GWiz

Well, that settles it, you can't read... No point in helping you anymore, you need professional help, I hope you get it... See ya, or not...

It's looking more and more like this will make Chernobyl look like a Disney movie by comparison... When the Emperor of Japan goes on national TV to calm the nations fears, as he did today, you know the jig is up...

Huh? I guess that means you got nothing... Thanks anyway...

You know anybody that lost their job or their home down there? I know I can buy a nice 2/2 CONDO, in a decent area, in Orlando or Tampa for under $15,000.00, wanna know what the CHEAPEST 1/1 CONDO in a "ghetto" anywhere in Canada sells for? Not quite the same thing, is it?

There's room to the RIGHT of Harper? Does he know? How would "Iggy" get by Harper to get there even if he wanted to? Got anything to substantiate this fantastic claim?

Ahhh, you were talking Technical Recession based on statistics not actuality, why didn't you say so? Would have saved us both a lot of trouble...

Like I told Saipan... You'll never catch anything when trolling with an empty hook... You need a good spinner bait to catch something... Red Devils with a triple hook seem to work best for Jack or Walleye... You're welcome... No charge for the tip... AND I accept you unconditional surrender... No need to thank me for that either...

Like I said, don't just complain about it, do something about it... "Your past is important, but it is not nearly as important to your present as is the way you see your future." - Dr. Tony Campolo

Obvious? To whom? Harper says no recession, Flaherty says no recession, Canada's Banks say no recession, Canada's (and world) economists say no recession, I lived it and say no recession, soooo, no recession as far as I'm concerned... Since YOU say different by all means tell us ALL from when to when this supposed "Canadian Recession" of yours took place...

I gotta admit you are funny, in a very stupid sort of way... YOU want the Governor of The Bank of Canada to "report" to you... Good one.. Too bad you don't even know what the Governor of The Bank of Canada does, so you'll never understand how stupid and funny that is... The things I put in BOLD are incorrect... AND since they are ALL incorrect they certainly aren't "facts"... But hey, look what I found, another reference to the Canadian economy of the early '90s > http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/bustech/story.html?id=1b8d2c49-663f-4c61-a193-c99f61e26741

http://www.theguardian.pe.ca/Economy/2008-10-24/article-1296767/Flaherty-says-it-again-rough-going-but-no-recession-for-Canada/1

http://www.streetside.ca/PlaceJosephRoyal/pdf/Nov7Conference%20Board%20says%20no%20recession%20in%20Canada.pdf

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2008/09/15/canada-harper-recession-idUKOTW00013320080915

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/bustech/story.html?id=1b8d2c49-663f-4c61-a193-c99f61e26741

http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/money/story.html?id=2c258ca4-7dff-412b-a003-6653424d468f

Nope...

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2008/01/09/recession.html

You think the Governor of The Bank of Canada is some sort of political pundit with an agenda? Give me a break... Just how stupid are you?

Yup...

Wrong terminology... I personally don't want anything... To detail all the reasons, many of which I've stated on that other F-35 thread, for my line of thing, would take more TIME and effort to post here than I'm prepared to do... Nor do I actually care a whole lot about what happens in regards to this whole matter... But since you asked nicely, here's my answer... My thinking on the matter is of the advantages the E/A 2 person Fighter brings and is rather futuristic thinking in that IT will be best suited to incorporate the "packages" in fighter aviation of the not too distant future... I'm the type of person that looks at ALL options, both now AND into the future, since this subject matter spans several decades into the future... No good reason to limit one's thinking is there? Especially when one is starting out with 2x the planes at 1/4 (or less) of the price tag... Whether or not Canada want's to be a "player" or not in the future is not a decision I'm empowered to make...

I don't know, maybe this TIME... "Whether you think you can or think you can't - you are right." Well, depending on when (50 year period), I've done many things, and depending on WHO'S ear was listening to me, if at all... Currently, since I'm not a member of the party anymore, but still can't find anyone more worthy of my vote, I'll still cast my vote the same way, for whatever good that does considering the demographics of my riding... So to back up my "concerns" I do it with whether or not I contribute my TIME and money (both pretty valuable commodities btw) to a particular candidate, that I know well and respect for his work ethic, that has a better than average chance of becoming an MP, a fairly effective way to bring my "points" to the fore... Along with voicing my concerns via e-mail and snail mail to ALL party leaders and MP for my riding of course... Beyond that there's not a whole lot Joe Blow ordinary can do...

Hey, let's live a little, about TIME Canada tries out some NEW capabilities and technologies, who knows, we may LIKE playing games with the "big boys"...

I see what you see...

OK, what say you, I, and everybody else hold "the Government of the Day", regardless of party, to that, say by asking that question in any upcoming debate, or whenever any of us have the chance to bring that question to the fore? I know I'll do that with the party I support, for whatever good that will do, as I've always held the party I support's feet to the fire on many, many issues...

Are you saying Ignatieff was an elected MP in Canada prior to running for the leadership and not a Harvard professor "called up" to become the Liberal's savior? Say it isn't so... Many here will be very disappointed if you are right you know...