Chinese Influence Campaign

[gatomontes99]

Ask yourself, why don't the Chinese want us to have power and data centers? 

 

 

[John Johnston]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ask yourself, why don't the Chinese want us to have power and data centers? 

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/kevin-oleary-data-centre-utah-9.7207716

Utah is currently facing significant water challenges, primarily due to its rapid population growth and arid climate.

The state ranks among the driest in the U.S., with only about 5% of its total precipitation available for human use. 

1

Despite this, Utah's population is expected to double in coming decades, leading to increased water demand. 

1

The Great Salt Lake and Lake Powell have seen declining levels, indicating a worsening water crisis. 

1

Efforts to improve water efficiency and conservation are ongoing, but challenges remain, especially in urban areas where water use is high. 

2

The state is also dealing with disputes over water projects, such as the Pine Valley Water Supply Project, which highlights the complexities of managing water resources. 

1

Overall, while Utah's water situation is serious, there are ongoing efforts to address these challenges and ensure sustainable water management.

 

That's why. Stop the bullshit. 

[gatomontes99]

3 hours ago, John Johnston said:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/kevin-oleary-data-centre-utah-9.7207716

Utah is currently facing significant water challenges, primarily due to its rapid population growth and arid climate.

The state ranks among the driest in the U.S., with only about 5% of its total precipitation available for human use. 

1

Despite this, Utah's population is expected to double in coming decades, leading to increased water demand. 

1

The Great Salt Lake and Lake Powell have seen declining levels, indicating a worsening water crisis. 

1

Efforts to improve water efficiency and conservation are ongoing, but challenges remain, especially in urban areas where water use is high. 

2

The state is also dealing with disputes over water projects, such as the Pine Valley Water Supply Project, which highlights the complexities of managing water resources. 

1

Overall, while Utah's water situation is serious, there are ongoing efforts to address these challenges and ensure sustainable water management.

 

That's why. Stop the bullshit. 

These facilities are on a closed loop cooling system. It is the cheapest way. Even if they were not, the water would come in, absorb the heat and then leave. It doesn't get consumed or vanish. 

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, John Johnston said:

Utah is currently 

 

No one's getting "information" from you about Utah or anything else, doofus.

You're considered to be nothing more than a Hamas/IRGC/Chinese Gov't/Demi propaganda outlet.

 That's your own fault. You just can't stop lying, now you have zero credibility.

Quote

That's why. Stop the bullshit. 

😂 Physician, heal thyself.

[John Johnston]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

No one's getting "information" from you about Utah or anything else, doofus.

You're considered to be nothing more than a Hamas/IRGC/Chinese Gov't/Demi propaganda outlet.

 That's your own fault. You just can't stop lying, now you have zero credibility.

😂 Physician, heal thyself.

Stay stoopid. Whatever. 

[John Stone]

Kevin O'Leary has been described as an ersatz American.

............. this guy was sued as recently as 2021 for fraud. 

Supposedly his wife isn't too good with swift boats............... successfully avoiding DUI by claiming she'd had a drink at her residence before the cops arrived. 

Kevin O'Leary is the only developer  to have a 'degree' in environmental studies.

'you can trust me' / O'Leary 

Trust this guy?

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, John Stone said:

Kevin O'Leary has been described as an ersatz American.

............. this guy was sued as recently as 2021 for fraud. 

Supposedly his wife isn't too good with swift boats............... successfully avoiding DUI by claiming she'd had a drink at her residence before the cops arrived. 

Kevin O'Leary is the only developer  to have a 'degree' in environmental studies.

'you can trust me' / O'Leary 

Trust this guy?

You're an ersatz human. A cheap spambot, and you just outed yourself on this page 😉

 

If you look above you'll see that you and John Johnstone are pretending that

• "Jean Carroll admitting that she lied isn't proof that she lied"

while you're now stating that

• "Kevin O'Leary's wife couldn't possibly have had a drink after she got home". 

Like it or not, many people have used the "I got drunk after I got home" defence, and it's basically bulletproof. Whether she's lying or telling the truth is impossible to say.

E J Carroll, on the other hand, told the world that she lied. It's on video. You and I both know that she lied now. 

In order for O'Leary's wife to get busted the same way, she'd have to be on a TV interview and say "I was totally plastered when I had that boating accident. I didn't have any alcohol after I got home."

[John Stone]

19 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You're an ersatz human. A cheap spambot, and you just outed yourself on this page 😉

 

If you look above you'll see that you and John Johnstone are pretending that

• "Jean Carroll admitting that she lied isn't proof that she lied"

while you're now stating that

• "Kevin O'Leary's wife couldn't possibly have had a drink after she got home". 

Like it or not, many people have used the "I got drunk after I got home" defence, and it's basically bulletproof. Whether she's lying or telling the truth is impossible to say.

E J Carroll, on the other hand, told the world that she lied. It's on video. You and I both know that she lied now. 

In order for O'Leary's wife to get busted the same way, she'd have to be on a TV interview and say "I was totally plastered when I had that boating accident. I didn't have any alcohol after I got home."

ersatz human? 😅

Anyway, back to facts. 

Carroll’s lawyers  stated that Carroll had never met nor had conversations with anyone associated with the nonprofit.

The judge permitted Trump’s attorneys to question Carroll again in a deposition – which was never released by Trump’s attorneys.

However, when the trial began two weeks later the judge said he saw no issue with Carroll’s credibility.

 

re: O'Leary

O'Leary's boat, with his squeeze at the helm,  at speed, collided with the other craft, riding up and over the bow - killing  a mother of two small kids. The other craft was adrift and not illuminated.

Rather than offering assistance, O'Leary backed off and made for their cottage - she needed a drink. 

Yadda yadda - 5 years later, O'Leary settled for 70k. 

................now get back to the corner and lick ur nutz. 😅

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, John Stone said:

ersatz human? 😅

Anyway, back to facts. 

'Cause you do facts, right? Gimme a break ffs.

Quote

Carroll’s lawyers  stated that Carroll had never met nor had conversations with anyone associated with the nonprofit.

The judge permitted Trump’s attorneys to question Carroll again in a deposition – which was never released by Trump’s attorneys.

That's neither here nor there. The fact is that she knew about the funding, but she lied.

• Initial Deposition: When asked in an October 2022 deposition if anyone was paying her legal fees, Carroll replied no. [1, 2]
• Correction and Explanation: Before her trials began, her legal team clarified that she was being represented on a contingency basis and that her counsel had secured outside funding from Hoffman's nonprofit, American Future Republic. Carroll’s lawyers stated "she had simply forgotten about the arrangement" when originally questioned.

Do you understand all that, doofus? Her lawyers said that "she forgot". 
 

She was asked if she was receiving outside funding and she said "No", and her lawyers changed her answer to "Yes, but she had just forgot about it".

That means that her initial answer was the exact opposite of truth, and her reason for having an answer that was the exact opposite of the truth was "I forgot".

So tell me, mr honest, unbiased, concerned citizen... If she couldn't remember that her lawyers had recently told her that someone else was paying her legal bills, and she didn't even notice that she wasn't paying her bills herself, then why should we believe that she remembers what happened during her slutty encounter 30 years ago?

I had girlfriends 30 years ago that I don't remember. 

Now tell me: why did her story need to go to trial? She didn't think of it as a rape when it initially happened, she described a situation where she giggled every time he did something to her, and then when she wanted to leave, she shoved him with one arm and left. She said that she couldn't even remember if he got his penis inside of her...

Who would listen to that story and say "That's a plausible r4pe story. She was really victimized. We need to pay lawyers so that she can bring that to court"? And then they're gonna say: "But can we win if we go to court? Hmmmmm, let's look at the strength of this case:

• ZERO evidence

• Extremely implausible story from 30 years ago

• The accuser can't even name a year

• The story doesn't even amount to a r4pe

• The accuser was caught lying, so her credibility is gone

• The accuser claims to have forgotten major details from within the past couple months, so even her memory is shot

Just look at her own statements that show that her memory can't be relied on: she couldn't name a year and she had somehow forgotten about an offer to pay all of her legal bills.

She forgot all that, and then people are gonna rely on her memory recall from 30 years ago to charge someone with r4pe?

That's not a real thing in a legitimate court with an actual judge.

FYI your story is not proof that a r4pe occurred: it is proof of a weaponized justice system. 

Quote

 However, when the trial began two weeks later the judge said he saw no issue with Carroll’s credibility.

That's proof that the judge was crooked. She didn't have a reliable memory, by her own admission, and she was caught lying. Of course there were issues with her credibility. She had none.

Edited Monday at 02:57 PM by WestCanMan

[eyeball]

On 5/30/2026 at 11:39 AM, gatomontes99 said:

These facilities are on a closed loop cooling system. It is the cheapest way. Even if they were not, the water would come in, absorb the heat and then leave. It doesn't get consumed or vanish. 

Where does the heat go?

[gatomontes99]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

Where does the heat go?

In a closed loop system? The ground. 

[Deluge]

On 5/30/2026 at 8:50 AM, John Johnston said:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/kevin-oleary-data-centre-utah-9.7207716

Utah is currently facing significant water challenges, primarily due to its rapid population growth and arid climate.

The state ranks among the driest in the U.S., with only about 5% of its total precipitation available for human use. 

1

Despite this, Utah's population is expected to double in coming decades, leading to increased water demand. 

1

The Great Salt Lake and Lake Powell have seen declining levels, indicating a worsening water crisis. 

1

Efforts to improve water efficiency and conservation are ongoing, but challenges remain, especially in urban areas where water use is high. 

2

The state is also dealing with disputes over water projects, such as the Pine Valley Water Supply Project, which highlights the complexities of managing water resources. 

1

Overall, while Utah's water situation is serious, there are ongoing efforts to address these challenges and ensure sustainable water management.

 

That's why. Stop the bullshit. 

The only "complexity" going on with water resources is the environuts - but then who's surprised? 

https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2026/04/02/groups-file-appeals-stop-pine/

[eyeball]

4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

In a closed loop system? The ground. 

Right, this sort of waste heat doesn't have much direct effect globally but there are local effects from this that cause greater local use of energy for air conditioning.

This use of energy along with the huge needs of the data centers for energy lead to increased emissions of CO2. The environmental impacts of data centers are real and increasing.

[Deluge]

25 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Right, this sort of waste heat doesn't have much direct effect globally but there are local effects from this that cause greater local use of energy for air conditioning.

This use of energy along with the huge needs of the data centers for energy lead to increased emissions of CO2. The environmental impacts of data centers are real and increasing.

There are over 10,000 data centers pumping shit into the air. When will coastal cities start going under water? 

Edited Monday at 03:53 PM by Deluge

[gatomontes99]

37 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Right, this sort of waste heat doesn't have much direct effect globally but there are local effects from this that cause greater local use of energy for air conditioning.

Absolutely not. You made that up. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. 

[eyeball]

22 minutes ago, Deluge said:

There are over 10,000 data centers pumping shit into the air. When will coastal cities start going under water? 

What's left of New Orleans will be an open ocean island somewhere between 2070 and 2100.

9 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Energy cannot be created or destroyed. 

That's right. What's that got to do with anything?

Edited Monday at 04:14 PM by eyeball

[gatomontes99]

7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

That's right. What's that got to do with anything?

You are acting like heat is being added to the atmosphere. It is not. You cannot create or destroy it. 

Otherwise the brakes on your car are causing warming. Don't believe me? How do you think the car stops? Breaks turn momentum into heat. Did that cause the world to warm? No. 

[Deluge]

10 minutes ago, eyeball said:

What's left of New Orleans will be an open ocean island somewhere between 2070 and 2100.

Because of climate change? Or because of something else? 

Ai talks about drying out peat soils:

Parts of New Orleans have been below sea level for over 130 years. The city was originally built above sea level, but after mechanized drainage systems and levees were introduced in the late 1890s to drain surrounding swamps, the underlying peat soils dried out, oxidized, and sank. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

By 1895, approximately 5% of the city had dropped below sea level. By the 1930s, roughly one-third of the city was below sea level. Today, more than half of New Orleans sits below sea level, with some of the lowest-lying areas—like Lakeview, Gentilly, and New Orleans East—sitting 5 to 12 feet below the ocean. [1, 2, 3]

For more details on the city's topography and history, check out this guide on How Humans Sank New Orleans from The Atlantic. [1]

[eyeball]

26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

You are acting like heat is being added to the atmosphere. It is not. You cannot create or destroy it. 

That's right, we're simply moving it around in ways that will change Earth's climate.

[gatomontes99]

37 minutes ago, eyeball said:

That's right, we're simply moving it around in ways that will change Earth's climate.

Do your breaks stay hot forever? No. Why? Because it moves. Does the atmosphere stay hot forever? No. Why? Because it moves. 

 

[Hodad]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

'Cause you do facts, right? Gimme a break ffs.

That's neither here nor there. The fact is that she knew about the funding, but she lied.

• Initial Deposition: When asked in an October 2022 deposition if anyone was paying her legal fees, Carroll replied no. [1, 2]
• Correction and Explanation: Before her trials began, her legal team clarified that she was being represented on a contingency basis and that her counsel had secured outside funding from Hoffman's nonprofit, American Future Republic. Carroll’s lawyers stated "she had simply forgotten about the arrangement" when originally questioned.

Do you understand all that, doofus? Her lawyers said that "she forgot". 
 

She was asked if she was receiving outside funding and she said "No", and her lawyers changed her answer to "Yes, but she had just forgot about it".

That means that her initial answer was the exact opposite of truth, and her reason for having an answer that was the exact opposite of the truth was "I forgot".

So tell me, mr honest, unbiased, concerned citizen... If she couldn't remember that her lawyers had recently told her that someone else was paying her legal bills, and she didn't even notice that she wasn't paying her bills herself, then why should we believe that she remembers what happened during her slutty encounter 30 years ago?

I had girlfriends 30 years ago that I don't remember. 

Now tell me: why did her story need to go to trial? She didn't think of it as a rape when it initially happened, she described a situation where she giggled every time he did something to her, and then when she wanted to leave, she shoved him with one arm and left. She said that she couldn't even remember if he got his penis inside of her...

Who would listen to that story and say "That's a plausible r4pe story. She was really victimized. We need to pay lawyers so that she can bring that to court"? And then they're gonna say: "But can we win if we go to court? Hmmmmm, let's look at the strength of this case:

• ZERO evidence

• Extremely implausible story from 30 years ago

• The accuser can't even name a year

• The story doesn't even amount to a r4pe

• The accuser was caught lying, so her credibility is gone

• The accuser claims to have forgotten major details from within the past couple months, so even her memory is shot

Just look at her own statements that show that her memory can't be relied on: she couldn't name a year and she had somehow forgotten about an offer to pay all of her legal bills.

She forgot all that, and then people are gonna rely on her memory recall from 30 years ago to charge someone with r4pe?

That's not a real thing in a legitimate court with an actual judge.

FYI your story is not proof that a r4pe occurred: it is proof of a weaponized justice system. 

That's proof that the judge was crooked. She didn't have a reliable memory, by her own admission, and she was caught lying. Of course there were issues with her credibility. She had none.

I know 18 very important people who heard all the evidence and disagree with your armchair QB take... unanimously. 🙄

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Deluge said:

Because of climate change? Or because of something else?

Both, climate change will simply make a bad situation worse.

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, eyeball said:

Right, this sort of waste heat doesn't have much direct effect globally but there are local effects from this that cause greater local use of energy for air conditioning.

This use of energy along with the huge needs of the data centers for energy lead to increased emissions of CO2. The environmental impacts of data centers are real and increasing.

And that's a real concern...why?

[Deluge]

4 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Both, climate change will simply make a bad situation worse.

No, you don't get to latch on to a legitimate problem. If New Orleans is going through rising seawater levels because of man-made climate change, then you need to be able to separate that problem from the peat soil problem and show it. 

[eyeball]

11 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

And that's a real concern...why?

You know.