WestCanMan

EKOS is not somebody you can quote. Frank Graves the owner has stated publically he will do EVERYTHING in his power to prevent PP from succeeding or becoming prime minister. ANd i've posted links to this before. Yet you continue to post what you know to be an outrageously bias source. Guess the truth doesn't serve your purposes as well? He said the quiet part out loud. That's how confident these guys are that Canadians are so brainwashed by the CBC and CTV that they don't care about one-party rule. I wonder how much taxpayer money finds its way to scumbag Graves through the various media outlets that the LPOC bribed.

Your poker face is ugly. Oh wait, that's just your resting b1tch face. Which is really just a b1tch face. Your poker face sucks. You reek of desperation. The jig is up, dummy. You can't run from the fact that Carney is a known serial liar, and he's not just lying about the number of droplets of rain that fell in 17 minutes either, or just being called a liar for telling the truth about a CNN false narrative: he's telling lies about who he essentially is and what he's doing as PM. Those are material lies which Canadians should be irate about. We've never had a liar like that in the PMO before, or even as a candidate. Trudeau was a scummy weasel that only cultists could stomach, but he didn't lie like Carney does, he just refused to answer questions and our media let him get away with it. For example, if Trudeau was in Carney's position, when he was asked if he played a role in moving the Brookfield HQ to NY, he woulda just talked about orange shirt day and called someone a racist, and the CBC journalists would have obediently followed up on those topics and left Brookfield alone. There would be no lie, just a simple non-answer to a question that we already know the answer to anyways, and the answer would just sit there in limbo forever, while reporters and journalists ignored the elephant in the room to instead focus on Trudeau's new divisive topic of the day. Fact: Carney answers to absolutely no one. The only reason he lies is because he's an id10t, and he doesn't know what the CBC will let him get away with yet.

Stow it, Beave. All that you're doing right there is pretending that a Dem talking point has some basis in reality. The Iran nuclear deal wasn't working. They were enriching Uranium well past the point where it needed to be for use in any civilian application. They were also still in the business of arming terrorist groups with things like cruise missiles and ballistic missiles. What's the point of that? Why does a tribe of 50,000 people need ballistic missiles? Who was ever gonna attack the Houthis from far enough away that they needed ballistic missiles to defend themselves from them? Does Kitchener have ballistic missiles? Do they have them in Flin Flon, or Timmins? Do they have cruise missiles in Moosamin? The Israelis also have a far greater intelligence gathering capacity in that region than everyone else combined. You're comparing the opinions of a few HS chess clubs to that of Magnus Carlsen. The Iranians were also jointly working on an intercontinental ballistic program with NoKo that they were not supposed to be involved in. Left4rds love to say that "The CIA/FBI can't answer that question because it relates to sources and methods", well, Israel can't tip their hand and let the world know what they know because they don't want to be incinerated. Iran was building their enrichment program to a capacity and capability level and with a level of security that made it very quick for them to transition to bomb-making, and very hard for Israel to prevent. That had nothing to do with anything that Trump did. It was happening while Obama was president. IS that CNN propaganda or Al Jazeera propaganda? Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference.

Unless the Iranians retaliate to the extent that America has to do something, they're pretty much done imo. There's this history of America "helping" people in the ME, only to have that war added to a laundry list of accusations of "oppressive wars in which the US just went to the ME to kill babies". Trump won't have it. IMO Trump's first term as president wasn't a typical "USA alienating the ME" term, where there was another war started in which the US inflicted mass casualties on an Arabic state. He kept the warfare to an absolute minimum, negotiated a lot of peace, and made some military strikes which were positively viewed by most people in the ME. Now, despite supporting Israel in this war, Trump is keeping US troops from killing Arabs and he eliminated Iran's nuclear threat, and that's quite unpopular among the majority of Arabs, and even a lot of Persians. Bottom line, Trump walked a fine line, killed very few people - probably no civilians - and he set Iran's nuclear program back to scratch. He couldn't be doing any better at this stage in the war. It's hard for even the Dems to find fault with him. I don't think he wants to escalate. And I don't think he wants the blood of any more people on his hands. Just remember that a lot of people who join the military do it to protect their own people. I think we should all celebrate those people, even when they're Iranian, Chinese, North Korean, Pakistani, whatever. Now, it's true that in a lot of instances those soldiers can end up being used aggressively regardless of their reasons for joining, but it's also true that if the US starts killing Iranian soldiers, some of them will be just as decent as any civilian, be they a woman or child. (I get that at some point they're viable military targets, and that's 100% different from killing civilians, I'm just talking about the quality of individual persons. There are 17-yr-old Gazans who'll be counted as "children" if they're killed tomorrow who are much more terrible as humans than some veteran Iranian soldiers are.)

He seems to be a real supporter of Persians within Iran escaping from the shadow of the mullahs, but I think he still supports it to remain as an islamic country. If he's not from Iran, his parents are, is my guess.

Why are you so worried about Poilievre? Shouldn't you be focusing our lying f'n scumbag PM?

It appears that when he thinks about Carney he thinks about adults having sex with children.

Is that your way of saying "Are you my daddy?" Beat it, kid. No one's hitting on you here. Go to left4rds.org or something.

They think that leftist social studies teachers will be able to manipulate them all into voting LPOC.

Still no mention on CNN and Fox about the "Canada-Europe Defence Partnership". IMO the timing of the release of this info was terrible and unentertaining. They shoulda done this at 9pm last night so that Trump would lie there fuming in his bed for a few hours, and then get up at 3 AM to do another cofvefe rant.

That was a compliment. We know you're not that old.

Maybe it will lead to Carney summoned to the WH to watch this video:

Hmmmmmm. The US is pretty serious about their stance on European influence in the Americas, judging by the tone of the Monroe Doctrine. Will they not see this Canada-Europe defence partnership, without the USA being involved, as a direct thumb in the eye? This will be an exciting "Canada Day" lol. If we're even allowed to have it now 😂

They prefer plugging their ears and saying: "LAAA LA-LAAA LA-LAAAAAAAAAAAA It wasn't on CBC or CNN so it can't possibly be true. NYAH!!!!!"

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT WHAT CARNEY SAID WAS THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF THE TRUTH?

You're the one who talked about the Trump phone call, ditz. Also, we're talking about Carney's lies, and there are a lot of them. You just wouldn't know because you automatically consider anything that comes out of an LPOC leader's mouth to be divine guidance. I don't even know what you're on about. I've never referenced that so it's just a straw-man argument here. Carney was... A GUY WHO PLAYED A MAJOR ROLE IN BROOKFIELD'S HQ MOVING, 100% HE WAS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD WHEN THE BOARD VOTED ON MOVING THE HQ THEN HE WROTE A LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS ADVISING THEM TO RATIFY THAT VOTE THEN HE TOLD CANADIANS THAT HE PLAYED "NO ROLE" IN THAT PROCESS. He thought that he could get away with making that claim because he resigned from Brookfield between the writing of that letter and the actual shareholder vote, but he got caught, and what he said was clearly 100% false. Do you really not understand this, Link? DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THE WORDS THAT CAME OUT OF CARNEY'S MOUTH WERE 100% FALSE? What he said wasn't even partially accurate. Not even 1% accurate. It was a total lie. An absolute, total lie. You would have to be ret4rded to not know the difference between "no role" and the lead role that Carney played in that process... FYI the CEO didn't unilaterally move the HQ. No one has ever made that claim but you. You were asked to plainly comment on the veracity of Carney's comment, and the assessment of 0-1 was pretty close, because it was actually a flat 0.00. That was the only time that you ever came close to telling the truth, or saying anything intelligent here, Missing Link. Again: DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT WHAT CARNEY SAID WAS THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF THE TRUTH? He said that he played "no role". The fact is that "he played a lead role". That was clearly proven, 100%. ^That's a simple, straightforward question, and we all know there's only 1 correct answer. So answer it, and admit that you were wrong, or just accept cultist-dolt status. The choice is yours. I just proved that you're a liar and a cultist dolt, sweetie-pie 😘

Cultists like to flood the zone with noise so that actual facts just get lost in the shuffle of e-f's ass-porn posts, Missing Link's denialism, etc. In general, if you want to find on-point posts with actual facts and cites, that form 10% of the posts here. The other 90% is just snotty comments, lies, disinformation and slander from the left4rds. Seriously, I bet that there isn't a left4rd here that can point to a single post they made in the last week where they stated a fact and verified it with a credible cite.

^Get this guy on a terrorist watchlist, STAT^

LPOC Statue of Liberty: "Give us your islamic state, Gazan, and Khalistani mass-murderers yearning to be free, then we will bring Iran's Quds generals to lead them all."

Riiiight. You just accept Carney's lies and "get over it", you are too dumb to know what common words mean and too lazy to look them up, and you think I'm the clueless one here 😆 I chew people like you up and spit them out. You're just such a cultist that you can't stop yammering.

The Trump phone call was a big lie, made bigger by the fact that the CBC went along with it and pimped him as "the guy who stands up to Trump" in the election, but it was just a run-of-the-mill lie by Carney's standards. Every time he opens his mouth he's lying, so that was just an average level of deceit for him for him. His biggest lie regarding Trump was saying "elbows up" when his real strategy was tits down, ass up. He put all these retaliatory tariffs in place and said that he was gonna use the money from them to get laid-off steelworkers and auto-workers through tough times, but after Trump b1tch-slapped him in the oval office, Carney came home and put an end to them, but still pretended that the punitive tariff plan was still in place at the debates. That was the whopper there. I don't know what you're referring to. I never said "Thunderstruck" in this or any other thread. Yes, he worked for Martin, but he said that he was there when Martin balanced the budget and that was a lie. Learn to speak the English language. Carney claimed that he "HAD NO ROLE IN MOVING BROOKFIELD" but he was the chairman of the board when the board voted unanimously in favour of it. Then he advised all the shareholders to do the same. That's not the same as "NO ROLE", dummy. He plainly lied. Right. And a 0-1 on a scale from 1-10 is bottom 10%. In other words, it's bad. Carney is a total liar and you can't even deny it. Did you not know what veracity meant and just guessed wrong? Sorry, I'll try and find another 5-letter word for you next time. No, not really. It's more of a case of "it never mattered at all to you because he's in the LPOC and you're a cultist." He could have promised to end hunger and then burned all of our grain, and you would have voted for him with a mouth full of bugs.

Stop making excuses for all of Carney's lies, cultist. You know he lied - to Canadians - and he did it just to get elected, not because he was busy executing some secret plan to help Canadians. Furthermore, he lied about something in the past, not something which was happening in the future. An example of lying to keep important info from the public domain is Trump saying "We might attack Iran in 2 weeks, we sent B2 bombers to Guam", but then attacking in 2 days with B2 bombers from the middle of America. Trump did that so that the Iranians thought that they had more time to move their people and nuclear material around, and to keep members of his military safe. It worked.

Obviously Pakistan wants Iran to have nukes, there's nothing that Pakistanis love more than seeing non-muslims die by the millions, and their love affair with Iran is well-known to all. What do Syrian people, Jordanian people, Egyptian people, and even Persians think about these military strikes?

I can't stand these internet cultists. These are the kinds of halfwits that just drop their heads and mumble when confronted face-to-face with facts.

So, because his lies are 2 months old, and they were just "campaign promise lies", they don't count? Because the CBC chose to ignore Carney's lies, after all of the billions of dollars of taxpayer money they got from the LPOC during the last 4 elections, the lies don't count? Confucius say: "When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging, cultist dimwit."