All Activity

1. The political a$$holes and their kangaroo courts. You perverts wouldn't have given a flying f*ck about Trump if he hadn't run for president. Besides, he's no more corrupt than any other political figure - your wasting your breath here. 2. Yes he has been a disappointment in multiple ways, but you're still full of shit: I don't "buy everything" he's selling. I've liked the man's approach to immigration, and I love that he blew queerdom out of DC, but that's about it so far. 3. Really?

A Trump fan, a Poilievre fan, a Charlie fan, a confused little Fxx.... Get back to me when you get your pint sized head out of your áss 🤡

Pierre Poilievre’s rallies attract significantly larger and more energetic crowds than Liberal events, drawing thousands of attendees in cities across Canada compared to smaller, more controlled gatherings for Liberals like Mark Carney. Stop listening to the CBC and open what is a closed mind.

17 yr old. My son doesn't turn 17 until Oct and he's almost 6'2. Whoa, that sounds realistic: "Martin's parents and their legal team enlisted the public relations services of The TASC Group to manage media attention around Martin's death and Zimmerman's subsequent trial." - wiki You're a hateful little bigot who makes shit up. Did I already mention that? You may not remember this, but I've said here many times that Obama's BS story about Trayvon Martin, back when he knew absolutely NOTHING about what happened that day, caused a lot of unnecessary racial division. And you're the poster boy for that: a dumb RPOC (racist person of colour) who heard a story from Barack Obama, and instantly believes that he knows exactly what happened thousands of miles away in the dark where there were no witnesses with a clear view who saw the whole thing. "BUT OBAMA KNOWS! HE SAID IT, SO HE MUST KNOW IT!!!!" You got played by America's Divider-in Chief, dummy. He set you up to fall for the M Brown BS and the Brionna BS and the Rayshard BS and the G Floyd BS, and you gobbled it all up. You need to think back to all of the hateful and stupid things that you said between 2014 and 2021, and how much of it was all based on total BS and lies from known racial agitators. Who said that, dummy? I'd love to see it. They sound pretty F'd up. I'm not a fan either. But the Martin/Zimmerman case at least has a guy who, by his version of the details, was actually in a situation where he may have been jumped and he feared for his life. But nothing you said here has anything to do with that.

Race hustler

1. What accusers? He paid a hooker to keep quiet which is fine if it's money from your personal bank account, but the fool used company funds and falsified business records to hide it. He's not a bright guy... 2. Yes he is a disappointment, and your crowd buys everything this con man is selling. The upside is that your CPI comes in at the consensus. The downside is that the CPI is +4.2% Y/Y. Trump creates the best inflation ever, like never seen before, like they said couldn't;t be done. He's the best... 3. The only people who think and talk about queers is you far right fools. Why is that? Agreed on immigration, which got out of hand.

Milhouse is not well liked, nor well respected. That is on him. Not the Canadian people.

In September 2022, Jeremy MacKenzie made a video stream where he threatened to sexually assault Poilievre's wife, Anaida Poilievre, referring to it as a "power move". This threat prompted a vehement response from Poilievre. He publicly called MacKenzie and his associates "dirtbags" and "losers," and formally requested that the RCMP investigate the threats. It's eminently obvious you and other weak minded people are afraid of Poilivere. The simple fact that using the childish response of "Milhouse" speaks volumes.

Moronic.

Woketard.

1) They weren’t killed they were rescued you clueless clown Ehy are you so wrong all the times try getting some actual facts for once 2) I never laughed at Kirk or the insurance executives murder you shameless liar. Why must must you lie all the time o being honest for once 3) I am laughing at the ridiculous mindless Trump puppets that parrots all of his ridiculous false claims and are in total denial about his disastrous and unnecessary war of choice that is tanking the global economy for NOTHING

The opposite is true. The shows that he stands on the side of the United Canada instead of letting pettiness divide us. The United Canada is a moral stance. You literally just proved yourself wrong. Yes, he absolutely did go and talk with people he disagrees with. And that's what he suggesting we do now. A good leader actually talks to people that he disagrees with and tries to find common ground You are literally saying that in order to have morals you must hate and attack everyone who disagrees with you. That is childish. It makes more sense to meet with people you disagree with and find ways to work with them and bring people together Just more proof that the left is all about hatred and bigotry these days and thrives on intolerance. You don't get anywhere as a nation by dividing people. You build a nation by bringing people together and finding common ground even when you might disagree on something Yeash

Is 35 years enough?

Moronic.

hodad will say anything to protect blacks, so nothing he says here, or anywhere else, can be taken seriously.

He clearly was not the aggressor. That's a plain fact. Metcalf assaulted him (battery, actually) after being warned multiple times not to. You can have the opinion that it was not a proportional response, but it's certainly not a fact. Texas law considered (as do most jurisdictions) disparity of force when evaluating reasonableness. If a much smaller person is attacked by a much larger person, as in this case, it becomes more reasonable to defend oneself with escalated force. If a person is outnumbered by a crowd, as in this case, it becomes more reasonable to defend oneself with escalated force. In effect, a person who is facing overwhelming odds has a much lower threshold for reasonable escalation because they face a much higher risk of serious harm if they don't defend themselves. The jury here are people forming opinions. They clearly found the prosecutions characterization more convincing. Because the truth is that most of them are reasonable people, and reasonable people would leave a hostile situation. Because nothing about that situation--on either side--was important. But a stand your ground law doesn't say you have to be reasonable about removing yourself from a bad situation. They just that you have to be legal. SYG laws don't just allow for unreasonable escalations, they cause them. And in addition to being bad laws, we see over and over again that there is massive racial disparity in terms of protection under those laws. Extensive and well documented.

We all lived through covid under a similar dictatorship. Couldn't even take a shit without the government trying to tell you what to do

Not m*rons, you piece of shit, gobsmacked. Apparently California was able to bake leftism right into its election system. Turley expounds below:

If you're talking about specific treatments, yes, like generic drugs after patents expire. But the price of medicine as a whole will never get cheaper. Constant evolution of treatments, techniques, drugs, equipment, buildings... that will always be inflationary. And the rich will always have a big advantage over the poor in getting treatment.

Nope, not confused at all...your buddies verndabouy, goodless and legoman seem to be defending your feeble posts so it is not a stretch to believe you need permission form them to post LOL LOL LOL You are such a feeble petty little LOSER HA HA HA

How would it be better off? Specifically?

In what deranged world of yours is that a threat?

You must be exhausted from all that backpedalling. And the Right being nuanced? The Right thinks nuance are their new stepdad's sisters.

And Quebec quickly becomes a failed state, unable to meet it's economic responsibilities. Blackmail is your strategy? Shooting yourself in the foot for spite?

"Although it passed the committee with minimal controversy, the amendment was defeated in a full Senate vote on Wednesday, with the Carney government declaring it would not support a similar amendment if it was included in the amended bill sent back to the House of Commons."