WestCanMan

E Jean Carroll herself said that Trump did not r4pe her, and no one can argue her point. By her own story, and the verifiable facts of the case, she was a 52 yr old woman, out walking the streets of NYC by herself in 4" heels, an the middle of winter. That's not a crime, she had every right to do that, but she just looked like a ho, and she got propositioned like a ho: Trump made a profoundly sexual overture right in the first moments they made contact Carroll played coy, but by her own admission she consented to his request to "model lingerie for him", because she took lingerie into a changeroom where he simply "closed the door behind him" Now, her bringing him into the changeroom with her to model lingerie for him does not not constitute "implied consent for rough, full intercourse", but it was by any reasonable reckoning "implied consent for him to try to go to the next base", which he did by pushing her against the wall and kissing her. In her own words, she never described offering any resistance at all at that stage, she said that "she just giggled" I dunno if they made out for 30 seconds or whatever, but they did it for long enough for him to get his fingers into her cooter, and again, she never described offering any resistance at all to him at that stage, she said that she just "giggled again" At this point, he's standing in the changeroom with her, his fingers are in her cooter, he starts fumbling with his belt or whatever, and she did the exact opposite of what robo would have done in that situation: she gave the very first sign that she was rejecting his advances, by pushing him with one arm By her OWN STORY, the 120-lb, 52-yr-old lady, in 4" high heels, pushed him one time, with one arm, and was able to exit the changeroom. He's 6'3 and weighs 225 lbs by the WH medical records. That's not her escaping, that's him letting her go instantly. So tell me robobigot: at what point above did that alleged encounter rise from the level of "sleazy encounter" to "r4pe"? Was it r4pe when she brought him into the changeroom? Did he commit "kiss-r4pe", when he kissed her and she giggled? Was it "giggling finger-b4ng r4pe" when she giggled as he put his fingers into her va-j-j? Was it r4pe when she shoved him and then he let her go? Describe for me, at what point of her own story, did she get r4ped? FYI she even said that she never considered it a r4pe until her friend suggested it was a possible r4pe. How does a woman not know that she was r4ped herself, the day it happened, and for days after, but you do, after only hearing of it 25 years later? Is it considered "r4pe" in your books whenever a guy tries to get to the next base and is rebuffed? What if he pretends to go back to the previous base and then tries for the next base again when he feels like she will go for it? Is trying twice r4pe, robobigot? Robobigot, I don't need a judge to tell me what a r4pe is. And I read her story, and she never called it a r4pe either. This is an alleged incident from "either 1995 or 1996" it allegedly happened in an extremely public place at the very busiest time of year but somehow there were zero witnesses the accuser hasn't described a r4pe of any sort she never considered the alleged incident a r4pe, her friend suggested it to her and no one in the entire history of the United States is considered a r4pist under those circumstances. For your edification, here is an example of a "non-r4pe" by a member of the Kennedy family: The William Kennedy Smith r4pe case is the high-profile legal matter often associated with the Kennedy family compound in Palm Beach, Florida (sometimes metaphorically referred to as "Camelot"). On December 11, 1991, a jury acquitted William Kennedy Smith, the nephew of Senator Ted Kennedy, of all charges after just 77 minutes of deliberation. Incident Details Date & Location: The alleged assault occurred in the early hours of March 30, 1991, on the grounds and beach of the Kennedy family’s oceanfront estate in Palm Beach, Florida. The Parties: The accused was William Kennedy Smith, then a 30-year-old medical student. The accuser was Patricia Bowman, a 29-year-old single mother. The Lead-up: Earlier that evening, Smith had been out at a local nightclub called Au Bar with his uncle, Senator Ted Kennedy, and his cousin, Patrick Kennedy. Smith met Bowman at the club, and she later drove him back to the Kennedy compound. The Allegation: Bowman alleged that while walking on the beach behind the estate, Smith tackled her and forcibly r4ped her. She testified that she repeatedly said "no" and that Smith called her a "b1tch" during the attack. The Defense: Smith maintained that the sexual encounter was entirely consensual. He testified that Bowman became upset and slapped him only after he mistakenly called her by the name of a former girlfriend, "Cathy". Key Trial Highlights Excluded Testimony: The prosecution attempted to call three other women who claimed Smith had previously assaulted them in the 1980s. However, Judge Mary Lupo barred their testimony, ruling it did not establish a specific enough pattern of behavior to be admitted under Florida law. Physical Evidence: A hospital examination documented bruises on Bowman's body and semen in her vagina, which the prosecution argued supported a forceful attack, while the defense argued it was consistent with consensual sex. Kennedy Involvement: Senator Ted Kennedy was called to testify about the family's activities that evening, drawing further global media attention to the "Camelot" legacy. Key differences: specific date and time of day, vs unknown year lol several witnesses that the two actually met vs no witnesses that they ever met during that entire "season" defendant's admission that at one point during the encounter she slapped him vs Trump saying he was never even with her victim feeling that it was an attack, while it was happening, vs victim playing along in a very sexual manner and then only giggling while the encounter was happening, and never offering any resistance until the exact moment it ended victim goes directly to the police with bruises all over her body and calls is a r4pe vs victim doesn't even consider it a r4pe for days, until a friends suggests that it might have been one. Do you see how hard it is to get an actual r4pe conviction? What you are describing between Trump/Carroll is nothing more than "he said/she said" story. By using that farcical story as an accusation of a r4pe, you are lying again, robobigot. You actually have no clue whatsoever whether or not she was even treated disrespectfully in said encounter, or if they ever even met at all.

You just ignored the elephant in the room: tens of thousands of pregnant women - who are not American citizens - just travel to the US every year to drop babies, for a free citizenship ticket, and it's not sustainable. That is the topic at hand, not your rah-rah BS about the American dream that is totally of topic. Left4rds only care about "American values" when they have a hidden agenda. Aside from that it's "F AMERICA! PUT THESE OTHER PEOPLE FIRST!!!!"

No, a simple google search instantly brings up several different sources saying the same things about Swallwell. By YOUR OWN STANDARDS, which we've seen you apply to Republicans over and over again, you have to say "SWALLWELL IS GUILTY! HE HAS BEEN ACCUSED MULTIPLE TIMES!" Think of Swallwell as your latest fallguy, robobigot, like Al Franken: a guy that you can throw under the bus to give your future accusations of sexual harassment some MUCH needed credibility. If you don't like it, then you should have thought about your future need for accountability on days like this, back on all those occasions when you said "ANONYMOUS SOURCE MEANS "GOSPEL TRUTH" YOU LOSERS!" That's actually a promotion from his other hobby as a genocide apologist.

The Democrats are the only party that thinks that women's accusations are more important than the Iran war you f'ing stupid bigot. You can't even cheer for America VS Iran because you're so concerned about some random hoes' personal/unsubstantiated accusations. I don't Republicans screaming: "THE ACCUSATIONS OF A COUPLE OF WOMEN IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE COUNTRY RIGHT NOW!" in the morning and then saying "Let's keep a lid on all of these accusations" in the afternoon Do you see the hypocrisy in that? Demt4rds are saying "Trump only started this war to draw attention away from the Epstein files (which Biden had for 4 years and did nothing with)" and then they vote to keep sexual harassment allegations secret.

Same as a terrorist supporter from the ME who never grew up here. If you look for any post from him that says anything patriotic you'll be waiting a really long time. And pro-LPoC and patriotic are not the same thing at all, even if the LPoC has a patriotic moment once in a while.

let's see if a bunch of women claiming that he's a predator matters to Dems

Looks like the range of Irans missiles has a massive effect on your willingness to ignore their evil.

You're just an evil piece of shit, robobigot.

"No kings, we want an ayatollah" - the left

If you really think about his posting history here, and what he does/doesn't support, do you think he's more likely air force or al qaeda? If he was in an air force, it definitely wasn't Canada's.

"When in Rome, doing as Romans do, you're guilty of cultural appropriation, you racist piece of shit." - Ketanji Jackson, from the SC, last Tuesday.

I guess the moral of their story is that "If you do kinky shit in private but act normal in public then you're a deviant, but if you do that same kinky shit in public, especially around children, then you're mentally healthy and other adults have to play along..." IOW, if Mr Noem just wore a short shirt with those boobs, and read books to elementary school children, that would make it ok 👍 By that same logic, my wife has to start wearing her nurse outfit to our son's baseball games, or I have to take her to a shrink.

If conservatives told a story about "rocks and trees talking to manly men to help them find gays to kill, even when the poor buggers were just trying to hide so that they wouldn't be killed", would you say that it was just a parable? You have no room to talk about other people's alleged bigotry when you're the worst kind of bigot yourself.

This is why reasonable people hate left4rds so much: Adults SHOULD be allowed to do what they want to do in their own bedrooms with other consenting adults. Whether that's LGBTQ adults are cisgender adults doing oral and anal, I don't make it my business and neither should you Adults should not be allowed to force the rest of the world to pretend that they are something that they are clearly not. If Mr Noem wants to come out in public tomorrow that's his business, but he can't just say "I'm a woman now, I can go into the girls' bathroom and compete in women's sports, and you can't say "mom" anymore". That's nt realistic. I can't even wrap my head around what twisted form of logic leads you to believe that 1) a man is a deviant if he has a secret sexual identity, but 2) if he chooses to call himself a woman then he's is a complete woman and everyone has to pretend along with him, and he is no longer considered a deviant Kamala Harris just called. She was wondering if she can go down on Kristi to get some political appointments. Kamala had an official title, that didn't make her any less of a useless tw4t. Surely you must have some examples of the public shaming... Are you accusing them of being liberals? Where's the proof? "Marriage" is a relative term. Everyone has a different definition of what it means. Ask Bill Clinton what it means, or Hillary. Sometimes people keep their fake "marriage" on the books and in public long after they are no longer a real couple. Proof, left4rd. Again, that's standard practice for liberals, and I've never heard you complain about Trudeau, Pelosi, teh Clintons, etc. Millions of pigs, cows and chickens are killed every day. To kill pigs they put them all into a tight corral with hydraulically powered, metal gates that just quickly compress them together to crush them. Is killing one dog that kills chickens so bad? Farmers also kill coyotes that kill their chickens. What's the difference? Again, it's the peak of hypocrisy for you to say that there's something wrong with that. I'm pretty sure there's a letter for that within your LGBTQ++ community.

The Dem leadership is so bad it's comical. Gavin "I love scandals" Newsom is still a front-runner there. He was caught out in large gatherings during his own covid lockdowns, he's anti-police, anti-ICE and pro medicare-scandals. He's honestly toxic at this point. Kamala is just a brainless whore who couldn't beat Trump with billions of dollars and the entire MSM doing their best to pump up her tires. AOC is arguable the dumbest person elected anywhere. She doesn't even have dementia yet and she makes Biden look like Einstein. So now they are leaderless, and their congressmen are all deeply unpopular. I'd love to see a 70-30 congress. The people need to utterly reject Democrat behaviour.

Yeah, there's no way that "73%" transfers directly into 73% at election time, but that's a swing that will translate into at least a couple percent. Honestly, aside from "hating Trump because maybe he will do something really wrong one day", which really isn't panning out for the Dems, they have nothing. Maybe they love terrorists more than other American presidents, but I don't think that's an election-winning strategy. And Trump has been president for 5 plus years now, and was just better than Biden by light years. He's on pace to finish 8 years with several huge wins and no real losses to speak of. The Dems are cheering for the ayatollahs because that's their last hope.

The Dems' "We hate everything!" campaign isn't working. Key Findings on Approval Ratings Record Lows: A late 2025 Quinnipiac University poll found that only 18% of voters approved of the way Democrats in Congress were handling their jobs, while 73% disapproved, marking a record low. Internal Dissatisfaction: A significant portion of Democratic voters are dissatisfied with their own party's leadership, with 48% of Democrats disapproving of their own party's performance in Congress. A 73% disapproval rating should tell them something. Maybe "We hate America" doesn't work in America. I wonder what their approval rating would be in Gaza... Probably higher than 17% lol.

I don't think it's that hard to hide WMD's in an entire country. It's not like you need an olympic swimming pool of nerve gas for it to be effective. a small droplet is more than enough to kill a person.

I guess that by now they know which islands the attacks are coming from. There are quite a few islands in that strait. Kharg island is a likely target. I guess they might need to get boots on the ground near some of those underground facilities to make sure that they are destroyed. Whatever it is, I hope this next phase is successful.

True

It could be worse... It could be a failed presidency, like Biden's, where not a single person got fired. Although almost everyone that ever worked for Kamal quit. IMO success is better, but you guys are free to have your own opinions.

Can you imagine getting away with just that much, against normal police in Canada? Maybe one time the police would let you do that. Second time, you'd be pulled out for sure. But over and over again, with all the other people yelling, and cars honking, when you're there for no other reason than to prevent the police from serving warrants? How could a judge find the police guilty of arresting you at that stage?

OMG, I think I found something we can all appreciate: ^^Babylon Bee^^