WestCanMan

You don't understand the meaning of the word, because I used it correctly and you said that the word force would only apply if they were pinned down physically. You're just completely unaware of the proper usage of the word. It's an absolute fact that people were forced to take the vaccine. Losing one's job, especially when they work in a field where they'll never get hired if they're not vaccinated, is not an option. Threatening people with the loss of their jobs absolutely counts as forcing them. If you don't get it, pout. Whine, Snivel. Whatever. What you stubbornly refuse to understand is that not everything is binary. It's not a case of "this is a democracy so everything that happens here is, by definition, democratic and fair in nature." This is not a completely totalitarian state, but the needle has moved a long way from democratic towards totalitarian. Forcing people to take the pseudovax was totalitarian all the way. Hitler would have loved that idea. Look up the word force ffs. 99% of adults have a thorough understanding of the word, and I already posted it here, yet for some you still don't have a clue what it means. If you threaten someone with consequences that they can't accept, in order to get them to do something, that's "forcing" them to do it. If Andrew Scheer put a gun to your head and said "Bark like a dog or I'll shoot!", and you decided to bark like a dog because you didn't want to take a chance on getting shot, it would be 100% accurate to say that he forced you to do it. I'm not going to use a softer word just because you're too stupid to learn or because you choose to remain ignorant. Hundreds of thousands of Canadians were "forced to vaccinate". - correct. You're confusing that with "forcibly vaccinated" which is a term that means something else entirely. It's a term I never used. Y'all larn up nahhw, boiiii!

The comparison to a person in a coma is ridiculous.

As usual You should be No thanks, I'll leave that to you.

Run that through Google translate for us if you could.

That's completely stupid. BLM didn't say "We'll be here from summer of 2014 until Dec 2016 looting, burning buildings down, torturing special needs kids, killing people and assaulting people". They didn't say "We'll be here from May 2020 to Aug 2020 looting, burning buildings down, killing people and assaulting people" They just lied about what happened when people attacked police or had bad interactions with them and then were killed, in order to start riots. They didn't kill people, loot businesses, burn communities. I'd rather have peaceful protests last a couple months than have riots last for years. You only say that because you're a stooge for Trudeau and CTV. By any reasonable measure, Tamara Lich is a person who dedicated most of her 2021 to organizing a large and peaceful protest which was for our basic rights and freedoms as Canadians. The gov't attacked people there and threw her in jail for it. She is absolutely like Gandhi and MLK. They would be proud of her. And so did Tamara Lich. Don't be stupid. Literally everyone in Canada knows that. Not at all. People of your ilk who lived in 1930s Germany worshipped Hitler and felt like his detractors were traitors and fools. You're on the wrong side of history just like they were, you just don't know it yet. Trudeau's fascist overreach will eventually be seen for what it was. For sure there are some decent people who agree with you, but they're just simple people who've been subjected to an overwhelming fearmongering campaign and who lack the capacity to think objectively in the face of it. Decency is no measure of intelligence, nor the value of one's opinion when they're exposed to a difficult situation, it's just a measure of their actual level of concern for others. In short, people with a limited capacity to understand the situation agree with you. What the what? Are you distancing yourself from the left now? Are you trying to say that the Tru-tards aren't leftists in this equation?

unrelated to the topic of killing a glob of cells You'd be killing a completely sentient being, not just some cells that are basically unaware of their existence. From the pov of the victim's awareness, killing the spider or cow is far worse.

Yes For sure, but definitely not a sentient being at that point. Just some cells. 14-yr-old girl gets pregnant, her life is basically over if she has a baby. It's an easy decision, and whether or not it's legal, they will almost always abort. It's just a matter of whether or not it's safe.

Again, not a child, nor even a fetus. Grab a dictionary. And no, it is not. Not as a miniature glob of cells. Have you ever squished a spider? Killed a wasp? They didn't want to be killed, and in a lot of instances they saw it coming and were in fear before they died. You killed them. Not so for a 7-week-old glob of cells. They weren't aware of what was happening at all. Do you eat meat? Do you think that cows want to die so that you can slather their muscles with bbq sauce and gorge yourself? Do you hunt? Do you think that deer want to be shot with .30 calibre bullets and bleed out so that you can feast on some wild game instead of eating some salad or something? The cows and deer wanted to live, the glob of cells was completely neutral to its own demise. Which acts were immoral Yz? It's accurate. The word child has an actual meaning. It's already in use. This is like if I started calling a chair a "child" and then insisted that you play along. It's silly.

BLM is "an excellent example of a protest" that our PM supports, and his legion of moronic supporters, you included, don't differ. You don't understand the concept of making a sacrifice for the greater good, but it's worth it. Tamara Lich has made her mark in history in the same way as Gandhi and MLK: people who peacefully strove to do the right thing and to make life better for others, and paid a price for it. Her struggle may not have been as dangerous or as large and she didn't die for it, but it was just as important. Intravenous freedom should never have been in question in the first place. You're like the guy who appreciated the assassinations of MLK and Gandhi. Decent people will look back on your ilk with utter contempt.

It is not a child. It isn't even a fetus yet until it's 8 weeks old. You don't get to pretend that a glob of a few thousand cells is more important to you than the entire life of a young woman is to her and her family. And you don't get to say that forcing a young girl to carry the product of a rape to term isn't immoral.

FYI you don't "state facts", you post stupid opinions with comments like "hehe" after them. That's why I stated that you were small, amoral and bitter.

I get it. You don't understand the definition of the word "force". You can add that to the laundry list of simple, basic facts that are commonly understood by the vast majority of Canadians over 8 but which are over your head. Still, the fact remains that hundreds of thousands of Canadians were forced to take the Pflacebo.

That would be the avowed racist Margaret Sanger, Hillary Clinton's role model. The first lady among alt-leftists.

It's not a child. You don't get to abuse the dictionary just because you're in an untenable position.

Leftists would argue that burning down communities, looting hundreds of stores, assaulting cops, and assaulting & killing innocent people was worthwhile because Michael Brown was killed after he attempted to kill a police officer. Conservatives would argue that sitting in jail for a few months for organizing a peaceful protest was worth it, when the protest was done to stop people from being forced to inject a useless, harmful serum into their body. Tamara Lich is a hero. It's a sad day when ultra-low morality leftards get to walk free while she's in prison.

What's immoral: aborting a blob of 3,000 cells, or forcing a 14-yr-old girl to carry a baby to term after she was raped? In your world a serial rapist could have dozens of babies if he doesn't get caught. It's immoral for you to think that a woman should be forced to abide by your rules in a situation that is life-altering for her and has nothing to do with you or any other human being.

Yay Canada! Little victories I guess.

How small, amoral, and bitter does a person have to be in order to feel joy when they see someone sitting in jail just for defending the freedoms of others? Not everyone is stupid enough to believe in the Pflacebo now that all the data is out. Even if the jab is partially effective, and they can put an end to the damaging side-effects, it should still just be a choice. No one should be forced to take it.

Not killing a 'person', killing a blob of 3,000 cells which have no idea that they are even alive. There are going to be 2 babies born in either scenario Yz, two babies born into a hot mess or two babies born into a loving home. Regardless which decision you make, 2 people get to be born and 2 people don't. If you're driving a trolley down the track and you have the option of switching tracks to avoid a person, do you do it? Yeah, sure. What if there are 5 people on the track you're on and one on the other... Do you switch to the track with only 1 person? You'd kill 4 less people, but you'd choosing to murder the other one. What if you know & care for the lone person on the other track but not the 5 on the track you're on, do you switch it then? 2 babies get to live, 2 don't. It's her choice, because none of the babies are cognizant of their own future yet. If the fetuses are formed into little humans inside of a womb it starts to take on a different dimension imo. It's not always easy to make these decisions, and TBH, if it's a really decision for the woman to abort a fetus, then she probably isn't the kind of person who would be bringing decent humans into the world.

By comparison to Senator, uh, Prezinprendi Bidden, almost everyone is perfect. Even Trudeau is well-spoken compared to him.

It's another name for the gesundheitspass/pseudovax passport.

Trump spoke off the cuff for hours and hours every week, taking questions from extremely biased and hostile reporters on a constant basis, and has made a small handful of minor gaffes in that whole time. Biden doesn't speak off the cuff for more than one or two sentences a week, he doesn't take questions from hostile/lying reporters, 99% of the questions that he does take are pre-approved, the total amount of time he spends speaking is just minutes a day, and yet he's still a shambling, mumbling, bumbling blooper reel. Biden's 'gaffes' are things like mentioning his willingness to get into a chemical warfare exchange with Russia, Trump botched the name of an app. Got anything else? LMAO. You don't have a clue what's going on because you're a fake news junkie.

Walking around with a Pflacebo passport is an example of trusting the government entirely.

It sounds good from a "sustainable earth" POV, but it's also putting us right back to having a monarchy.

If a girl is gonna have 2 kinds in her lifetime should she: 1) Have them by surprise when she's in grade 10 and 12, or 2) Do it as a married woman at 30 and 32 years old? Which children are better off in that scenario? Keep in mind that we'd like to have a happy, healthy country, with children that are loved and well-cared-for. You're asking for a woman and her child to grow up in misery and poverty when it's not necessary.