Jump to content

WestCanMan

Senior Member
  • Posts

    27,486
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    115

Everything posted by WestCanMan

  1. To this, let me remind you that the Duffygate "scandal" was never really a scandal at all, and the LPOC's WE scandal was serious enough to result in the finance minister having to resign. The WE scandal involved 10,000 times as much money. The WE scandal got 1/12th the amount of coverage, in terms of how long the CBC carried on about them. Duffygate: Involved only $90k, which turned out to have been spent within the framework of what's acceptable, and the money was even paid back. The only question was: "Did the PM play some part in paying the $90k back for a non-scandal". Real riveting stuff, right? The kinda thing that you topple a gov't over. But the CBC gripped that story like a dog with a bone for 3 full years, even going so far as to call the 2015 election - 3 years later - a "referendum on Duffygate". What's more, Trudeau's only real poignant moments as Oppo Leader for that whole period came when he yelled about Duffygate in the HoC for 3 years, but the CBC never said that he was too negative. FYI Poilievre's tone has never sunk to the level that Trudeau constantly carried on in the HoC, and PP is only ever seen to politely offer the truth and pragmatic comments on air, yet somehow the CBC calls him "too negative to be an effective leader". Hmmmm. WE Scandal: Involved, literally, 10,000 times as much money. 900 "million" is exactly ten thousand times as much as 90 "thousand". To put that into perspective, the yellow dots on Hwy here in Langley are 6m long, and there's 8M gap between them. So it's 20m from the beginning of one dot to the end of the next. IE, each dot takes about 10m in distance. So if you pass 10,000 dots at 10m each, you go 100,000m. That's 100km. So, the next time you're driving down the hwy, just say "$90,000 Duffygate scandal" every time you pass a yellow dot, and do that for 100km. That's how many Duffygate non-scandals it takes to equal the amount of money from the WE actual scandal. The actual WE scandal got about 3 months of lukewarm coverage on CBC. Sometime it was there, sometimes it wasn't. There was an election later that same year and they never talked about it until the election was over, oddly stating that "Scheer couldn't win the election despite Trudeau's scandals (plural), so it's probably time for him to resign". Not only did WE give Trudeau's mom $300k for her speeches, they gave her $150k in expenses (a lot for just a person with no equipment to speak of). Trudeau's gov't also offered WE money, about $1.9M per event, to do shows. So a lot of taxpayer money went into WE and then straight to his mom's pocket. WE also made Hitler Youth-style propaganda for Trudeau. Trudeau's mom, doing speeches, earned ten times as much as Morneau's daughter did for working there for 1 full year. But Margaret's speeches weren't contractual, so Morneau had to resign but Trudeau was in the clear πŸ˜‚ Summary of CBC's coverage: 3 years for a $90k non-scandal by the CPC 3 months for $900M actual-scandal by the LPOC Does that seem like "CBC's bias is always in favour of the gov't"? You had an astonishing 100% accuracy rating after 3 words. You shoulda stopped there. You managed to flip your accuracy score on its head, while whining like a tw4t.
  2. Ok, that's a very minimalistic answer. You're admitting that there is some bias, but leaving the impression that it's very minimal. Was that your intention? To say that the amount of bias is very minimal? IOW, it's almost fair? Maybe just a bit off, sometimes? Of course you could. I'm not asking for 3 decimal places, 99.9% of the time. I'm asking for your general impression. Maybe to the nearest 10%. Do they tend to favour the LPOC or CPC? By: 90-10 80-20 70-30 60-40 Less than 10%. It's just a bit, here and there. Oh, that's rich, coming from you, Michael... The guy who claimed to have seen evidence of rampant racism at the Freedom Convoy, but then couldn't find a single picture or video to support such a strong, accusatory claim... Don't talk about anyone's honesty, Mike, tell us all what YOU think about the level of bias at the CBC. This isn't about what anyone else thinks. This is just about your own, "honest" opinion. The are billions of liars on the planet, but you're about to lay down the truth, Michael. Bring it on. You've been watching the CBC for decades, Mike. Decades. Benefit of the doubt day came and went twenty years ago. Give your answer, or check the box beside "Plead the 5th, even though I'm not an American". Don't be snotty and trite. Man up. Have a real opinion. I think that you're in the horns of a dilemma. I think that you want to lie and pretend to be unaware of any real bias, but you know how dumb that will make you look. Buddy: here's a real, honest to goodness, grown-up answer... The CBC is a complete farce when it comes to political coverage. In order to accurately portray their POV, they should be decked out in LPOC uniforms with swastikas on them, to represent their dedication to 1) propaganda and 2) the eradication of unwanted information. 90-10 is an understatement - the CBC will do anything to promote the LPOC, and they are always willing to slander the CPC if they think that they can get away with it. Oh, and they also think that they can always get away with it, because of people like you, who always let them get away with it. You might not like that answer, but it's an honest answer. That's how I truly feel. You can call me any names you want, but IDGAF, because I'm not afraid to give my honest opinion. Now you try it. Just man up give your honest opinion about the CBC.
  3. Carney shouldn't have said "new world order"... when he was shifting Canada's "economic and strategic partnerships" from the US to communist China. Wake up. From your LPOC-coloured glasses POV that was always going to be cute and positive, because Carney said it, but from a reality-based Canadian and American POV, that was catastrophically stupid. Ask yourself: if Poilievre did this, would you somehow see just a teensy bit of a problem with it? πŸ˜‚ The CBC would be ranting about"Chinagate: the biggest political blunder in the last 200 years of Canada-US relations", and they would also be calling the next election "a referendum on Chinagate". Carney is even talking about letting China be a partner in a new pipeline. Isn't that weird, when you consider that the Libs spent so much time and energy making pipelines impossible, and Trudeau chased away over $135B in energy projects in Alberta? Did those two chase away American and Canadian investment to pave the way for China to slide in there and get a bigger share? A controlling share? Here's something about China that you don't know: they killed millions of their own people in the middle of the 1900s ("the 1900s" sounds so long ago now), and then they did God-only-knows-what to all of their own babies circa 2000, you are completely oblivious to reality if you think that killing 500,000 Canadians would phase them. And was it really a casual mistake to talk about the "new world order" while he was right on the podium at the WEF...? The place that our LPOC MP's go to get their marching orders? Or did he use his inside voice out loud?
  4. He still believes that "the balance will budget itself", and runs into the wall when he chases the red dot. You'll be a while trying to explain that to him.
  5. Thanks Dr CrakHo. And at what point did you notice Biden's cognitive decline...? Thought so. The only things that your profession qualifies you to diagnose are testicular and rectal cancer, at $10/exam. Now get back on your corner and use your fingers the way God intended, to save some lives.
  6. the one one that is drinkn drinkn is you shut up clown
  7. Are you trying t say that the CBC isn't 100% biased and dishonest? How Biased do you think they are? How dishonest do you think they are?
  8. It was 100% accurate, you're just a dumb cultist who won't admit to anything. Carney's trip to China was political suicide for half the country, and all of the US. Carney is almost as reviled as Trudeau is now, and that's after 1/10th the time in the PMO. .You're not a big believer in trends, or patterns, are you πŸ˜‚ Carney - the guy who is always backpeddling and caving ,when he's not biting the pillow- is gonna cave again.
  9. Nice try, idjit. None of them even cared when he talked about making us the 51st state. The ad that Mark "elbows up!" bite-the-pillow Carney apologized for? πŸ˜‚ How many Chinese cars/trucks/EV's have we sold here? Probably more, but we lost the superpowers and gained some welfare muslim states. FYI it's not normal or healthy for a country to have their MSM controlled by one political party.
  10. He meant it in the same way that your wife means it if she says "Sure, you can go to ________ with your buddies on our anniversary. That's important."
  11. We also celebrate the murders of people we call terrorists in other countries and get pissed off when India takes out our garbage for us. I'm pretty sure that the Indian gov't isn't prejudiced against Indians, if they want to take out 1 guy every 20 years I'm pretty sure they have their reasons. We have still never convicted a single Khalistani terrorist here, ever. Not one. And we have thousands of them plotting actual violence. Then we even invited a terrorist to dinner with the Indian gov't πŸ˜‚ Our country is just f'ing whacked.
  12. I told you guys that Trump was just calling Carney's bluff, and letting him paint himself further and further into a corner. Before this, average, everyday Americans had no real beef with us, and now our relationship is eroding at an alarming pace. Trudeau and Carney have been pi55ing off India, Japan, China and the US for a decade now. The only reason China even listened to Carney last week was to stick his thumb in America's eye. Trust and confidence between the US and Canada were never in doubt until we elected these liberal jackasses. And TBH, they're not the actual problem. The actual problem in Canada, again, is the fact that our liberal leaders know that they can do and say whatever they want and our media will whitewash their mistakes, ignore their scandals, slander their opponents, back their lies, push their false narratives, and heap praise on everything they say and do that's not catastrophic. It works internally, because the gov't and the MSM are a tagteam that can bully Canadians and lead a small majority of us around by the nose, but our MSM can't do a thing for them internationally, because no one in India, China, Japan or the US gives a F what the CBC and CTV have to say. When we f those countries over, it doesn't get swept under the rug by their MSM. Canada's reputation is now on the slippery slope. We've rubbed too many raw nerves in the past decade and we are now running out of free passes that took generations to accumulate. Unless all these muslim countries that we gave so many billions of dollars to us somehow find it in their hearts to love their first non-muslim country, we are running out of friends.
  13. Unions don't listen to Carney, provinces ignore him, the US ignores him, FN chiefs ignore him... No one respects the guy.
  14. I think the general rule of thumb for leftists is: if Tim Walz carried it in a war, it's a weapon of war. TBH, "weapon of war" and "assault rifle" are just really cool buzzwords, and there's nothing that lefties love more than their buzzwords. Sedition, collusion, cognitive dissonance, confirmation bias, cisgender, terrorizing..... oooohhhh, they all have so many letters! They have to be true!
  15. Brookfield must have got some contracts there. You tell us, Spanky. You're the one who thinks it's an issue, so tell us how. Be as specific as you want.
  16. I don't understand why violent crime is suddenly tolerated in Canada and the US.
  17. LMAO Great powers, like who, for example? Which countries "like Canada"? Maybe "Canada"? Did Trump "try to make Canada subservient", or did he succeed? Last time I checked, Carney had folded like a cheap tent. πŸ˜‚ IOW, "Bad, bad Twumpo maked me his b-otch, mommy."
  18. You're such a pathetic weasel that it's disgusting. Timeline: Barack Obama's administration was in charge, created the kid cages when adults were detained, they separated the adults from the kids because no one puts children in adult jails inevitably, some of the kids detained while Obama was president were still there to be processed when Trump came into the WH, which he did inevitably, some of the kids detained while Trump was president were still there to be processed when Biden's autopen team came into the WH, which they did. None of that changes the fact that Trump is winning while Dems are literally crying about all the pedophiles being arrested.
  19. Call it "slavery light" if you want, but it's 100% certain that there were slaves in the past who had nicer lives than the avg illegal immigrant does, and there are illegal immigrants in the US who lead far worse lives than 90% of slaves ever did. There are sex-slaves in the US, Hodad. Does it get any worse than that? Not legally, mind you, but this massive front of 10M+ illegals living in secrecy provides a huge curtain, and allows rampant gang crime activity to flourish. There are people who work in slaughterhouses for 60+ hrs a week for meagre pay. Was slavery so much worse than that? At the end of the day, they all just did shit jobs just to go back to eat low-cost foods in their shitty houses. And don't forget, Hodad: people of your race and religion owned slaves at one point in history too, and they all thought it was normal. And not just for a minute, probably centuries. Not just a few slaves either, millions. Some of your ancestors' slaves were badly mistreated, some were treated well, and I know that because human nature just is what it is. You can't raise everyone in Iran to love pedophilia & beheading people just because of their religion, and you can't make everyone in Tibet move earth worms out of the way when they want to dig a hole. The picture you're trying to paint is one of minimization and exaggeration. If you think that every slave was whipped every day you're wrong. If you think that illegals don't experience violence and fear on a regular basis you are wrong again. And part of the reason the feel so much fear is that the Dems allow groups like the cartels, MS13 and Tren De Aragua prey on them. They don't arrest people like that, they let people out of jail without avoiding ICE, and they let them out on low bail. Illegal immigrants experience a lot of fear and loss, simply because Dem politicians don't give a F. Gimme a break. What state has more illegals than Texas? And what happens to illegals that get shipped out of Texas to Dem-run states? You're sitting here playing the division game while your handlers in the DNC make bank off of the illegals that work in their slaughterhouses, sleep in their slums, and eat the garbage at MacDonald's and a bunch of refined/processed food. Illegals are profitable for Hillary et al. They're not here because "Hiwawy wants to pwotect them" you raging dipshit.
  20. Carney is a great orator like Hitler and Stalin were great orators. He can sell you out with a confident smile. ^That's^ all I see when his lips move.
  21. But since when has a leftist or leftist leader ever admitted to causing inflation or any other hardship? Why would they when the MSM will run cover for them? He regrets nothing - he is remorseless and pathological. That's why he can be such a convincing stone-cold liar, and never look back. He just goes straight to the next lie without flinching. And, do leftists really believe in those things? They use fake values as bait and have no regard whatsoever for rules. They condone cop-killing, assaults, looting, burning, etc and let rioters, pimps, wife-beaters, drug dealers and child molesters go free. What rules do they obey? "Protect my massive bank account"? Our culture, under the LPOC, is "we hate whites". Count me out. That depends on what side you're on. If you're pro-Canada, then "no". If you're an LPOC leader then "yes". They don't have to because the media ignores it, glosses everything over, and hails Libs as virtuous heroes and conservatives as angry ne'er-do-wells. 42% of Canadians are awe-stricken by it. FIFY.
  22. 100%. "Peace, land, bread." - a liar "Awwwww 😍πŸ₯°." - peasants/serfs/peons/slaves "Hey, wait, where's all that stuff you promised us... We're worse off tha☠️☠️☠️" - peasants/serfs/peons/slaves Rinse/repeat
×
×
  • Create New...