WestCanMan

Ooh you’re so into insulting people’s intelligence. You must be either a genius super-liberal or an angry virtue signaller. Judging by how far you’re reaching to make a point that you would have to be an idiot to believe it’s obviously the latter. Here’s the thing reefermadness: if people were routinely getting gang-raped at local parties she would stop going to local parties, period. Maybe it could happen once and she only found out later, but three times? No way, and certainly not ten. And by her account that’s not what happened anyways - she claims to be a witness to it. That’s not the same as “I know some people who said etc...”. Once she knew for sure about all this, on the rare ovcasion that she had to go to something, like a best friend’s bithday, she would definitely take the time to make sure that “Brett’s gang-rape crew” weren’t going to be there, or she would leave as soon as they showed up. For her to just stick around and wait for the inevitable gang-rape to unfold SEVEN OR EIGHT MORE TIMES like that is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard of. Wrap your oh-so-superior cerebral cortex around the fact that girls try really hard to avoid getting gang-raped and they avoid gang-rape parties like they avoid invading armies. This is like the story of the little kids at the California daycare who said that other kids there were getting fed to sharks. And in your other idiotic scenario, where “she knew the guys so she felt like she wouldn’t ever become a victim herself”, she was actively covering for them & normalizing the parties to make it seem safe and cool for other girls to go there. So she WAS AN ACTUAL ACCOMPLICE IN YOUR OWN EXAMPLE. She was like the in-heat coyote, luring male dogs into the desert to be eaten by her pack. I get that you’re a virtue signaller, and you like nothing more than to prove hiw righteous you are, but your epic failure of an attempt to add plausibility to her story just makes it all the more obvious that it’s 100% BS. Thanks for that swingandamiss!

Avenatti's client has the most interesting story line ever. 1st of all, it cracks me up. I burst out laughing the first time I saw it. Sounds terrible right, that I find a rape allegation hilarious? It's only funny because it's not even a little bit believable. Here's the thing, she says she went to ten parties where they were drugging and gang-raping girls. TEN! If you were a school-aged girl and you went to a party where you witnessed something as horrific and grotesque as a gang-rape wouldn't you report that to someone? Or at the very least, not go to the next "party" with those same people? How fun does a party have to be so that you say to yourself "It was an awesome party but the harrowing sights & sounds of the gang-rape at the end kind of brought it down a notch. Still, I can't wait for the next one!"? I'm literally blown away that no one on tv even talks about that. What could possibly have compelled her to go to a second party? Was Prince there? Michael Jackson? Did someone win a free car? And if for some crazy reason you went to a second party and the exact same thing happened again, wouldn't you quit right there? Nope, she went to a 3rd gang rape party. And she went to a 4th gang rape party. And she went to a 5th gang rape party. And she went to a 6th gang rape party. And she went to a 7th gang rape party. And she went to an 8th gang rape party. And then she went to two more gang rape parties. Is she really a "victim" now, or did she know exactly what was going to happen, and she basically consented to it by going there? By the 2nd or 3rd party she was actually more of an accomplice or co-conspirator than anything imo. Helping convince other girls to come to the parties. It honestly seems like a stupid allegation to bring up, really easy to discount it after all these years where none of these hundreds of victims or witnesses said anything for 36 years lol. But here's the BRILLIANT part. I gotta hand it to Sleazanatti.... It really leaves the door wide open for more "victims" to come forward, and their testimony is pre-corroborated by that of his client. If twenty random girls come forward (and they get to become part of history by stopping a Trump nominee appointment so why not?) it all makes perfect sense to the Demmie crowd. This is the ugliest, stupidest gong show to ever afflict a democratic society.

At least manufacturing is your #2 industry, at 11%. You're 4.5% higher than BC, and your population is nearly double ours so that's a lot of extra manufacturing jobs. A lot of extra money coming into the province from outside.

Wiki has a list of terrorist attacks month by month for recent years. I don't know how far it actually goes back. Worldwide there are 150+ per month on average. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_January_2017 It's worth checking these things out.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/608359/gdp-distribution-of-british-columbia-canada-by-industry/

Our Canadian economy is tied to the American economy. When they go up, we go up too. I can't speak for the rest of the country but in BC our economy is based mainly on real estate, and that's pretty sad. If you just count real estate, financing, construction & related services that's the bulk of our economy. Very little of our economy here is based on manufacturing, forestry, fishing, agriculture, mining, etc. I don't know what percentage of the money coming into BC from outside of Canada is for the purchase of real estate but it's probably the lion's share. I know hundreds of people, none of them have jobs that bring money into BC from outside. Teachers, Realtors, mortgage brokers, lawyers, people who work in various fields of construction and renovations, hair dressers, people who work in grocery stores, drive trucks, work for the railway, home inspectors, tech people, medical professionals, police & corrections, advertising, etc. Some of my family members in Alberta worked for coal mines and plants west of Edmonton but those jobs are gone, or going away soon thanks to the Libs/NDP. I have a cousin in Alberta who works on oil rigs but his job is obviously in Trudeau's crosshairs. Those are Alberta jobs anyways. My neighbour across the back alley is a welder and he was working on pipelines, no joke, but I doubt they do much of that right now. Unless of course their pipelines are for raw sewage to go into the ocean. I'm thinking that if the real estate industry here tanks for a while BC is royally screwed.

The problem is that a lot of Canadians (and Americans) know that they are being lied to but they are ok with it as long as it benefits their side. It's especially ok for Libs because it gives them something to bitch about, and they feel like that elevates them socially. Liberalism is a lot like being a born-again Christian: people feel like they instantly pull their reputation up from the gutter by bragging about their religious purity or their liberal superiority. Born again: "I used to rob houses, sell drugs, and I got a lot of people started on crack, but now I'm born again, so I'm going to lecture you on how to live." Liberal: "I don't really know anything about foreign trade, foreign affairs, the economy, world history, religion, or socialism/capitalism but I really hate that guys like Brett Kavanaugh think that they can get away with attempted rape so I'm a Democrat, like Madonna. Trump is like, really really gross. Yeah I know that saying stuff like that proves that I'm like, totally ossummmm, but I don't do it for the instant recognition. I do it because I'm like, a bad-ass social justice warrior, ya know?"

I wish he was harmless to Canadians.

1) Is this a political hit-job or a legitimate issue? 2) Rank the hypocrisy level of the left-wing media, the Democrats and the Hollywood elites on a scale from 1-100. (CNN and the Dems didn’t care about Clinton’s rapes or sexual harassment, although the allegations were more specific, had more credible evidence, and in some cases resulted in civil settlements. What’s more is that the Dems ruthlessly slandered Bill’s accusers but now they’re saying that “all victims need to be believed”. The Hollywood elites pretend to care about this victim, but they gave Roman Polanski an Oscar and a huge round of applause after he fled the country to escape justice after he raped a child that was incapacitated from the quaaloods that Polanski gave them). 3) Is it possible for someone to be a victim of a “harrowing event” like an attempted rape, and yet the victim and witnesses can not remember specific things like the time, location and date? 4) Is it totally bogus that they’re demanding that Ford won’t testify until the FBI investigates the story, despite the fact that rape cases by civilians are out of their jurisdiction, and the statute of limitations has expired? They’re also trying to get the defendant to testify first, which goes against a defendant’s right to a proper chance for their own defence....

About 30-40% of Americans “fear” Trump. Basically anyone stupid enough to watch CNN or MSNBC. Fear mongering and division is what they do. The CBC and CTV here follow CNN like a lost puppy, so there are a lot of Canadians in the same boat as the safe-room, blankie, comfort pony crowd in the US. To be honest I fear every US president until I am comfortable that they won’t start a huge war. Trudeau can’t do anything to you, but he is damaging Canada-US relations which is bad for everyone.

Boges do you understand that there’s a big difference between lying to Congress under oath, and being accused of lying by CNN?

I know there are lots of people calling Trump a serial liar but he has no track record of lying re: material facts as president. Honestly if you look back at all his "big lies" he turned out to be right and CNN was lying the whole time. 1) Trump: "Obama wiretapped me". CNN, Obama, MSNBC: "Haha Trump is a big liar and a joke". Turns out that Obama's crew did spy on Trump. To say "wiretapped Trump directly" isn't 100% accurate but Obama and the media knew Trump was telling the truth when they all laughed and called him a liar. No apologies ever came from that. 2) Trump's lie re: Hillary's debate "preparations" It was some big joke that Trump thought Hillary was surprisingly well-prepared for certain debate questions, and he was a liar/loser for insinuating anything. It turns out that Hillary actually did have some of the questions in her pocket - CNN knew because they gave them to her. Sure Trump slept with a playboy bunny and a porn star, and that's not good, but 90% of the guys you know would have done the same thing given the opportunity and Bill Clinton did far worse. He raped and sexually harassed his employees. Think about the difference between consensual sex with two women who were independently wealthy compared to raping/harassing women who work for you or are interns. CNN never cared about that and they still don't, but for some reason they care that some stupid broad says she was almost raped approximately 36 years ago (doesn't know the exact year, let alone the date), she doesn't remember exactly which party she was at, but there were witnesses there (wink wink, if you want to step fwd and be a witness I'll provide you with some details, hurry we only have til Tuesday). Still after 36 years none of them know exactly when or where. And it's totally honest for Dems to pretend to care about this. And also for Hollywood celebs, who gave an Oscar to Roman Pedophilanski and cheered for him when they all know he was guilty, to pretend to be concerned for someone who is most likely a bullshitter. She says "it's still too harrowing to talk about" but she doesn't remember where or when it happened. Give me a friggin break. If you're following Dems or CNN and you believe anything they say you should never admit to that in public.

Lying to Congress under oath. He has a long history of it, but never with the stakes this high. Re: Trump see #3, and keep in mind that more is known now than when the article was written. Brennan does not want declassification and it’s not for the good of the country or anyone else: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/john-brennan-dishonesty-long-record/

There was time when Bob Woodward was regarded as a man of integrity, but honestly he got that reputation by reporting on something that was true. He locked his sights on a story that he wanted to report on, and that fit his narrative. If he loved Nixon the way that Anderson Cooper loves Hillary would he even have reported on that? Probably not, judging by what we are seeing today. He has completely distanced himself from the notion of having any integrity whatsoever, because all the people he is quoting through his "anonymous sources" are calling BS. And Trump obviously has more understanding of world politics than a 5th grader. No 5 star general would make such a stupid comment to begin with. There was also a time when the FBI was regarded as one of the most trusted institutions in the USA. That time has passed as well. When I was in high school and I watched the news I just assumed it was "the news". We would all agree that we can turn on the TV and pick a news channel that will lie to us. Anderson Cooper getting busted for standing in a ditch to exaggerate the level of flooding where he was should tell you all that you need to know about CNN.

The "intelligence" community is really afraid of the release of the un-redacted documents. Excuses about "sources and methods" abound, but honestly it's their methods that are in question here. If they were all acting above board they'd still have jobs. Brennan is the worst. He's crapping his pants, and acting government officials to resist the authority of the whitehouse. He's going to be making excuses about his own conduct soon enough. That slimy piece of garbage is going to be in hot water before Trump ever will.

A CNN poll, that's cute. I wonder what spongebob squarepants has to say about this topic.

Paul Manafort's indictments stem from things that happened decades ago, that the FBI had already investigated. Nothing at all to do with Trump or Russia.

It's "Sunni Ways".

Lol. It's a new facepalm moment for Trudeau every day. He's similar to Trump from the diametrically opposite sides of the spectrum. Trump embarrasses Americans by being "brash" and putting America first, Trudeau embarrasses Canadians by being a super-pansy and putting every country, religion and culture (aside from the US) ahead of Canadians.

Canada's main shared experience of the last century was HNIC, and the #2 isn't even close. That shared cultural experience is fading fast though, as people who come to Canada now still have access to all the shows and sporting events that they had back home via the internet.

1) Hillary Clinton used a law firm to funnel money to Russians, through Christopher Steele, for dirt on D trump. If she paid Russians for info isn't that the kind of thing that they're trying to get on Trump? 2) LMAO, you've been programmed Argus. Your buttons have been pushed and your internal BS filter has been turned off by CNN and CBC. It's a known fact that Hillary had evidence destroyed after it was subpoenaed by the FBI. I can get you a link if you want. Strzok/Comey investigated her and let her off the hook. She was also negligent in her handling of classified information. They still let her off the hook. Strzok was wildly biased in favour of Hillary, whom he let off the hook, and against Trump, against whom he started an investigation (aka insurance policy). Those guys tampered with witness statements, misrepresented the accuracy of Christopher Steele's intel, and presented it as being independently corroborated when they knew it wasn't. Should FBI agents get fired for that, or not? Is the FBI the Democrats' equivalent of the KGB now? They do this stuff with impunity, and get medals and raises? I'd like to see what kind of coherent response you can muster for this because honestly I'm fed up with CNN's mindless drones uttering the same bullshit all the time.

Don't believe everything (anything) you see on CNN Argus. This whole Russian Collusion farce that CNN has been playing up for 2 years still has no ties to collusion with Russia by any Americans. Or at least, any non-Democrats. Hannity was right about a lot of people in the FBI who got fired or demoted, does CNN even cover the FBI firings? So far these are the only Americans facing discipline for wrongdoing in the Russia probe. I've posted several outright lies broadcast by CNN. Just the other day the NYT tried to blame Nikki Haley for curtains put up by the Obama administration - more fake news. If you want to post some Hannity lies go ahead, but don't call out the integrity of a national broadcaster with no more than your own opinion.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/immigrants-are-getting-right-vote-cities-across-america-664467%3famp=1 Dems also want people to be able to vote without id, which seems to make it so that you and I could cross the border, pick names from the phone book, and cast ballots for thise people. It’s ridiculous.

You seriously equated what I said to being for or against legal immigration?

There are some indictments against Russians who will never see the inside of a US court. Just for election meddling mind you, not helping the Republicans. The Russians who were “meddling” on FB weren’t picking sides either. Just sewing discord, which the Dems fell for hook, line and sinker. They’re tthe ones doing Putin’s dirty work right now, by splitting up the country. They’re calling for verbal abuse against Republicans, supporting Antifa violence, name-calling, fear-mongering, speaking out against a duly-elected President, etc. It’s extremely pathetic the way Demmies are acting, and anyone who supports them is equally pathetic. Question: if Dems want foreigners to vote so badly, why should they care if some Russians influenced the election? What’s the difference if they illegally cross the border and vote, or give some cash to influence the election from the outside?