Trump has Destroyed 80 Years of Stable Government Foreign Relations Because He Let Stephen Miller and Russel Vought Control Foreign Policy

[robosmith]

Trump has Destroyed 80 Years of Stable Government Foreign Relations Because He Let Stephen Miller and Russel Vought Control Foreign Policy In the NSS 12/25 VIDEO

 

Unleashing the whirlwind of National Destruction because he doesn't know what they're doing.

Edited March 29 by robosmith

[John Stone]

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

Trump has Destroyed 80 Years of Stable Government Foreign Relations Because He Let Stephen Miller and Russel Vought Control Foreign Policy In the NSS 12/25 VIDEO

Unleashing the whirlwind of National Destruction because he doesn't know what they're doing.

'Everything that is wrong with this country today, the people who are opposed to Donald Trump are responsible for" / Stephen Miller. 

 

 

[John Johnston]

 

https://theamericanrefugee.substack.com/p/americas-economic-collapse-is-already-underway

[gatomontes99]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

Trump has Destroyed 80 Years of Stable Government Foreign Relations Because He Let Stephen Miller and Russel Vought Control Foreign Policy In the NSS 12/25 VIDEO

Unleashing the whirlwind of National Destruction because he doesn't know what they're doing.

1. Trump knows what they are doing because they are executing his policy.

2. Nothing has been changed for the worse.

3. You are a doody head.

[John Stone]

3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

1. Trump knows what they are doing because they are executing his policy.

2. Nothing has been changed for the worse.

3. You are a doody head.

................. arguably the World isn't that concerned about American domestic policy - they're  likely more concerned about the greater picture. 

Just wondering if Congress will  be informed if an invasion of Iran is initiated.................

Israel is opening  another front with Yemen - 

....... might be difficult for SA to not become involved. 

yippee-ki-Yay!! 

[Nationalist]

43 minutes ago, John Stone said:

................. arguably the World isn't that concerned about American domestic policy - they're  likely more concerned about the greater picture. 

Just wondering if Congress will  be informed if an invasion of Iran is initiated.................

Israel is opening  another front with Yemen - 

....... might be difficult for SA to not become involved. 

yippee-ki-Yay!! 

Yes I'm sure you'd be happier with a Demoncrat who would surrender.

[John Stone]

11 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Yes I'm sure you'd be happier with a Demoncrat who would surrender.

I trust ur not riding  into battle? 

[Nationalist]

20 minutes ago, John Stone said:

I trust ur not riding  into battle? 

Why would I? It appears to be under control. And hey...no Demoncrat to surrender. 

[Deluge]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

Trump has Destroyed 80 Years of Stable Government Foreign Relations Because He Let Stephen Miller and Russel Vought Control Foreign Policy In the NSS 12/25 VIDEO

Unleashing the whirlwind of National Destruction because he doesn't know what they're doing.

Trump has destroyed 80 years worth of decay. 

Pack your shit and gtfo - you don't belong here. 

[John Stone]

6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Why would I? It appears to be under control. And hey...no Demoncrat to surrender. 

............... would u believe me if I said I'm not surprised. 

[Nationalist]

11 minutes ago, John Stone said:

............... would u believe me if I said I'm not surprised. 

And you're over in the ME fighting?

[John Stone]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

And you're over in the ME fighting?

Irrelevant counselor .................. I'm not beating the drums of war ............. justifying war based on a clown car's rhetoric. 

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, John Stone said:

'Everything that is wrong with this country today, the people who are opposed to Donald Trump are responsible for" / Stephen Miller. 

 

 

Only FOOLS would take moral advice from Miller, who was obviously warped badly as a child.

[John Stone]

18 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Only FOOLS would take moral advice from Miller, who was obviously warped badly as a child.

............ that's just ur common sense talking ............. or are u judging the book by it's rhetoric. 

[robosmith]

4 minutes ago, John Stone said:

............ that's just ur common sense talking ............. or are u judging the book by it's rhetoric. 

BOTH.

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, John Stone said:

................. arguably the World isn't that concerned about American domestic policy - they're  likely more concerned about the greater picture. 

Just wondering if Congress will  be informed if an invasion of Iran is initiated.................

Israel is opening  another front with Yemen - 

....... might be difficult for SA to not become involved. 

yippee-ki-Yay!! 

Do you think that SA would be on the side of Yemeni terrorists? 

• As of March 2026, Saudi Arabia – Yemen relations are defined by a complex transition from a decade-long military intervention to a fragile de-escalation, recently complicated by renewed regional instability. 

Since 2022 they have just had a truce. 

Right now Saudi Prince MBS is openly in favour of regime-change in Iran. 

• As of March 2026, Saudi - Iranian relations are in a state of severe crisis, with the 2023 rapprochement deal effectively collapsed following a direct military conflict. While the two nations had spent 2024 and 2025 rebuilding diplomatic and economic ties, a regional war that began in late February 2026 has returned them to a state of open hostility.

I think that you feel like "Everyone who's a muslim likes Iran", and that's only the case in America, where they're far-removed from the daily BS of co-existing with destructive religious fanatics and terrorists. FYI islamic terrorism isn't just directed at the west: anyone who runs afoul of the ayatollah's plans has terrorists after them. And being a muslim doesn't take you off the list. 

Much like the US tries to bully the rest of the world around economically, Iran tries to bully the rest of the world using terrorism. And FYI what's going on the Strait of Hormuz is THAT EXACT THING playing out: Iran is using terrorist tactics, aimed at supertankers, to control the world and get out of this war with their regime intact.

They're trying to win this war by saying: "If you don't do what we say then we will kill civilians and disrupt the world's economy by sinking oil tankers along our own coastline." AKA, at terrorist threat.

That's it. Their military strategy is nothing more than another terrorist threat, even when the gun is in their own mouth, pointed out the back of their own head. That's how f'd up they are. And you want those guys to have nukes 🤣. F'n dummy.  

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

And you're over in the ME fighting?

He's fighting the propaganda war for the Iranians, right? So he actually does consider himself a "Keyboard Commando". 

[robosmith]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Do you think that SA would be on the side of Yemeni terrorists? 

• As of March 2026, Saudi Arabia – Yemen relations are defined by a complex transition from a decade-long military intervention to a fragile de-escalation, recently complicated by renewed regional instability. 

Since 2022 they have just had a truce. 

Right now Saudi Prince MBS is openly in favour of regime-change in Iran. 

• As of March 2026, Saudi - Iranian relations are in a state of severe crisis, with the 2023 rapprochement deal effectively collapsed following a direct military conflict. While the two nations had spent 2024 and 2025 rebuilding diplomatic and economic ties, a regional war that began in late February 2026 has returned them to a state of open hostility.

I think that you feel like "Everyone who's a muslim likes Iran", and that's only the case in America, where they're far-removed from the daily BS of co-existing with destructive religious fanatics and terrorists. FYI islamic terrorism isn't just directed at the west: anyone who runs afoul of the ayatollah's plans has terrorists after them. And being a muslim doesn't take you off the list. 

Much like the US tries to bully the rest of the world around economically, Iran tries to bully the rest of the world using terrorism. And FYI what's going on the Strait of Hormuz is THAT EXACT THING playing out: Iran is using terrorist tactics, aimed at supertankers, to control the world and get out of this war with their regime intact.

They're trying to win this war by saying: "If you don't do what we say then we will kill civilians and disrupt the world's economy by sinking oil tankers along our own coastline." AKA, at terrorist threat.

That's it. Their military strategy is nothing more than another terrorist threat, even when the gun is in their own mouth, pointed out the back of their own head. That's how f'd up they are. And you want those guys to have nukes 🤣. F'n dummy.  

Everyone ELSE knows there are TWO OPPOSED branches of Islam. Iranians are primarily Shite and Arabs are primarily Sunni which is why Iraq and Iran fought each other.

Quote

Sunni and Shiite are the two main branches of Islam, comprising roughly 85-90% and 10-15% of Muslims worldwide, respectively. While they share core beliefs, they differ on leadership succession, originating from a 7th-century dispute. Iran is overwhelmingly Shiite, while most Arab nations are predominantly Sunni, often leading to geopolitical rivalry. 

The Strauss Center +4

Key Distinctions:

• Split Origins: The divide started in 632 AD after Prophet Muhammad’s death. Sunnis believe leaders should be elected (Caliphs), while Shiites believe leadership belongs to Muhammad's descendants (Imams).
• Geographical Concentration: Iran is the center of the Shiite world (~90% of its population). The Arab world is predominantly Sunni, although significant Shiite populations exist in Iraq, Bahrain, Lebanon, and Yemen.
• Relationship and Conflict: The split is often political rather than entirely religious, used to fuel regional competition, especially between Iran and Saudi Arabia. 
  The Strauss Center +5

Commonalities:
Despite differences, both branches share core tenets: they follow the Quran, believe in one God, perform daily prayers, and observe the five pillars of Islam. 

National Geographic Education Blog +1

Nuances in the Split:

• Not All Arabs are Sunni: Iraq, Bahrain, and Lebanon have large, sometimes majority, Shiite populations.
• Not All Shiites are Iranian: The Shiite population is diverse, including Persians, Arabs, and South Asians.
• Geopolitical Alliances: The divide is not always purely ideological; political alliances can transcend sectarian lines, such as Shiite Iran supporting the Sunni group Hamas.

 

[User]

13 hours ago, robosmith said:

Unleashing the whirlwind of National Destruction because he doesn't know what they're doing.

Trump is fixing the national destruction Biden was engaged in. 

[WestCanMan]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Everyone ELSE knows there are TWO OPPOSED branches of Islam. Iranians are primarily Shite and Arabs are primarily Sunni which is why Iraq and Iran fought each other.

That's a rudimentary explanation of it. Some have said that the US only propped up that Iranian regime to foster hatred between the Shia and Sunnis, and for all I know that's true. 

Regardless, SA and Iran are not allies. They are not even allied against Israel anymore. Almost everyone hates the Iranian regime.

Now, SA might greatly favour another islamic regime taking over in Iran, but in any event, at the current time, I don't see any indication that SA is closer to joining the fray on Iran's side than America's. 

Do you have something to back up your belief that SA would ally themselves with Iran?

[John Stone]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Do you think that SA would be on the side of Yemeni terrorists? 

• As of March 2026, Saudi Arabia – Yemen relations are defined by a complex transition from a decade-long military intervention to a fragile de-escalation, recently complicated by renewed regional instability. 

Since 2022 they have just had a truce. 

Right now Saudi Prince MBS is openly in favour of regime-change in Iran. 

• As of March 2026, Saudi - Iranian relations are in a state of severe crisis, with the 2023 rapprochement deal effectively collapsed following a direct military conflict. While the two nations had spent 2024 and 2025 rebuilding diplomatic and economic ties, a regional war that began in late February 2026 has returned them to a state of open hostility.

I think that you feel like "Everyone who's a muslim likes Iran", and that's only the case in America, where they're far-removed from the daily BS of co-existing with destructive religious fanatics and terrorists. FYI islamic terrorism isn't just directed at the west: anyone who runs afoul of the ayatollah's plans has terrorists after them. And being a muslim doesn't take you off the list. 

Much like the US tries to bully the rest of the world around economically, Iran tries to bully the rest of the world using terrorism. And FYI what's going on the Strait of Hormuz is THAT EXACT THING playing out: Iran is using terrorist tactics, aimed at supertankers, to control the world and get out of this war with their regime intact.

They're trying to win this war by saying: "If you don't do what we say then we will kill civilians and disrupt the world's economy by sinking oil tankers along our own coastline." AKA, at terrorist threat.

That's it. Their military strategy is nothing more than another terrorist threat, even when the gun is in their own mouth, pointed out the back of their own head. That's how f'd up they are. And you want those guys to have nukes 🤣. F'n dummy.  

I'm curious, how do you think the Iran / United States excursion ends? 

Give us ur best shot. 

 

Edited March 29 by John Stone

[John Stone]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

BOTH.

................ Steve always  reminds me of mini-me................... my apologies, mini! 

 

[WestCanMan]

33 minutes ago, John Stone said:

I'm curious, how do you think the Iran / United States excursion ends? 

Give us ur best shot. 

I think that a lot of players on both sides, who sat on the fence waiting to see which way the wind blows, are going to start to become more/less involved in this fight, now that it decisively going one way.

From the pro-IRGC side, if China and Russia could be seen to be helping Iran win, and defend their own country, it could be politically advantageous for them to do that. But all that they can do now is help the Iranian regime sink tankers, and that's 1) not a good look internationally, 2) not good for China's own economy.

From the anti-IRGC side, the perceived danger of going directly against Iran's militarily collapsed when Iran's forces folded like a cheap tent. And while there's a highly vocal and irrational pro-regime faction in every western country, the economic impact of the oil shortage is outweighing their fear of terror cells. 

An international coalition will gain momentum as pro-IRGC forces are squeezed like the zits they are.

The current regime will fall completely, because they can't rule from underground bunkers while a new gov't is in the seat of power, and I think that Trump's force of will is going to get his chosen replacement into that seat.

 

It sounds like a lot to ask for, but this one-sided ass-whooping was also unexpected. Everyone thought that Iran was going to be a tougher nut than this.  

Edited March 29 by WestCanMan

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

That's a rudimentary explanation of it. Some have said that the US only propped up that Iranian regime to foster hatred between the Shia and Sunnis, and for all I know that's true. 

Regardless, SA and Iran are not allies. They are not even allied against Israel anymore. Almost everyone hates the Iranian regime.

Now, SA might greatly favour another islamic regime taking over in Iran, but in any event, at the current time, I don't see any indication that SA is closer to joining the fray on Iran's side than America's. 

Do you have something to back up your belief that SA would ally themselves with Iran?

I didn't say Saudis would ally with Iran, dummy.

[bush_cheney2004]

President Trump has done nothing to destroy American foreign policy...it is exactly the same as it was before:

 

USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71)

Edited March 30 by bush_cheney2004