User Posted April 2 Report Posted April 2 On 4/1/2026 at 9:46 AM, LinkSoul60 said: I'm good with it... doesn't me. You, not so much.... I like things the way they used to be too but life changes. You'll be seeing a lot brown come into the US as time goes on. Nah, we will just build a train that runs them up to Canada. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted April 2 Report Posted April 2 58 minutes ago, User said: Nah, we will just build a train that runs them up to Canada. Nah, you'll leave them be to keep your economy sustainable. Quote
Deluge Posted April 2 Author Report Posted April 2 24 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Nah, you'll leave them be to keep your economy sustainable. Just the productive ones. You get to have the freeloaders and little Somalians, but not Omar - that slice of evil is going back to big Somalia. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted April 2 Report Posted April 2 1 hour ago, Deluge said: Just the productive ones. You get to have the freeloaders and little Somalians, but not Omar - that slice of evil is going back to big Somalia. First things first.... We're in the process of closing our southern border to idiocy and rift raft. Maga's need not apply 👉 We'll talk about Somalian's when the time comes. Quote
Deluge Posted April 3 Author Report Posted April 3 16 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: First things first.... We're in the process of closing our southern border to idiocy and rift raft. Maga's need not apply 👉 We'll talk about Somalian's when the time comes. Actually it's you (leftoids) first, along with the illegal trash. We'll get to the productive ones on a case by case basis. Anchor babies will no longer be anchored, so that will make deportations a whole lot easier. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted April 3 Report Posted April 3 1 minute ago, Deluge said: Actually it's you (leftoids) first, along with the illegal trash. We'll get to the productive ones on a case by case basis. Anchor babies will no longer be anchored, so that will make deportations a whole lot easier. Be sure to take off your Red hat if you want to cross the border. You'll be flagged for sure and will have a tough time passing the new aptitude test. Now that Trump wants to massively increase military spending and is asking for $1.5T you'll be struggling to find the funding to deport all those people anyway. In theory you could have all those Somalian's living in your neighbourhood real soon.... 1 Quote
Deluge Posted April 3 Author Report Posted April 3 9 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Be sure to take off your Red hat if you want to cross the border. You'll be flagged for sure and will have a tough time passing the new aptitude test. Now that Trump wants to massively increase military spending and is asking for $1.5T you'll be struggling to find the funding to deport all those people anyway. In theory you could have all those Somalian's living in your neighbourhood real soon.... Are you sure you're up for dirty water and communal property? Third-world living is not as sexy as it sounds, comrade - I've witnessed it. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted April 3 Report Posted April 3 5 minutes ago, Deluge said: Are you sure you're up for dirty water and communal property? Third-world living is not as sexy as it sounds, comrade - I've witnessed it. No, I'm too spoiled for that... I'm okay with dirty water though if they keep my golf course fairways mowed tight and the greens healthy and running fast. Quote
Deluge Posted April 3 Author Report Posted April 3 10 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: No, I'm too spoiled for that... I'm okay with dirty water though if they keep my golf course fairways mowed tight and the greens healthy and running fast. You're not thinking practically. That space could accommodate a lot of tents for you and your neighbors. I'm sure the third-world occupants of your former homes will want you as comfortable as possible. 1 Quote
John Johnston Posted April 3 Report Posted April 3 On 4/1/2026 at 10:07 AM, LinkSoul60 said: Ahhhh... calling out Trump for what he is has upset you. That's a shame. It's funny. You have to admit. Quote
Deluge Posted April 3 Author Report Posted April 3 On 3/23/2026 at 10:23 AM, John Johnston said: None of this has to do with any science, it has more to do with hatred and people who seem to have problems with Life, the Universe and Everything. Personally I could not imagine spending all my days have problems with everyone around me. Shrug. That's today's democrat. Didn't you say that you vote with hate, I mean left? Quote
SkyHigh Posted May 2 Report Posted May 2 On 3/29/2026 at 8:18 PM, CdnFox said: . Right off the bat you've demonstrated that i WAS correct and you are NOT basing your opinions on science at all. Further, you are not even TRYING to present any science to back up your claims. You simply decide what you would LIKE to be true and then claim it as science This demonstrates your profound misunderstanding of what science is. The scientific method IS the only important thing. Science does NOT make truth claims. All science is provisional, science uses models and the entirety of the scientific community would admit that NO models are right some are just useful. Science doesn't prove anything (only mathematics provide proof) , in fact science does the complete opposite, it endeavors to disprove the existing models (theories) and this is how they advance understanding of reality. One only needs to look at history to find a cornucopia of things top minds " knew" to be true that have been since debunked and we don't even have to go that far back to see changes in fundamental aspects of the universe. A hundred years ago we thought the atom was the smallest thing in the cosmos. So by continuing to use the scientific method which in a nut shell is as follows Observation , hypothesis , experiment, conclusion Now I understand that this is all an elementary level science lesson but I figure thats about all you'll understand On 3/29/2026 at 8:18 PM, CdnFox said: You then go on to climate change as your 'big example'. Yet you present NO science. Zero. Not even a scrap Here is a perfect example. I spoke about air quality using some those aforementioned simple concepts even you should understand. Observation : people noticed the quality of the air in major cities was getting worse. They also observed that all manner of things including plastics and other industrial waste were being burned by industries Hypothesis: they hypothesized that there was not only a correlation between the toxic particles released by industrial smoke stacks but a direct causation Experiment: studies were done, regulations put in place both by private and public interests to stop the burning of toxic industrial waste Conclusion : A large reduction in smog in major cities. The idea that i needed to link to various studies ( that we both know you couldn't read anyway) to show how the science worked here, again just shows do don't understand science. Further more the claim I made as it related to climate change, was not an end of the world scenario I was just looking for anyone of you mørons to admit something so basic as Yes we saw a problem with the climat(smog in big cities) found the cause (man made) and fixed it. Agree or Disagree??? On 3/29/2026 at 8:18 PM, CdnFox said: For example you state that With regards to gender studies, gender is a social construct That has been found to be false by numerous scientific studies and has been written about in a number of papers. While social or external factors can play a role there's no doubt it's not a 'social construc I know you have difficulty with reading comprehension and are in general contrarian and argumentative in nature, but in this instance it's proving challenging for me to differentiate between your ignorance or your bad faith. I used the term "social construct" because that's what the people that advocate for that use and then only in the context to show why it is NOT science. So your whole tangent was arguing for something that ,i clearly stated i didn't agree with particularly aa it pertains to science as if it wasn't already my point whilst acting like a dīck . Again though all I feel is pitty for someone that has nothing else in their life but going off at anonymous people from behind a keyboard. As it related to "gender," my only scientific claim was Not every human is born XX or XY Agree or Disagree??? Those were two of the three questions that as of yet nobody has addressed. The third was simply Do you accept evolution by natural selection as the reason for the diversity of life. Agree or Disagree??? I await your responses with bated breath. I almost said informed or educated or scientific response but realized i would never breath again Quote
User Posted May 3 Report Posted May 3 2 hours ago, SkyHigh said: As it related to "gender," my only scientific claim was No, that was not your only claim: "1 Gender studies, gender is a social construct, the complete opposite of Objective, " Gender is not a social construct. "roles" are a social construct and the folks pushing the trans madness want to conflate these things so they can pretend some dude who thinks he is a woman, is a woman, and we should all go along with calling him one too. That is what the trans madness folks claim now, so they can reconcile calling some dude a woman. It completely falls apart as soon as you ask them to define what a woman is. So, can you define what a woman is in any meaningful way? That is objective. Sex is objective. And up until about 5 minutes ago for all of human history sex/gender were objective. 3 Quote
CdnFox Posted May 3 Report Posted May 3 3 hours ago, SkyHigh said: This demonstrates your profound misunderstanding of what science is. I suppose if you lie to yourself like that it makes you feel better. But there's not much truth to Quote The scientific method IS the only important thing. And none was presented. Quote Science does NOT make truth claims. All science is provisional, science uses models and the entirety of the scientific community would admit that NO models are right some are just useful. Really. So scientific models don't make predictions. And no models make accurate predictions. Do you have any idea how stupid that sounds? In fact there's a huge body of scientific models that make extremely accurate predictions. Quote Science doesn't prove anything (only mathematics provide proof) Really. So there's no way to experiment to verify the truth of a scientific model huh. , Well that's about enough of you embarrassing yourself i'd say. Sounds like you're the one in need of a primer kiddo Scientific models are tested by making predictions and checking them against real world data. | Science or not? In fact science does make predictions and if the predictions are proven to be accurate through testing the model is considered to be true. That is the basis of science. Go lie to a gradeschooler kid, you might impress them. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
CdnFox Posted May 3 Report Posted May 3 3 hours ago, SkyHigh said: Here is a perfect example. I spoke about air quality using some those aforementioned simple concepts even you should understand. You mean you made some crap up in your mind and expect everyone to believe it without you provide evidence for science. Yeah, that is a perfect example. You have absolutely no fact or data behind here statements just whatever the voices in your head tell you Kid you're a total fake. Everything you said about gender studies and the environment is completely made up bullshit in your head and you have absolutely no idea what science or logic or reason or deductive methodology is All you care about is "muh feels". You start with an answer and you try and argue your way back to a question and that is always the most stupid and asinine way to look at things. But very common. Those of you on the left Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Hodad Posted May 3 Report Posted May 3 On 3/27/2026 at 6:57 PM, eyeball said: You must mean globalism because real conservatives love globalization. See, you just can't help yourself can you? I have a spare Che T-shirt and beret you can have. It's a genuine French merino wool Basque-style. You'll have to earn the little embroidered Star on the front though. I'm a cityist. Why should my city entangle itself with other governments an economies? Those other people are different. The city is the only right size of government and I'll believe it until I die. Everyone telling you about the need for and value in more sophisticated relationships is a commie Satanist traitor hell-bent on destroying the city. Yessir, 32.7 square miles is the ONLY holy and blessed and legitimate unit of land that can be legitimately governed. Quote
Deluge Posted May 3 Author Report Posted May 3 3 hours ago, Hodad said: I'm a cityist. Why should my city entangle itself with other governments an economies? Those other people are different. The city is the only right size of government and I'll believe it until I die. Everyone telling you about the need for and value in more sophisticated relationships is a commie Satanist traitor hell-bent on destroying the city. Yessir, 32.7 square miles is the ONLY holy and blessed and legitimate unit of land that can be legitimately governed. But what if you're a bunch of backward cannibals that abduct unwitting travelers? Who's going to stop you killers then? No, a Christ-centered nation is the only way to ensure that you unwashed cannibals don't get away with murder - literally. Quote
Nationalist Posted May 3 Report Posted May 3 (edited) On 4/2/2026 at 5:00 PM, LinkSoul60 said: Nah, you'll leave them be to keep your economy sustainable. What a dumb comment. Nobody needs "brown" people in their society. They're...cancerous. The techs cheat... And the headhunters cheat... there's nothing "stable" or even beneficial from these Indians. They all cheat. Edited May 3 by Nationalist 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted May 5 Author Report Posted May 5 (edited) On 5/2/2026 at 5:18 PM, SkyHigh said: The scientific method IS the only important thing. That would mean you wokejobs could do something really stupid like make queer & tranny studies the focal point of science, or even worse, turn science INTO queer and tranny studies. Scientific method is fine, but it's not nearly as important as defining science itself. Edited May 5 by Deluge Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 On 5/3/2026 at 8:32 AM, Nationalist said: What a dumb comment. Nobody needs "brown" people in their society. They're...cancerous. The techs cheat... And the headhunters cheat... there's nothing "stable" or even beneficial from these Indians. They all cheat. Speaking of 'dumbass comments'.... You win. Quote
Nationalist Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 20 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Speaking of 'dumbass comments'.... You win. Really? Looks like they are corrosive to the trucking industry, I.T. and fast food. They're cancerous. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
LinkSoul60 Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 4 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Really? Looks like they are corrosive to the trucking industry, I.T. and fast food. They're cancerous. You'll enjoy being a bigot in the US. The less we have, the better.... Quote
Nationalist Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said: You'll enjoy being a bigot in the US. The less we have, the better.... Sad. Your best argument is... "TSK...YOU'RE THUTH A BIGOOOT!" You can't deny the results, so you whimp out. Well...The Euros have finally figured this out. I suppose they're bigots too. Or are they just trying to save their society and culture produced over thousands of years? Do you know what a traitor to one's own people might be? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
LinkSoul60 Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 9 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Sad. Your best argument is... "TSK...YOU'RE THUTH A BIGOOOT!" You can't deny the results, so you whimp out. Well...The Euros have finally figured this out. I suppose they're bigots too. Or are they just trying to save their society and culture produced over thousands of years? Do you know what a traitor to one's own people might be? Sad, because you're a bigot. That's not much of an argument is it? Deny what... I can easily think of a dozen EI's off the top of my head who are and have been far more successful in the business community than you have or will ever be. They work hard, employ a lot of people, pay their fair share of taxes, and contribute to our society. You....??? They'd probably look at you out here every day complaining about Canada and being a bigot with a good laugh. As far as your complaints.... The trucking industry, whats the problem with that industry and EI's in it? Tell me about IT and why it's a problem for you we have some talented EI's working in that field? And fast food... whats the problem with EI's working in that industry? Quote
Nationalist Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 12 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Sad, because you're a bigot. That's not much of an argument is it? Deny what... I can easily think of a dozen EI's off the top of my head who are and have been far more successful in the business community than you have or will ever be. They work hard, employ a lot of people, pay their fair share of taxes, and contribute to our society. You....??? They'd probably look at you out here every day complaining about Canada and being a bigot with a good laugh. As far as your complaints.... The trucking industry, whats the problem with that industry and EI's in it? Tell me about IT and why it's a problem for you we have some talented EI's working in that field? And fast food... whats the problem with EI's working in that industry? Trucking: https://www.readthemaple.com/temporary-foreign-worker-permits-are-destroying-trucking/ You already saw the abuse in the IT industry. Fast Food: enjoy... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.