WestCanMan

What's stopping you from just accepting that some people would like to stay where they are, and just no longer be associated with Canada?

FYI "half of Quebec" is already more than 10% of Canadians, you effing idjit.

I don't see joining the USA as a positive. Would you wanna suddenly be a part of the ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN clown-show? Would you wanna be represented by Danielle Smith, or Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris, etc? Would you be jumping up and down to join a gov't with Hakeem Jeffries in it? The squad? Schumer and Pelosi? Alberta needs to jump out of the frying pan for sure. Into the fire? Not so much.

No, it wasn't, and just basic reading comprehension tells you as much. The "I just grab 'em..." comment was about "women" in general, plural. The comment that I quoted from CBC referred to "a married woman", singular. The comments referenced about the married woman were printed later in the article: "Trump is heard saying he "did try and f—k her. She was married." He's referring to an unknown woman. He also used graphic terms to describe the woman's body and said he frequently tried to kiss beautiful women." Well, if I was to report on it with a conservative bias that's similar to CBC's leftist bias I guess I'd start the article by saying: U.S. President Barack Obama said on Monday that Donald Trump should be immediately removed from the Republican ticket. He joined his wife Michelle in calling out the GOP candidate for a comment that he made to Billy Bush in private a decade ago, which was caught on tape by Access Hollywood. That would be the opening paragraph, running in perfect parallel to CBC's article about the Kimmel/Trump topic, shown here: U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday that Jimmy Kimmel should be immediately fired by ABC and its parent company ‌Walt Disney. He joined his wife Melania Trump in calling out the late-night talk show host for a monologue he delivered prior to a shooting that took place over the weekend near a gathering of journalists and politicians. Do you see how my opening paragraph didn't touch on Trump's comment at all, like the CBC article avoided Kimmel's comment? And how I framed the article to condemn other people's reactions to Trump's comment, while not commenting on Trump's comment? That's how CBC rolls, so I guess that I should do the same thing if I wanted to be "objective", right MH? Then I would parallel CBC's article again, with a comment like this: Obama has repeatedly urged the GOP to remove candidates that he dislikes or that have been critical of ⁠him, and has pressed the IRS, FBI and other government agencies to investigate and discriminate against conservatives and conservative-oriented groups. That's an important addition to the article about Trump's comment, right? Because it mirrors this: Trump has repeatedly urged broadcasters to remove comedy or news programs he dislikes or that have been critical of ⁠him, and has pressed regulators to take action to revoke the licences of broadcasters he says treat him unfairly. What I said about Obama was true, just like what was said about Trump was technically true. Do you see how my comments, which are a direct parallel of the opening paragraph and another one from CBC's article, takes the heat off of Trump's comments, and instead turns the whole article into an attack on Obama? If you read this "article", would you find it a fair commentary on the Trump comments, from the Access Hollywood tape: ACCESS HOLLYWOOD COMMENTS CAUGHT ON TAPE U.S. President Barack Obama said on Monday that Donald Trump should be immediately removed from the Republican ticket. He joined his wife Michelle in calling out the GOP candidate for a comment that he made to Billy Bush in private a decade ago, which was caught on tape by Access Hollywood. Ten years ago, in a comment that Trump made in private which was caught on tape by Access Hollywood, Trump was heard saying "I grab 'em by the pu**y", and he wasn't just talking about Justin Trudeau. Obama has repeatedly urged the GOP to remove candidates that he dislikes or that have been critical of ⁠him, and has pressed the IRS, FBI and other government agencies to investigate and discriminate against conservatives and conservative-oriented groups. If you read that article, would that cover the Access Hollywood comments story adequately and fairly? Is that what you needed to know about it, MH? Did you learn enough about Trump, Obama, and the comment? Surely you must think I nailed it, because I echoed CBC's methods perfectly.

For leftists, the highlight of babysitting is sniffing the diaper. JJ: "Eau de Lemon 🥰" Your voice-to-text is working just fine.

And oh how you resent him for that. That's literally the CBC you dolt.

He can just copy & paste a picture of the down-arrow into Word 300 times and print that on a piece of paper to bring with him. He should also bring this picture of him in his dad's uniform:

FYI when you're laughing about posts that prove how much of a m0ronic cultist you are, that's nothing to be proud of. You're another one that should be taking printouts of your posts to a therapist. You and robo should go together. Hold hands.

I did a search for David Morens on CBC and an article from 2013 popped up. That's it. Bird flu virus's pandemic potential assessed in lab animals CBC https://www.cbc.ca › news › health › bird-flu-virus-s-pa... Jul 10, 2013 — They have infected mammals including humans, study authors David Morens, Jeffery Taubenberger and Anthony Fauci said. In humans, H7 viruse

I'll grant you this much, @LinkSoul60: If leftists can find humour in being exposed as cultist m0rons, then maybe Kimmel's comments really were funny to you, just like you're "environmentalists and champions of freedom and women's rights" who can make an exception for sinking tankers with 2M barrels of oil if it helps the ayatollah. You leftists are a strange breed.

OMG you're stupid. I showed you a perfect example of "CBC being entirely judgmental" after you pretended that they only present objective, pertinent facts. Try as you might, the fact remains that you got hoisted on your own petard. Now you think that somehow the date matters: "Being objective was invented in 2017, clown!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!! HA HA!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!" Seek help, cultist dipshit.

Did you spot the part about CBC being judgy there, Link? Ten minutes ago you rushed to CBC's defence, pretending that "they didn't get judgy in that article because they're so objective that they're above that", and then I showed you their own quote from a different article about Trump which was 100% judgment and no news, which showed how much of a Mo-ronic cultist you are. You basically just pointed the thread title at yourself. Then you dodged that bit of info, which is the main thrust of the thread, and made an awkward attempt at a strawman argument about Biden. Dummy, your "news" channel is nothing but a propaganda portal that TELLS you how to feel about everything that happens, and you don't even notice.

Print that and take it with you the next time you go to see your therapist. They can't help you unless they know how truly unstable and m0ronic you are.

That's a perfect snapshot of just how much of a dumb f'ing cultist piece of shit you are. You don't think that CBC passes judgment on a constant basis? Caught on tape making shockingly crude comments about a married woman he tried to seduce, Donald Trump reeled under widespread condemnation on Friday. That's the first line from a CBC article about Trump. Take as much time as you want to read that you GD loser, and tell me if you can spot a part that's a bit judgy 😂 But if it was a joke about Trudeau or Biden you would have wanted Kimmel fired. There's the rub.

Do you bring your emotional support goat with you to scream at clouds parties, or does it dampen the mood?

Dude you're just too dumb to be toxic. I think you wanna be, you're just not good at anything.

Word on the street is that Jimmy Kimmel's wife can't have an orgasm without thinking about Jimmy getting shot like Charlie Kirk.

Jimmy Kimmel did a skit where he pretended to be at the WH Correspondents' Dinner, and made this comment: "Look at Melania, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow" CBC's only comment about Kimmel's atrocious filth was: CBC: "Trump has repeatedly urged broadcasters to remove comedy or news programs he dislikes or that have been critical of ⁠him, and has pressed regulators to take action to revoke the licences of broadcasters he says treat him unfairly." Firstly, the CBC couldn't find the decency to comment on how distasteful Kimmel's comment was. Then they glossed over the story about the shooter in the WH with this one simple sentence: "Trump and the first lady were rushed out of the dinner on Saturday after a shooting in the ⁠lobby of the ⁠Washington Hilton where the event was taking place." They made no mention at all of the shooter's hatful ideology, or where it obviously came from. If a shooter went into the WH while Obama was president and then his GOP-playbook manifesto was revealed, the CBC would be talking about it at length for the next 6 months. Thirdly, Trump wasn't whining for no reason, and he wasn't just talking about himself. His strongest criticism of Kimmel prior to this was back when Jimmy Weasel was making jokes about Charlie Kirk being murdered. Last, but not least, Trump has successfully network news for blatantly lying. He won approximately $35M from ABC back when they edited out Kamala's botched interview question and swapped in a coherent response from her which was made from a mashup of her other comments during the interview. The CBC absolutely does not have a "news" channel, and it's another stab in the heart of democracy every time they get to call themselves that. In fairness to CBC, here's what other cult-leaders posted, and what Google Search pulls up in a search for Kimmel's comment: FWIW, here is Melania's eloquent reply: "Kimmel’s hateful and violent rhetoric is intended to divide our country. His monologue about my family isn’t comedy- his words are corrosive and deepens the political sickness within America. People like Kimmel shouldn’t have the opportunity to enter our homes each evening to spread hate."

Less and less people feel like Canadian sovereignty is worth maintaining every day. Almost half of Quebecers want to leave the country and a sizeable chunk of people in Alberta and Saskatchewan feel the same way. That ended under Biden, dungus. Saudi Arabia was trading using other dollars in 2023. Left4rds pretended that it wasn't a big deal back then, but I guess that it's suddenly a big deal now, right?

Carney just called... He was crying like Justin Trudeau after Idris Alba told him that he couldn't watch. Apparently he's really worried because one of the biggest f'ing cultists on planet earth just spoke ill of his plan to make Canada into China's lap-doggie.

Do you think that terrorist supporters go to heaven, Gaetan? Is slitting the throats of babies & raping small children and killing them the path to your "heaven"? We both agree on one thing: it's gonna be really warm where you're going.

18, hey? Given your support for radical islam, my guess is she was more like 6: prime marrying age for mohammed and his gang.

They have full control of the CBC, polling data is controlled by the CBC, and they used to have control over social media through TNI until Musk took over Twitter, and they really want that level of social-media control back. It's looking more and more like we will never see a real election again in this country.

Interesting info on FB today about the Gray's Bay mine up in Nunavut. The claim is that the mine had been inaccessible ever since it was discovered 60+ years ago, and then it was bought by a company that's owned by the Chinese gov't about 15 years ago, and it's getting an access road built to it by Carney and the gang now. Apparently there's more in that region than just the Chinese mine, but I don't know how much more. I will wait to learn more about this before I get too excited. I'm too tired today to be bothered.

The fact that he was outed, instead of earning a pension by doing that, illustrates the difference between Israel and Hamas. I would say that the fact that they were unarmed isn't a big deal, imo, provided he knew for certain that they were members of Hamas. Eg, if they were identified before they were killed, or if they were giving orders or information to Hamas soldiers, it wouldn't really matter if they were armed or not, because they were performing acts of military service at the time. TBH, people who are fighting without uniforms have less protection than uniformed soldiers, not more. I doubt that everyone in Osama's compound was armed when they were killed, but no one's gonna say otherwise. If members of Hamas wore uniforms all the time then this would be a cut and dried issue, but in Ukraine and Gaza people without uniforms are killing uniformed soldiers, they're shooting from residential buildings, schools and hospitals, using ambulances as troop transports, etc, all the time. Hamas soldiers only wear their uniforms for parades, they fight in civilian clothes.