All Activity

YOUR FANTASIES mean NOTHING. LMAO

It's literally what he said, how would that make me suspicious?? Starting to sound like you've been into the NyQuil again a little bit early. I suppose it is a day off tomorrow It really doesn't. It sounds like somebody childishly fabricating something in order to deflect from the wrongdoings of a current incumbent that they approve of. And that's a common theme with the left, if they can't make their fail leader look good then they'll try to make another leader look bad so that there's looks good by comparison. The pattern is that you're dishonest piece of crap who can't keep his story straight for 5 minutes. And yes I definitely see it But the fact also remains that many of them had were would have anyway converted away from social housing units. That's one of the reasons the Conservatives moved away from that model and spent the money on the Housing First initiative, which proved very successful and was vastly superior to the subsidized housing. In fact given the economics of the time it's quite fair to say that the majority and possibly all of those units would have been lost regardless. So even the statement that harper's policy lost 800,000 units is a complete and utter fabrication. Not to mention the fact He spent the money subsidizing people instead of properties and that worked out better What are you even talking about. The people before him addressed homelessness in one way which was fine and harper came at it from a different direction that proved more successful. Neither party in that did anything wrong No it's not. Carney has choices, he can do a good job or you can do a bad job. He only takes heat if he does a bad job And he's doing a bad job. I see we've got new tariffs on us from china now for our agriculture which I predicted. But you keep insisting daily that he's wonderful and doing an amazing job and we're so lucky and what a great guy etc etc This isn't some sort of general criticism, you can point to specific things and say this is wrong. What he's doing with bailing out the developers is wrong. It has nothing to do with anything other than the fact that it's corruption and it's wrong And yet once again you're here defending corruption on claiming how it's not Carney's fault for doing the corruption it's everybody else in history fault leading up to this that's made him corrupt or something What he's doing is wrong. You should call evil out for being evil when you see it. Instead, you support it.

No kid we all hear them. And at least I don't have to go around lying about what I said every 5 minutes like you do This is why nobody respects you Oh look who's jumping into a threat again with absolutely nothing to add trying desperately to make Himself feel better about his own failings by attacking his betters. What a shocker

YOU quoted Kavanaugh's OPINION and said it matters, LIAR ONE justice's strand alone OPINION never matters at all. Kavanauh NEEDS FOUR CONCURRENCES to mean ANYTHING. Who told you otherwise? Your SOP is NO EVIDENCE. LMAO

It bears mentioning our governing and political system was never constituted on the need for a prime minister. Now that it effectively is dependent on a PM is why it, along with virtually and distractingly everything else, is a partisan issue. Personally I'd rather see it become a governing issue along the other political axis - up and down.

It's pretty easy alright when you start caring less about AGW. Oh well maybe accelerating the problem will bring it into a sharper relief.

You're an idi0t, and he was a failure.

Nationalist logic at work again. 🤣

Wow, how did you figure that out all on your own? You're so woke. One that's easily falsifiable. Do you believe or wish to argue otherwise or something?

Meanwhile you swear by words only you can hear.

Only for those who have no other sport

Because if a stunned wonder like you chose not to get vaccinated you had a greater likelihood of infecting someone who was compromised than someone who was vaccinated. Think hospitals fool.... people who are vulnerable may even be there? You're a certified psycho... WTF are you even mumbling about, or is your helmet on too tight again. Dying.... give me a break. I know countless young, healthy people including my kids who got vaccinated and are just fine. You watch too much Rebel News. You're a fool...

It seems more like an oversight and you're ridiculously suspicious. The idea was fabricated alright, by partisans seeking to blame an incumbent for everything that was going wrong. Do you see the pattern here, am I getting thru to you at all? But the reality remains that 800,000 is the estimated number of affordable and social housing units across Canada that gradually lost federal funding and rent subsidies when Harper let long-term federal operating agreements run out. He was just finishing a job that started long before anyone had heard of him. Now it's Carney's turn to take the heat. No one said the system is smart. It's certainly unable to cultivate much in the way of a forgiving temperament to avoid everything defaulting to endless acrimony and combat.

Correct. No, 100% blame for a long term widespread problem is simply a partisan dodge all too commonly used to dump on incumbents in the present. This dodge has been with us for decades, it won't be going away anytime soon and it contributes nothing towards a solution. They certainly didn't make things any better. I didn't expect them to, why did you?

It’s a national sport of Canada

A consensus only exist until it does not. You should join the flat earth people, they have a consensus.

Well in fairness sometimes he deflects

LOL i can hear you crying from here kiddo It must absolutely suck that you know in your heart the best financial prime minister we've ever had was a conservative and that none of the liberals before or after have come even close. And that as much as people didn't like him he still in the top spots for best prime minister ever again and again and again when polls are taken. Try harder kid. Love seeing those salty tears

Dodge again, we all know that's you're singular forte.

You need to look for better hero's Kid. Your guy was a failure.

If the jab protects you, then why the F do you care if someone else is unvaccinated, loser? Linkie: "Duuuuuh, me have vax, so me is safe. Me no can get virused. But peeple no vaxeen can get covid,and then me gonna die from it." Do you understand that part, stupid? If your vax works then why do you care who else has it? The whole point of making people take the vax was that "the vax theoretically worked". It's one way or the other you worthless goddamned fool. It works like you say it does, or it doesn't work so why take it? Furthermore, by the time the vax was available for young people, we KNEW that they did not need it at all. Not one teeny tiny fking bit. How about this, loser... If people are too scared to go outside then they should stay inside. Right? F-off you weak little biotch. The VAST VAST VAST majority of people who were vulnerable didn't have to work. They could stay home. Very few people who were vulnerable to covid were in any shape to hold jobs. Why should young people take a chance of dying from the jab when they had no chance of dying from covid? Why should they take a chance of getting myocarditis, pericarditis, or any of the other serious side-effects. How much of a gutless weasel are you that you'd risk the lives of young, healthy people just to save your worthless ass?

I see you're back on the payroll. Harper was a success...accept it and move on.

It really doesn't. Either climate change is happening at a crisis level and is an existential threat to human life and we can do something about it or it isn't a crisis and we can't do something about it. Nothing else matters unless you're trying to turn this into a political opportunity and don't actually care about the subject That's one of your stupidest statements and it was up against some pretty stiff competition. It would be more akin to saying "Is this cancer? and if so is there a treatment?'" Which are two logical questions. And a person who was concerned about cancer would seek those answers first and have in hand evidence that it is cancer and that it is treatable or evidence that it wasn't cancer or if it is there's nothing we can do about it anyway That's what a reasonable and sane person would do. Yet it is not what you and your courts have done. Despite numerous requests you still cannot provide any evidence that there is a crisis or that any proposed solution would have any significant effect No, you haven't presented a single thing from a actual climate scientist or even a non-climate scientist. Despite being asked billions of times at this point. Let's try again, provide the scientific research specifically that shows that climate change is a crisis and that there's something we can do about it that would substantially avoid that crisis. It can be more than one paper,it can arrive at those conclusions without perhaps using those precise words as long as it's clear that there is a huge danger to mankind and that we can fix it with one or another proposed solution I'll wait. Nope and I actually just went through this with someone else. It's sadly not dramatic. It's sadly actually true What's dramatic is suggesting that much of humanity will die or that our civilizations will fall or that 2 billion people will come streaming across our borders and we won't be able to stop it, etc etc even on this very board as well as other places I'm afraid you've got the drama queen title all wrapped up kiddo

No, the answer is not 'no', because it does matter. Using your logic is akin to saying "I have X cancer but it's not a crisis right now so I'll wait to start any type of treatments". Climate change is costing us today and will cost future generations a hell of a lot more if we don't something about it, which we are. Can more be done yes, but at what cost and in the world as it is today. My 'kind' is the actual climate scientists who have studied this subject for years and have unequivocally agreed that climate change is man made. Given that we know greenhouse gases are not good for the atmosphere it makes a least a bit of sense to reduce them as much as we responsibly can, don't you think? Radical actions have destroyed our economy.... dramatic much?

You're the only one that hears voices in your head kiddo Of course there is. I say intelligent things but I don't worry about double checking for grammar. You say stupid things and think that your grammar somehow makes them less stupid Which is pretty stupid. Not to mention you just screwed up your grammar while you were calling someone stupid I pointed out the sentence already and good lord, I don't have enough hours in the day to start teaching you decent English skills, you can barely think your way out of a paper bag as it is. But I find it absolutely hilarious that you couldn't spot the error and need someone to walk you through it while you're complaining about people's grammar oh, and.... "Which sentence?" is a sentence fragment sweetie. Bad grammar! No star for you!