do not. And why do you think that is the case, Beaverfever? Lol. That's called a Freudian slip and you're the last person who should be calling others brainwashed and simple. Do you really think that's all the proof there is Beave? That's stupidity of a magnitude never seen before. That's just layer upon layer of stupidity. You really can pack it in there Beave. FYI criminal cases usually go along the lines of: become cognizant of a crime, follow the evidence, identify some suspects, check them out, etc. The police aren't supposed to take blatantly bogus 'evidence' from known DNC criminals/Russian spies, use it to spy on their political rivals, open a smear campaign on them disguised as an investigation, submit fake evidence to a court once they realize that there's no actual evidence just so that they can spy some more, withhold exculpatory evidence from the court, tamper with witness statements, and then at the conclusion just say "we feel like he's guilty, we just never found a shred of evidence". That's really bad Beave. Really, really bad. It's the stuff of banana republics and dictatorships. The Dems and their KGB got you so whipped into a frenzy that you would be willing to throw a man in prison against whom there's never been a shred of credible evidence. 1) You're swearing like a trucker and using words that you don't understand now Beave. 2) Since when did leftists start caring about rioting? Shouldn't you be supporting that? Isn't this protest 'retarded' enough for you?

I don't think Trump actually helped the cause in Georgia this week. Regardless of what happened in the general election he really needed to take the high road in Georgia and focus on the good of the country. The US is screwed now. The Dems are going to move ahead with their Supreme Kangaroo Court plan now and there's nothing to stop them.

I'm about 4 years ahead of you on that one. Theoretically, tea leaves are more accurate (they don't lie).

Funny how after 100 days of rioting and arson in Portland, including an incident where terrorists tried to block the doors of a federal building and light it on fire with people inside, nothing even remotely close to this happened.

That's funny. Are you one of the dolts who was upset by the fact that the police in DC cleared a path through a bunch of terrorists who just destroyed a church, so that the President of the US could go visit it?

Antifa's protests are over hyped-up stories of people who shot at police and got killed, or who were in the room with someone who shot a cop and got killed in the ensuing gunfight. Their protests involve the murders of innocent civilians and police officers, arson, looting, rioting and widespread violence. They cost dozens of lives and billions of dollars in damage. The people in Washington right now are protesting a federal election that may have been stolen, or at the very least was greatly affected by proven instances of serious & widespread fraud. To this point they've done it without any violence or property damage to speak of. Do you think that murders and billions of dollars in property damages aren't worth wringing your hands over Boges? Can you explain to us how that works? Millions of people have seen evidence of a serious level of fraud. FYI that's far more worthy of protests than when the police shoot some drunk loser after he punches them and shoots at them.

Our media in Canada is just as tightly-controlled as the media in any of those countries, and our police are political pawns of the state as well. Democracy in North America is unravelling right now. Once the Dems convert the SC into the DNC Kangaroo Court, as was advocated for by Kamala and other high-level Demonrats, it's a done deal.