WestCanMan Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 (edited) 26 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Otherwise? Two things can be true at the same time you know Naw. That little maggot LOVES to say that Trump IS a r4pist just because E J Caroll said "He stuck his fingers in my cooter while I was giggling back in 1995 or 1996." That's his standard, not mine. If his line in the sand is "no witnesses, no evidence, no police report, can't even name the year, regardless of whether the defendant is known to have ever even met her" is enough evidence for a R4pe conviction, then he has no choice but to admit that Swallwell IS a r4pist. And TBH, he also considered Kavanaugh guilty based on the same level of evidence. Or even less, because Kavanaugh's accuser couldn't even name a place. So in TWO instances he declared someone was an actual r4pist based on zero-evidence/unknown-date testimony. Swallwell's accuser has a date, a place, witnesses that she said she was r4ped, claims to have borne physical evidence of a r4pe (but never mentioned if she had witnesses for that), she has proof that she claimed to be a r4pe victim when she went to a clinic to get tested for STD's and pregnancy right afterwards... For me, personally, I wouldn't find someone guilty of r4pe based on what's written there, because my standards don't waver. That doesn't mean that I'd let him come within 50' of my daughter, I just wouldn't throw a man in jail without more evidence than that. Edited April 12 by WestCanMan Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
CdnFox Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 14 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Naw. That little maggot LOVES to say that Trump IS a r4pist just because E J Caroll said "He stuck his fingers in my cooter while I was giggling back in 1995 or 1996." No No, i mean he could admit stallwell is a rapist and STILL be a complete hypocrite, the two wouldn't be mutually exclusive 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
gatomontes99 Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 18 hours ago, robosmith said: Anonymous "former staffer" for two years is a huge red flag right before an election. Why are you quoting me from an UNRELATED POST? Dude...hypocrite much? 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 50 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Did I hear you say that Swallwell is a r4pist? You need to come out and state clearly and unequivocally, in no uncertain terms, that Eric Swallwell is a r4pist. Otherwise you are the epitome of a hypocrite. The ANONYMOUS EVIDENCE, which waited for an election, is not very strong. You guys say the same thing about ALLEGATIONS against Trump or ANY RepubliCON. 🤮 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 (edited) Leaving this right here: Quote CNN found corroboration for key elements of each of the women’s claims, including the former staffer who said she was sexually assaulted. Two family members and a friend said in interviews with CNN that she told them about the alleged 2024 assault in the following days, and CNN also reviewed text messages she sent two friends describing her allegations at the same time. “I was sexually assaulted on Thursday,” she wrote to one of her friends, adding: “By Eric.” https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/10/us/eric-swalwell-sexual-misconduct-allegations-invs The three women that are not named sat down with CNN and so did their families. The one woman that is named also allowed family and friends to be interviewed. They ALL have evidence. Two of them have very similar rape stories. It really appears that it might be ruffies or something similar. This might get very ugly for him. Edited April 12 by gatomontes99 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
WestCanMan Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 16 minutes ago, robosmith said: The ANONYMOUS EVIDENCE, which waited for an election, is not very strong. You guys say the same thing about ALLEGATIONS against Trump or ANY RepubliCON. 🤮 everything about the Swallwell case is stronger than the case against Trump, robo: Swallwell's accuser knew what year it occurred. She even knew the month, the day of the week, and the date - Trump's accuser couldn't even guess what year the incident allegedly happened Swallwell's accuser and the accused both knew each other very well - there's no evidence that Trump ever even met Caroll personally, they are just known to have briefly shaken hands at a large event, several years earlier Swallwell's accuser claims to have clearly indicated to the accused that she was not a willing partner, and that he beat her bloody - Trump's accuser never gave any indication that she was not a willing partner: by her own story she just giggled every time he advanced to the next base, and then she shoved him with one arm, at which point he let her go... Swallwell's accuser has proof that she even went to a clinic and told them she was r4ped - Trump's accuser didn't even think she was r4ped. It was her friend that suggested that it might have been a r4pe, several days later... Carroll's own words The case against Swallwell has FAR MORE ACTUAL EVIDENCE, the accuser knows the year it happened lol, and by all accounts Swallwell's attack was very violent, like an actual R4PE r4pe, not just a grey-area-maybe-date-r4pe. Assuming that both women told the absolute truth about everything, and video was produced that showed things EXACTLY as the accusers described them down to the very last detail: Trump would not spend a day in jail. The judge would rule that there was implied consent at every step, until the accuser showed the very first sign of retracting her consent, at which point she was able to leave. Swallwell would go to jail for "Rape with Aggravating Factors" in California - the highest level of severity under California law (using violence to get sex). He would be a felon and would serve the maximum amount of prison time, because she said that she was "bruised and bloody". The accusation against Swallwell is as serious as it gets. It's what's called "First-Degree Rape" in most jurisdictions. He's not accused of trying to get his fingers in there while she was just wriggling away. He is accused of using violence causing harm to get sex from a victim who was clearly saying she did not want sex. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
WestCanMan Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 Anyways, the hypocrisy accusation against Robo is plain to see... Robo is pleading "no evidence" in Swallwell's case, while knowing full-well that there was "no evidence" in the Trump case, and yet he states that Trump is somehow guilty. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
WestCanMan Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 My guess is that Swallwell's career trajectory is going to mirror Matt Gaetz's... From "popular, emerging, high-end potential", to "retired young due to allegations of sexual impropriety". Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 30 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: everything about the Swallwell case is stronger than the case against Trump, robo: You're LYING AGAIN. Trump BRAGGED about grabbing pu$$y and was accused by 28 women, plus CONVICTED. Swalwell has never even been accused before. Only in your your fantasies is Trump less suspect. Does sharing "wonderful secret" mean nothing to you? LMAO Quote
West Posted April 12 Author Report Posted April 12 32 minutes ago, robosmith said: You're LYING AGAIN. Trump BRAGGED about grabbing pu$$y and was accused by 28 women, plus CONVICTED. Swalwell has never even been accused before. Only in your your fantasies is Trump less suspect. Does sharing "wonderful secret" mean nothing to you? LMAO There's been rumors since 2018 that the guy has used tax payer funds to pay off sexual harassment claims Quote
West Posted April 12 Author Report Posted April 12 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Naw. That little maggot LOVES to say that Trump IS a r4pist just because E J Caroll said "He stuck his fingers in my cooter while I was giggling back in 1995 or 1996." That's his standard, not mine. If his line in the sand is "no witnesses, no evidence, no police report, can't even name the year, regardless of whether the defendant is known to have ever even met her" is enough evidence for a R4pe conviction, then he has no choice but to admit that Swallwell IS a r4pist. And TBH, he also considered Kavanaugh guilty based on the same level of evidence. Or even less, because Kavanaugh's accuser couldn't even name a place. So in TWO instances he declared someone was an actual r4pist based on zero-evidence/unknown-date testimony. Swallwell's accuser has a date, a place, witnesses that she said she was r4ped, claims to have borne physical evidence of a r4pe (but never mentioned if she had witnesses for that), she has proof that she claimed to be a r4pe victim when she went to a clinic to get tested for STD's and pregnancy right afterwards... For me, personally, I wouldn't find someone guilty of r4pe based on what's written there, because my standards don't waver. That doesn't mean that I'd let him come within 50' of my daughter, I just wouldn't throw a man in jail without more evidence than that. Release all the Swalstein files. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 13 minutes ago, West said: There's been rumors since 2018 that the guy has used tax payer funds to pay off sexual harassment claims Anyone can start a rumor to TRY TO bring down a political opponent. Duh Only a FOOL believes unsubstantiated rumors mean something. I mean you believe pathological LIAR Trump all the time. LMAO Quote
West Posted April 12 Author Report Posted April 12 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Anyone can start a rumor to TRY TO bring down a political opponent. Duh Only a FOOL believes unsubstantiated rumors mean something. I mean you believe pathological LIAR Trump all the time. LMAO All the reason to end the NDAs and release the Swalstein files Quote
robosmith Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 19 minutes ago, West said: All the reason to end the NDAs and release the Swalstein files Who told you Swalwell has NDAs? FOS LIES? LMAO OF course we all know that it's Trump who started making government employees sign NDAs. Quote During his presidency, Donald Trump introduced the use of nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) for senior White House staff, a departure from traditional government practices. These agreements, often used in his business dealings, aimed to prevent leaks of confidential information, covering staff during and after their service and sometimes including non-disparagement clauses. Quote
West Posted April 12 Author Report Posted April 12 8 minutes ago, robosmith said: Who told you Swalwell has NDAs? FOS LIES? LMAO OF course we all know that it's Trump who started making government employees sign NDAs. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-kills-effort-release-congressional-sexual-misconduct-harassment-rcna261679 A google search indicates millions being paid out. While this doesnt specifically mention Swalwell they are not allowing the release anything related to these claims Quote
robosmith Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 7 minutes ago, West said: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-kills-effort-release-congressional-sexual-misconduct-harassment-rcna261679 Your cite says NOTHING about any NDAs. Next time quote it or I won't read it. 7 minutes ago, West said: A google search indicates millions being paid out. Not news. 7 minutes ago, West said: While this doesnt specifically mention Swalwell they are not allowing the release anything related to these claims It will come out in discovery. That's how it works here. IF there is a lawsuit filed. No one is required to testify against himself. Quote
West Posted April 12 Author Report Posted April 12 (edited) 9 minutes ago, robosmith said: Your cite says NOTHING about any NDAs. Next time quote it or I won't read it. Not news. It will come out in discovery. That's how it works here. IF there is a lawsuit filed. No one is required to testify against himself. "He also said one prominent claim that women have remained silent because of non-disclosure agreements is false." You clearly HAVE NOT followed this story. The initial claims were women could not speak because of NDAs. Swalstein should release them from their NDAs https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/07/politics/swalwell-campaign-denies-misconduct-allegations "As of April 2026, U.S. Representative and California gubernatorial candidate Eric Swalwell is facing allegations that he forced staffers to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to cover up sexual misconduct, including claims of sexual assault from a former aide." -Google AI "Swalwell NDAs Edited April 12 by West Quote
WestCanMan Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 2 hours ago, robosmith said: You're LYING AGAIN. Trump BRAGGED about grabbing pu$$y and was accused by 28 women, plus CONVICTED. Wrong, liar. There's nothing wrong with grabbing women by the **** if they don't complain, and if you're a famous billiionire, there are a lot of women who will let you do that. Ditto for famous basketball players, football players, movie stars, singers.... Adam Levine and Michael Jordan could each grab 500 pussies a day if they wanted to. That's just the way the cookie crumbles. Quote plus CONVICTED. Trump has never been convicted of r4pe, or anything remotely close. There was a civil suit against him, never a criminal trial, and even then the jury found him not guilty of r4pe. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever, anywhere on this planet, that Trump r4ped Caroll. Her original story, in her own words, depicts a sleazy, non-r4pe. Quote Swalwell has never even been accused before. Swallwell is known to have r4ped a former staffer of his. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 1 hour ago, West said: "He also said one prominent claim that women have remained silent because of non-disclosure agreements is false." You clearly HAVE NOT followed this story. The initial claims were women could not speak because of NDAs. Swalstein should release them from their NDAs https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/07/politics/swalwell-campaign-denies-misconduct-allegations "As of April 2026, U.S. Representative and California gubernatorial candidate Eric Swalwell is facing allegations that he forced staffers to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to cover up sexual misconduct, including claims of sexual assault from a former aide." -Google AI "Swalwell NDAs It's only "allegations." IF it were true, there would be PROOF. Unless the woman was too dumb to keep a copy. Quote
robosmith Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Wrong, liar. There's nothing wrong with grabbing women by the **** if they don't complain, and if you're a famous billiionire, there are a lot of women who will let you do that. Ditto for famous basketball players, football players, movie stars, singers.... Adam Levine and Michael Jordan could each grab 500 pussies a day if they wanted to. That's just the way the cookie crumbles. Doesn't make it NOT sexual assault UNDER THE LAW. Esp when "I don't even wait." YOU pretending it's NOT just makes you as guilty as Trump. 13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Trump has never been convicted of r4pe, or anything remotely close. There was a civil suit against him, never a criminal trial, and even then the jury found him not guilty of r4pe. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever, anywhere on this planet, that Trump r4ped Caroll. The judge said he was and your amateur legal OPINIONS mean NOTHING HERE. 13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Her original story, in her own words, depicts a sleazy, non-r4pe. The judge found Trump LIABLE and that's ALL THAT MATTERS LEGALLY. 13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Swallwell is known to have r4ped a former staffer of his. Known by WHO? YOU? LMAO ANONYMOUS victem? Trump has 28x accusers and your denial won't make them go away. But keep on proving just how out of touch with REALITY YOU ARE. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 6 hours ago, robosmith said: Doesn't make it NOT sexual assault UNDER THE LAW. Esp when "I don't even wait." YOU pretending it's NOT just makes you as guilty as Trump. What was actually said: “I moved on her… I did try and f--- her,” “I just kiss. I don’t even wait,” “when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the ****” He was commenting on how easy they are around him. He said he could do it. He did not say he was doing it. He might have been. He did not say he was, though. As for Swalwell, CNN published interviews with corroborated evidence. This is not some flimsy allegation. Four stories, all with coroborating evidence. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
West Posted April 12 Author Report Posted April 12 The Democrat talking point seems to be that this alleged sex pervert can be a member of congress but cant run for governor of California. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 4 hours ago, West said: The Democrat talking point seems to be that this alleged sex pervert can be a member of congress but cant run for governor of California. And convicted rapist Trump can remain POTUS because MAGATS didn't care about him grabbing pu$$ies and BRAGGING ABOUT THAT. Quote
Legato Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 22 minutes ago, robosmith said: And convicted rapist Trump can remain POTUS because MAGATS didn't care about him grabbing pu$$ies and BRAGGING ABOUT THAT. There are many people that like cats. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.