Leaderboard

Justin recommended her to the Queen, and the Queen approved the recommendation as if Justin choice was going to be questioned by the Queen. The blame is to rest with Justin and his minions no one else....To even suggest this is the Queens fault is short sighted.

An interesting article in Quillette today on the prevalence of misogyny in society. What a review of studies shows is the reverse, that in almost all things, society favors women over men. Many feminists and progressives argue that the West is plagued by pervasive misogyny. In fact, this claim is made with such frequency, and is so rarely challenged, that it has become part of the Left’s catechism of victimhood, repeated by rote without a second thought. The only real question is how powerful and pernicious the misogyny is. Real-world data, however, suggest a different narrative, complicated by the fact that men have worse outcomes in many domains. For example, they are much more likely to be incarcerated, to be shot by the police, to be a victim of violent crime, to be homeless, to commit suicide, and to die on the job or in combat than women. Furthermore, they have a shorter life expectancy and are less likely to be college educated than women. Although these (and similar) data can be reconciled with the pervasive misogyny theory, they should at least give pause to the open-minded. The best data from contemporary social science tell a rather different story and suggest that the very persistence of the pervasive misogyny narrative is itself a manifestation of the opposite: society is largely biased in favor of women. https://quillette.com/2020/07/27/the-myth-of-pervasive-misogyny/

The purposeful buriers are the same people who tried to act like Rayshard Brooks was just a cool, fun-lovin', family-man that took a nap in his car and then got shot by racist white pigs for no good reason. The same people who acted like they just KNEW that Trump colluded with Russia for almost 3 years when they KNEW for most of that time that he did not. The same people who act like Trump did a quid pro quo in Ukraine and Joe/Hunter Biden's actions in China and Ukraine were obviously above reproach. The same people that acted like a snot-faced woman from Berkeley just had to be believed even though she was caught on some lies and made a ridiculously vague accusation. The same people who act like SNC was no big deal, firing Raybould was no big deal, blackface was no big deal, the hijab hoax was no big deal, the We scandal was just a minor misunderstanding, but Duffygate was an apocalyptic scandal. The ones who act like the riots were mostly peaceful, cops are mostly racist, defunding cops will make society better, the NS shooting had something to do with gun control laws, the Danforth shooter was just an incel, the attack in Pennsylvania were inspired by Trump's blatant anti-Semitism, , Smollett was no big deal, Michelle Obama's hate speech is inspiring greatness in grads, the Pulse Nightclub shooter wasn't an islamic terrorist, brining in islamic state terrorists/war criminals and letting them go free while re-branding them as 'fighters' was a great idea, etc, etc, etc. No one has to tell the alt-left dolts at CTV and CBC to bury anything, they hire alt-left-brainwashed muppets with no compunctions about lying and they spend more time polishing the spin than searching for the truth. Honestly they spend more time talking about fake Trump scandals than they do covering up actual Trudeau scandals. When a news item makes the rounds on CTV, do you ever worry that they'll present it accurately if in so doing they'll discredit their alt-left narrative? Gimme a break. The only time leftists are ever honest is when the mob is at their own door. The epitome of leftism is the ESPN reporter, Chris Palmer, tweeted about the riots. When a low-income housing complex was in flames he tweeted: "Burn that shit down. Burn it all down." Then when the rioters were in his neighbourhood he called the cops [leftist hypocrisy] and tweeted: "Get these animals TF out of my neighbourhood. Go back to where you live". and then "Tear up your own shit. Don't come to where we live at and tear our neighborhood up. We care about our community. If you don't care about yours I don't give a shit." Soak it up eyeball. You've been on the wrong side of history regarding all of those issues, in grandly pathetic fashion.

From previous reports the cop knew Floyd, which means he almost certainly knew he was a convicted felon with a record of using firearms, and a junkie. All of which is plenty of reason to be very wary. The video shows that Floyd was treated properly until he started to go bananas in the back of the police car. The police decided he was in the throes of 'excited delirium' and took him out again and called for an ambulance (which will throw a wrench into the prosecution's assertions they treated him with 'depraved indifference'. He was also six feet nine, which no doubt played a part in their decision to pin him down. Incidentally, there are a lot of Americans who, if they're just going from the mainstream media, don't even know Floyd had a record, or that he was on fentanyl and meth. These things weren't generally reported.

It doesn't fit the narrative of an unresisting, gentle giant being cruelly abused by the evil white police.

If you missed Tucker earlier today, you can watch his show on Fox News at 9 pac/12 eastern. I only saw 8 minutes of it so far, the show to this point has been brilliant.

I know exactly how you do it. You don't question anything that you see there, no matter how blatantly false it is at the time it's said, or how horribly idiotic it looks with the benefit of hindsight. If you mistakenly chose the words frank talk, too bad. FYI 'frank talk' is the exact opposite of what to expect from the politicians that you love, and it's what you hear from the politicians that you detest. Trudeau simply does not ever answer the questions that he is asked. To him, every question on any topic is an excuse to randomly virtue signal about loosely-related principles. Our MSM accepts his blather as answers, as do you.

Honourable men have resigned for a lot less.

Maybe the problem is that they did Google it, and they decided that's the kind of corporation that they want to do business with. It does look like something straight out of the Liberal playbook. Funny thing about socialists, they elect a guy like Trudeau because he talks a good game, and then when it's proven that he's less trustworthy than a fox in a henhouse, they still want to funnel all the money in the country through his sticky little fingers because they still like listening to him.

A former female housemate from 40 years ago declared, for getting attention and also for her sadistic pleasure of destroying a man's life which is a third wave feminist number 1 activity, that John Jarrat raped her. It was not true. It was a made up story from A to Z. There was no evidence whatsoever. There were no witnesses. The woman didn't remember how he raped her, or what he did exactly to her, and changed her version multiple times. She settled on a version to which she claimed she let John Jarrat have sexual intercourse with her, but she said she didn't move and didn't like it. BUT she had one key argument. An ideological one. She claimed that if she were to denounce him 40 years ago, macho men from the Police Department, and all society would have told her she's crazy. Because rape was, of course, according to the nut jobs of the Left, something nice to do and that every men had to do in the 1970s, when Civilization wasn't even there in place and people had just invented wheels. Murder was also made a criminal offense only 2 years ago, obviously. We need to change laws against false accusations. These women who perpetuate those lies are not only vicious. They are psychopaths, deranged people, who could get people killed and lives ruined by such allegations. They are on the same moral level as rapists themselves, no question about it. Rape sentences should equal sentences for false accusations. Sexual predators are not necessarily rapists, they may also be people deciding to ruin someone's life based on sex. The false accusers should also be on the same lists as rapists, and be put to jail for very long. As long as the time the guy would get for really committing the rape the accuser describes. https://www.9news.com.au/national/60-minutes-john-jarratt-why-he-wants-changes-to-laws-identifying-alleged-perpetrator-of-crimes-australia-news/dee70e2c-bfdb-477b-9955-bae761335df4 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-02/john-jarratt-rape-accuser-defends-40-year-wait/11270296