Lunatic NDP members send email encouraging their crazy base to hate conservatives

[CdnFox]

9 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Except I already did answer about those 2 laws.

Except that you didn't

Quote

They will be amended or dropped when private industry steps up for projects.

Private industry has said they won't put forward anything while those laws are in place. They've been extremely clear so what you're saying is the government is knowingly putting conditions in place that prevent any kind of deal.

And even you, as slow and dull with it as you are, have to realize that that's the case. If they were really willing to set the side the laws they would set them aside now especially in light of the industry's comments

Quote

.But you couldn't answer my question about what regulations to ditch.

I gave you two examples which you ignored. For starters I would ditch those two because while they are in place nobody is putting forward any plans

You lied and pretended that somehow the magically vanish if people put forward plans knowing damn well that nobody is going to put forward plans while they're in place because they said so

As always you're a liar and dishonest.

[ironstone]

Did the NDP convention remind you of anything?

 

[West]

3 hours ago, blackbird said:

Except it was all a lie.  Health care is not really universal.  Some get a degree of health care if they happen to be among the number that get a family doctor.  Millions of others have no family doctor and little chance of ever getting one.  Millions wait on waiting lists for ages for specialized care.  Thousands never get it in time and die on waiting lists every year.  Some "universal care".  More like universal lack of care.  So much for Canadian Socialism.

Dang blackbird alot of truth in your post

[Reg Volk]

 

[herbie]

Quote

Except it was all a lie.  Health care is not really universal

Your nitpicking does not render something a lie. You're sounding like some other simpletons who think anything not 100% effective means it's a lie. If they don't like it, it's a lie. If the information has changed, it was a lie. Only those who are compulsive liars themselves or just stubborn stupid think like that and you are not normally  one of those.

All of the statements in that meme are true. A proper counter would be to say WHY they did so, and make a case for that.
None of wich would stand the test of time

Edited March 30 by herbie

[Barquentine]

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I gave you two examples which you ignored.

Just as I thought. You have no clue about regulations.

 

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

As always you're a liar and dishonest.

What's long and hard on a Liberal? What puts a smile on our wive's faces.

What's long and hard on a Conservative? Grade 5!

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Just as I thought.

It's pretty obvious you didn't think

Quote

You have no clue about regulations.

I literally gave you two of the biggest ones out there that have been specifically pointed out by the industries and you ignored them. The person here without a clue is you.

Also you don't seem to understand the difference between an act and a regulation. 

If you got rid of those two acts then industry would come to the table for pipelines and mining.  So that would be a great start.  

The reason you don't' want to admit that is you know i'm right, and the liberals ARE preventing economic development with useless red tape designed to kill deals, not protect people. 

Quote

What's long and hard on a Liberal? What puts a smile on our wive's faces.

Uhhh... not quite sure what you're saying but it sounds like you're following the left wing tradition of having weird sex delusions when they lose  and what keeps left-wing girls happy is banging conservatives on the side and faking it when they're with their husbands  

 

Quote

What's long and hard on a Conservative? 

Nothing that we don't want to be   We're strong, we're smart, we follow science, we're consistent.

That's why study after study proves that conservatives have much better mental health than liberals  

Edited March 30 by CdnFox

[Barquentine]

20 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Also you don't seem to understand the difference between an act and a regulation.

You didn't actually read my OP and you still haven't mentioned even one regulation you'd do away with.

"Waa - I said 2 acts over and over - why do you want me to think. You know extreme partisan Conservatives don't like to think. Why are you picking on me?"

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

You didn't actually read my OP and you still haven't mentioned even one regulation you'd do away with.

 

I read your Op just fine.

And In fact I've mentioned literally hundreds of regulations. They're all enabled by the acts I mentioned

You just feel that if you lie about it you can feel better about the fact that you're wrong

I would get rid of those two acts in there attending regulations and move back to what we had prior to thatthat is a perfectly legitimate answer.

But because you know you're wrong and that what you have said is stupid you're trying desperately to pretend that I didn't answer because the answer makes you look stupid

3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Waa - I said 2 acts over and over

Which is actually an answer to your question  

Now go and change your diapers

[Barquentine]

19 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And In fact I've mentioned literally hundreds of regulations.

You haven't even mentioned ONE regulation. Why are you avoiding the question?

Lets try this:

Example: Would you eradicate water course setbacks for clear-cutting?

Now for your homework see if you can think of an example.

Sadly I expect only childish insults, bragging and cute little emoticons. That's your schtick.