WestCanMan Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 17 hours ago, robosmith said: I can read the US Constitution. You can't even read a comic book. You probably had to use a spellchecker to get "US" right. And wtf did you mean by "advocations" of Trump? Do you even know what advocate means? What is Trump "advocating" for? Last i heard, he was the president, so he was "doing" things, not just advocating. Edited 6 hours ago by WestCanMan 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 41 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: You can't even read a comic book. You probably had to use a spellchecker to get "US" right. And wtf did you mean by "advocations" of Trump? Do you even know what advocate means? What is Trump "advocating" for? Last i heard, he was the president, so he was "doing" things, not just advocating. Trump advocates breaking the LAW all the time. That's why his retribution cases have FAILED. All but Bolton not convicted. Duh. And IRONICALLY Trump was guilty of the same crimes to which Bolton plead guilty. Bolton probably thought they were OK since Trump was doing them. LMAO Quote
CdnFox Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 28 minutes ago, robosmith said: Trump advocates breaking the LAW all the time. That's why his retribution cases have FAILED. If he advocates for breaking the law then there wouldn't have been retribution cases. You're literally proving that he's following the law. They have their day in court and they were able to win, trump actually respected the legal process You don't have much luck with thinking do you? Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
WestCanMan Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 26 minutes ago, robosmith said: Trump advocates breaking the LAW all the time. Again, wtf do you even mean by that? He's saying that people should break the law? Do you have an example? You know that's a daily occurrence from the Dems, right? They're constantly inciting riots, or telling their supporters to harass political opponents, etc. Quote That's why his retribution cases have FAILED. There are no retribution cases, dingbat. Trump was repeatedly charged by Dem AGs for BS offences, and his investigation into Carroll is "an investigation of a known crime". She lied during her deposition. And then she admitted to it because she's braindead. I'm not following your Bolton story. What's that even about? Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Again, wtf do you even mean by that? He's saying that people should break the law? Do you have an example? There are NUMEROUS examples. The most notorious was on Jan 6th when he LIED to INCITE the attack on the Capitol. Of course, you know that, but are in denial about his clear INTENT as PROVEN by the FACT that he pardoned the perpetrators. 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: You know that's a daily occurrence from the Dems, right? Who is "the Dems"? LMAO 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: They're constantly inciting riots, or telling their supporters to harass political opponents, etc. Your fantacies are amusing. LMAO 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: There are no retribution cases, dingbat. LMAO. You really are IGNORANT for someone who always pretends to know everything. Quote President Donald Trump inadvertently posted a revealing message on Truth Social intended as a direct message to Attorney General Pam Bondi, urging her to immediately prosecute his political opponents. Trump’s post specifically targeted former FBI Director James Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff, and New York Attorney General Letitia James. [1, 2] The Truth Social Message Addressed directly to “Pam,” Trump publicly expressed frustration with the pace of retribution against his former investigators. The post stated: "We can't delay any longer, it's killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!" [1, 2] The Aftermath Reports from NBC News and The Wall Street Journal indicated that Trump believed the text was a private DM and was surprised when it was published publicly. Bondi was reportedly upset by the public nature of the post, which forced an awkward follow-up post praising her. [1, 2] Shortly after this pressure campaign, federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia were replaced, and a flurry of indictments followed. Both James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James were subsequently indicted on federal charges. [1, 2, 3] Source and Video References For additional coverage of how this directive unfolded and the legal implications of a president directly pressuring the Justice Department, see reports from POLITICO or NBC News. [1] For analysis and expert opinions on how President Trump publicly ordered the prosecution of his political adversaries: 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Trump was repeatedly charged by Dem AGs for BS offences, and his investigation into Carroll is "an investigation of a known crime". She lied during her deposition. And then she admitted to it because she's braindead. SOLELY BASED on EVIDENCE of CRIMES. 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: I'm not following your Bolton story. What's that even about? Bolton was convicted of mishandling classified materials. You know, JUST LIKE the SECOND SMITH INDICTEMENT OF Trump, IGNORAMUS. Edited 2 hours ago by robosmith Quote
User Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, robosmith said: There are NUMEROUS examples. The most notorious was on Jan 6th when he LIED to INCITE the attack on the Capitol. Of course, you know that, but are in denial about his clear INTENT as PROVEN by the FACT that he pardoned the perpetrators. Except... this is your baseless accusation. There is no evidence he was lying to incite an attack. The evidence we do have shows him explicitly calling for them to go march peacefully. Pardoning those involved was because of how the Biden administration abused the DOJ process to vindictively go after anyone involved. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.