Leaderboard

This could have gone under US politics, but it might as well also go under world politics because it could apply anywhere. Do democracies need to have certain anti-democratic features in order to survive? I'm not talking about secret police, etc., I don't mean THAT kind of anti-democratic, but electoral systems that aren't directly wired into popular opinions, upper houses of parliaments/congresses that aren't based on one person/one vote at the national level. A democracy requires a stable state, and sometimes direct democracy can destabilize political systems. This is especially true when it comes to judicial independence. Would you really want supreme court justices elected in nationwide elections? Certain parts of governments, in order to function, must be insulated from the wilder winds of public debate. In the US system, for example: 1. The president, though elected by the people, is effectively elected through a filter that doesn't always reflect their will. (In 1888, 2000, and 2016, the president elected lost the overall popular vote.) 2. The Senate is actually more anti-democratic than the electoral college. California has 2 senators, so does Wyoming; but the former has a population of 38 million, the latter, about 600,000. 3. First past the post elections allow a victory for the candidate with the most votes, even if it wasn't a simple majority. And if it was a simple majority, legislatures divided into single member districts don't always produce the same party distribution as the number of people who, overall, voted for those parties. Just a few examples.

LoL thanks but I dont care, we are different, complately.

This is an interesting idea. The concern I have is I do not have the time to study legislation to determine how I would vote. Neither do I have the legal training. I don't have the financial background to appreciate the intricacies of tax legislation. I don't know many people who do. Those I do know are people who I would support to run for Parliament. MP's have the time and resources to deal with issues. Many of them work 18 hour days 6 1/2 days a week. Parliament is not that expensive when you consider what they do. We hire them to do what we cannot. My experience with online discussion groups is that they tend to be taken over by people I would never trust to govern (myself included).

What in the blue hell are you on about this time? What in the fizzityuck does Tesla have to do with Kevin Spacey or Leonardo or selfies? -k

Backwardness is demanding that women cover up because men can't control their primal urges because they do see women as sex objects. Sex objects who have to bow to their demands.

The face covering is a mark of a backward-thinking culture and ideology that devalues women as mere chattels. It has no place in a modern society that professes to respect women as equals. Anyone who can't see that is woefully blind of the reality. Ignorance is bliss.

The CPC party has no position or policy on the face covering as far as I know. I don't know where you are coming from. Rather presumptuous. It was already reported something like 2/3 or 70% of Canadians agree with bill 62 in Quebec.

Maybe if governments weren't always so blatantly wasting tax money by the hundreds of billions, people would be less inclined to avoid tax. I don't mind paying towards useful spending done well.. infrastructure, education, scientific research, national defense, etc. I'm sure many people feel the same way, in fact, many of the "rich" give extensively to various charitable causes. The problem is that the government does not spend money wisely or well, funds are wasted in massive corruption, bureaucracy, wasteful programs, and bad decisions. When people feel that their hard earned tax dollars are being wasted or, worse, being used to fund the lavish lifestyles of politicians, of course avoiding taxes will be foremost on their minds. To address tax evasion, what the government needs to do is not to go after tax evaders, but to go after its own corruption and wasteful spending. Make people believe in their leaders and governments again, make people trust their institutions.

I agree, he's definitely the best thing to happen to US politics in a long long time. He does the right wing the same sort of favour some PC university students do for the left - underscoring the more ridiculous edges that need to be trimmed.