All Activity
- Past hour
-
You used empirical testing, observation, and falsification to determine this? I'm guessing you didn't have your conclusions peer reviewed but you have every opportunity to prove that as well. That would be a two-fer and an excellent demonstration of the scientific process in action - establishing the truth of something on the truth of something else that's been established. Just don't neglect to show your work. Sez who?
-
Don't look up!
-
SCOTUS: Birthright EO struck down
gatomontes99 replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Appeal to authority pertains to the affirmative, based on popular support. It does not pertain to the negative based on popular opinion. Further, your ad hominem attack (because you meant the statement to discredit me based on my association with a geographic location) was also a bare assertion fallacy. It turns out that a plurality of Americans that don't live in Texas view the people that live in the state favorably: The survey from Crosswind Media and Public Relations shows 59 percent of Americans outside of Texas view the state favorably, with 33 percent having a "very positive" view of the state, and 26 percent having a "somewhat positive" view. On the other side of the spectrum, 21 percent of those surveyed did not view Texas positively. Not only did you employ ad hominem, you incorrectly used appeal to authority and you neglected to recognize that you used bare assertion. -
SCOTUS: Birthright EO struck down
gatomontes99 replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Good gawd dude. Yes, it is part of the Majority opinion and there are 3 parts, authored by 3 people. All on the majority opinion side. Again, I am always right: Congress (8) Senator Howard, when proposing language to be included in the 14th Amendment and making reference to English common law exceptions, clarified his intent that citizenship should not be conveyed to everyone born or present in the United States, when he stated, ``This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are FOREIGNERS, ALIENS, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons''. You are correct that it is embarrassing that this is 6-3. It should be 9-0 in favor of omitting foreigners and aliens just because they happen to give birth inside the country. Congress is working on a solution already. I am not hopeful it will ever pass, but it needs to. -
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
Reg Volk replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
-
SCOTUS: Birthright EO struck down
robosmith replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
I know exactly what they mean, and there's NO REASON to believe ^this OPINION. LMAO -
They were paid off, or they're activists pretending to be scientists, or it's both; whatever it is, it stinks of 100+ year rot and it's time to say bye-bye to the idea of man-made climate change.
-
And lies are lies. You seem to prefer the second to the 1st By almost every measure he was success As we were recovering from the greatest recession in almost 100 years. Gosh And he did better than almost all of his peers But better than most countries. Again we're talking about the greatest recession in almost a hundred years He was a wild success and it drives the liberals absolutely nuts. The Canadian recovery was almost twice the pace of Obama's, it led the world in many cases, and our recession was not as deep as long as other countries. It's hard to imagine a prime minister doing better than he did in those economic times I know that this is you off. But as you say the facts are the facts and your lies are lies
- Today
-
You know that voter fraud that doesn't happen?
CdnFox replied to Fluffypants's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Oh it's there, your brain just edits it out when you realize how stupid it was in the first place And once again your left denying having said something that you said because it was stupid -
SCOTUS: Birthright EO struck down
Hodad replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
That's not part of the majority opinion. Just Kavanaugh's personal. It has no holding power and sets no precedent. And no, you can't simply pass a law that overrides constitutional law. That would make the constitution rather pointless. -- Congress could TRY, but it would again fail, even before this incarnation of the court. And there frankly isn't support for it in congress. It's really, really embarrassing that this was even a 6-3 split. There simply isn't a serious argument to be made that the constitution doesn't say and mean exactly what it says and means--and has meant since the amendment was drafted. And the SCOTUS majority opinion reflects that and is clear on that point. -
SCOTUS: Birthright EO struck down
gatomontes99 replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Wow. You don't even know what ad hominem or appeal to popularity means. -
Covid deaths in 2020 go up by 35% over the year before Hospitalizations rise to triple what they were in 2020, back when they were "overwhelmed" almost 90% of the covid deaths are occurring among the vaxed eyeball "notices" that the covid jabs are "working" Don't take it personally, stupid. I do it to robodolt too.
-
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
Reg Volk replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
-
Easy guide to bring up the birth rates
LinkSoul60 replied to paxamericana's topic in Sex and Gender Issues
F*ck are you stûpid.... This is what sitting in your basement in Scarborough all day pretending to be American does to your brain. -
SCOTUS: Birthright EO struck down
robosmith replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
You are wrong. You are always wrong to ^LIE What you quoted ^here is the opinion of ONE JUSTICE KAVANAUGH, who "dissenting in part." LMAO; -
Coercing someone is forcing them. Grab a dictionary, stupid. Putting people in a position where they have to either: lose their job, during a huge economic downturn, and be forced to work in a different career, or get a dangerous jab that they don't want MEETS THE DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF FORCED you lying dung-beetle. You can't help being a piece of shit... it's exactly like you're a piece of shit.
-
LOL - of course the degenerate Marxist Jew-hating scumbag Charlie Angus, flush with Soros cash, jumps in to lie about the Canadian graves. Canada should have moved these graves to Canadian soil in 2005 rather than leave these guys buried anywhere that these Jihadi scumbags were going to take over. This was a failure of the Canadian government, as they should have known that the Hamas genocidal scumbags would start tunneling under every cementary in the entire "country". What a joke.
-
Carney says MPs are "just useful for votes"
Reg Volk replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
