Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

WWWTT

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,561

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by WWWTT

  1. WWWTT
    Please be specific with whom has an minority when drawing an conclusion. I'm finding it hard to follow you hypothetical possibilities. Thank you WWWTT
  2. WWWTT
    Easier hill for the NDP to climb! Did you really believe that anything was automatically granted to the conservatives or liberals? WWWTT
  3. WWWTT
    Polls are actually pointing to an NDP majority when accounting for momentum WWWTT
  4. WWWTT
    I believe cybercoma has answered your question. I clearly titled this thread and posted it under the proper heading. I also made a clear example in the fist comment of how this thread will work. What you are now doing Charles Anthony(in the comment highlighted here) is called thread drift. If you continue in this direction, you will get another warning point! When I fist started this thread, there was an comical tongue in cheek flavour to it. But now there seems to be a possibility that this thread may be the most difficult for you to moderate! WWWTT
  5. WWWTT
    No problem brother. CA already made a comment on this thread and I don't think he's going to lock/delete it as long as we just post the comments moderators have openly made that are out of line deserving of a warning point. WWWTT
  6. WWWTT
    Wow 3 minutes! Didn't take you long to respond to this thread! Oh no there's no "next" required! What's next is more warning points given to you! If there's any "next" is would be how you deal with it. If it's good enough for the posters, then I'm sure it should be perfectly OK with the moderators. WWWTT
  7. WWWTT
    Very unpredictable hypothesis in several ways. But still a good one! Probably worth it's own thread. WWWTT
  8. WWWTT
    I had a felling that was it. WWWTT
  9. WWWTT
    Ok here's an example of what I'm thinking http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/topic/24584-arcticantarctic-sea-ice-what-to-make-of-it/page-5#entry1061149 Moderator CA recently made this comment during an on going debate. After getting called out on it, he retracts his comment or changes it around to sound like he meant something else. Clearly poor moderating skills! By the power invested in me (by my own thread), I award Charles Anthony, moderator of Maple Leaf Web, due to false accusations and abuse of power, 1 warning point! Take that you moderator! Not feeling so "high and mighty" anymore hey CA? WWWTT
  10. WWWTT
    Ever want to give that moderator a warning point? Or how about a suspension? Well here's your opportunity! And I'm sure that the MLW moderators have given it's posters many opportunities to scratch their head and say to themselves "hey that's not fair, you should get a warning point/suspension for being biased/unreasonable!" I'll start it off. WWWTT
  11. WWWTT
    Ya there's this thing called polls and trends. Check out my status update. Clear movement towards an NDP federal majority government! Ahhh but you guys still have your good old opinions. At least one of you guys understand how these things work. WWWTT edited to add I'm not sure if I should be adding cybercoma into this because he's always making sarcastic comments and this makes it difficult to gauge his opinion from time to time.
  12. WWWTT
    https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/momentum?source=feed_text&story_id=10152871856565779
    1. WWWTT

      WWWTT

      conservatives and liberals are both bleeding off to feed big orange!

    2. WWWTT

      WWWTT

      At this rate 40% of the vote with a majority NDP federal government are reasonable to conclude. No wonder Harper is scared shitless to have a televised debate with Mulcair!

    3. WWWTT

      WWWTT

      My advise to Harper, stay in the closet buddy!

  13. WWWTT
    Until someone takes the time to verify your claims. WWWTT
  14. WWWTT
    Ya the reason why I asked you to make some references is because you are not reading what is in the link The measurement you are doubting is in regards to "sea level rise". But for some reason, you are implying that it is the amount of ice melting. WWWTT
  15. WWWTT
    I suggest you go back and see who was being asked the question about staff NOAA scientists from OGFT because OGFT didn't ask me such question. As far as corruption in China goes, where did that come from? WWWTT
  16. WWWTT
    What does your accusation towards my knowledge of geography have to do with your double standard of political influence within government departments from different countries? You clearly implied that there is no political influence within an US government department. However, in the past, you have implied that at least one government department in China was politically influenced. Why deflect when ignoring would be a better debate tactic in my opinion. WWWTT
  17. WWWTT
    You seem perfectly comfortable in accusing Chinese state departments in being politically motivated. Your double standard is showing. WWWTT
  18. WWWTT
    Nothing wrong with using simple straight forward data! Funny how that the alarmists feel that for some reason this must be made difficult to understand and always change what "global warming" is. WWWTT
  19. WWWTT
    Absolutely false statements! For someone whom claims to be answering questions, you are again displaying "sidestepping", no need to answer anything when avoiding seems to your choice. And after sidestepping, you claim to be "answering" questions, and then make the claim to impose demands on other posters. I'll wait for another sidestep from you. I should really just ignore these attempts from your part. WWWTT
  20. WWWTT
    No it wasn't! You're going to have to point out where this 0.45mm comes from. But you seem to be dodging that part. WWWTT
  21. WWWTT

    Where's the "global warming" smoking gun? Oh ya, the smoking gun is .0319 degrees celcius andsheets of ice from the most isolated barren parts of the surface of the Earth. Any questions?

    1. Show previous comments  10 more
    2. bush_cheney2004

      bush_cheney2004

      Gosh...another American reference...big surprise!

    3. WWWTT

      WWWTT

      Oh ya thanks waldo, I forgot about the "other" smoking gun from the alarmist arsenal, an increase of ppm in CO2. So what's the level of ppm now? 300? 352?

  22. WWWTT
    Oooopps almost forgot! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quackery WWWTT
  23. WWWTT
    Alberta tar sands for one is an excellent example! It is well known/believed that the geographical area of Alberta had a much warmer climate. Just north of where I live in Brampton, in Caledon there is much limestone (used in building Queen's park buildings among other buildings) that originally grew in tropical coral reefs. Are you suggesting that there was intelligent life on Earth millions of years ago that un naturally changed the climate???? Or that millions of years ago, life forms found now in tropical climates thrived in colder climates where their fossils and forms of are now found? WWWTT
  24. WWWTT
    "Quack" is actually an recognized term I believe. I just transposed it to fit the alleged "global warming" science due to man made CO2 and the resolving of such claimed ailment. WWWTT
  25. WWWTT
    IF that was the claim Shady was making. What is consensus science? Why are there scientists that dispute your claim? Seems to be an contradiction that you have resolved in your own mind by just calling anyone whom disputes as a denier. Why do alarmists always use data that is difficult to verify independently? and very vague? Always from locations far away and isolated? Why do alarmists always label those not convinced? Why do alarmists never question their own sources? Where's the smoking gun? WWWTT
×
×
  • Create New...