West Posted May 19 Report Posted May 19 https://apnews.com/article/trump-lawsuit-irs-leak-3729de38770b558be01712a143437bf8?taid=6a0b37ff5bba4e0001319810&utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter Yet one more reason Biden's administration was one of the most crooked in history. Sad Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 19 Report Posted May 19 The Biden regime was so flipping slimy. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Nationalist Posted May 19 Report Posted May 19 Hilarious. Well Libbies...maybe you'll stop cheating and lying now. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted May 19 Report Posted May 19 Trump sued the Trump administration for $10B --and then agreed with himself to settle the suit with a $1.7B slush fund to dole out to his cronies and allies. No congressional approval. No judicial vetting. Just unregulated self dealing with taxpayer money. His biggest grift yet. And you cheer it on. Gross. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted May 19 Report Posted May 19 2 hours ago, Hodad said: Trump sued the Trump administration for $10B --and then agreed with himself to settle the suit with a $1.7B slush fund to dole out to his cronies and allies. No congressional approval. No judicial vetting. Just unregulated self dealing with taxpayer money. His biggest grift yet. And you cheer it on. Gross. Canucks don't care about Trump's FRAUD because they're not paying for it. There's already two other threads about this GRIFT, but another had to be created to SPREAD LIES. The FACT is, this slush fund "settlement" has NOTHING to do with the IRS lawsuit, except its use to FOOL MAGAts. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 20 Report Posted May 20 (edited) 14 hours ago, Hodad said: Trump sued the Trump administration for $10B --and then agreed with himself to settle the suit with a $1.7B slush fund to dole out to his cronies and allies. No congressional approval. No judicial vetting. Just unregulated self dealing with taxpayer money. His biggest grift yet. And you cheer it on. Gross. You love to play fast and loose with the truth. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-anti-weaponization-fund This fund mimics the racial discrimination fund Obama had. It is managed by a five member panel, it is auditable and it collects information to help prevent fraud. Only people that were unjustly targeted by Biden's DOJ are eligible for compensation and an apology letter. I can't remember, did you complain when Biden sent $83B out the door in the final months as payouts to his cronies? What about the Inflation Reduction Act that went to NGOs that did not do a damn thing? AI Overview of December 2025 spending AI Overview IRA abuses Edited May 20 by gatomontes99 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
West Posted May 20 Author Report Posted May 20 Peoples privacy was violated by Biden and the left is upset that they are receiving an apology and settlement because of it. Sick Quote
robosmith Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 On 5/19/2026 at 5:40 AM, Nationalist said: Hilarious. Well Libbies...maybe you'll stop cheating and lying now. You don't even understand what happened AT ALL because FOS LIES never tells the whole story. LMAO Quote
Hodad Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 10 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: You love to play fast and loose with the truth. Well, that takes a lot of chutzpah considering the bullshit you're trying to pull here. Quote https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-anti-weaponization-fund This fund mimics the racial discrimination fund Obama had. It is managed by a five member panel, it is auditable and it collects information to help prevent fraud. Only people that were unjustly targeted by Biden's DOJ are eligible for compensation and an apology letter. The "fund" is vaguely similar, in that it's a fund. But the circumstances are WILDLY different. Trump sued himself, then agree to settle with himself using taxpayer dollars. It's "auditable" at the direction of Trump's personal attorney/acting AG, so no oversight or accountability whatsoever. It's a slush fund. Full stop. 1 Quote
Hodad Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 Dear gods, this is a fatal dose of irony. “The machinery of government should never be weaponized against any American, and it is this Department’s intention to make right the wrongs that were previously done while ensuring this never happens again,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. “As part of this settlement, we are setting up a lawful process for victims of lawfare and weaponization to be heard and seek redress.” “The use of government power to target individuals or entities for improper and unlawful political, personal, or ideological reasons should not be tolerated by any Administration,” said Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter. This, THIS, from the party of "lock her up." From administration that is actively targeting people who have committed the great sin of opposing Trump. Trying to prosecute those political "enemies" with legal cases so obviously flimsy that they are tossed out of court. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Well, that takes a lot of chutzpah considering the bullshit you're trying to pull here. The "fund" is vaguely similar, in that it's a fund. But the circumstances are WILDLY different. Trump sued himself, then agree to settle with himself using taxpayer dollars. It's "auditable" at the direction of Trump's personal attorney/acting AG, so no oversight or accountability whatsoever. It's a slush fund. Full stop. Oh, the circumstances are wildly different. Obama's fund was for an imaginary loss while these people have to show a real loss. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 (edited) 6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Oh, the circumstances are wildly different. Obama's fund was for an imaginary loss while these people have to show a real loss. ZERO EVIDENCE to support ^this ridiculous OPINION. If you're talking about Obama's "Tribal Trust Case Settlement" you have HUGE cojones to pretend Native American losses were "imaginary." Are you really that IGNORANT? Edited May 21 by robosmith Quote
Hodad Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: Oh, the circumstances are wildly different. Obama's fund was for an imaginary loss while these people have to show a real loss. Bullshit. Trump brought another frivolous lawsuit--against himself--and when the judge started to shoot it down, Trump agreed to settle--with himself. And give his cronies $1.7B in a slush fund with no oversight or accountability. Nobody has to show anything. It's money taken from taxpayers with no oversight by taxpayer representatives. "Has to" would imply some form of accountability. There is none. That's an accurate characterization of what has happened. It's naked corruption, and wholly indefensible. Yet here you are, trying to defend it. 1 Quote
User Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Bullshit. Trump brought another frivolous lawsuit--against himself--and when the judge started to shoot it down, Trump agreed to settle--with himself. And give his cronies $1.7B in a slush fund with no oversight or accountability. Nobody has to show anything. It's money taken from taxpayers with no oversight by taxpayer representatives. "Has to" would imply some form of accountability. There is none. That's an accurate characterization of what has happened. It's naked corruption, and wholly indefensible. Yet here you are, trying to defend it. Well, if there was any BS being put down, it is by you. The President can't simply create a slush fund and then use it to payout to anyone he wants, existing federal laws prevent this, there would be immediate legal injunctions and actions, Congress always has oversight, the President can't use this as a slush fund to simply pay out anyone he wants for the same reason he can't do that any other day of the week from the treasury. You are wildly off the rails and too big of a coward to face me. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 3 hours ago, Hodad said: Bullshit. Trump brought another frivolous lawsuit--against himself--and when the judge started to shoot it down, Trump agreed to settle--with himself. And give his cronies $1.7B in a slush fund with no oversight or accountability. Nobody has to show anything. It's money taken from taxpayers with no oversight by taxpayer representatives. "Has to" would imply some form of accountability. There is none. That's an accurate characterization of what has happened. It's naked corruption, and wholly indefensible. Yet here you are, trying to defend it. You don't know what you are talking about. The Judgement Fund is administered by the Treasury Department and they have oversight. The 5 members that will review and administer claims come from the Treasury. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/1304 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
gatomontes99 Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 3 hours ago, robosmith said: ZERO EVIDENCE to support ^this ridiculous OPINION. If you're talking about Obama's "Tribal Trust Case Settlement" you have HUGE cojones to pretend Native American losses were "imaginaary." Are you really that IGNORANT? Nope. I am talking about the $1.7B to Iran. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: You don't know what you are talking about. The Judgement Fund is administered by the Treasury Department and they have oversight. The 5 members that will review and administer claims come from the Treasury. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/1304 There is NO JUDGEMENT related to a claim for this fund. See the word JUDGE, it's IN THE NAME. This is a SLUSH FUND and ILLEGAL. Quote
robosmith Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: Nope. I am talking about the $1.7B to Iran. That is Iranian money, NOT funded by US taxpayers, like Trump's ILLEGAL SLUSH FUND. Do you know ANYTHING about the sanctions against iran? LMAO They put a downpayment on Boeing jets (among other things) and it was frozen by sanctions. The JCPOA aggreement UNFROZE those accounts. Now be a man and apologize for your stupidity. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 21 Report Posted May 21 1 hour ago, robosmith said: There is NO JUDGEMENT related to a claim for this fund. See the word JUDGE, it's IN THE NAME. This is a SLUSH FUND and ILLEGAL. A judge is not required for the Judgement Fund. 1 hour ago, robosmith said: That is Iranian money, NOT funded by US taxpayers, like Trump's ILLEGAL SLUSH FUND. Do you know ANYTHING about the sanctions against iran? LMAO They put a downpayment on Boeing jets (among other things) and it was frozen by sanctions. The JCPOA aggreement UNFROZE those accounts. Now be a man and apologize for your stupidity. You are woefully uneducated. "Yes, the $1.3 billion in interest portion of the $1.7 billion payment made by the Obama administration to Iran in 2016 was paid out of the U.S. Judgment Fund.The remaining $400 million was the return of a trust fund containing Iran's original payment for undelivered military equipment from a 1979 arms deal." https://share.google/aimode/sRdsJYzqfE3f13VMU https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-united-states-iran-and-1-7-billion-sorting-out-the-details/ https://law.stanford.edu/2016/08/12/the-400-million-payment-to-iran-was-american-diplomacy-at-its-finest/ Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
BeaverFever Posted May 22 Report Posted May 22 On 5/18/2026 at 11:56 PM, West said: https://apnews.com/article/trump-lawsuit-irs-leak-3729de38770b558be01712a143437bf8?taid=6a0b37ff5bba4e0001319810&utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter Yet one more reason Biden's administration was one of the most crooked in history. Sad Nope. More proof Trump is most crooked in history. Trump awards himself a $1.8Bn slush fund to dole out to his minions and useful idi@t insurrectionists as he pleases while granting himself immunity for his tax crimes. MOST. CORRUPT. PRESIDENT. EVER. 2 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 22 Report Posted May 22 (edited) 32 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: Nope. More proof Trump is most crooked in history. Trump awards himself a $1.8Bn slush fund to dole out to his minions and useful idi@t insurrectionists as he pleases while granting himself immunity for his tax crimes. MOST. CORRUPT. PRESIDENT. EVER. Flynn had over $4.6M in UNPAID legal expenses because the Biden DOJ attacked him, turned the process into the punishment and then threatened to do the same to his family if he didn't comply. But, yeah, it is Trump that is corrupt. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/18/michael-flynn-unpaid-legal-tab-1420304 Edited May 22 by gatomontes99 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Hodad Posted May 22 Report Posted May 22 7 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: You don't know what you are talking about. The Judgement Fund is administered by the Treasury Department and they have oversight. The 5 members that will review and administer claims come from the Treasury. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/1304 Why don't you ever read the links you post? Not Twittery enough? -- The DOJ plainly stated where the members come from and the circumstances of audit. That money does NOT sit with Treasury. It moves into this insane griftorium. The Fund will consist of five members appointed by the Attorney General. One Member will be chosen in consultation with congressional leadership. The President can remove any member, but a replacement must be chosen the same way as the replaced member was selected. At the Attorney General’s direction, the Fund can be audited. The Fund must take steps to protect private information and avoid fraud. ^^ There is no oversight. They can choose the members to do their bidding. They can replace any member who gets out of line, and the only person who can audit the fund is Trump's personal attorney/acting AG who created the settlement and picked the 5 members. No judicial oversight. No congressional oversight. No transparency requirement. Let that sink in!! 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted May 22 Report Posted May 22 This is so comical. Brandon's admin leaks tax info from a bunch of people. That was illegal. Trump provides funds to pay the victims of Brandon's illegality, for their grievances and you Libbies hate the idea. "NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW! Unless we Libbies dont like it!" Such goofs. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
BeaverFever Posted May 22 Report Posted May 22 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: This is so comical. Brandon's admin leaks tax info from a bunch of people. That was illegal. Trump provides funds to pay the victims of Brandon's illegality, for their grievances and you Libbies hate the idea. "NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW! Unless we Libbies dont like it!" Such goofs. It has nothing to do with compensation for IRS leaks. They can dole out cash to anyone who wants to claim a Democrat was mean to them, including people who claim their tweets and social media were “censored” due to government pressure (COVID kook misinformation for example) . They wouldn’t even rule out giving money to Jan 6 insurrectionists who were convicted of assaulting police officers. This is a fund created by Trump cronies for Trump cronies and administered by Trump cronies all at the direction of Trump himself. Yet another one of his many scams. 2 Quote
BeaverFever Posted May 22 Report Posted May 22 13 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Flynn had over $4.6M in UNPAID legal expenses because the Biden DOJ attacked him, turned the process into the punishment and then threatened to do the same to his family if he didn't comply. But, yeah, it is Trump that is corrupt. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/18/michael-flynn-unpaid-legal-tab-1420304 “.BIDEN DOJ” LMAO TRUMP was president when the Putin acolyte Flynn was prosecuted and pleaded guilty you CLOWN. I wonder how much of those millions found their way to Trump to purchase his pardon. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.