The insane Left's vicious antisemitism on full display at Guelph

[eyeball]

19 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

You probably murdered a bear and stole his freshly caught salmon too.

No thanks, fish are to far gone when you catch them that late.

Bear gall bladders OTOH can be worth some $1500 or more on the black market.

25 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

But you're the one who just claimed he was against the carbon tax and that he was for the carbon tax within about five posts at each other

Sure kid.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Yeah it's called paying the bills. The difference is I can acknowledge the need to tack on an extra charge to help mitigate the damage paying the bills causes.

But it didn't mitigate it. You still spend the same amount of fuel.

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

No, and it would be a lot less friendly if everyone flew their own plane.

It would be a lot more friendly if people didn't fly at all and drove instead.

But you advocate for massive pollution as long as it's convenient for you.

Again, for you it's all about the hypocrisy

[Moonbox]

Soooo dumb.  

[CdnFox]

24 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Soooo dumb.  

That's okay, we know you're doing your best

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

But it didn't mitigate it. You still spend the same amount of fuel.

Would you please at least try to make sense.

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It would be a lot more friendly if people didn't fly at all and drove instead.

Most do and thankfully we have more buses.

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

But you advocate for massive pollution as long as it's convenient for you.

No, that's just a ridiculous weaponized characterization of yours.

As I've repeatedly and clearly said I advocate for taxes to mitigate the cost of that convenience to the environment. Not to mitigate the cost of fuel like you just said. LMAO!

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Again, for you it's all about the hypocrisy

No, this is just you being a hyper-partisan dweeb about everything - a silly Karen in drag.

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Would you please at least try to make sense.

Oh sorry I forgot that English wasn't your first language

You have admitted that you spend the same amount of fuel whether there's a carbon tax or not. So you absolutely didn't mitigate your use

Was that clearer or do you need me to go get crayon?

10 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Most do and thankfully we have more buses.

Most don't but that's really not the issue. I see you're trying to change the subject having realized that your claim that aircraft were somehow fuel efficient And it's not carbon intensive fell apart

11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

No, that's just a ridiculous weaponized characterization of yours.

As I've repeatedly and clearly said I advocate for taxes to mitigate the cost of that convenience to the environment. Not to mitigate the cost of fuel like you just said. LMAO!

No that's an accurate statement based on your statements. Nobody mentioned the cost of fuel other than to say that you still use the same amount whether there's a tax or not. What shows that you didn't mitigate anything

So all you advocate for is attacks, you don't actually believe that it will reduce pollution and it didn't in your own case. You still spend obscene amounts of fuel Just so you can make a buck but you expect other people to pay out of their own pocket when they can't afford it because you like taxes. That much because the tax didn't change your behavior

13 minutes ago, eyeball said:

o, this is just you being a hyper-partisan dweeb about everything - a silly Karen in drag.

In drag no less   Once again they immediately go to weird homosexual fantasies and now you're Daydreaming about me in a dress for some reason     Sorry kid you're definitely not my type

Weird way to admit to Admit defeat but clearly that's where you're going with that.  

I thought you left these were supposed to think that drag was okay and not meant to be an insult? Hypocrisy again, what was that your fifth example for the thread?

Sorry kid. But we both know I'm right

[eyeball]

48 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You have admitted that you spend the same amount of fuel whether there's a carbon tax or not. So you absolutely didn't mitigate your use

Was that clearer or do you need me to go get crayon?

We spend a fùck of a lot more thanks to Trump.

I understood what you were  saying perfectly well, why was the only mystery. Now it's obvious you need to double down on pretending you had a point and it's made you look three times as stupid.

Trust me when the electric boatyard is up and running we'll be at the front of the line to eliminate the cost of carbon and Trump to us.

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

No that's an accurate statement based on your statements.

That's what you have to say while tripling down.

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

You still spend obscene amounts of fuel Just so you can make a buck but you expect other people to pay out of their own pocket when they can't afford it because you like taxes. That much because the tax didn't change your behavior

...quadrupling down...

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

That much because the tax didn't change your behavior

It certainly helped keep us moving towards more fuel efficient engines.

The desire for alternatives is causing the market and economy to behave differently, hence things like electric boatyards.

Maybe you need to change your behaviour so it doesn't take months and years for you to incorporate things like this into your thinking.

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, eyeball said:

We spend a fùck of a lot more thanks to Trump.

You're confused.  Sigh. I keep forgetting reading isn't a strong skill of yours 

Nobody said anything about what you pay for fuel.  But you spend fuel to run your boat.  Not that you spend ON fuel.

Again a 4 year old could have figured that out but it's over your head

Quote

 I understood what you were  saying perfectly well, why was the only mystery.

butchadidn't   

 

Quote

Now it's obvious you need to double down on pretending you had a point and it's made you look three times as stupid.

The point is perfectly valid and you've had to pretend you didn't understand what i was saying in order to avoid having to deal with the simple truth.

Quote

Trust me when the electric boatyard is up and running we'll be at the front of the line to eliminate the cost of carbon and Trump to us.

So nothing has changed due to a carbon tax.  Gotcha. 

Quote

That's what you have to say while tripling down.

ANd you still can't address the simple point. 

You use the same amount of fuel. The carbon tax made no difference . 

Quote

It certainly helped keep us moving towards more fuel efficient engines.

No it didn't.  lets see a note from a manufacturer that says they only developed better engines because of the carbon tax.

Quote

The desire for alternatives is causing the market and economy to behave differently, hence things like electric boatyards.

So nothing's changed.

And there's no evidence any changes that might happen because of a carbon tax.

Quote

Maybe you need to change your behaviour so it doesn't take months and years for you to incorporate things like this into your thinking.

Considering you spent 10 years wasting Canada's money and turning people off of climate change for something that produced absolutely no difference whatsoever I don't think it's me that needs to look at changing Behavior  

[eyeball]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Considering you spent 10 years wasting Canada's money and turning people off of climate change for something that produced absolutely no difference whatsoever I don't think it's me that needs to look at changing Behavior

Well, thankfully we have Trump motivating everyone now.

[I am Groot]

You have to wonder just how our universities hire people, how some of these doorknobs manage to even graduate, much less become employed at a place of higher learning. The way universities have become little more than factories of the most confused, unthinking ideology does not presage a good future for us.

And how do such regressive people call themselves progressive?

 

https://archive.is/enwoI

[ironstone]

Islamists living in Western nations, who do they always vote for and why do they vote that way?

 

[I am Groot]

20 hours ago, ironstone said:

Islamists living in Western nations, who do they always vote for and why do they vote that way?

 

You don't need a video to tell you that. They vote for the left wing parties. Everywhere. Because the Left is their allie in their desire to destroy the West, Western culture, and Capitalism. And because the Left parties are most enthusiastic about mass immigration, generous social welfare programs, and allowing newcomers to continue living entirely in their own cultures with no integration.

And don't for a moment think this is not well known by politicians. By any metric you wish to measure them, immigrants fromn Muslim countries are the worst performing in all Western countries. The majority of them are unemployed in every country which publishes statistics (Canada, of course, does not). They do not integrate. They remain hostile to their new host countries, even into the second and third generations. They are disproportionately involved in crime.

Yet Western politicians like Carny are eager to keep importing them. Why? Because while they're bad for Canada, they vote Liberal. And that's all that really matters. It's the same in the UK, in Australia, and in other European nations. The Spanish PM gave citizenship to half a million migrants from North Africa and the ME and quite openly said he did it so they could help him defeat the Right in coming elections. Australia had a terrible terrorist attack not long ago by Muslims and its leftist prime minister has spent the time since then screaming into every microphone he could find about how incredibly wonderful and peaceful Islam is, and threatening to arrest anyone who disagreed.