Do you use gender pronouns?

[WestCanMan]

On 5/26/2026 at 8:54 AM, eyeball said:

 

I've never had to consider it. My guess is because it's such a rare circumstance.

Are you like Goddess who inexplicably knows dozens if not hundreds of people who've been killed by vaccine?

Can you show me a quote where she claims to "know dozens, if not hundreds"? 

I have personally met 2 young people that were seriously harmed by the jabs. Neither were male, but we're led to believe that it was almost always males that were injured or killed by the jabs. I'll just say "small sample size" with regard to the ratio of male to female jab-induced injuries and deaths.

Also, the number of 4x-jabbed that died was suspiciously high. Before 2022, very few people died of covid in the summer, but a LOT of 3x- and 4x-jabbed "died of covid" in summer 2022.

I don't know about using gender pronouns.

TBH, I don't even know any trans people. Langley isn't a big hangout for trans, and I stay away from downtown when I can, and that's almost always. 

If I was talking to a trans person who put the effort into being the other sex, I wouldn't be rude to them. 

[eyeball]

11 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Can you show me a quote where she claims to "know dozens, if not hundreds"? 

Just ask her.

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Just ask her.

Just ask THEM 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

Just ask her.

So that would be no?

[Deluge]

18 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. No, I'm not. I'm saying they are both in the domain of the employer 

2. I'm saying you can't legislate against attitudes.  Nothing more. 

3. Well, they're subject to the same laws as the rest of us. 

4. Well, in an employment situation, you signed the contract so you have to deal with the terms. 

5. No. I think you're getting bored with me not fighting with you, so you're starting something by misrepresenting me. 

6. I'm fine with calling people the way they want to be called.  Go ahead and live your life and I'll live mine.

 

1. Which is also bad. 

2. You legislate against LGBTQ - they way overstepped their bounds. 

3. Doesn't feel like it, though, does it. I haven't tracked LGBTQ crime rates, but I wouldn't be surprised if they got away with more than the rest of us. 

4. Unless you were employed there before some rainbow warrior hijacked HR and threatened the CEO. 

5. Oh, it's not boredom, Mike. I enjoy seeing you fight for the Left in your own subtle way.  

6. I call it like I see it.  

 

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

 

1. You legislate against LGBTQ - they way overstepped their bounds. 

2. Unless you were employed there before some rainbow warrior hijacked HR and threatened the CEO. 

3. Oh, it's not boredom, Mike. I enjoy seeing you fight for the Left in your own subtle way.  

4. I call it like I see it.  

 

1. Not sure what you mean or how you would do that but I think I understand your intent.
2. Well, the law would cover that.  I doubt you get grandfathered on general employment terms like following company policy but maybe ?  I could imagine a way that you could get out of some things legally.
3. Haha... at least you say it's subtle.  I appreciate that.  I will point out that Harper's #2 man voted with his conscience and voted for FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION when he voted in support of legal protection of rights for Trans folks.  Despite the culture wars, there are LGBTQ+ people at the top echelons of conservative circles, including Poilievre's #2.
4. Me too, cheers.

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Not sure what you mean or how you would do that but I think I understand your intent.
2. Well, the law would cover that.  I doubt you get grandfathered on general employment terms like following company policy but maybe ?  I could imagine a way that you could get out of some things legally.
3. Haha... at least you say it's subtle.  I appreciate that.  I will point out that Harper's #2 man voted with his conscience and voted for FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION when he voted in support of legal protection of rights for Trans folks.  Despite the culture wars, there are LGBTQ+ people at the top echelons of conservative circles, including Poilievre's #2.
4. Me too, cheers.

1. You make their agenda illegal. 

2. Make the agenda illegal and all that shit goes away. It's simple. 

3. Rights for Trans folks means pride flags everywhere (including the White House), gender pronouns in public schools, and swinging d*cks in female locker rooms. 

No thanks, I'll go with legislation against the pride community.  

[User]

On 5/26/2026 at 10:12 AM, Michael Hardner said:

Corporate HR has mandated it as standard in places where I have worked.

It takes basically 0 time since you do it with regular updates of your signature... 

The upside is it makes 1% of people or so feel like they're recognized.

 

 

The downside is that HR has created a culture of forcing employees to partake in someone else's delusions and promote a lie. 

Do you support those policies? Do you support firing someone for not using a pronoun to call a man a woman?

[User]

On 5/27/2026 at 5:57 AM, Michael Hardner said:

I feel that the controversy around pronouns is similar to the one around the use of "Ms." In the 1970s.

That controversy died down, I would suggest, because honorifics generally fell out of use and feminism won.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms.

 

LOL

The difference here is that "Ms" was more about how to accurately label a woman without it being connected to her status of being with a man or not. 

The use of pronouns now, that is being pushed, is about pushing a lie and "acceptance" of trans ideology. 
 

[Michael Hardner]

12 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. You make their agenda illegal. 

2. Make the agenda illegal and all that shit goes away. It's simple. 

3. Rights for Trans folks means pride flags everywhere (including the White House), gender pronouns in public schools, and swinging d*cks in female locker rooms. 

No thanks, I'll go with legislation against the pride community.  

1. 2. The devil is in the details... whatever you are suggesting would likely require significant legal changes to our framework is all I will add.  In short, it's highly unlikely to happen.
3. For sure, most of this yes.

Get started on that legislation and be sure to ask me to sign your petition ! 

[User]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. 2. The devil is in the details... whatever you are suggesting would likely require significant legal changes to our framework is all I will add.  In short, it's highly unlikely to happen.
3. For sure, most of this yes.

Get started on that legislation and be sure to ask me to sign your petition ! 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase!

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. 2. The devil is in the details... whatever you are suggesting would likely require significant legal changes to our framework is all I will add.  In short, it's highly unlikely to happen.
3. For sure, most of this yes.

Get started on that legislation and be sure to ask me to sign your petition ! 

It's easier than you think, Mike. Trump scrubbed the woke stain right out of Washington DC. He even killed the department that was pumping that shit straight into America's public schools!  

I may start a petition, but my vote in November of '24 is what had the most impact. 

Edited Friday at 08:48 PM by Deluge

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, User said:

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase!

Can I borrow this as a catchphrase?

53 minutes ago, Deluge said:

It's easier than you think, Mike. Trump scrubbed the woke stain right out of Washington DC. He even killed the department that was pumping that shit straight into America's public schools!  

I may start a petition, but my vote in November of '24 is what had the most impact. 

If you think Trump eliminated transgender people, then congratulations on your success.

[User]

4 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

If you think Trump eliminated transgender people, then congratulations on your success.

Of course, you conflate socially embracing and celebrating transgender people with their existence. 

They can exist all day long, without having to allow men into women's spaces, force men into their sports, without painting the sidewalks, putting flags in the classroom, and letting them walk around half naked on the White House lawn....

 

[Deluge]

18 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

If you think Trump eliminated transgender people, then congratulations on your success.

Mike, who said that Trump eliminated transgender people?

Just when I thought you were making progress, you go off with some wildly stupid comment like that. lol

[User]

3 hours ago, Deluge said:

Mike, who said that Trump eliminated transgender people?

Just when I thought you were making progress, you go off with some wildly stupid comment like that. lol

LOL, making progress? LOL

 

[Deluge]

On 5/30/2026 at 1:30 PM, User said:

LOL, making progress? LOL

Maybe I'm being too much of an optimist. He does sound like the rest of those zombies, usually. 

[User]

4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Maybe I'm being too much of an optimist. He does sound like the rest of those zombies, usually. 

This is part of the game he has always played here. For as long as I’ve been here to see it. 

The folks pushing the trans madness know they can’t win a discussion based on facts and logic so they play these dumb games.