What Is Climate Change?

[eyeball]

37 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right ... In science, consensus is irrelevant."

After all this time and with the level of science at hand, where is this individual, when will they  emerge with the evidence that proves there's no crisis?

Economically it would be like the 2nd coming of Christ in terms of saving us. And as always, there will be a Nobel...millions in cash...renamed high schools everywhere...Steven Tyler blushing at their mountain of panties.

Is this saviour among us now, even as we speak? 

 

[Goddess]

15 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Is this saviour among us now, even as we speak? 

Well, you believe it's Fauci, so......

In 1931, 100 scientists got together and wrote a paper on how Einstein was wrong.

Ooopsy-doodle.

Science is not decided by voting.

Edited 1 hour ago by Goddess

[eyeball]

17 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Well, you believe it's Fauci, so......

Nope, but millions of you still know climate change isn't a crisis. How? Because the UN dialled back a couple of predictions?

17 minutes ago, Goddess said:

In 1931, 100 scientists got together and wrote a paper on how Einstein was wrong.

How's that worked out for them?

18 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Ooopsy-doodle.

Science is not decided by voting.

That's right.

[Goddess]

7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

That's right.

Thank you for finally seeing this point.

Previously, you've been a rabid proponent of "consensus science", often citing some generic "the vast majority of scientists say......"

Glad you're finally cluing in.

[Goddess]

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature - Astrophysics Data System

We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991-2011 matching the topics ‘global climate change’ or ‘global warming’. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. 

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

After all this time and with the level of science at hand, where is this individual, when will they  emerge with the evidence that proves there's no crisis?

Economically it would be like the 2nd coming of Christ in terms of saving us. And as always, there will be a Nobel...millions in cash...renamed high schools everywhere...Steven Tyler blushing at their mountain of panties.

Is this saviour among us now, even as we speak? 

 

 

[Deluge]

Climate change is every bit as dangerous as the boogeyman.