Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

angrypenguin

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,073

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by angrypenguin

  1. angrypenguin
    Because the left is yet again angry before an election.
  2. angrypenguin
    We lose the ability to keep track of them? Give me a break. LOL.
  3. angrypenguin
    You don't get it. Everything done under a Harper government sucks
  4. angrypenguin
    Nope. That would have a detrimental increase in the signal to noise ratio
  5. angrypenguin
    I'd still stand behind him versus your liberal cronies
  6. angrypenguin
    Pfffft. At least he didn't have to step down
  7. angrypenguin
    Uh oh the liberals are falling All margin of error. Relax.
  8. angrypenguin
    How does one drive again? Enlighten me.
  9. angrypenguin
    So ignore me. I have found few lefties on this board who actually want to have a proper debate. I tried, but I give up now. It's the same garbage left and right. There's one of you who I agree that actually give a damn and I respect, the rest, I shake my head. Let me sum this up. HARPER is crap. He's shit because of what his beliefs are.
  10. angrypenguin
    you're assuming I care. Money is a wonderful thing. Lefties can whine all they want.
  11. angrypenguin
    I LOLD.
  12. angrypenguin
    I disagree with you with how the Tories have performed.
  13. angrypenguin
    And the Liberals in their 13 year reign did not cause them to be arrogant? Please
  14. angrypenguin
    Lol.
  15. angrypenguin
    Sigh. I tried folks, I tried.
  16. angrypenguin
    I have made no comments about how the Conservative party is perfect. They are not. The LPC isn't perfect, the NDP isn't perfect. As I've said before, pick the turd that smells the least smelly for the next election
  17. angrypenguin
    Thanks for finding that out. I thought Treason was a new provision of C51, guess not. Ok, what would prevent someone from adding other clauses? Uhh, votes, no doubt. Adding terrorism was controversial enough (when I think it should not have drawn up great controversy, but that's just me). I'm all for adding in rape provisions, mass manslaughter, but I suspect no MP would ever dare to add those. Also, one of the terrorists that have been convicted (part of the Toronto 18) was born in Canada, but their parents were from Pakistan. the government is looking to get him his Pakistani citizenship and to deport his ass. I'm all for it.
  18. angrypenguin
    So the equivalent of this is....getting tried and convicted of a heinous crime, like terrorism or rape of a minor, and then 20 years later...that person says "but i've changed! That was 20 years ago". Look, what I'm saying is that the Conservative party, the Liberal party, AND the NDP party (for stealing money to upgrade their offices) are all political parties. And they are all corrupt to some extent. So let's stop pretending that one party is "holier than thou" vs another. It adds no value to a thread IMHO when we start mudslinging.
  19. angrypenguin
    Oh hey folks. We were talking about this last night!!! http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tom-mulcair-challenged-over-niqab-pipelines-on-tout-le-monde-en-parle-1.3256496 Interesting! I don't think Layton's success will be repeated there.
  20. angrypenguin
    Well aren't you holier than thou? You're the one that started this thread: http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/topic/25065-harper-the-disgrace/ Your first post is dishonest, disgraceful (towards the PM) and some of it is a stretch/lie.
  21. angrypenguin
    Or, it gives them access to an unprecedented market! The US and CDN stock market today was in happy happy land, most likely because of this deal.
  22. angrypenguin
    I'm pretty sure it's upthread. I'm multitasking, but I do know that for sure "War crimes" was a reason for citizenship to be revoked. I'm 100% sure Harper mentioned this in the Munk debates. Edit i'll spend the next few minutes Googling it Edit II: Ah, I mixed up treason. Treason/terrorism etc is part of C51: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/new-citizenship-act-allowing-revocation-of-canadian-citizenship-takes-effect-1.3093333 The stuff from the stone ages was mentioned in the Munk debates (war crimes was one of the reasons) As far as whether or not that has happened, I'm not sure.
  23. angrypenguin
    I would have to agree with this. Unless the NDP/Liberal COMPLETELY go off their rails....at the same time, and can't sell their vision. When the vote on the left is split, well, it is what it is.
  24. angrypenguin
    Well, The Signal just updated their polling info and included the Ipsos poll. http://signal.thestar.com/ Conservative 33.2% Liberal 31.8% New Democrat 23.4% Because this is the most new poll, I don't believe it in the slightest bit, but thought I'd share!
  25. angrypenguin
    I wonder how the left will deal with this one! Oh wait, I know already. Terrorism is not enough for someone to lose citizenship. All Canadians have the right to blow up people in this country. #righttokill
×
×
  • Create New...