WestCanMan

It’s not my belief at all. I don’t care who said what. Those emails were supposed to be turned in. It was her job to get it done. In 3 weeks she never bothered to do it, then they got destroyed. If that’s the new standard then the fbi will never get any evidence by subpoena.

What comes first, March 4th or 25th? Do you need a hint? Ok I’ll tell you, I’m not good at keeping surprises. The 4th comes first. Your birthday present is a deck of cards with four suits missing. DOH! Subpoena M4, “Oh shit (this crazy hag is gonna kill me if I don’t break the law for her)” moment M25.

Who said I have minority anxiety, or white guy persecution anxiety? I’m not the one pulling out my hair in anticipation of other people’s posts. “Ooh they’re not going to gobble up everything they read. What's wrong with them? How do they formulate opinions without the guidance of CNN or the CBC?”

I just sent an emotional support squirrel to your back yard. Free of charge.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/09/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-deleted-33000-em/ Summary: A Clinton aide (Mills) said to the company managing Hillary’s server that emails older than 60 days “didn’t need to be kept”. A subpoena was sent to Hillary for all the emails on her server. About 2 weeks after the subpoena an employee had an “oh shit” moment and deleted 33,000 of them. Then he used bleach bit on the server. That employee also received the subpoena, I saw that in a different fact check page. Funny that it’s not that easy to find a decent fact check, and they all start off sounding pretty innocuous until you get down a few paragraphs. No one really says “Yes” right away. If we can all give our subpoenaed evidence to other people and it can be destroyed worry-free then subpoenas don’t mean jack anymore.

No change in tactics? The ability to make command decisions was moved from the Pentagon/oval office down to commanders closer to the situation, so that attacks could be quicker and more effective. Surrounding and killing Isis troops was also a more effective strategy than merely contesting ground and allowing escape. Obama himself admitted that getting rid of Islamic State in Syria would take years. Trump decimated them quickly, down to small pockets of resistance within months. Name a big muslim terrorist attack in the US in Trump’s 2 years? There was one every 6 months under Obama. Apparently having a government that wouldn’t condemn the attacks didn’t help them. Ill put a link re the deleted emails in the next post. Yes, not even a real crime. Don’t you speak english? Trump didn’t commit a crime by getting an NDA signed. People have been on trial for that before. It’s never stood up in court.

You think that there are only tens of fraudulent votes cast per election? Lol.

1) Paste a link for the intel on NoKo, and the sanctions are still on there anyways 2) You said CNN doesn’t jump to conclusions, then you said they all do in pursuit of eyeballs. So you’re admitting that you lied earier. And fyi Fox has the better track record for jumping to the right conclusions, so you should probably tune in there when things happen. 3) communities are so big now that no one knows 1% of the local voters anymore, so voter fraud is too easy now. There are also over 10M illegal residents in the US. If democracy is important then it’s also important to make sure people get to cast their own votes, and fraud is kept to a minimum. Pretty basic right? Also, what % of legal us citizens have no id, by your estimate? It’s such a small percentage that it’s less of a concern than fraudulent votes, plus it’s such a small cost to get id that a lack of id is no excuse. If you want to vote, get id. Really simple.

If you honestly fact checked your own statements Argus pretty much everything you said is a farce and you know it. I said how, Obaama was the one who said "the 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back", and he was caught on hot mic with Dmitri Medvedev, remember that one? Talk about collusion ffs. Islamic state was growing under Obama, rapidly dying under Trump. Trump didn't have a "plan", his plan was to let his generals make a plan. That's good leadership. There were a lot of terrorist attacks while Obama was in the whitehouse, but he refused to talk bad about them. They don't attack as much under Trump now do they? Weird. So you have suspicions again, not facts. CLINTON DESTROYED EMAILS AFTER THEY WERE SUBPOENAED. EVEN SNOPES ADMITS IT. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT EVERYONE ELSE ON EARTH WOULD HAVE GONE TO JAIL FOR. BS Argus. He was offered decades off his sentence to plead guilty to something that's not even a real crime.

Strength as in, carrier task forces, plural, on his doorstep? War games at the border. Mad Dog Mattis replying to his threat of shooting a missile by Guam with the simple words "If they shoot a missile towards us that's called war." And getting China to actually impose sanctions against him. That kind of strength. NoKo gave back the remains of some soldiers, let people out of jail, he stepped across the border to sign peace treaties. More progress was made with NoKo in a month than in the 30 years prior. They do rush to judge though. "GUN CONTROL ISSUE" came out of their mouths to describe a crime scene with no legal guns on it. When terrorists attack with vans they still talk about gun control. You are the one who refuses to see Argus. People need ID to drive, to buy booze, to buy guns, to buy weed, to use their medical.... There's nothing easier to do than grab a phone book and go to the polling station to cast votes for people. Your point is literally 100% idiotic and yet you stand behind it puffing out your chest. Get a grip.

You can do it in the States apparently. Just grab a phone book so that you have 20,000 names and addresses. Go from polling station to polling station and give them a random name from the book. You can vote 20 times in a day if you're fast enough to get around to enough stations. See how many wildly different people you can vote for. Make sure that their names don't match up with your face just for kicks. "Hi I'm Gurpreet Singh and I'm here to vote!" "Hi I'm Kim Smith and I'm here to vote! You know Kim is a guy's name too, right?" "Hi I'm Dayquanda Jackson Jr. and I'm here to vote!" "Hi I'm Sue Johnson and I'm here to vote. My dad was a big Johnny Cash fan." "Hi I'm Xin Xiaopang and I'm here to vote! Which party do I have to vote for if I want my son to be able to get into Harvard despite the fact that we are asian? Is it the Republicans? Oh it is, ok thanks." "Hi my name is T^pook Kpok Naoomaopo. This is my first time voting, I grew up in Africa. I lost my tan because of the crappy Seattle weather. Have a nice day!"

It's sad to see how many people can be influenced to believe such a serious accusation based on such a flimsy case with so many obvious flaws. If anything, this just proves how important it is to get people on the bench with the ability to impartially consider evidence and testimony.

I'm 100% up to speed on the level of evidence required. I'd even put the required standard miles lower than a preponderance of the evidence for Kavaanugh. Any actual evidence, or corroboration of her specific story, would have been enough to sink Kavanaugh's boat. But her case got weaker and weaker under every level of scrutiny applied to it: FBI investigation, the careful consideration of her own details, testimony from people who knew Dr Ford, character witnesses for BK.... All roads point away from the appearance of guilt. The most compelling evidence backing her claim is that BK might have been really drunk a few times while he was in University. No one who applies for a SCJ position will ever pass that test but even if it's true, you can always find some people to claim the opposite. The actual evidence is zero point zero zero. 0.00%. Zip. Zilch. Nada. There's just no evidence aside from 1 woman who lied about several material facts in her case and another woman that had a totally farcical story to begin with. If you want to abandon presumption of innocence that's just your opinion, but literally no one can ever be appointed to the SC if their political opponents can stop their nomination just by finding two people who are willing to tell lies that are so vague that they can never even be turned into a perjury case. Eventually there will be no more SCJs.

Obama wasn't negotiating from a position of strength against those countries. He was being a whiner and a wimp. Trump had no choice but deal with KJU. CNN lies all the time. When a guy runs around screaming praises to allah they always start with "It's too early to say that it's Islamic terrorism". They did it about the Pulse nightclub shooting. Tried to pass it off as a gun control issue, even though the guns used were 100% illegal to begin with. You can't watch anything on that channel and take anything they say seriously. OMG, to say that Republicans are trying to stop people from voting is seriously the best example of drinking the kool-aid that Ive ever seen. Too funny.

I don't know much about the early Obama years. I was happy that they elected an African American, I thought it would be good for the country. All I really ever cared about before was that they didn't start any crazy wars. Obama put the USA in the toilet. He couldn't have done more damage if he tried. Wrong about Russia, weak against them, wrong about Islamic State, weak against them, wrong about domestic terrorism, weak against them, wrong about police shootings and ran his mouth, started the country on fire and never did anything about it, and you could basically blame his big mouth and big ego for the rise of Donald Trump. The Mueller investigation is a huge farce. The FBI has lost every shred of integrity they ever had in the last few years with their "bungling" of the Clinton investigation and now their sham of a "Russian collusion investigation". The pressure tactics that they are using on Cohen and Manafort are a disgrace to democracy. The DNC primary was a disgrace, the rigged debates were a disgrace, Hillary destroying evidence and getting away with it was a disgrace, Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch's "coincidental" tarmac meeting was a disgrace, ad the top 5 members of the FBI and Brennan are a huge disgrace. There actually is a swamp in DC. I don't know how far it pre-dates Obama but it's disgusting. The Republicans have a bunch of misogynist/cheaters. So do the Dems. Let's be honest, probably a handful of people in Congress and the Senate combined could live up to the scrutiny that's on Trump. People like Maxine Waters are even openly crass and disgusting on national tv. Whether you're a Dem or Libertarian you're still buying into the hypocrisy of defending Bill Clinton, the actual rapist.

Who has proof of anything re: SCJ nominations? Is there some level of proof that’s suddenly required, when just a week ago the Democrats and their toadies tried to set the precedent that evidence was just a formality?

The Republicans didn't stoop to the level of the Democrats and bring in some someone to accuse him of almost raping them, at an unknown location, four decades ago, with no witnesses, and fake PTSD symptoms. Am I right?

Right Argus. If you have so much to say about Fox's fake news then why don't you reply to my points from earlier? Or throw down some examples of your own? Vague accusations is all you've got Argus. It's your go-to and it's getting old really fast. I can watch CNN for ten minutes tonight and catch them lying. If it was a drinking game everyone would be dead by the first commercial break. African Americans who can think for themselves reject the democrat narrative. Americans of any stripe who are susceptible to emotionally-charged, fact-starved drivel are sucked right in.

1)Clinton was competent, Obama turned the country into a dumpster fire. Would you rather go to Iran or the USA in 2016? 2) Trump didn't commit crimes. You exaggerate too much.When Trump said "I just grab 'im by the pussy" he was probably talking about negotiating with Justin Trudeau. And there are varying levels of "supporting abortion". Anyone who is 100% against all abortions all the time is an idiot. By the same token, anyone who thinks that it's ok to stab a healthy baby in the head one second before it pops out of it's mother's vagina is also an idiot. The abortion debate needs to move to an adult level of discussion. 3) The bible has nothing to do with it. I'm an atheist, and I'd never vote for Hillary Clinton if I was American. 4) Typical Democrat. 100% hypocrisy. So hard to debate with someone who flips the board every ten seconds.

Yes it was their turn to NOMINATE. And if they nominated someone that the Senate would have approved then that would have been awesome for Obama. Why is this so hard for you to understand? This isn't the first time I've seen this comment here. Unfortunately for the Democrats, Obama wasn't elected emperor, so he couldn't jsut put whoever he wanted on the SC. Is that what you need to hear Argus?

Yeah yeah yeah. Baseless accusations all around Argus. Thanks for the input. You're part of the crew here that just spews the opinions of CNN without a shred of evidence, a link, an anecdote, or any kind of observation and you consider yourself an informed, open-minded intellectual lol. You just got the impression that Fox is fake news from watching CNN and that's all the proof you need. And yet you call other people sheep. LMAO. Are african americans who support the republicans sheep? Are they just going with the flow too? 'Cause that's the easy thing to do, right Argus?

And Adam Schiff wouldn't have to lie over and over again. That would probably be a really weird feeling for him.

I love the anecdote about the college professor asking the socialist students if they want to donate part of their grades to other students. "Tina you have a 3.8 gpa and drunk Timmy just has a 2.0 gpa. Why don't you give him .9 and then you will both have a 2.8?" "Ahhhhh hell no! I worked hard for those grades!" They're fine taking the money away from other people who worked hard to earn it, but sharing their grades doesn't work for them. Re: Trump specifically, the accusation is that he's giving the tax breaks to his rich buddies so that they can all get ahead and that's bad for everyone. The truth is, if Trump wanted money for his buddies, he'd start up big government programs and give his buddies consulting fees, fat government contracts, appoint them as chairmen, etc. People don't understand how much power and money flows through sticky little government fingers in socialist countries. The other thing Trump's economy does is it frees people to become small business owners. Starting up a business is hard enough in a capitalist system, but if you add the burden of excessive socialist taxes (someone's gotta pay for all that free university, dental, and medical that Bernie is promising everyone), and create an environment where potential employees won't get off their welfare for less than $15/hr, it cuts into businesses from both sides.

Voter apathy is a huge difference maker in every election. The best known cure is to have your opponent say something like "Your supporters all fit into what I like to call the basket of deplorables" lol. Hillary blamed a million other things on her worldwide excuses tour, but anyone with a brain knows how she blew it. BEST VIDEO EVER!!!!!! (snowflake alert: if you get triggered by awesome stuff, look away!!!!!)