All Activity

Well wait a minute, Y'all been saying I'm suffering from TDS? So which is it? You cannot have it both ways kids.

Lmao. I need a coffee and a smoke...

Mike, the whole idea of gay pride night is divisive.

You don't believe the girl had to wrestle a boy? Until what?

Certainly it should matter which verses? Why wouldn't the article tell us that? It's pretty relevant. Some verses would be unifying, others would be divisive.

Because I don't take it as fact? Like I say it's an allegation. I don't believe everything I read, especially in the context of people trying to continue the culture War.

No really. I am much more concerned with results than schtick. Actions speak louder than words.

No I keep demonstrating the fact. Everybody can look back in the thread and see that when you ask the questions it was answered and multiple times in many cases. The answers were made the same throughout the entire interaction. The government did not substantially advise the publicist the danger, they downplayed it and in your comparison suggested it was similar to other vaccines which is absolutely not true and they were aware of that at the time, they have not stood behind people who have become affected as proven by the newspaper story I started this with, they should. Simple facts easily proven within this thread. And no matter how many times I answered your question you kept saying that it hadn't been answered so you're an absolute lying little piece of shit Those are facts kid. It's not an accusation it's an observation of the facts which everyone can look at above. You let your emotions get the better of you and make you stupid. You should be deeply ashamed of that and do better in the future

That would make you a trump supporter if it was true

And it's red that had nothing to do with trump or political divisiveness but did have something to do with the behavior of an individual. There is no reason to bring it up unless you are point is that trump is responsible for their behavior of the individual. I realize you think you're talking to grade two students because that's your usual audience but unfortunately the people here for the most part are adults There's absolutely no reason to bring up trump except to excuse this Behavior. And I notice that you still haven't condemned this Behavior or admitted that it has nothing to do with trump. Game set and match kiddo

No they don't. In fact I just posted the most recent study which showed that the left wing is by far more prone to violence. And we certainly seen that in the last year or two Are Democrats growing more accepting of political violence? liberals are becoming more open to political violence. In the Marquette poll, taken days after Kirk was killed, 15% of Democrats agreed with the statement that it is "justified for Americans today to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals." That was higher than for independents (12%) and Republicans (6%). The Reuters/Ipsos poll found a similar disparity when asking whether it is acceptable "for someone in my political party to commit violence to achieve a political goal." Among Democrats, 7% said yes, more than twice the rate of Republicans. (A differently phrased question found similar results between the parties.) Ooopsie doodle. In fact three recent polls from credible sources show this same trend And as noted in the last 2 years most of the violence has been done by those leaning left. Certainly political violence at least. So that would be a big fat nope . You have said that this person is not responsible, it's trump's fault But if that's not what you meant to say you can correct it right now. You can say trump had nothing to do with this this person is entirely responsible for their own actions. Which would be true. But you won't say it because it doesn't fit your echo chamber narrative

In French: https://bombardier.com/fr/avions/global-8000

https://www.foxnews.com/outkick-sports/major-league-baseball-warns-san-francisco-giants-players-writing-bible-verses-pride-night-hats Now if this is not far left extremist bigotry what is? Sick stuff

No problem. Or as Australians say, "No worries." Returning to my OP: IMHO, there is a huge f*g-hypocrisy in Quebec, and federal Canada. 1. Quebec has a large industry to build jets for rich people who burn kerosene - emitting CO2. 2. Quebec taxes people who drive ICE cars

So celebrate that the man who could give every single American over $2000 or single handed could fund Universal Healthcare backstopped Trump instead. You're not great Americans, you're Ferengi.

Or can you just say that every time you fools attempt to deny my statements, you prove them more and more?

I'll take/accept these numbers. Billions here, billions there. 1. Canadians trade much, far more with Americans than they do with Chinese. 2. Our smart Canadian politicians understand Americans. 2a. As Pierre Trudeau famously said, "We sleep with an elephant."

It's too crazy to be a movie. No one would believe that someone that hates Nazis would become a Nazi's slut and paying him for it. But...if you change her nexis to like Nazis, well, then that movie becomes very believable. Now that they have voted for a Nazi in Maine and paid a Nazi to bang her at the SPLC. Maybe the truth is that the Democrats never really left the KKK.

Before 1991, Americans had an obvious opponent: Communism, Soviets. As JFK/Reagan said: "We won." Since 1991, American foreign policy is unstable.

C'mon, that's funny now... You don't listen to his schtick but then go off and start justifying it with his guilt findings, and Melania's underwear. Really...

Trump thinks his supporters are imbeciles. So, um, Are you?

By intervening, you Americans did not help the world in 1917. By intervening, you Americans did not change Europe in 1944. You changed Asia in 1945. After 1945 and prior to 1991, I would say that Americans were successful.

1. I don't want to do that. Wouldn't;t be upset if he did though. 2. No, it means independents are probably tired of the hyper-partisanship and idealogical divide between the two parties and voting for issues, not party. 3. Not that I keep up with either, but haven't heard of either group rioting in the last 5 - 6 years. have they?

Leftits: "Can I say that the anthem is just racist, sexist, colonial propaganda, or are we still pretending to be patriotic?" 😬

No, fortunately I chose a career path where my life wasn't on the line every day, and am glad my kids did too. I get you served which is appreciated and I can most certainly understand your concern for your children as they're serving, but don't be overly dramatic. Actually, we can blame Harper for a lot more but as far as military spending was concerned, he spent the least. I only point that out because all you do is say it's because of the liberals that our military is antiquated and undermanned. It didn't matter which party was in government, we didn't spend on our military as we should have. We're spending now so there you go. Do you think that the pressure from the US for our lack of military spending would be any different if Poilievre had won the election? They think he's Mitt Romney with a French accent. We'd be getting hammered... Not following though.... you're complaining at the lack of spending and now you're complaining of the spending.... odd. Yes, most people are appreciative of our military supporting distasters and providing that assistance. I wasn't aware that the majority of personnel are conservatives though... Is that a fact, or just the people you hung with?