WWWTT

I thought I put forward a link that questioned the benchmark being used in measuring the claimed amount of ice melting/melted. The intent is to question the credibility of the data when the providers of data that you are quoting are always literally moving the bench mark/goal posts. WWWTT

Why should he? YOU are the one that is making the claim that the climate is warming due to CO2 created by humans! Burden of proof is upon YOU! WWWTT

Actually I believe that lots of info is being collected around the world. Very useful info!!! However, the Earth is at least several billions of years old. And the info is only accurately retroactive for 2-3 decades. Not enough info to make an determination/diagnosis. The fact that alarmists claim they know exactly what's going on (ailment and cure) with so little history of accurate global data really makes them "quacks" in the scientific community! If you want to believe in "quacks", be my guest! But as far as I'm concerned, most alarmists are just that, QUACKS! WWWTT

If you do not understand the point I'm making, then you are a true trooper in the front line alarmist militia! Never questioning the data that you are trying to drive into everyone, and only labeling those whom doubt the credibility as "deniers". Oh and by the way, do you have multiple independent source info? Or is it all NASA info? And from decades ago? How about centuries? WWWTT

« Acceptez-vous que le Québec devienne souverain, après avoir offert formellement au Canada un nouveau partenariat économique et politique, dans le cadre du projet de loi sur l'avenir du Québec et de l'entente signée le 12 juin 1995 ? » "Do you agree that Quebec should become sovereign after having made a formal offer to Canada for a new economic and political partnership within the scope of the bill respecting the future of Quebec and of the agreement signed on June 12, 1995?" And what about Louis Reil? You feel the same way of him? I notice you have a hit and run debating tactic. You make these gran exclaiming comments, then you run. You are either a moderator trying to stir up traffic (most likely). Or you have nothing. You pick! WWWTT

And then there's this now famous flip flop http://www.isciencetimes.com/articles/6040/20130911/global-cooling-arctic-ice-cap-60-photo.htm “Gravimetric measurements from the NASA GRACE satellites have been shown to be subject to large errors and have established nothing ‘beyond doubt,’” he said. “In addition, scientists have only a few years of gravimetric data. Such data are subject to short-term fluctuations in ice and do not have an estimate of what has been occurring over decades of time for either Greenland or Antarctica.” Goreham said he believes Greenland is only “melting near the edges as the Earth warms naturally from the cold period of the Little Ice Age, but is getting thicker in the center from accumulating snow.” He cited an example of a group of airplanes left on Greenland in 1942 that was found hidden under 270 feet of ice. http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/world/polar-ice-is-melting-or-is-it-301228.html WWWTT

What’s a TRF error? That stands for Terrestrial Reference Frame, which is basically saying that errors in determining the benchmark are messing up the survey. In land based geodesy terms, say if somebody messed with the USGS benchmark elevation data from Mt. Diablo California on a regular basis, and the elevation of that benchmark kept changing in the data set, then all measurements referencing that benchmark would be off as well. Taken from here. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/12/03/why-ice-loss-and-sea-level-measurements-via-satellite-and-the-new-shepard-et-al-paper-are-highly-uncertain-at-the-moment/ WWWTT

Ya that's a rarely used word but from searching the definition of, it can not apply to me because I don't make the rules around here. WWWTT

Want to test how biased the mods on this site are? Get involved in debates about the Israeli conflicts and watch you posts get deleted! BIASED BIASED and more BIASED! Mods make the site! Crap mods=Crap site! Biased mod =crappiest mod! Oh sorry mods,am I hitting a little too close to home??? You can still delete this comment. But here's a strong warning for you mods. If you do delete this comment, you will only be proving an weakness. WWWTT

Politics isn't an easy gig man! It's a battle getting re elected! I've met a couple people you mentioned and they're getting up there in age. I believe a couple people there are already collecting a Canada pension for crying out loud man!!!!! In order to be an MPP or MP, you have to join an established top 3 in Canada party, then sign up at least 50 members that you can bring out to the nomination meeting to vote for you. Get $100,000 in political contributions to go into election. And knock on doors until the freekin cows come home! You have time for that?!?!?!?!? I can see if you already have an celebrity name with good contacts and wealthy but for regular folks like you and me and our next door neighbours or the people we work with, forget it! (I know for a fact in the ONDP if you are already a municipal politician with good contacts, and in other exemptions, the party will pull strings for you to help you get your foot in the door!) This is part of the reason why I always go on about the rights people in China have compared to those in Canada!!!!! I was at an ONDP provincial council meeting a few years back and my stomach twisted and turned when the election committee told the delegates that new candidates moving forward had to be pulling in money or they would be shown the door. It wasn't the ONDP's fault that they were addressing the reality of Canadian politics, it was the reality of our political system that made me sick! WWWTT

Same could be said about a prominent cabinet minister losing their own seat in an election. Faced with an uphill battle only getting steeper in getting re elected, retirement looks pretty good! WWWTT

I suggest you check out some recent polls on bill c-51 WWWTT

Do you mean the NDP and green? When I last checked, Justin was voting with Harper on key issues creating a split on the right. WWWTT

And probably the last. Just heard from a source that polling in NS shows that McKay would lose his own seat. Too many f ups and not enough pin ups. WWWTT

Not my argument. I don't even believe that is relevant with an attempt to sue him. But let me ask you this. What makes a death by a soldier any different than from anyone else? How about a death from a drone? WWWTT

I think cybercoma made a strong point but I can it's in vein. There is absolutely nothing anyone can say/write to convince the Harper supporters that they're wrong. I myself feel that cyber is wasting his time. But that's none of my business anyways. If cyber wants to go into further detail who am I to stop him? WWWTT

I seriously doubt Harper will not show up at the national debates put on by the traditional big 3 Canadian broadcasters!!!! Mulcair is probably crossing his fingers hoping he doesn't. The no show will become the biggest blunder in Canadian political history! I'm actually hoping as well he makes good on his promise (but we know how good Harper is with promises) because the anslaught will turn the conservatives on this site to stone! WWWTT

Won't even ever come to that. Many things going on that will probably prevent the superior court of justice from looking at this lawsuit. He was a minor at the time for first! Not sure if the court will handle a case revolving around an event that happened outside of Canada. Statute of limitations is not pivotal on whether Omar has money or not. Don't think the death of a soldier in combat could ever be ruled accidental. There's probably several other things going on that would prevent this from going to trial. As well, there's many Afghans living in Canada, if this case ever went through, the flood gates would burst wide open against the Canadian military. Since this hasn't happened, I'm inclined to believe that there are many obstacles in the way from such cases ever coming to light in Canada. WWWTT